I am amazed that the FBG depth charts don't list offensive line positions. The way that games are filmed the vast majority of the time you are watching the offensive line, yet the analysis on offensive linemen is nothing compared to that of WRs and defensive backs. Really though, how often are you lucky enough to get a replay that shows the whole play in context so you can really make judgements on those positions?
I have a dream that one day NFL games will be broadcast so you can see all 22 players at once and you can judge players not by their boxscore, but by their actual play on the field in it's full context. I can't believe more people aren't demanding this. With all the time and effort that goes into fantasy teams and gambling on the sport people don't mind that they aren't seeing the whole game, which just rubs me the wrong way. Take how much you think you know about the NFL now and how do you think it would compare to your understanding of the game if you could in fact see all 22 players on every play. Sorry to go off on a tangent, but the way games are filmed really needs to change.
Anyways, can we officially make the IDP forum a place for offensive line discussion as well? The Shark Pool just has too many important discussions going on about things such as is Adrian Peterson's nickname AP or AD or ADP, I have the 10th pick should I take Marshawn Lynch, what's new with Chris Henry, and numerous threads on Brett the Jett. All kidding aside, the IDP forum has a different breed of regulars and the discussions are better. Sifting through the mess that is the SP to find some tidbits on Eric Winston is going to involve reading a lot of cheap shot personal insult posts and nonsense. In here a discussion on why Jake Long is better suited as a RT might actually be productive.