What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Browns Camp News (1 Viewer)

Faust

MVP
Browns burning question: Who will start at QB?

What do the Democrats, Republicans and the Browns all have in common? They all have shaky three-way races for a potential leader. But while the Clinton-Obama-Edwards and Giuliani-Romney-McCain triangles have next year to play out, Cleveland's football-loving constituency wants to know who'll get the nod at quarterback this fall.

What was expected to be a battle between 2007 first-round pick Brady Quinn and 2005 third-round pick Charlie Frye has a surprise sudden frontrunner after minicamp: Derek Anderson, who started three of the team's final four games last season. And his minicamp performance makes him the favorite to start the team's first game of this season.

So what's so special about Anderson, who went 0-3 with 7 INTs and only 3 TDs in his three career starts? A part of it comes from the way he played in relief against Kansas City in Week 13, showing great moxie with both his arm and his legs in leading the Browns to a home overtime victory. He also showed a good deep connection with go-to receiver Braylon Edwards, and being 6-6, 229 doesn't hurt the third-year QB, either.

Of course, a bigger part of it is the fact that Frye hasn't been very impressive in practices and Quinn is a rookie trying to learn his first NFL offense. Both looked out of sync in minicamp, setting the tone with early interceptions.

Frye is confident about his passing talents, but his inability to back them up on the field prompted the Browns to target and draft Quinn.

Quinn comes in with a big college name, Notre Dame pedigree and local flavor as a native of Dublin, Ohio. He also comes recommended by Browns coach Romeo Crennel's former Patriots colleague Charlie Weis, Quinn's coach at Notre Dame. For a hungry fan base looking for hope, Quinn represents just that. But it will be a while before he's ready to deliver.

Considering Frye's practice history and Quinn's potential for an extended holdout, Anderson is the best bet to come out of training camp on top of the depth chart. Browns fans, however, shouldn't read too much into who starts in Week 1. The team's chances of contending for the playoffs this season are microscopic -- that's the reality of playing in a tough AFC North with Baltimore, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh.

Because of that, sticking with one quarterback doesn't make sense. In a season where they aren't going anywhere, the Browns need to, at some point, evaluate both Frye and Quinn with '08 in mind. Quinn has time on his side and will be the bigger investment, likely making Frye the odd man out beyond '07.

Quinn won't -- and shouldn't -- start right away, but as the losses mount and when the team can only look ahead, he will -- and should -- play. It would be one thing if either Anderson or Frye were a seasoned veteran such as former Brown Trent Dilfer. But when there's no mentor for Quinn to learn behind, he is better off learning on the job.

Browns fans should focus on who finishes the season as the starter, because it's a lot more important than who "wins" the job out of camp. If things go right, Quinn will play for keeps in the second half of the season and make sure the team doesn't have a burning quarterback question next summer.

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=226071

 
All I know is that Saturday there was a Brady Quinn siting

He sang "Nothing but a good time"

with Bret Michaels and Poison on the encore at

Blossom music center

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

Rumor is that charlie frye wasnt invited, so i would assume that Brady is the favorite

:blackdot:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Browns burning question: Who will start at QB?

What do the Democrats, Republicans and the Browns all have in common? They all have shaky three-way races for a potential leader. But while the Clinton-Obama-Edwards and Giuliani-Romney-McCain triangles have next year to play out, Cleveland's football-loving constituency wants to know who'll get the nod at quarterback this fall.

What was expected to be a battle between 2007 first-round pick Brady Quinn and 2005 third-round pick Charlie Frye has a surprise sudden frontrunner after minicamp: Derek Anderson, who started three of the team's final four games last season. And his minicamp performance makes him the favorite to start the team's first game of this season.

So what's so special about Anderson, who went 0-3 with 7 INTs and only 3 TDs in his three career starts? A part of it comes from the way he played in relief against Kansas City in Week 13, showing great moxie with both his arm and his legs in leading the Browns to a home overtime victory. He also showed a good deep connection with go-to receiver Braylon Edwards, and being 6-6, 229 doesn't hurt the third-year QB, either.

Of course, a bigger part of it is the fact that Frye hasn't been very impressive in practices and Quinn is a rookie trying to learn his first NFL offense. Both looked out of sync in minicamp, setting the tone with early interceptions.

Frye is confident about his passing talents, but his inability to back them up on the field prompted the Browns to target and draft Quinn.

