Public perception has the colts going WAY too high on spreads this year.The last two weeks have been EASY picks to take the points.Tennesee was a big dog and lost by 2.Houston was a 6.5 point dog and lost by 6.Fading the public is always good, and I think the Colts will have a hard time finishing over .500 vs the spread this year.is it me, or is that line way too high??I criticized Denver last week when they were 2-0, and they struggled this week, but I figured the line would be around seven or so . . .
New England at -7 is the second biggest joke of the week, behind only the 52.5 O/U.How about the Chargers laying 11.5!What a slap in the face to K.C.
Just out of curiosity, what would you put the spread at, over/under included?ETA: Personally I think Vegas is counting on the public perception that the Patriots are unstoppable at this point and the Bengals defense blows. A seven point road favorite is pretty hefty, they're probably tired of paying money to the Patriot backers this season. I think it should be more in the -3/3.5 range but I wouldn't be surprised to see New England cover.New England at -7 is the second biggest joke of the week, behind only the 52.5 O/U.
I'd put the spread at 10, and I'd take NE at -9.5. Over/under should be close to 60. I don't see how the Pats score less than 38, but I think we're looking at somewhere between a 38-28/41-31 finish here. Wouldn't shock me to see the Pats get in the high 40s this week alone.Just out of curiosity, what would you put the spread at, over/under included?ETA: Personally I think Vegas is counting on the public perception that the Patriots are unstoppable at this point and the Bengals defense blows. A seven point road favorite is pretty hefty, they're probably tired of paying money to the Patriot backers this season. I think it should be more in the -3/3.5 range but I wouldn't be surprised to see New England cover.New England at -7 is the second biggest joke of the week, behind only the 52.5 O/U.
The Bengals can't run the ball, they can't stop the run, and they can't stop the pass. I don't think a one dimensional team has even a puncher's chance of beating NE, even if they've got a terrific one punch.I could easily see that but to make the Pats a double digit road favorite when you have Palmer, Rudi, CJ & TJ on the other side is ballsy. I'd have to think the money % would be in the 80/20 range if the Pats were -10.
the last time i saw a big of a lock to beat the spread was way back on 9/22 with penn st over michigan.The Bengals can't run the ball, they can't stop the run, and they can't stop the pass. I don't think a one dimensional team has even a puncher's chance of beating NE, even if they've got a terrific one punch.I could easily see that but to make the Pats a double digit road favorite when you have Palmer, Rudi, CJ & TJ on the other side is ballsy. I'd have to think the money % would be in the 80/20 range if the Pats were -10.
Maybe no Rudi Johnson (and he's been awful anyway), 8 passing TDs allowed the past two games, and averaging 6.05the last time i saw a big of a lock to beat the spread was way back on 9/22 with penn st over michigan.The Bengals can't run the ball, they can't stop the run, and they can't stop the pass. I don't think a one dimensional team has even a puncher's chance of beating NE, even if they've got a terrific one punch.I could easily see that but to make the Pats a double digit road favorite when you have Palmer, Rudi, CJ & TJ on the other side is ballsy. I'd have to think the money % would be in the 80/20 range if the Pats were -10.![]()
Denver has lost 5 of their last 7 home games. The two wins were the result of icing Janikowski in week 2 and a special teams flub by the Bengals last year. The Broncos could easily be 0-7 in their last 7 home games. I agree with the statement that Indy seems to play up or down to their competition and seems to only do enough to win (week one v.s. the Saints not withstanding, I think we know how good the Saints are now at this point.) Push comes to shove this weekend, I'd be much more comfortable backing the World Champs.ETA: I realize that this game is in Indy, my point about Denver losing 5 of 7 at home is to justify the fact that they are not nearly as good a team as many on this message board are making them out to be. They could very well be 0-3 this year if it weren't for some very fortunate luck on their end.duaneok66 said:is it me, or is that line way too high??I criticized Denver last week when they were 2-0, and they struggled this week, but I figured the line would be around seven or so . . .