What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Childress's 1st year (1 Viewer)

I see your point, and I think he chose to run it his way whether they fit in or not. That doesn't make him a bad play caller. If he has better talent and calls the same plays, what happens? I would expect to see better results. If someone was going to come in here and try to really change things, why would he be flexible to players who won't be around for the long term?
I do see your point about not being flexible with players that won't be around, but only to a certain extent. Who on the offense in around for the long term? QB? Nope. WRs? Except for Williamson (and even that is starting to look iffy), nope. TEs? Nope. Chester? Maybe. Really, the only players going long term on the O side are on the line. Does changing the offensive game plan make any effect on them? Probably more than I would give credit for, but certainly not to the point where Chili is going to set them a year back by being a little more creative with the play calling.
I think in terms of who's going to be around, obviously it's a core group of guys on the team as a whole. Keving Williams, Hutch, McKinnie, Winfield, etc...This seems like the old school approach to me. He's going to break them down and try to build a solid core to fill in around. To be successful, those core guys have to buy in. The ones that don't will be moved on. He's the boss though. He's running his system his way. If you're not good enough, or don't like it, someone else will always be ready to take your job. You had better perform and be a team player, or else. I've got no problem with this and fully understand to pull it off, it will take a couple of seasons. Hopefully this season was rock bottom.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see your point, and I think he chose to run it his way whether they fit in or not. That doesn't make him a bad play caller. If he has better talent and calls the same plays, what happens? I would expect to see better results. If someone was going to come in here and try to really change things, why would he be flexible to players who won't be around for the long term?
Well, then lets go back to my complaint about the playcalling. My original complaint was they did too much run-run-pass-punt. The offensive line and running back were not the major problems with the offense. If that is the offense he wanted to go with, and would run if he had all the talent he wanted, it still wasnt creative enough. The only thing would be that if he had the QB he really wanted, then he would have given him more freedom to audible and that would have created more opportunities. But, if that was the case, why start Johnson at all when all he brings to the table is a veteran presence?
Forgot about this part. Which would you rather see? Trying to run against a defense stacked because all your receiving options are poor. Trying to pass against a stacked defense even though your receiving options are poor. Does it matter if you run for little or no gain, or see a pass caught/dropped for little or no gain? I'm all for passing on 1st and 2nd down to mix it up, but your not reinventing the wheel.
 
BadI'm already pretty tired of Childress. With all due respect to his credentials, this is a guy who went from not even calling offensive plays to virtually running things (including calling plays) in Minnesota. They basically did a whole KFAN show yesterday discussing his failures. Nutshell version:(1) His mantra coming in was this team will not beat itself. Result? Vikes led the league in penalties. Is all of this attributable to him? No. His players apparently still don't know how to line up 15 games in, however.(2) He had an entire offseason to review roughly 15 years of Brad Johnson game tapes and determined he would be a good fit to lead the Childress offense. Result? Brad Johnson had a catagorically horrid season. Childress holds 100% accountability here as he was the one who hitched his cart to BJ instead of pursuing FA QBs such as Brees/McNair (for starters). Still, at the end of the season Childress has the audacity to refer to his predictable "take no chances" offensive scheme as a "kick ###" offense. (3) The team started off 2006 going 4-2, beating teams it arguably should have lost to. It ended the season on a huge slide, losing to teams it should have beat. You'd expect the opposite to hold true for a coach destined for success, as it suggests the team is going backwards rather than getting more comfortable in Childress' scheme.(4) Not a fan of the ego. This is a guy who treats every team issue as a matter of national security... whether it is why a player was deactivated after not being on the injury list or whether he'll be starting a rookie or a horrible existing starter for the next game. Sorry Chilly (or "secret squirrel" as certain KFAN personalities call him), an irrelevant NFL team is not important enough for such secrecy. To me the Culpepper fallout was a ramification of ego. Marcus Robinson mysteriously being cut in week 16 is another shimmering example of ego. Most any other coach would have allowed the final game to pass and walked away from an unwelcome player without much ado. Not Childress, need to make a statement here over this NFL veteran who was ten times better than the other crud he had at WR. To me a guy has to do something before he gets to toss his ego around and act more important than he is. He hasn't done a single thing particularly well yet, outside of hiring Mike Tomlin as DC. Bottom line, this is a team that was 9-7 with less talent under Mike Tice.
:popcorn: I agree wholeheartedly with all of your points. I think we were spoiled by the anti-secrecy of Mike Tice which we are all now used to, and now the game of "competitive advantages" is getting old. He learned from Andy Reid, and while Reid is tight lipped on some information, he isn't a wet dish rag like Childress is.
The Mike Tice that refused to sign Donald Driver when he was a FA several years ago? :D That Mike Tice?
 
