Sweetness_34
Footballguy
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=647385
My personal view on the situation is that the Packers are over-estimating their D a lot. This D was horrible the 1st half of the year last year. People keep referring to how well they played the last 4 games of the year but all those folks just do not want to look at the fact that those last 4 games included playing against a team that was not interested in playing a game (Bears in week 17), against a team that was starting a rookie QB with 4 days of prep work (Vikings - remember that snooze fest game last year?), against a team that was barely average on O (Niners - with no real WR threats and no Vernon Davis) and a team with a decent O but a bad OL (Detroit) at home in the cold.
So, I fully expect that the Packers will need to wing it in 2nd half of games to win, so Favre will still throw for 4000 yards or more. Also, wiht no real running game, winging it in the red zone will also be required.
Thoughts?
My personal view on the situation is that the Packers are over-estimating their D a lot. This D was horrible the 1st half of the year last year. People keep referring to how well they played the last 4 games of the year but all those folks just do not want to look at the fact that those last 4 games included playing against a team that was not interested in playing a game (Bears in week 17), against a team that was starting a rookie QB with 4 days of prep work (Vikings - remember that snooze fest game last year?), against a team that was barely average on O (Niners - with no real WR threats and no Vernon Davis) and a team with a decent O but a bad OL (Detroit) at home in the cold.
So, I fully expect that the Packers will need to wing it in 2nd half of games to win, so Favre will still throw for 4000 yards or more. Also, wiht no real running game, winging it in the red zone will also be required.
Thoughts?