What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Buffalo at Cleveland (1 Viewer)

renesauz said:
Insein said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Click to expand...
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
Click to expand...
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Click to expand...
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first
Click to expand...
You can't tackle a receiver by his jersey no matter what. That's a clear penalty.
 
Hey Hackett, now you're down 7. How about keep running it up the guy over and over and let the defense tee off and Manuel on third?

 
at least this gives us another opportunity to watch Spiller standing on the sideline while the Bills offense is out there

 
jurb26 said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Click to expand...
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
Click to expand...
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Click to expand...
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first
Click to expand...
You can't tackle a receiver by his jersey no matter what. That's a clear penalty.
Click to expand...
He's no longer a receiver after he steps out of bounds.

 
GroveDiesel said:
Hey Hackett, now you're down 7. How about keep running it up the guy over and over and let the defense tee off and Manuel on third?
Click to expand...
1-10: (shotgun) Spiller left tackle for 1 yard

2-9: (shotgun) Spiller right tackle for 2 yards

3-7: (shotgun) Manuel pass incomplete

4-7: punt

 
jurb26 said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Click to expand...
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
Click to expand...
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Click to expand...
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first
Click to expand...
You can't tackle a receiver by his jersey no matter what. That's a clear penalty.
Click to expand...
Did you watch what preceded that? Apparently not. At best it would be off-setting. Make no difference to me personally, not a fan of either team and none of players involved mattered to me in fantasy.

If a player goes OOB and is ineligible to catch the ball, it would follow that he can't be illegally contacted or interfered with. BUt even if he could, he can't push off first...the DB grabbed him as he lost balance, which happened because he was pushed by the WR. Just an ugly play all the way around.

 
They're ####### kidding about Matt Millen, right?

eta* I mean, please tell they're kidding about devoting an hour of bio to this guy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GroveDiesel said:
jurb26 said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Click to expand...
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
Click to expand...
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Click to expand...
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first
Click to expand...
You can't tackle a receiver by his jersey no matter what. That's a clear penalty.
Click to expand...
He's no longer a receiver after he steps out of bounds.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter. From the rule book."A defensive player may not tackle or hold an opponent other than a runner. Otherwise, he may use his hands, arms, or body only: ..."

Thus illegal contact was called. It was a penalty.

 
GroveDiesel said:
jurb26 said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
renesauz said:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Click to expand...
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
Click to expand...
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Click to expand...
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first
Click to expand...
You can't tackle a receiver by his jersey no matter what. That's a clear penalty.
Click to expand...
He's no longer a receiver after he steps out of bounds.
Click to expand...
you are correct, but he's still allowed to defend the ball, yes?
 
GroveDiesel said:
nickdiesel said:
KellysHeroes said:
any QBs in the stands?
Click to expand...
Paging josh freeman
Click to expand...
It would be hilarious if Freeman just started showing up at Browns, Jags and Rams games in the stands.
Click to expand...
Ha! Best post so far. Freeman should sit in the stands wearing sunglasses, chewing gum with a "you want some of this?" look like WWE or UFC "heels" do

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

starks
Week 11 Weather
Replies
16
Views
1K
Faust
Faust
J
Is the schedule maker broken or is it just me?
Replies
4
Views
315
joshpopp1
J
kupcho1
  • Poll Poll
Eight Steelers Nominated for Pro Football Hall of Fame Class of 2026
Replies
4
Views
423
timschochet
timschochet

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top