What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best wr in the draft (1 Viewer)

For PPR, who tops your list?

  • Sutton

    Votes: 25 24.5%
  • Ridley

    Votes: 21 20.6%
  • St Brown

    Votes: 8 7.8%
  • Washington

    Votes: 6 5.9%
  • Kirk

    Votes: 9 8.8%
  • Miller

    Votes: 3 2.9%
  • Moore

    Votes: 19 18.6%
  • Chark

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • Gallup

    Votes: 7 6.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 2.0%

  • Total voters
    102

Snorkelson

Footballguy
It seems people have a wide range of WRs they like this year, and the fact that I felt the need to put 9 options I think these guys are grouped pretty closely with different strengths/weaknesses and could be viable nfl options. This won’t be a running poll for wr2 etc, just want to see how many different guys get votes. 

 
One amateur's opinion: the class seems to have a good amount of depth, without a lot of guys with WR1 potential. There are probably 15 WRs who I wouldn't be surprised to see in the top 25 scoring at their position in 2018, depending where they land. But there aren't many guys with a WR1 ceiling, and those that have it have a lower perceived floor than a guy like Davis last year, or your typical top WR in the draft.

 
One amateur's opinion: the class seems to have a good amount of depth, without a lot of guys with WR1 potential. There are probably 15 WRs who I wouldn't be surprised to see in the top 25 scoring at their position in 2018, depending where they land. But there aren't many guys with a WR1 ceiling, and those that have it have a lower perceived floor than a guy like Davis last year, or your typical top WR in the draft.


Agreed, except I do see a few with WR1 potential (meaning being the most productive WR on their NFL team).  Just because a guy doesn’t pan out as the most productive FF WR in the NFL doesn’t mean he can’t help my FF team and is a wasted pick.  Some people set the bar so high.  I don’t quite get that.

 
I am very intrigued by a few guys that I feel have similar floor and ceilings depending on landing spots. I think Ridley could produce sooner, long term I like Sutton a bit more if he falls into a +situation, similar to Amari or Davis, young and improving qb + limited options for targets otherwise and the opportunity to step into an Alpha role.

I really like Moore, and Kirk a lot. Again, landing spot will be huge. Not sure if either is the kinda guy who will be true #1 stud, but a solid fantasy option with upside in the right situations.

I see Moore as a Steve Smith/Landry hybrid. Kirk gets Golden Tate comps a lot. I see him as less tough, but more dynamic an athlete.

Washington and St Brown are next for me. I feel like washington really needs to land in a spot with a qb that can throw the deep ball. Havent watched enough to know if he is going to be good all over the field, or just good at running by people yet. ESB I think can be very good, but wont be an impact guy right away. He will be a more traditional 2-3 year project, but he has speed and size, if he can get the right mentor and coaching he could develop nicely, ala Davante Adams.

Not sure what to think of Chark, needs to bulk up just a little I think. I don't foresee Miller being a solid fantasy option.

Not sure what to think yet about guys like Gallup, Hamilton, cain, cobbs etc

 
I agree that none of the WRs in the draft seem likely to be a WR1 type for a team. 

However, my favorite might be Anthony Miller. Seems like a cross between Antonio Brown and Kendall Wright. Didn't run any field drills at the combine b/c of the foot injury but his speed certainly shows on tape, and has room for improvement. Great in the red-zone with strong hands and contested catches. Great run after catch ability, has a nice stutter step/juke and head fake, solid size for his height. Can run all routes. Great college production (consecutive 1400 yard seasons).

 
Here's what it would take for each of them to be the top receiver in this draft, imo

Ridley - opportunity and a good qb. He's more skilled than he is physically talented, but he plays wide receiver very well.  He's fast enough and all of his traits are good enough to be a stud - but he will need the targets.  Ideal fit would be the packers, who need a technician with deep speed to replace jordy. 

Sutton - good coaching and a quarterback who can overcome his skill deficiencies.  He's the opposite of Ridley imo.  Great athletic clay but his receiver skills are not special at all.  That sounds a lot like guys like cordarelle and Kevin white. Everyone wants the next Julio so badly that they're willing to overlook when a guy doesn't know how to play the position that well. Put him in an ideal situation, though, where he could get coached up and a veteran qb could overcome his skill deficiencies, and he had the highest ceiling.  For me that's the saints - put him across from Thomas with ginn taking the top off and brees using him on routes he runs well, while Payton coaches him up, and he could be a stud. 

St brown - the good news is he's 6'5" and runs a 4.48 and had an awesome year with kizer at qb.  The bad news is his play dropped off when kizer was gone.  I've got the same kind of concerns about him that I have with Sutton, but worse.  Would benefit from playing with a skilled receiver in an offense with a better tall receiver than him so he draws the second tallest corner, and he needs to be coached up/mentored for a bigger role down the road.  Would be surprised if he had a fantasy relevant rookie season but he needs to get some NFL game experience. Best fit cardinals.