This is one of the best threads, devoid of the seemingly incessant smart-### baloney, that I've read around here in a long time. It summed up the 2006 Vikings and the Vikings fan experience perfectly.

Major Brad embodies the new generation of head coaches (Nick Saban, Bill Belichick, etc.) that infect the NFL today. Arrogant, condescending control freaks who treat the media as the enemy and their customers, the fans, as a nusiance. It's tolerated if you win, but wears thin quickly when you lose.

Chilly's play calling this year was atrocious, dreadful. George Allen / Chuck Knox conservative. Beyond the typical "1st down run behind Hutch, 2nd down run behind Hutch, 3rd down short pass short of the sticks hoping to break a tackle" play-calling was his unwillingness to go for the throat against superior oppoenents.

I can't recall how many times (multiple) the Vikings would effectively move the ball into scoring position on their opening drive with a semi-creative blend of passing and running, only to go back into the "run-run-pass" shell and ultimately settle for a field goal, keeping their opponent in the game.

Chester Taylor was signed to be their Priest Holmes and was clearly their best weapon on offense, yet was rarely used effectively, ala Holmes, by being creatively placed in space on the perimeter to use his speed and explosiveness. Instead he was run squarely between the tackles, where eight defenders were waiting, 95% of the time. Disgusting. And that's coaching.

The Vikings have personnel work to be done, for sure. But Childress' feet deserve to be held to the fire for his numerous, legitmate blunders in his handling of the offense. His relationship with the media will only hasten his departure if things don't improve next year.

 
To answer the question: Neutral

I know I haven't enjoyed watching the Vikings this season - they are BORING (I have missed about 4 games this season due to family commitments - I'll save the wife "bashing" on this issue for the FFA - and a cable company that conveniently added the NFL network the day AFTER the Viking/Packer game - maybe this was a blessing in disguise, but I digress), but Childress has taken over a team that was built on down the field passing and tried to mold them into his short passing scheme which is not a one year task. He runs the same offense that the Eagles do and they are having success. Mewelde has the same playmaking ability as Westbrook, so the short passes can be turned into long plays rather easily, but people don't call out Reid (Morningwheg) for this because the plays are broken for big gains.

I have complained about the conservative play calling but I can remember everyone calling for his head for throwing deep on 4th and short against the Bears (1st game), this was definitely NOT conservative play calling - maybe not the best call in the world but you can't say it was boring. After that play, his play calling really went to the conservative side.

I can give the guy this year to get personnel straightened out into his style, so I am expecting better things next year. If the defense performs on par to this season (hopefully pass defense gets better - at least a little), then I am expecting big things from this team. If they can at least score a TD or two a game they will add 4 victories to this year's total.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question for the people giving Childress a C/Neutral or above, What are your expectations for next season?

A return to Tice Era 7-9 to 9-7 mediocrity or a big jump to double digit wins and NFC North contention or more of the same Kick ### 4 to 6 win type season?

I suspect we are looking at blackouts and fan apathy next season. I don't think that is why the Wilfs are throwing money down a hole in Winter Park and it will not get a Viking stadium even in the door with the new legislature. When Chilly took the job he said he wanted the Vikings job because they were the most ready to win now. The defense has played well enough to win 10+ games. The fact that the Vikes did not have the offensive weapons this year fall on the front office and defacto GM Childress and the coaches scheme that 14 games into the season he figured out was not working/did not have the personnel to work.

