No controversy here - I'm starting both.
Delahomme can also outscore brees week 1, go figure....Not sure why Bradshaw is ranked so low by everyone and Rice is ranked relatively high, but this is my call week one.Write it down, make the swap in your lineups. Bradshaw blows up, Rice doesn't find the endzone.
Nicks owner by chance?Don't underestimate how much Ray Rice will be used in the passing game with Boldin being covered by Revis Island. I think Bradshaw will get more yards but Jacobs, Hakeem Nicks will get the TD's. Sorry I still think Ray Rice outscores Bradshaw.
If Bradshaw is running well, Coughlin will play it conservative and give Bradshaw a shot at running it in or getting the ball on a screen. Bradshaw's the type of back where running it in from 12 yards out is an option. They'll play it safe on early downs,Don't underestimate how much Ray Rice will be used in the passing game with Boldin being covered by Revis Island. I think Bradshaw will get more yards but Jacobs, Hakeem Nicks will get the TD's. Sorry I still think Ray Rice outscores Bradshaw.
so what.Me - 1 every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
Me - 1 every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...amp;hl=rankings![]()
Me - 1
every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
Let's go with "recognized expert" then.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...amp;hl=rankings![]()
Me - 1
every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
One huge island of right in a sea of wrong.Don't underestimate how much Ray Rice will be used in the passing game with Boldin being covered by Revis Island. I think Bradshaw will get more yards but Jacobs, Hakeem Nicks will get the TD's. Sorry I still think Ray Rice outscores Bradshaw.
BRADSHAW IS THE WORLDS GREATESTBlasphemy.
You might be able to get it Bradshaw if you package Ray with Finley.Guess this means I better move Ray for Bradshaw.
this thread is a good lesson to those "experts" ranking too much based on name recognition/ADP and not enough on matchups/opportunity...so I agree, sticky this thread, learn from it.Kool-Aid Larry said:mods -- sticky, plz
I dont think this is going to be as crazy as you think by years end.MrSoup said:Guess this means I better move Ray for Bradshaw.
I like Bradshaw to have a good year, but the reason why Rice underperformed in week one was because he was going up against the best defense in the NFL.Not sure why Bradshaw is ranked so low by everyone and Rice is ranked relatively high, but this is my call week one.Write it down, make the swap in your lineups. Bradshaw blows up, Rice doesn't find the endzone.
Me - 1 every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
by my count your now 3/99 for predictions/bets
24. Kareem Huggins27. Lesean Mccoyhttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...amp;hl=rankings![]()
Me - 1
every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
The Huggins call was no good, but I was almost dead on with my projections of Mendenhall, for 60 minutes. Mccoy ran for a TD, othewise i would have been right on him too. Not to mention, the reason i ranked him so low was because i thougt he wouldnt get many carries, and i was right, he only had 7.I noticed you didnt point out how i ranked Foster, Forte, Charles and Bradshaw in the top 10 and had Ray Rice and Shonn Greene outside of the top 20.24. Kareem Huggins27. Lesean Mccoyhttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...amp;hl=rankings![]()
Me - 1
every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
28. Rashard Mendenhall
![]()
Bradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
BradshawBradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
I watched both games, and i have to say, Bradshaw looked much better than Rice.BradshawBradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
Just thought it was a little comical since huggins is a backup and didn't even touch the ball. Don't worry, your E-rep is still in tact. Just having a little fun with your self-congratulatory post. What you say about Mendy & McCoy can just as easily be applied to Charles too FYI.The Huggins call was no good, but I was almost dead on with my projections of Mendenhall, for 60 minutes. Mccoy ran for a TD, othewise i would have been right on him too. Not to mention, the reason i ranked him so low was because i thougt he wouldnt get many carries, and i was right, he only had 7.I noticed you didnt point out how i ranked Foster, Forte, Charles and Bradshaw in the top 10 and had Ray Rice and Shonn Greene outside of the top 20.24. Kareem Huggins27. Lesean Mccoyhttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...amp;hl=rankings![]()
Me - 1
every FF "expert" that put out a ranking in week 1 - 0
28. Rashard Mendenhall
![]()
Big diff in the defenses faced. Rices stats are self explanatory. Bradshaws stats ended up looking pretty good but in watching him it was painful for about 90% of the game.I watched both games, and i have to say, Bradshaw looked much better than Rice.BradshawBradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
Exactly why I made the call...not sure what your point was here.I'll have to take a look at this week's rankings to see if I can identify where the "experts" have made yet another weekly ranking mistake.I think CBS has theirs out...ESPNs come out today or tomorrow.I like Bradshaw to have a good year, but the reason why Rice underperformed in week one was because he was going up against the best defense in the NFL.Not sure why Bradshaw is ranked so low by everyone and Rice is ranked relatively high, but this is my call week one.Write it down, make the swap in your lineups. Bradshaw blows up, Rice doesn't find the endzone.
