Sorry man, The Mason Train already left the station the moment McNair was traded, and it's been picking up steam this preseason.He's my main groan canidate for 2006. He's going to be the guy you take a half a round early then the book says and everyone in the room is going to groan about it.Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
I like that analogy.He's my main groan canidate for 2006. He's going to be the guy you take a half a round early then the book says and everyone in the room is going to groan about it.
Oh, I know...I'm doing the best I can on the fantasy football's version of damage control...Sorry man, The Mason Train already left the station the moment McNair was traded, and it's been picking up steam this preseason.He's my main groan canidate for 2006. He's going to be the guy you take a half a round early then the book says and everyone in the room is going to groan about it.Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
Nah, talk all you want, he's already on my team as WR2!!!!!oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
True, but given how variable TDs are, I'll take a guy that can catch 80-90 balls any day. You never know how many could turn into the TD variety.He's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.
The Mason train left the station sometime in February.The Ref said:Sorry man, The Mason Train already left the station the moment McNair was traded, and it's been picking up steam this preseason.oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
February 2003, that is.The Mason train left the station sometime in February.The Ref said:Sorry man, The Mason Train already left the station the moment McNair was traded, and it's been picking up steam this preseason.oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
I have him on my team as well!!! Check out my recieversM. Harrison INDD. Jax SEAR. Williams DETD. Mason BALIn My League We Start 3 WR'sNah, talk all you want, he's already on my team as WR2!!!!!oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
WR 3 for meNah, talk all you want, he's already on my team as WR2!!!!!oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
He's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.
Missed the PPR part huh?Said above is that even if he doesn't get many TDs, hauling in 80-90 catches will give him incredible value.... last year he went for 86 1073 3 for 204 fantasy points... Yeah, not bad, but not some great fantasy player that everyone expects him to be.Even if he repeats his 80-90 catches, he needs those TDs... and I just don't think he'll get them with Lewis and Heap aroundMove him back down fellas
No, I'm pretty sure he didn't.He's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.Missed the PPR part huh?Said above is that even if he doesn't get many TDs, hauling in 80-90 catches will give him incredible value.... last year he went for 86 1073 3 for 204 fantasy points... Yeah, not bad, but not some great fantasy player that everyone expects him to be.Even if he repeats his 80-90 catches, he needs those TDs... and I just don't think he'll get them with Lewis and Heap aroundMove him back down fellas
86+107+18... minus one fumble lost... Somehow in my league that equals 204 fantasy points, tho when I do the math it comes to 209. Regardless, no Jr, I didn't miss the PPR part. Tons of catches doesn't equal startable fantasy stats. 13 fantasy points per week... yikes. Sorry, but I hope my #2 WR pulls in at least 15 per week. I want to winHe's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.Missed the PPR part huh?Said above is that even if he doesn't get many TDs, hauling in 80-90 catches will give him incredible value.... last year he went for 86 1073 3 for 204 fantasy points... Yeah, not bad, but not some great fantasy player that everyone expects him to be.Even if he repeats his 80-90 catches, he needs those TDs... and I just don't think he'll get them with Lewis and Heap aroundMove him back down fellas
So a guy who never had less than 5 TD's with McNair in Tenn, but is a virtual lock for 80-90 catches, 1000 yards has no place because of limited upside. TD's are the hardest thing to predict, ask Reggie Wayne who was drafted as borderline a WR1 and put up 83/1055/5 last year. TD's are gold, no doubt, but they are very unpredictable even at the very top of the WR position. Torry Holt wasn't far off this status a while ago--tons of catches + tons of yards, but limited TD's. Now he is being lauded as WR#1 by many because of his consistency. Tons of catches = tons of opps for TD's = which equals FF success. Would you rather hang your hat on the guy who gets less opps? No one is saying put him the tier 2 guys with Chambers, Roy...but he absolutely belongs with the Rod Smith's and Kennison's of the world who are consistently overlooked/undervalued because of limited upside. McNair is a crazy upgrade over Boller, not only as a QB, but a leader too and has built in chemistry with McNair. You are freakin nuts not to consider this guy when he can be had as a possible WR3 with an average ADP of 6.3 (10 teams) that will get you ONLY 12 points, with upside, almost guaranteed every week.86+107+18... minus one fumble lost... Somehow in my league that equals 204 fantasy points, tho when I do the math it comes to 209. Regardless, no Jr, I didn't miss the PPR part. Tons of catches doesn't equal startable fantasy stats. 13 fantasy points per week... yikes. Sorry, but I hope my #2 WR pulls in at least 15 per week. I want to winHe's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.Missed the PPR part huh?Said above is that even if he doesn't get many TDs, hauling in 80-90 catches will give him incredible value.... last year he went for 86 1073 3 for 204 fantasy points... Yeah, not bad, but not some great fantasy player that everyone expects him to be.