I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This recent article by Seifert pretty much explains why the team has looked so flat all year. I don't have high hopes for things changing in '07.

Coach casts frosty aura

Vikings players offered mixed reviews in assessing their relationships with first-year coach Brad Childress, but most all acknowledged the aloofness he portrays in public carries over to the locker room.

By Kevin Seifert, Star Tribune

Oct. 22 was a happy day for the Vikings, perhaps the high point of their season. They trounced the defending NFC champion Seattle Seahawks 31-13 at noisy Qwest Field, proclaiming themselves a force in the conference playoff hunt.

Afterward, coach Brad Childress gathered his players in the locker room. He congratulated them for the victory, according to those who were present, but reminded them it would not count for much if they lost the following week to New England. Then, continuing in his monotone, Childress announced the next day would be a "Victory Monday."

Except for a few awkward claps, the room was silent. In the NFL, "Victory Monday" normally means consecutive days off -- Monday and Tuesday -- following a big win. But after 10 months of Childress' tenure, players had learned not to assume anything about his methods and did not know if "Victory Monday" was reward or punishment.

As it turned out, players received a reduced workload but still had to report for conditioning during that 48-hour span. The scene illustrates the Vikings' slow adjustment to Childress in his first season as coach, one that has been marred by personality clashes and offensive struggles on the way to a 6-9 record entering today's season finale against St. Louis.

The Christmas Eve release of receiver Marcus Robinson raised new questions about Childress' relationship with his players. In a moment of frustration, quarterback Brad Johnson said earlier this month that he and Childress "never talk," and interviews with more than a dozen players last week suggested Childress' arrival has been met with mixed reviews.

Some players requested anonymity, fearing retribution after witnessing Robinson's surprising departure. One used the word "cold" to describe the team's daily working environment, while another referred to a constant "uneasiness" that some players feel in Childress' program. Both players said his demeanor with them is identical to the detached persona he displays in public and with the media.

Others acknowledged their minimal relationship with Childress but downplayed its significance. Cornerback Antoine Winfield, who reached a truce with Childress after publicly criticizing the offense, said: "I've been in this league long enough to know you don't have to be friends. You just have to be business partners."

Childress said last week that "change is tough and not always comfortable for everybody" but has turned down requests for interviews. As his first season concludes today, he enjoys full support from owner Zygi Wilf and seems prepared to retrofit the roster this offseason to better fit his approach.

"There's been an adjustment period," center Matt Birk said. "You'd like to think that you come in and learn everything and that it would be seamless. It turns out it hasn't been. That's too bad, because everybody had high hopes. Our record is going to be worse than it was last year, so it's going to look like this season is a failure.

"No one should be giving us a free pass, but when you've got new coaches and everything else, and you want to win a Super Bowl championship, you have to look long-term. That stuff doesn't normally happen overnight."

'You guys'

Last spring, Childress described how he would handle players as a head coach.

"It's like I tell my kids when I'm disciplining them," he said. "I'm not your friend. I'm your dad. And so there's a certain protocol that the dad has to pay attention to. ... There are certain things that have to happen. Sometimes they're not all pleasant for everybody, but they have to happen. It's part of the job."

Childress has proved true to his word. He occasionally makes small talk -- "more than Dennis Green, less than Mike Tice," Birk said -- and meets weekly with a leadership council of nine or 10 players.

Robinson, on the other hand, described his relationship with Childress as "a total lack of communication" and said he was not the only player who felt that way. None of the players interviewed professed to have a strong relationship with Childress but some questioned the importance of such a connection.

"I don't look at it as a big deal," Winfield said. "The only person I need to be on the same page with is the players I'm with on the field. Coaches relay our assignments and everything, but off the field, not talking to us and stuff like that, that doesn't bother me.

"We all have a job to do. It's a business. It's always good when you do have a good relationship with a coach. But as long as the players are on the same page, all you have to do is give me my assignment and everything else is cool."

Nevertheless, like many new coaches, Childress has caused hard feelings on several occasions. He has chastised players at least five times after newspapers reported information about injuries or changes to the starting lineup, in essence accusing them of leaking the information. He also has upset several players by referring to them as "you guys" during team meetings and "those guys" in media interviews rather than the generic "we."