I was at the Giants game and from where I was sitting, Bradshaw looked terrible for the first 3/4 of the game. He was getting booed in the stadium. He had the one long run to the goal line, and then punched in the TD a play or two later, but otherwise he was almost completely ineffective.I watched both games, and i have to say, Bradshaw looked much better than Rice.BradshawBradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
Why are you such a tool? Seriously, your look-at-me syndrome is pathetic. Did your parents not love you enough?Two words guy, Matt Leinart.Just stop this awful, awful charade.this thread is a good lesson to those "experts" ranking too much based on name recognition/ADP and not enough on matchups/opportunity...so I agree, sticky this thread, learn from it.Kool-Aid Larry said:mods -- sticky, plz
No credit to the Carolina front 7? i didnt see much room for Bradshaw to run.I was at the Giants game and from where I was sitting, Bradshaw looked terrible for the first 3/4 of the game. He was getting booed in the stadium. He had the one long run to the goal line, and then punched in the TD a play or two later, but otherwise he was almost completely ineffective.I watched both games, and i have to say, Bradshaw looked much better than Rice.BradshawBradshaw or Rice?Nice call. But did anyone actually watch the game? He looked like ##### through most of it.
First correct call out of the last 100 you've made. Nice job finding the nut, you dumb-luck little squirrel. Hella' proud of you.I started Matt Forte over Ray Rice this week. Does this make me as lucky as you that I went against ADP and with the matchups?Exactly why I made the call...not sure what your point was here.I'll have to take a look at this week's rankings to see if I can identify where the "experts" have made yet another weekly ranking mistake.I think CBS has theirs out...ESPNs come out today or tomorrow.I like Bradshaw to have a good year, but the reason why Rice underperformed in week one was because he was going up against the best defense in the NFL.Not sure why Bradshaw is ranked so low by everyone and Rice is ranked relatively high, but this is my call week one.Write it down, make the swap in your lineups. Bradshaw blows up, Rice doesn't find the endzone.
that's not very niceWhy are you such a tool? Seriously, your look-at-me syndrome is pathetic. Did your parents not love you enough?
Doesn't count unless you posted it...did you?I started Matt Forte over Ray Rice this week.
All I know is the guy on this site (Waldman) who said to get Rice in his article last year is saying in his article this year to get Bradshaw.I have Bradshaw.And I think this Waldman guy is pretty smart.
I wish CBS "experts" set the lines in VegasExactly why I made the call...not sure what your point was here.I'll have to take a look at this week's rankings to see if I can identify where the "experts" have made yet another weekly ranking mistake.I think CBS has theirs out...ESPNs come out today or tomorrow.I like Bradshaw to have a good year, but the reason why Rice underperformed in week one was because he was going up against the best defense in the NFL.Not sure why Bradshaw is ranked so low by everyone and Rice is ranked relatively high, but this is my call week one.Write it down, make the swap in your lineups. Bradshaw blows up, Rice doesn't find the endzone.
I dunno. Seems like I got credit for about 30 more points in the league where this took place.Doesn't count unless you posted it...did you?I started Matt Forte over Ray Rice this week.
I knw of another smart guy who called this back in the begining of March.All I know is the guy on this site (Waldman) who said to get Rice in his article last year is saying in his article this year to get Bradshaw.
I have Bradshaw.
And I think this Waldman guy is pretty smart.