Even if he repeats his 80-90 catches, he needs those TDs... and I just don't think he'll get them with Lewis and Heap around
Move him back down fellas
15 FPG = 240 on the year. Only 9 WRs did better than that last season.209 FP = WR 19 last year, a solid WR2Basically, I'm86+107+18... minus one fumble lost... Somehow in my league that equals 204 fantasy points, tho when I do the math it comes to 209. Regardless, no Jr, I didn't miss the PPR part. Tons of catches doesn't equal startable fantasy stats. 13 fantasy points per week... yikes. Sorry, but I hope my #2 WR pulls in at least 15 per week. I want to win
I'm not saying he doesnt have upside... I think he could be a great steal this season. Taking him as your #2 WR puts a lot of hope in McNair... someone who hasn't been able to stay healthy for the last 3 seasons. It's kind of funny how someone like McNair can be thought of as "the answer" for Baltimore... I highly disagree. Baltimore has been able to get it done with Trent Dilfer. What used to make McNair such a threat was his ability to scramble and rush. He was one of the first in the age of "Michael Vick QBs." Today you won't see him scramble as much... in fact, his rushes are down by over 50% last season. I think Boller is a much better QB than McNair. He showed us towards the end of the season. He has a MUCH stronger arm than him. The only thing McNair brings is experience, which shouldn't be sold short, but when you're talking McNair these days, you're not talking bombs to Derrick Mason that we used to see long ago... I just think Boller is a better talent than McNair, although you are correct, McNair brings more to the table than Boller. I just think it's entertaining how you everyone says McNair is the answer, acting like he's the second coming.So a guy who never had less than 5 TD's with McNair in Tenn, but is a virtual lock for 80-90 catches, 1000 yards has no place because of limited upside. TD's are the hardest thing to predict, ask Reggie Wayne who was drafted as borderline a WR1 and put up 83/1055/5 last year. TD's are gold, no doubt, but they are very unpredictable even at the very top of the WR position. Torry Holt wasn't far off this status a while ago--tons of catches + tons of yards, but limited TD's. Now he is being lauded as WR#1 by many because of his consistency. Tons of catches = tons of opps for TD's = which equals FF success. Would you rather hang your hat on the guy who gets less opps? No one is saying put him the tier 2 guys with Chambers, Roy...but he absolutely belongs with the Rod Smith's and Kennison's of the world who are consistently overlooked/undervalued because of limited upside. McNair is a crazy upgrade over Boller, not only as a QB, but a leader too and has built in chemistry with McNair. You are freakin nuts not to consider this guy when he can be had as a possible WR3 with an average ADP of 6.3 (10 teams) that will get you ONLY 12 points, with upside, almost guaranteed every week.86+107+18... minus one fumble lost... Somehow in my league that equals 204 fantasy points, tho when I do the math it comes to 209. Regardless, no Jr, I didn't miss the PPR part. Tons of catches doesn't equal startable fantasy stats. 13 fantasy points per week... yikes. Sorry, but I hope my #2 WR pulls in at least 15 per week. I want to winHe's more valuable in a PPR league cuz his TD's may not turn out to be that great, but he'll probably haul in 80 or 90 balls.Missed the PPR part huh?Said above is that even if he doesn't get many TDs, hauling in 80-90 catches will give him incredible value.... last year he went for 86 1073 3 for 204 fantasy points... Yeah, not bad, but not some great fantasy player that everyone expects him to be.