Such minor issues have melted away over time, defensive tackle Pat Williams said.

"This offseason when the coaches first came here," Williams said, "a lot of guys' eyes opened because they had different kind of rules and the way they did things. But everybody understands it now and is doing better with it. I think they need to change some little stuff and everything will be a lot better."

But irritation reached a higher level when Childress said publicly that one of the team's top problems was execution -- in other words, players not doing their jobs. Two players said they felt teammates were being "thrown under the bus" for failures that extended beyond simple execution.

Birk, for one, did not go nearly that far but said that football is always a team game.

"Every play that gets drawn up on the blackboard works on the blackboard," Birk said. "When it doesn't work, there is plenty of blame to go around. There's not a player that can say, 'I'm executing the way it's supposed to be done and it's not working.' But just like there's ownership in success, there has to be ownership in failure, too."

Isolation chamber

Childress' clinical personality has not lent itself to traditional motivation or emotional speeches. The player who referred to the Vikings this season as "cold" said Childress' typical pregame message is " 'Go out there, do the job and win the game.' "

The only known outburst came Oct. 8 game against Detroit, when running backs coach Eric Bieniemy delivered a fiery halftime speech. Otherwise, Childress relies on players to motivate themselves.

"You are who you are," Birk said. "You can't be a rah-rah guy if you're not. I believe that for the long term, a player has to be self-motivated. Every week, a coach can't give you a 'Win one for the Gipper' speech. Would I classify him as 'rah-rah'? No. But he is passionate about football, about his system, and I think he has conviction when he talks about it. That's something players should feed off."

The buttoned-down approach includes players' daily experience at Winter Park, where Childress has limited their contact with outsiders during work hours. Access to the first floor of Winter Park, which houses the locker room and player lounge, has been so restricted that even team employees are prohibited from entering except for designated hours.

Salesmen, corporate sponsors and other longtime visitors also have been turned away, and until midseason the Vikings did not allow caterers into the locker room to provide their traditional Friday lunch.

One of the players who requested anonymity questioned the intent of such restrictions and said it contributes to the "cold" environment.

"There are not many people around," the player said. "It's not like a dictatorship, but it's just kind of 'blah.' There is no emotion. It's just 'blah' and cold and no emotion, the way we practice and in games and the way everybody is talked to."

Long snapper Cullen Loeffler, who signed a five-year contract extension earlier this season, is among those who appreciate the limited access.

"You can be around your players and form a better bond," Loeffler said. "That's what Coach Childress has been trying to implement all year. You don't just have people coming in and out. A lot of times [in previous years] we've had people coming in and out that we had no clue who they were. That can be frustrating to players in the locker room. He allows for the players to do their thing."

Thanks for the suggestion

With the Vikings trailing 10-3 at halftime of the Oct. 8 game against the Lions, coaches asked a prominent offensive player what he had seen on the field. According to two people who witnessed it, the offensive player -- whose own name is withheld to protect him from retribution -- responded that his opinion didn't matter because he knew it would not impact the coaches' approach in the second half.

In that game, the Vikings took more than two quarters to adjust to a relatively simple defensive adjustment the Lions had implemented that day. The incident highlights a season-long complaint from many offensive players: While defensive coordinator Mike Tomlin maintains an open-door policy, well-meaning suggestions to offensive coaches were rarely heeded.

Even as the Vikings offense went without a touchdown in six games this season, Robinson said "nothing happened" when he offered input. Robinson and other players said Childress often uses the phrase "non-negotiable" when speaking about his scheme, suggesting there is little room for adjustment. His audible package limited Johnson, known as one of the league's most knowledgeable game managers, and even casual observers can recognize that the offense has remained largely intact despite its failures this season.

"There are veteran guys around here that have had success doing other things other ways," Birk said. "You might try to put in your two cents, but at the end of the day the head coach is the boss and he has his plan in. I agree that you have to stick with your plan especially when things are going tough. You can't make everybody happy and take everybody's input.

"He's the head coach and he's the boss. As players, our job is to do what they tell us to the best of our ability."

