I get the MBrown hate trust me. I'm still surprised so many people are on Palmer's side on this.
He thinks he should be able to ignore his contract, demand a trade, and then dictate which team (or small list of teams) he gets traded to. What other player is even trying that? Would anybody else in the league have universal backing that doing that is OK? Vincent Jackson got crushed by fans/press for half as much.
He didn't sign a contract to be miserable. There was an awesome rant once about a Lions fan saying he was going to sue because he bought his season tickets expecting to see a competition and his team doesn't compete or even try to. Yeah it was a rant and to be taken with a huge grain of salt, but what is Carson genuinely guaranteed?
Pick a CBA article from the last CBA and it most assuredly mentions how owners are crying that they do not want guaranteed contracts. This is a cake and eat it too thing.
I joked about Elvis earlier. Barry retired fairly early. Wasn't it Calvin Johnson who has lost more games as a Lion than in peewee, HS, and college combined. What's that? 15 years?
Carson has watched the roster turnover so many times. He's watched the coaches change, the OC change etc.
A few years ago it felt like who hasn't been arrested in Cincy, not who has.
When is it that Carson has persevered through enough and he's able to move on? When he's so old he can't play anymore? The system does allow a trap of sorts with the franchise and transitional tags so even if his contract is done, he can be forced to stay.
If Carson wrecks his knee (which he did years ago) his career could be over and he isn't guaranteed to make five to ten years worth of a salary. (Whatever you think he has left in his career)
Why does Mike Brown get a guarantee, but Carson doesn't? Shouldn't he be allowed to play for a winner after putting in X amount of time doing all he could to make his team better?