Quinn comes in with a big college name, Notre Dame pedigree and local flavor as a native of Dublin, Ohio. He also comes recommended by Browns coach Romeo Crennel's former Patriots colleague Charlie Weis, Quinn's coach at Notre Dame. For a hungry fan base looking for hope, Quinn represents just that. But it will be a while before he's ready to deliver.

Considering Frye's practice history and Quinn's potential for an extended holdout, Anderson is the best bet to come out of training camp on top of the depth chart. Browns fans, however, shouldn't read too much into who starts in Week 1. The team's chances of contending for the playoffs this season are microscopic -- that's the reality of playing in a tough AFC North with Baltimore, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh.

Because of that, sticking with one quarterback doesn't make sense. In a season where they aren't going anywhere, the Browns need to, at some point, evaluate both Frye and Quinn with '08 in mind. Quinn has time on his side and will be the bigger investment, likely making Frye the odd man out beyond '07.

Quinn won't -- and shouldn't -- start right away, but as the losses mount and when the team can only look ahead, he will -- and should -- play. It would be one thing if either Anderson or Frye were a seasoned veteran such as former Brown Trent Dilfer. But when there's no mentor for Quinn to learn behind, he is better off learning on the job.

Browns fans should focus on who finishes the season as the starter, because it's a lot more important than who "wins" the job out of camp. If things go right, Quinn will play for keeps in the second half of the season and make sure the team doesn't have a burning quarterback question next summer.

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=226071
In all fairness neither party (republican or democrat) has a three-man race going on... It's clearly one two-man race and a man-woman race :unsure: ... Definitely will be Clinton or Obama for the Dems and Gulliani or Thompson for the republicans... McCaine will drop out soon and Edwards is a walking punchline.As for the Browns I would like to see Charlie Frye start AND finish the season. I thought Frye has been pretty good for his experience and supporting cast. I think it was foolish for the Browns to trade to get him, they gave up too much. As for how Frye looks in practice... We talkin' bout practice?! LOL... Jeff Garcia always looks bad in practice...

 
Anderson was a walking INT during his career at Oregon State. I'll be very surprised if he ever amount to anything. This is a rough situation in redraft leagues. I'd probably avoid it entirely. Quinn is still the best of the bunch for dynasty purposes, IMO.

 
i liked the way Anderson seemed to get rid of the ball much quicker than Frye. i was at the Kansas City game, and was amazed at how the offense was suddenly working correctly. that said, he's obviously backup material too.

i personally have seen enough of Frye to believe that he's never quite going to "get it", and he's going to bounce around the league for a few years as a backup. the kid's got heart, but he just doesn't seem to have the brains.

Quinn is obviously going to take some time.

so, i think you have to run with Anderson right now, as kind of the stop gap solution, because i don't see spending any more time evaluating Frye being worth it.

the thing i find so disconcerting about the article, is that while i agree that the AFC North is a difficult division, i don't like the attidute that the Browns have no chance at the playoffs. while i will agree the chances are on the slim side, i would not call them 'microscopic' before a down of football has been played.

with an improved offensive line and the defense being in the third year of Crennel's scheme, i think they need to pick the quarterback who will give them the best chance to not lose. i don't see them needing the QB to win games, they just need to give them a chance to stay in them.

 
Further updates from Sportingnews:

SOMETHING TO PROVE: Is Brady Quinn really the most NFL-ready quarterback to come out of a recent draft? Can Charlie Frye hold off Quinn and prove two years worth of NFL learning and an improved cast will allow him to break through as a winner? Derek Anderson is out to prove he not only is part of the team's complex quarterback question, but that he will be the answer in 2007. Anderson has a stronger arm than either Quinn or Frye and gets the ball out quickly. As spring practices unfolded, he became more convinced his style is perfectly suited to Chudzinski's attack-style offense, in which passing windows come open quickly and must be exploited by a passer with Anderson's skills. Anderson has a low-key confidence that will help him stay cool under the pressure of a quarterback competition. His breakout performance in which he outdueled Trent Green and passed the Browns to an overtime win over the Chiefs opened up eyes among higher-ups. Anderson isn't very mobile, but an improved line and a new power runner in Jamal Lewis reduce the need for him to scramble. The biggest thing he has going for him is the clear notion he can win as a starter.

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=233689

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top