Teams often take on the personality of their head coach, and if anything, the Vikings have assumed Childress' corporate approach this season.

"This is all a business," Williams said. "We still have fun playing the game, but it's turned mostly to a business. Some things have happened out of the blue this year, but that happens all the time in business. So you have to move on and get ready for the next thing."

 
O.K. I have been away for a while and just got caught up on this thread and one huge thing seems to be missing to me. Everyone talks about the lack of WR talent and not having a TE that fits his system, etc. What I want to know is why his "system" is so inflexible that it cannot adapt to the players that are here.

The team went 9-7 with noodle-armed Johnson (and a horrible C-Pep) and the same basic ball catchers (minus KRob). When Johnson entered the games late in the season, the team made adjustments to the offense, sitting Johnson down and finding out what he wanted to do. The system morphed to the players that were here. Bad example because is was idiot Tice coaching? Think about the switch from Bledsoe to Brady in NE. Adjustments to the offense were made. How about the Jets this year? Do you think Mangini hasn't made changes to his original offensive system? Of course he has. Did Brian Billick run the same offense in Baltimore that he ran in Minnesota with Moss and company? No. He had to make adjustments. Why can't Childress make changes?

Your best receiver is Wiggins. If your offense isn't geared to the TE, then split him wide, or be creative and run plays for him! His numbers are a discrace to the coaching staff this year! He led them in receptions the last two seasons. ADJUST!!!

How about halftime adjustments? The adjustments that were made by the Vikings were completely ineffective. The second half of games were as painful to watch as the first half.

So in conclusion, what bugs me most about Childress is his complete lack of flexibility as a head coach. :thumbup: :bag: :excited:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BadI'm already pretty tired of Childress. With all due respect to his credentials, this is a guy who went from not even calling offensive plays to virtually running things (including calling plays) in Minnesota. They basically did a whole KFAN show yesterday discussing his failures. Nutshell version:(1) His mantra coming in was this team will not beat itself. Result? Vikes led the league in penalties. Is all of this attributable to him? No. His players apparently still don't know how to line up 15 games in, however.(2) He had an entire offseason to review roughly 15 years of Brad Johnson game tapes and determined he would be a good fit to lead the Childress offense. Result? Brad Johnson had a catagorically horrid season. Childress holds 100% accountability here as he was the one who hitched his cart to BJ instead of pursuing FA QBs such as Brees/McNair (for starters). Still, at the end of the season Childress has the audacity to refer to his predictable "take no chances" offensive scheme as a "kick ###" offense. (3) The team started off 2006 going 4-2, beating teams it arguably should have lost to. It ended the season on a huge slide, losing to teams it should have beat. You'd expect the opposite to hold true for a coach destined for success, as it suggests the team is going backwards rather than getting more comfortable in Childress' scheme.(4) Not a fan of the ego. This is a guy who treats every team issue as a matter of national security... whether it is why a player was deactivated after not being on the injury list or whether he'll be starting a rookie or a horrible existing starter for the next game. Sorry Chilly (or "secret squirrel" as certain KFAN personalities call him), an irrelevant NFL team is not important enough for such secrecy. To me the Culpepper fallout was a ramification of ego. Marcus Robinson mysteriously being cut in week 16 is another shimmering example of ego. Most any other coach would have allowed the final game to pass and walked away from an unwelcome player without much ado. Not Childress, need to make a statement here over this NFL veteran who was ten times better than the other crud he had at WR. To me a guy has to do something before he gets to toss his ego around and act more important than he is. He hasn't done a single thing particularly well yet, outside of hiring Mike Tomlin as DC. Bottom line, this is a team that was 9-7 with less talent under Mike Tice.
:goodposting: I agree wholeheartedly with all of your points. I think we were spoiled by the anti-secrecy of Mike Tice which we are all now used to, and now the game of "competitive advantages" is getting old. He learned from Andy Reid, and while Reid is tight lipped on some information, he isn't a wet dish rag like Childress is.
The Mike Tice that refused to sign Donald Driver when he was a FA several years ago? :mellow: That Mike Tice?
:confused: I don't know what you are talking about. As I recall, Driver didn't want to come here, but I have been wrong before.The point I was making is that Tice told it like it was. He would go on his TV show on Sunday nights and his radio show on Wednesdays and you knew which guys were injured, you knew who screwed up during the game and you knew where the head coach stood on many issues. When Randy Moss threw an interception on an end around and everyone was screaming, he said "That was on me. I thought it was a good idea at the time." I respected that. I am not a Tice appologist. I don't want people to think that I think he was a great coach. I just like knowing about the team I root for. Childress is difficult to listen to, seems aloof, and arrogant. I have a hard time rooting for someone like that.
 
