At least he's a proven NFL back unlike Irons/Bush/Pittman/Hunt (all a crapshoot) who they'd be able to pick with the 25th pick. As a Charger fan I hate to see him go for what I consider a cheap price, but it's tough to pass up a 1st round pick for a player who is only going to be around another year.
Proven? He's never carried the ball more than 80 times in a season. Kevan Barlow was far more "proven" after his big 2003 than Turner is now, and look how that turned out.I think Turner will be pretty good from what I've seen, but he's far from a lock.
Obviously it's never a lock when you are giving a part-time RB the full-time job, but Turner's worst YPC (5.2) is higher than Barlow's best (5.1). In Barlow's case, I think he was (is?) a talented guy who doesn't handle adversity well and doesn't have the self-drive to be a great player.What I do find special about Turner is not only does he run for a very high YPC, he's also a big RB. Not often do you find a guy his size who can run the way he can.
Richard Huntley, Steelers, 1999Ht/Wt: 5-11, 22493-567-6.1-5, 27-253-9.4-3 Michael Turner, Chargers, 2006Ht/Wt: 5-10, 23780-502-6.3-2, 3-47-15.7-0 Troy Hambrick, Cowboys, 2001Ht/Wt: 6-1, 235113-579-5.1-2, 4-62-15.5-0Lamont Jordan, Jets, 2004Ht/Wt: 5-10, 23593-479-5.2-2, 15-112-7.5-0 One of the nice things about not being new to this hobby is having a sense of historical perspective.Seems like a lot of newbs see a young backup RB do well in part time, and assume he can do well as a starter.It is rarely the case.