Even if he repeats his 80-90 catches, he needs those TDs... and I just don't think he'll get them with Lewis and Heap around
Move him back down fellas
"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league. How many of you can say that you would be comfortable with McCardell or Kennison as your #2 WR? #3, yeah for sure, in fact I had McCardell as my #3 last year. Of course, I can see Mason improving his numbers to be an average #2 WR... but if you want to win you're going to try and get a great #1 and a great #2...15 FPG = 240 on the year. Only 9 WRs did better than that last season.209 FP = WR 19 last year, a solid WR286+107+18... minus one fumble lost... Somehow in my league that equals 204 fantasy points, tho when I do the math it comes to 209. Regardless, no Jr, I didn't miss the PPR part. Tons of catches doesn't equal startable fantasy stats. 13 fantasy points per week... yikes. Sorry, but I hope my #2 WR pulls in at least 15 per week. I want to win
Basically, I'm![]()
![]()
over your point, here...
2005 PPR Final Stats14. Houshmandzadeh, T.J. 226.8"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league. How many of you can say that you would be comfortable with McCardell or Kennison as your #2 WR? #3, yeah for sure, in fact I had McCardell as my #3 last year. Of course, I can see Mason improving his numbers to be an average #2 WR... but if you want to win you're going to try and get a great #1 and a great #2...
Yeah, actually a lot of games in my league are decided by a few points. Every point matters, especially in a money leagueMoss finsihed behind Mason, yes, but Moss also didn't play every game last season. I distinctly remember him starting in some games just to keep his consecutive start streak alive- or whatever that was. I think it was against GB where he started the first play and then was taken out. I thought that was pretty cheap. Moss was hampered by injury and on a new team... you can put money on it that Moss is better this season (but maybe not after watching Aaron Brooks....)Here's my top 20 WR this season (and I'm not hear to debate them, just listing off who I think is better than Mason)C. JohnsonTOFitzgeraldHoltSmithHarrisonR. MossRoy WilliamsChambersBoldinWardBurressA. JohnsonDriverWayneS. MossHoushmandzadehJ. WalkerGallowayBranch (if he ever reports)Mason at 21If you disagree, then we can agree to disagree. I just don't think he's as solid #2 WR as people are making him to be. His ADP is better than a lot of those in my top 20 as far as value goes. If you can get him fairly late, then that's awesome. Good steal for you... I just think a lot of people in this thread are talking him up like he's going to be a 10-15 WR, I just don't see that happening with the WRs I listed above himThe difference between a "Bottom of the barrel" WR2 like Mason, and a "solid" WR2 like Houshmanzadeh or Glenn was roughly one point a game.Are the games in your league that close?Besides, Moss and Wayne were probably drafted way ahead of Mason and they finished behind him with Boller as QB. No offense, but I am still not sold on your argument.
Excellent rebuttal. At the end of the day, while I won't comment on your rankings, it says a lot that you put them out there, so good for you. Different owners place different rankings on players. Its what makes the hobby worthwhile.Yeah, actually a lot of games in my league are decided by a few points. Every point matters, especially in a money leagueMoss finsihed behind Mason, yes, but Moss also didn't play every game last season. I distinctly remember him starting in some games just to keep his consecutive start streak alive- or whatever that was. I think it was against GB where he started the first play and then was taken out. I thought that was pretty cheap. Moss was hampered by injury and on a new team... you can put money on it that Moss is better this season (but maybe not after watching Aaron Brooks....)Here's my top 20 WR this season (and I'm not hear to debate them, just listing off who I think is better than Mason)C. JohnsonTOFitzgeraldHoltSmithHarrisonR. MossRoy WilliamsChambersBoldinWardBurressA. JohnsonDriverWayneS. MossHoushmandzadehJ. WalkerGallowayBranch (if he ever reports)Mason at 21If you disagree, then we can agree to disagree. I just don't think he's as solid #2 WR as people are making him to be. His ADP is better than a lot of those in my top 20 as far as value goes. If you can get him fairly late, then that's awesome. Good steal for you... I just think a lot of people in this thread are talking him up like he's going to be a 10-15 WR, I just don't see that happening with the WRs I listed above himThe difference between a "Bottom of the barrel" WR2 like Mason, and a "solid" WR2 like Houshmanzadeh or Glenn was roughly one point a game.Are the games in your league that close?Besides, Moss and Wayne were probably drafted way ahead of Mason and they finished behind him with Boller as QB. No offense, but I am still not sold on your argument.
