F&L:
Here's my argument: Teams just can't go out and get high quality starting QBs and WRs that easily in the NFL. We would have to trade away our best defensive talent or multiple high draft picks to do that and trading in that fashion is not prevalent anyhow. Nearly all teams protect their playmakers, so building from within is the path of choice for nearly every team.
Orton and Grossman both signed one-year deals, meaning the staff is giving both one more chance to prove they belong. If neither is successful, initiate rebuilding mode or try to land a big-time FA QB.
Snowball effect: Woeful O-line = woeful QB = woeful receivers = woeful running game
Still, our woeful passing attack somehow wound up in the upper half of the league last season.
Why are you bending over backwards to make excuses for them? They blew their shot at a championship because they were too stubborn to admit they were accepting mediocrity when they should have been going for it all. I don't buy the argument for a minute that the Bears couldn't find a better QB than Rex Grossman. There are better QBs sitting on benches around the league. The main point, however, is that Grossman's strengths and weaknesses were an appallingly bad fit for the surrounding talent on defense and special teams. The team needed a caretaker/game manager, not a turnover prone wannabe playmaker.
Now you're saying it's understandable that the team is
once again allowing Grossman and Orton the opportunity to "prove they belong" when they've already proven they don't belong anywhere but on the sidelines holding a clipboard. That's ludicrous. That would be like a baseball team running their cleanup hitter out there for two straight years with a .195 average, .300 SLG, and .250 OBP and saying, "Yeah, but we think he's better than that. We're going to give him one more year in the heart of the lineup to show whether he belongs or not." Damn, you're a heck of a nice guy to be handing out free passes so easily.
Face it, the jury is in and they've handed the judge a rope. . .