Moore - a little better combination of talent and skill.  Not as big as Sutton and probably not as skilled as Ridley but a nice mix.  Good receiver skills but got a lot of volume but on simple routes so his route tree will need work.  4.42 speed at 6 feet can cover for some of that but he will need good coaching and a good young qb to grow with.  Ideal fit San Francisco.

Miller - good quickness,  good head on his shoulders decent route running considering he doesn't have a lot of experience as a college starter.   Would like to see him get some seasoning with a young qb and be his security blanket. Ideal fit Philadelphia. 

Kirk - should cut a check to cooper kupp for making the slot sexy again. Could have the biggest year one impact of any of these guys and doesn't need elite qb play to get there. Has decent speed but better quickness, very good hands but poor size. He's the kind of guy the ravens should have been drafting all these years to fill the void from their tight ends and Steve Smith.  Best fit Baltimore. 

Gallup - I really like this write up.

 https://www.musiccitymiracles.com/2018/3/25/17152580/2018-nfl-draft-profile-wide-receiver-michael-gallup-colorado-state

Basically everything I said about Ridley, but he's from a smaller school so he might need more time to adjust to the NFL. 

Chark - he's got speed but it's not John Ross speed.   He's got good size at 6'3" 200. Not a lot of receiver skills - route running, use of hands, adjusting on routes. Needs someone who is willing to chuck it deep to big fast guys.  Ideal fit is the Panthers. 

 
pbandy1 said:
I agree that none of the WRs in the draft seem likely to be a WR1 type for a team. 

However, my favorite might be Anthony Miller. Seems like a cross between Antonio Brown and Kendall Wright. Didn't run any field drills at the combine b/c of the foot injury but his speed certainly shows on tape, and has room for improvement. Great in the red-zone with strong hands and contested catches. Great run after catch ability, has a nice stutter step/juke and head fake, solid size for his height. Can run all routes. Great college production (consecutive 1400 yard seasons).
I'm a Miller fan too. I like how he plays the game. Could be one of the best WR values of the draft.

 
A nice thing about this year's rookie WR depth is a lack of clear / sure-fire WR1 as seen in past years (i.e. Julio Jones / AJ Green in 2011, Sammy Watkins / Mike Evan / Odell Beckam Jr in 2014, or Corey Davis / Mike Williams in 2017).  So, some of the high rated WRs can be taken in lower 1st round or high 2nd round pick. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A nice thing about this year's rookie WR depth is a lack of clear / sure-fire WR1 as seen in past years (i.e. Julio Jones / AJ Green in 2011, Sammy Watkins / Odell Beckam Jr in 2014, or Corey Davis / Mike Williams in 2017).  So, some of the high rated WRs can be taken in lower 1st round or high 2nd round pick. 
2014 was Sammy/Evans and then everyone else.  Beckham was barely in the top half of the 1st round of rookie drafts, and I know he fell much lower than that in some.

 
2014 was Sammy/Evans and then everyone else.  Beckham was barely in the top half of the 1st round of rookie drafts, and I know he fell much lower than that in some.
Correct, don't even recall him going in top 6 of a draft I was in to be honest. Watkins, Evans, Cooks, Sankey, Ebron(TE premium leagues) and even Jordan Matthews all went higher on average in my leagues than Odell who I saw go in 8-9 range of a few drafts. 

 
2014 was Sammy/Evans and then everyone else.  Beckham was barely in the top half of the 1st round of rookie drafts, and I know he fell much lower than that in some.
Beckham was fourth WR after Cooks in my dynasty league a couple of picks before Adams and Matthews.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ridley is the best prospect by quite a bit IMO. If I'm an NFL GM, he's the only WR I'd be comfortable taking in round 1.

 
I see I'm one of the few that like Gallup the best.  If we look at it purely based on WR traits, I think Gallup is the clear winner here.  He's likely to take a year to become something equitable as long as situation allows him to develop though.  There isn't a thing I don't like about him.    

Ceiling wise, I think St. Brown is the clear cut favorite but like Bostonfred was saying, he probably needs to learn the position a bit from an established vet to maximize his talents.  I think of him as a Davante Parker type, needs 2 years and even then we'll see if he can put it all together.  

 
2014 was Sammy/Evans and then everyone else.  Beckham was barely in the top half of the 1st round of rookie drafts, and I know he fell much lower than that in some.
Thanks for reminding me about Evans.  In my league for rookie draft in 2014, Beckham was taken at 1.11.  I tried so hard to trade up to get him because I knew how talent he was at that time (after blowing up in combine).  But yeah, point is any WR can be had in lower pick in 1st round. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top