Matthews and Nicks. Both players obviously have been there before and are teams where the ideal philosophy is to use them in ways where they would bounce back. They just need to avoid the buzzard's luck.
No on Stafford because the Lions want to not throw as much so if they are more successful as a team this year, he can't throw like he did in that all-time career yardage year.
No on MJD because the Jags are different now and should have more options in the receiving game and a Lisfranc is a Lisfranc. It's just betting against the house to say a player comes back and is the same old usual in that first year.
No on Bowe because Bowe had a perfect aligning of situation those couple of years he had the monster runs. A terrible team that had no other player of use matching up against the historically worst passing defenses (I think there was a stretch there where he literally played against the 30, 29, 28, 30, and 9th pass defense that year and the 9th ranked team was Denver and Champ Bailey sat out that week).
These are my thoughts exactly. I just don't think Stafford is really that good. Just a product of huge workload. MJD wouldn't shock me, but seems like a longshot. Bowe is reliant on a new system and on Alex Smith to do more than short passes. Again, seems like a longshot. Just too many variables.
With Mathews, the offense just can't be worse. Mike McCoy is a good offensive mind. It looks like he'll get 250 carries and goal line duty. If that offense is even mediocre, Mathews will easily be top 15. If he'd torn both ACLs I'd be a lot more worried than breaking both clavicles. Get that man some bigger pads...
Nicks, like Mathews, is almost certain to produce if healthy. They have both been top 10 at their position recently.