If McNair can stay healthy 14 out of the 16 games this season, then yes I think McNair is an upgrade for the entire Baltimore offense. Knowing the game, how to read defenses, etc is going to be huge for that offense, and for Mason as well. I think Mason is a guy who can very well outperform his ADP. If someone can grab him as their #3 WR, I think that's a steal and you've got a fantastic team built. He's one of those solid, but not superstud guys that can take you far in your league. I think it's incorrect however for guys to be drafting him as their #2 wr and expecting top 10 or 15 WR dividends.If I understand correctly, you feel Boller is a better QB than McNair, but McNair brings more to the table. Would you say that McNair is an upgrade to the Baltimore offense? Boller threw 11 TD's last year and doesn't even average 1 TD a game over his career. I think that McNair is a vast improvement, maybe less so as a QB (maybe not), but huge in leadership/intangibles and this will rub off on his team, IMHO. My point about Mason was he is the guy with limited upside and I think those guys can help you win at FF because they fly under the radar and can easily outperform their draft spot a la Kennison and Smith. Getting Mason as WR2 would be OK, but he prolly won't turn in a WR1 return, but as a WR3, he could reasonably turn in a WR2 performance.
So it looks like we can agree that getting Mason as a WR3 is probably value and as a WR2 means we probably aren't everything else being equal?If McNair can stay healthy 14 out of the 16 games this season, then yes I think McNair is an upgrade for the entire Baltimore offense. Knowing the game, how to read defenses, etc is going to be huge for that offense, and for Mason as well. I think Mason is a guy who can very well outperform his ADP. If someone can grab him as their #3 WR, I think that's a steal and you've got a fantastic team built. He's one of those solid, but not superstud guys that can take you far in your league. I think it's incorrect however for guys to be drafting him as their #2 wr and expecting top 10 or 15 WR dividends.If I understand correctly, you feel Boller is a better QB than McNair, but McNair brings more to the table. Would you say that McNair is an upgrade to the Baltimore offense? Boller threw 11 TD's last year and doesn't even average 1 TD a game over his career. I think that McNair is a vast improvement, maybe less so as a QB (maybe not), but huge in leadership/intangibles and this will rub off on his team, IMHO. My point about Mason was he is the guy with limited upside and I think those guys can help you win at FF because they fly under the radar and can easily outperform their draft spot a la Kennison and Smith. Getting Mason as WR2 would be OK, but he prolly won't turn in a WR1 return, but as a WR3, he could reasonably turn in a WR2 performance.
As HK has shown, the difference between him and the 15th WR last year was 1 point per game... and those guys will go much higher in the draft than Mason. That's why I think he can make an excellent #3 WR.
Maybe I'm in my auction draft mode more than a typical draft mode... maybe it's impossible to get Mason as a #3 WR. I'm used to having everyone availible to me and not having to decide, do I go RB/RB/WR?WR or RB/WR/RB/WR? I just grab who I want for the price I want them at... which makes Mason as a #3 WR very possible.
It all depends what kind of risk. Mason has a lot of risk, but a lot of reward
definately. It'll be interesting to watch his season for sure. I'm not a believer in the Ravens, but I definately welcome the opportunity to be proved wrong!So it looks like we can agree that getting Mason as a WR3 is probably value and as a WR2 means we probably aren't everything else being equal?![]()
good post. the longer people wait for their drafts the less chance they have and making a steal like this.We had our draft back on JULY 23... way too early for us, we typically do it around this weekend. I found myself able to get much better steals than I have in recent years. My team would be MUCH different if we had waited until this weekendDid not read the thread (only the title), but he WILL NOT represent value for anyone drafting after their last preseason game. I had him at WR #13 about a month ago, maybe moving him up a notch or two now (in PPR).
