McGarnicle
Footballguy
Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
Yes. Lots.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
I think the complexity really kicks in after the Bang. The universe gets much more complex if some being is running it on a daily basis than if they just started it rolling and let chips fall where they may. But yeah we are splitting hairs a bit. However that's half the fun.I am not nor ever will be an expert on the Big Bang, but I recognize the complexity and inherent room for improvement.Every theory given so far for the Big Bang is incredibly complex and has a very small chance of being right. I don't think an omnipotent being makes it that much more complex at that point in time. Of course added complexity is one of those reasons I mentioned for rejecting the God theory. But again you can't name a Big Bang theory that hasn't been worked over pretty good on multiple fronts or one that has even come close to being accepted as the one, especially given all the new work on the theoretical existence of a multiverse.Not being able to say it "absolutely" does not mean it is an equally likely explanation. Just another variable on top of an already mind boggling level complexity.I have evaluated that statement for some time. The reality is an omnipotent being has as much potential as say our universe really being like a sheet paper that touched another universe thus causing the Big Bang. Until we get a few nanoseconds out and the laws of the universe kicked in we got nothing. Now I don't believe in God or gods. But I have absolutely no basis in science to say beyond an absolute doubt that an omnipotent being couldn't have started the Big Bang. Of course there are reasons to reject the God theory but that is true of every theory out there. And if we believe where science is leading us with quantum theory we really have to allow for an infinitesimally small chance of it happening that way.I'd disagree here, and I bet you would too upon re-evaluating this statement.While you excluded them they have the best argument. No one can say what happened before the Big Bang. No one can say how it started. We reach a point where an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has. Now I don't believe it but it's at least in line with scientific evidence to some degree.A headcount of all self-identified Christians worldwide (including non-practicing "cultural" Christians, "cafeteria Catholics", etc.) woudl reveal that among this set, hardcore Creationists** would be outnumbered several hundred to one. At best.If you visit the Christianity subreddit, you'd find a lot of people who disagree with Ken Ham.
** this excludes those that believe in the "watchmaker God" that initiated the Big Bang, then sat back and watched the universe unfold.
Put another way, which is more complex (less likely)?:
The Big Bang by itself
or
The Big Bang + supernatural omnipotent god
![]()
Why add a god to the mix? Which god or gods are you adding? You just made an the problem infinitely harder.
I guess we are splitting hairs, but adding an infinite amount of complexity (a god) to an incredibly complex equation (Big Bang) certainly affects it's likelyhood.
There is a new documentary coming out about Noah's ark that can hopefully shed some light on the matter. My linkAre there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
No one ever spoke to NoahAre there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
Nice Hooters referenceNo one ever spoke to NoahAre there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
They all laughed at him instead
Working on his ark, working all by himself
Only Noah saw it coming
Forty days and forty nights
Took his sons and daughters with him
Yeah they were the Israelites
All you zombies hide your faces
All you people in the street
All you sittin' in high places
The rain's gonna fall on you
Of course. I used to, in fact. I grew up in a Southern Baptist church, and they preached the Bible as literal truth, young earth, Jonah and the whale and the whole nine yards. In college I began to really question those things and it caused me great heartache because, although I absolutely believe in God and accept Christ as my savior, how can I be a true Christian if I don't believe Noah literally fit all those animals on the ark? Come to find out there are millions and millions of Christians like myself who view the OT as allegory, and accept traditional evolutionary views as scientific truth.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
So you think the polls that say 40% are wrong? Granted, results vary on how you word the question, but not that much.Of course. I used to, in fact. I grew up in a Southern Baptist church, and they preached the Bible as literal truth, young earth, Jonah and the whale and the whole nine yards. In college I began to really question those things and it caused me great heartache because, although I absolutely believe in God and accept Christ as my savior, how can I be a true Christian if I don't believe Noah literally fit all those animals on the ark? Come to find out there are millions and millions of Christians like myself who view the OT as allegory, and accept traditional evolutionary views as scientific truth.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
"YEC" (young earth creationists) are not as numerous as Americans think, though. There are a lot in America, which probably explains why atheists/agnostics think every christian believes in a 6,000 year old Earth, but it is not the majority.
Just curious, which polls? And yes, I doubt 40% of Christians (including Catholics) are "YEC".So you think the polls that say 40% are wrong? Granted, results vary on how you word the question, but not that much.Of course. I used to, in fact. I grew up in a Southern Baptist church, and they preached the Bible as literal truth, young earth, Jonah and the whale and the whole nine yards. In college I began to really question those things and it caused me great heartache because, although I absolutely believe in God and accept Christ as my savior, how can I be a true Christian if I don't believe Noah literally fit all those animals on the ark? Come to find out there are millions and millions of Christians like myself who view the OT as allegory, and accept traditional evolutionary views as scientific truth.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
"YEC" (young earth creationists) are not as numerous as Americans think, though. There are a lot in America, which probably explains why atheists/agnostics think every christian believes in a 6,000 year old Earth, but it is not the majority.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
This polls everyone, not just Christians
Just sad.I wonder how much the number goes down by if they exclude the South.http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-vi
ew-human-origins.aspx
This polls everyone, not just Christians
I would like to learn about Noetics with #7.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
Strong cross-section of America there.I would like to learn about Noetics with #7.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
I'd #### the stupid out of her for sure.I would like to learn about Noetics with #7.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
link? was thinking of making a poll but looks like it already exists.20% of FFA Christians believe the earth is 6000 years old, FYI.
