Brooks not starting tonight (1 Viewer)

[Weiner Dog]

Per Rotoworld...

http://www.rotoworld.com/

 

[Jayrok]

Cool... let's go KC defense!

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

Cool... let's go KC defense!

 

[GOroute]

this has to be bad for curry, right? it makes sense that the raiders do this as they aint going nowheres with abrooks.

thoughts on curry tonight?

 

[kwille]

Cool... let's go KC defense!

Super

 

[smcindoe]

So is this a good thing for the KC defense?

Wouldn't Brooks slinging it around like a madman be better than Walters executing what will probably be a timid, please-don't-hurt-us gameplan?

 

[mad sweeney]

Cool... let's go KC defense!

Super

And timely. Been agonizing over starting them or the Steelers with Ogden hurt. But that list of inactives for OAK is just tragic. Another wonderful and exciting game brought to (some of) us by the NFL Network.

 

[cortez444]

Walter = hopefully a lot of KC sacks

 

[PahtyTom]

brooks starting. nice info

 

[KiddLattimer]

brooks starting. nice info

 

[my man otis]

brooks starting. nice info

look again.

 

[KiddLattimer]

brooks starting. nice info

look again.

Ah, Yahoo Stattracker can't tell the difference between a quick black guy and a big doofy white guy. Nice job Yahoo

 

[Tarkin]

brooks starting. nice info

look again.

Ah, Yahoo Stattracker can't tell the difference between a quick black guy and a big doofy white guy. Nice job Yahoo

I am in the finals of my survivor-style league where two QBs start. I have Brooks, Plummer, Young, Volek, and Brunell. It's a miracle I made this it this far, I guess .

 

[wannabee]

To me, the question is whether Walter will/can be the starter in 2007.

 

[Colt Of Personality]

Seriously, do the Raiders have a death wish? Walters is a bonafide WASTE!

 

[[scooter]]

this has to be bad for curry, right? it makes sense that the raiders do this as they aint going nowheres with abrooks.

Philosophy 101: would you rather go nowhere with Brooks, or go backwards with Walter?