Ro3384, are you in a 10 team or 12 team league?"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league.
Nah, talk all you want, he's already on my team as WR2!!!!!oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
10. In a 12 I would conceed and say that yes he makes a solid #2 WRRo3384, are you in a 10 team or 12 team league?"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league.
That is probably why you got some static in this thread.When stating that a WR19 is a "bottom of the barrel" WR2, it is probably helpful to clarify that you are referring to a 10-team league. While 10-teamers are common, I would guess that at least 65% of the posts in the Shark Pool are directed towards 12-team leagues.You should always assume your Shark Pool audience thinks you are talking about 12-team leagues unless you clarify.10. In a 12 I would conceed and say that yes he makes a solid #2 WRRo3384, are you in a 10 team or 12 team league?"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league.
That would have made an interesting thread a little while back, but with everyone in draft mode now, I'd expect people wouldn't be as willing to offer their favorite candidates.The Ref said:Sorry man, The Mason Train already left the station the moment McNair was traded, and it's been picking up steam this preseason.He's my main groan canidate for 2006. He's going to be the guy you take a half a round early then the book says and everyone in the room is going to groan about it.oddball said:Mods, please delete this thread....and all mention of Derrick Mason in the past and the future. Everyone, just hush up!![]()
Yeah, actually a lot of games in my league are decided by a few points. Every point matters, especially in a money leagueMoss finsihed behind Mason, yes, but Moss also didn't play every game last season. I distinctly remember him starting in some games just to keep his consecutive start streak alive- or whatever that was. I think it was against GB where he started the first play and then was taken out. I thought that was pretty cheap. Moss was hampered by injury and on a new team... you can put money on it that Moss is better this season (but maybe not after watching Aaron Brooks....)Here's my top 20 WR this season (and I'm not hear to debate them, just listing off who I think is better than Mason)C. JohnsonTOFitzgeraldHoltSmithHarrisonR. MossRoy WilliamsChambersBoldinWardBurressA. JohnsonDriverWayneS. MossHoushmandzadehJ. WalkerGallowayBranch (if he ever reports)Mason at 21If you disagree, then we can agree to disagree. I just don't think he's as solid #2 WR as people are making him to be. His ADP is better than a lot of those in my top 20 as far as value goes. If you can get him fairly late, then that's awesome. Good steal for you... I just think a lot of people in this thread are talking him up like he's going to be a 10-15 WR, I just don't see that happening with the WRs I listed above himThe difference between a "Bottom of the barrel" WR2 like Mason, and a "solid" WR2 like Houshmanzadeh or Glenn was roughly one point a game.Are the games in your league that close?Besides, Moss and Wayne were probably drafted way ahead of Mason and they finished behind him with Boller as QB. No offense, but I am still not sold on your argument.
LOL at this guy talking about a 10 team league when everyone else is discussing a standard 12 team league. I won't go as far to make the comment he made to me yesterday..."Sheesh, it's people like this that shouldn't be allowed to breed...", but I will sort everything he has to the proper pile...the trash heap.That is probably why you got some static in this thread.When stating that a WR19 is a "bottom of the barrel" WR2, it is probably helpful to clarify that you are referring to a 10-team league. While 10-teamers are common, I would guess that at least 65% of the posts in the Shark Pool are directed towards 12-team leagues.You should always assume your Shark Pool audience thinks you are talking about 12-team leagues unless you clarify.10. In a 12 I would conceed and say that yes he makes a solid #2 WRRo3384, are you in a 10 team or 12 team league?"Solid" #2 WR? Sorry, but WR19 makes for a "bottom of the barrel" #2 WR. a "solid" WR2 is someone in the 11-15 range. In my league last season, Kennison and McCardell scored above and below Mason... finishing off the top 20 in my league.