Best one:I'd #### the stupid out of her for sure.I would like to learn about Noetics with #7.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
How do you explain a sunset if their is no God?
To be fair, the FFA is notorious for shtick votes.20% of FFA Christians believe the earth is 6000 years old, FYI.
Do they know how many ant species there are? The ant population alone disproves the Noah myth.Yes. Lots.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
I like "if we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys". This guys really has a great understanding of Evolution.Best one:I'd #### the stupid out of her for sure.I would like to learn about Noetics with #7.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
How do you explain a sunset if their is no God?
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=334460&page=1link? was thinking of making a poll but looks like it already exists.20% of FFA Christians believe the earth is 6000 years old, FYI.
unreal that anyone can believe the earth is 6000 years old.![]()
Cool. That shows that yes, there are a lot of AMERICAN Christians who believe in the young Earth theory. Just as I said above. But the poll is only focused on Americans. I don't think that is as widely believed among Christians throughout the rest of the world.http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
This polls everyone, not just Christians
The sad part is those questions are easily answered with a few minutes of research.No ####. Do we even live in a first world country? I mean look at all the stupidity in the link below. Buzzfeed sent a reporter to have creationists write a message to people who believe in evolution.Embarrassing that this is still a 'debate'.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolution
My favorite has to be "If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" Unreal that people seemingly capable of logical thought believe in this stuff.
We do come from monkeys.And this is why I have a fit when I see someone who believes Evolution saying we came from monkeys. We shared a common ancestor with the other great apes, we didn't come from them.
I agree with NCCommish that an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has, but that's because, when it comes to "before the Big Bang," science doesn't have any answers at all.I'd disagree here, and I bet you would too upon re-evaluating this statement.While you excluded them they have the best argument. No one can say what happened before the Big Bang. No one can say how it started. We reach a point where an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has. Now I don't believe it but it's at least in line with scientific evidence to some degree.
Well to be technical we originally evolved from Sea Sponges. Just like every other multi-cellular animal did. So I mean where ever you want to draw the line. But these people are referring to modern apes. We definitely didn't evolve from them. Maybe Pan Prior but not modern chimps or bonobos.We do come from monkeys.And this is why I have a fit when I see someone who believes Evolution saying we came from monkeys. We shared a common ancestor with the other great apes, we didn't come from them.
Humans, along with chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans, are great apes. Great apes split with Old World Monkeys after Old World Monkeys split from New World Monkeys. That means that the most recent common ancestor between Old World Monkeys and New World Monkeys -- which would be categorized as a monkey were it alive today -- was also an ancestor of humans.
We also come from fish.
Yep. I think we agree almost entirely.I agree with NCCommish that an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has, but that's because, when it comes to "before the Big Bang," science doesn't have any answers at all.I'd disagree here, and I bet you would too upon re-evaluating this statement.While you excluded them they have the best argument. No one can say what happened before the Big Bang. No one can say how it started. We reach a point where an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has. Now I don't believe it but it's at least in line with scientific evidence to some degree.
But that doesn't mean that an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything my twelve-year-old cousin has. My twelve-year-old cousin can conceive of a very powerful, but not quite omnipotent, being. That seems more likely because omnipotence is not strictly required for universe-creation, and there are many more ways to be not-quite-omnipotent than there are to be omnipotent.
I think a lot of them just believe there were two ants. Total. Aka two of each "kind" of animal/insect. Instead of the however many thousand species of ants there are.Do they know how many ant species there are? The ant population alone disproves the Noah myth.Yes. Lots.Are there really adults who take stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's ark literally?
.Yep. On the semi omnipotent God that would fit with the Old Testament:I agree with NCCommish that an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has, but that's because, when it comes to "before the Big Bang," science doesn't have any answers at all.I'd disagree here, and I bet you would too upon re-evaluating this statement.While you excluded them they have the best argument. No one can say what happened before the Big Bang. No one can say how it started. We reach a point where an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything science has. Now I don't believe it but it's at least in line with scientific evidence to some degree.
But that doesn't mean that an omnipotent being is as good an answer as anything my twelve-year-old cousin has. My twelve-year-old cousin can conceive of a very powerful, but not quite omnipotent, being. That seems more likely because omnipotence is not strictly required for universe-creation, and there are many more ways to be not-quite-omnipotent than there are to be omnipotent.
And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.
You can't. It's a non-starter.From what I gather, his trump card is that the bible is the literal word of God and thus everything in it is true. I'm not sure how you argue around that.
Great, now conspiracy theorists are gonna start worrying about a New World Monkey Order.We do come from monkeys.And this is why I have a fit when I see someone who believes Evolution saying we came from monkeys. We shared a common ancestor with the other great apes, we didn't come from them.
