What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bottom 5 offenses (1 Viewer)

moleculo

Footballguy
I like to play DTBC, where I focus on match-ups. IMO, an average D up against a poor O is about the same as a great D vs an average O. The avg D obviously costs less, and is often a waiver pick-up.

The trick, then, is identifying the poor O's. Before yesterday, I would have said Carolina, Cincy, Seattle, SF, and I'm not sure who else.

After week one, who are the weeklings?

 
Definately think SEA and SF are still there.

Cleveland and Cincy too

and Indy

will want to Oak tonight too, they may make the list.

 
Until Leslie Frazier realizes that Mike Shanaahan might know what he's talking about,

I think you can put Minnesota as one of those bottom feeders. Plus their coverage teams

are always susceptible to giving up a TD.

 
will want to Oak tonight too, they may make the list.
Doesn't Oakland return most of their offense from last year?You do realize that they were 5th in the NFL in scoring last year, right? Just 4 points behind Atlanta and 25 points behind the Colts.
 
Seattle

San Fran

Cincy

Jacksonville

Indy

Carolina (probably; I'm not sure if week one was a fluke or a real improvement over last year)

 
I'm literally upset about Sam bradford. He has nothing around him now that Sjax and Amendola are out for a few weeks. Many more drops a coming. Kendricks will shake off the first game jitters and become a solid target..But(and its a big but), I have to agree until they get something around Bradford...Its gonna be rough times in STL.

 
Shockingly, no one is mentioning Chicago. In many of the other threads people keep pointing out how they were 30th overall.

Fascinating.

JAX

SEA

SF

INDY

CLE

 
'FreeBaGeL said:
'rainram said:
will want to Oak tonight too, they may make the list.
Doesn't Oakland return most of their offense from last year?You do realize that they were 5th in the NFL in scoring last year, right? Just 4 points behind Atlanta and 25 points behind the Colts.
Not their entire offense though. Zach Miller was pretty good for them. Gallery may have been important for them (arguably)I think teams will really key in on the running game until Campbell beats them routinely.I also think losing Nnamdi will allow teams to score more against them, and Oaklands opponents' offenses will be able to stay on the field longer.I'll probably be wrong though
 
looks like the best available in my league is dallas at sf, went arz wk 1

or bills vs oak on a short week cross country :eek:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm starting to think that Denver belongs on this list. It's a team built to pass first trying to run first. They don't have the OL to do what they want to do. That, and Orton seems to crumble at a hint of pressure.

 
I'm starting to think that Denver belongs on this list. It's a team built to pass first trying to run first. They don't have the OL to do what they want to do. That, and Orton seems to crumble at a hint of pressure.
Shhhhh! Not so loud! Some people on these boards still think Orton = Cutler. Keep saying stuff like that and people are going to actually think Cutler > Orton - how will the myth be perpetuated if people start looking at actual facts!?!? Good lord, man.But yeah, you're right. Sadly, I own Moreno in a dynasty league too.

 
I can't believe nobody else is putting St. L on here. They just lost the best player on their team and star RB, their WR still can't catch (TE's either) and their QB doesn't look to throw the ball more than 10 yds down the field.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top