Did the Bears defense send a message to Benson?
August 8, 2006
Brian Urlacher and Mike Brown of the Chicago Bears defense would never admit it publicly, but I believe, and will always believe, that the hit they put on Cedric Benson in a team practice last weekend had a message behind it.
Players get hurt in training camp, but for the most part, it is usually on a bad cut on the surface that blows out a knee, or a twisted ankle. It's usually not a three-week minimum injury from a combination hit that causes a dislocated and sprained shoulder.
Terrell Owens did not get hurt last week from contact. Brian Finneran of the Falcons and LeCharles Bentley of the Cleveland Browns both suffered season ending injuries, and both seem to be typical, normal football deals.
I would never be anyone to fuel the fire of a controversy (yeah, OK), and while I did not actually see the hit, it's hard to tell if there was any extra intent other than pure, physical football. However, that's just the problem! Since when did teams with Super Bowl aspirations, with two veteran leaders like Brown and Urlacher, pop the starting running back hard enough to cause a pretty fair amount of damage during a practice early in camp?
I know freak things can happen, and football is a game played by men, not boys for the most part. So I could very well be barking at the moon here, but I'm not the only one who feels this way. I think most Bears fans have their suspicions as well.
Cedric Benson did not endear himself to teammates last year by having a ridiculously long contract holdout that cost him any chance at having the starting job. After he got his money, he had some decent productive spurts, but also got hurt. From what I'm told was not well liked in the locker room.
I would never applaud any intentional injury of a player, certainly not a teammate, but this just smells fishy, doesn't it? I wouldn't have come to this conclusion, if not for another oddity.
The Bears clearly dangled leading rusher Thomas Jones during the offseason, almost making a deal with the Indianapolis Colts. The Bears, Lovie Smith and Ron Turner want Benson's more physical nature to be the identity of the Bears backfield. They figure he can pound away and soften up a defense much more easily than Jones can.
Here's the problem: Benson hasn't proven a damn thing, and say what you will about Jones' style, but he sure is pretty productive. Could you ever imagine a running back that puts up over 1,300 rushing yards and some more in catches, plus nine touchdowns, getting benched in favor of a prima donna, second-year player?
It's one thing to get benched because of production, but unless I'm missing something here, those numbers are pretty healthy. He did all of this without a legitimate quarterback for almost the entire season.
Want more to bite on? Supposedly, one of the main reasons for the move is because Jones missed some voluntary workouts over the offseason. Boo-freaking hoo! NFL players miss voluntary workouts all the time.
Were Urlacher and Brown, who are pretty smart cookies, trying to send a message to Benson that he isn't well-liked in the Windy City? Could they be forcing the Bears' coaching staff into having no choice other than Jones as the starter on opening day? They'll deny it all day long, but just because they would deny it, doesn't mean it didn't feel good and there wasn't a little extra purpose behind it.