Humans, along with chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans, are great apes. Great apes split with Old World Monkeys after Old World Monkeys split from New World Monkeys. That means that the most recent common ancestor between Old World Monkeys and New World Monkeys -- which would be categorized as a monkey were it alive today -- was also an ancestor of humans.
We also come from fish.
Therein lies the problem. People actually believe the bible is god's word, that it was written by god. It's not. I was written by men. men with agendas, men with biases, men with bills to pay, etc.You can't. It's a non-starter.From what I gather, his trump card is that the bible is the literal word of God and thus everything in it is true. I'm not sure how you argue around that.
How did the moon get there?
I made it through both five-minute intros, and through maybe a third of Mr. Ham's 30-minute argument. I'll try to pick it up again tonight.I guess I'll put this on right now as I'm falling asleep. Then tomorrow I can try to figure out how far I got by looking for the break between stuff I remember and stuff I don't.
Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.As a young earth creationist, why even pretend that you need "evidence" for your beliefs? If you're gonna go with it, man, just go with it.I'm a "young earther" - but I recall someone here on this board at some point opening my mind to the possibility that the earh was created as an "old or mature" earth - similar to Adam being created as a mature adult.
I'm going to watch the debate today, if it's still available for watching onlne.
![]()
Nobody likes a guy who buries his head in the sand then keeps peeking out
While what you say is accurate ... to an unscientific mind, the "come from monkeys" thing holds up in a oblique way. Consider that if a hypothetical Pan prior specimen were ever time-travelled to the present day, pretty much anybody would point to it and call it "a monkey"And this is why I have a fit when I see someone who believes Evolution saying we came from monkeys. We shared a common ancestor with the other great apes, we didn't come from them.
Holding to a literal view of the human/animal creation story, how are there animal fossils in a layer of "aged" earth that dates to millions of years ago?Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.As a young earth creationist, why even pretend that you need "evidence" for your beliefs? If you're gonna go with it, man, just go with it.I'm a "young earther" - but I recall someone here on this board at some point opening my mind to the possibility that the earh was created as an "old or mature" earth - similar to Adam being created as a mature adult.
I'm going to watch the debate today, if it's still available for watching onlne.
![]()
Nobody likes a guy who buries his head in the sand then keeps peeking out
How does this work? Did god create the earth with dinosaur bones deep in the earth to fool us? So we would think it's aged? Like as a prank? What day did he do that on? His schedule that week seems kind of busy although he may have been able to squeeze it in by COB on that Thursday.Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.As a young earth creationist, why even pretend that you need "evidence" for your beliefs? If you're gonna go with it, man, just go with it.I'm a "young earther" - but I recall someone here on this board at some point opening my mind to the possibility that the earh was created as an "old or mature" earth - similar to Adam being created as a mature adult.
I'm going to watch the debate today, if it's still available for watching onlne.
![]()
Nobody likes a guy who buries his head in the sand then keeps peeking out
That's Gods way of testing you. Are you going to believe him or your lying eyes?Holding to a literal view of the human/animal creation story, how are there animal fossils in a layer of "aged" earth that dates to millions of years ago?Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.As a young earth creationist, why even pretend that you need "evidence" for your beliefs? If you're gonna go with it, man, just go with it.I'm a "young earther" - but I recall someone here on this board at some point opening my mind to the possibility that the earh was created as an "old or mature" earth - similar to Adam being created as a mature adult.
I'm going to watch the debate today, if it's still available for watching onlne.
![]()
Nobody likes a guy who buries his head in the sand then keeps peeking out
This is youI hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation.As a young earth creationist, why even pretend that you need "evidence" for your beliefs? If you're gonna go with it, man, just go with it.I'm a "young earther" - but I recall someone here on this board at some point opening my mind to the possibility that the earh was created as an "old or mature" earth - similar to Adam being created as a mature adult.
I'm going to watch the debate today, if it's still available for watching onlne.
![]()
Nobody likes a guy who buries his head in the sand then keeps peeking out
It wasn't a star, it was the TARDIS.21. "Relating to the big bang theory... where did the exploding star come from?"
Not to answer for On the Rocks, but some might say that God put those faux fossils there to create the false appearance of an old earth, the same way that he created light from distant stars already on its way, or the same way that he created Adam and Eve with belly-buttons.Holding to a literal view of the human/animal creation story, how are there animal fossils in a layer of "aged" earth that dates to millions of years ago?Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.
Pretty sure all of those people are tardies.It wasn't a star, it was the TARDIS.21. "Relating to the big bang theory... where did the exploding star come from?"
I wouldn't say that ... the methodology presented at the bottom says it's based on polling 1,024 people.
That god sure is a wacky guy. He should get a sitcom.Not to answer for On the Rocks, but some might say that God put those faux fossils there to create the false appearance of an old earth, the same way that he created light from distant stars already on its way, or the same way that he created Adam and Eve with belly-buttons.Holding to a literal view of the human/animal creation story, how are there animal fossils in a layer of "aged" earth that dates to millions of years ago?Not burying my head or looking for any additional evidence at all. I hold to the Biblical position of a six day creation. I have no idea why you would think that entertaining the idea that earth may have been created as an "aged" creation is a compromise of beliefs - but whatever.