Nice article in today's Pioneer Press: LINK

Year One of the Brad Childress Era ends today at the Metrodome.

While his team plays for "momentum" heading into the offseason, former Vikings offensive coordinator Scott Linehan's St. Louis Rams still are playing for an NFC playoff spot.

Childress' "plum job" shriveled into a prune, and the Vikings' underachievement this season has fans calling for his job, and players grumbling about his leadership style and offensive system.

Yet in the midst of all the chaos, Childress is unfazed by the criticism, and unshakeable in his commitment to the plan he unveiled to owner Zygi Wilf nearly a year ago.

Childress and Wilf declined to comment for this story.

But agent Bob LaMonte said his client witnessed one of the NFL's most painful rebuilding projects, and Childress will not budge from the course he crafted over nearly three decades as an assistant coach.

"No one understands what it's like to stick to a plan," said LaMonte, whose clients include Mike Holmgren of the Seattle Seahawks, Andy Reid of the Philadelphia Eagles, John Fox of the Carolina Panthers, Jon Gruden of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Charlie Weis of Notre Dame. "America is a quick-fix nation. All we want to do is take a pill to drop weight, and if it doesn't work in 24 hours, then abandon it.

"The Vikings' ship really sailed in the early 2000s. Those are teams that should have potentially won Super Bowls, and at least been to several," LaMonte said. "He's bringing in a new ship, and he's landed, but it's going to take time."

But can Childress clean up his decks and keep his crew from jumping ship?

Here's a closer look at his first season as the Vikings coach:

HIS WAY

Players quickly recognized that Childress would be the anti-Mike Tice. Childress rarely smiled, let alone cracked a joke, and he imposed his will throughout Winter Park. He "encouraged" players to attend the offseason conditioning program, and he pushed them through one of the league's most physical training camps.

So when the veterans committee was formed, players hoped they finally had a forum to express their concerns. Those players met with Childress on Wednesdays, and they talked about that week's schedule and points of emphasis.

Childress wanted feedback and suggestions, and one kept cropping up: padded practices. After a grueling training camp, players asked their peers on the committee to encourage Childress to pull back during the season. But each week passed, and the padded sessions continued.

So what is the committee's legacy?

Chicken tenders on the team charter flight home.

"Little things he really looked out for us on," said linebacker E.J. Henderson, one of the committee members.

For instance, in addition to chicken tenders as an alternative to hamburgers on the airplane, Henderson said Childress also allowed them to have catered food on Fridays laid out on tables in the locker room instead of in the cafeteria.

But Childress didn't address their requests to shorten meetings or fly to away games earlier to provide more free time there. He also wouldn't budge on practices.

"We kind of gave up on trying to talk him out of that," Henderson said of reducing the number of padded practices. "He had his schedule set for when we were going to be in pads and when we weren't."

Safety Darren Sharper was on a similar committee in Green Bay, and he said they are very comparable.

"It was a good medium, to have the guys on the committee filter stuff that we were going to do that week," said Sharper, who also is on the Vikings' committee. "But most of the time, it was us relaying messages to the team, as far as scheduling, and that kind of thing."

"He has his ideas, and he has things he's going to go on," said tight end Jermaine Wiggins, another committee member, "and that's pretty much what it's going to be."

While his goal of fielding a disciplined team that doesn't beat itself didn't materialize this season (the Vikings lead the league in penalties and are tied for eighth in turnovers), Childress did address the character of his players and holding them accountable for their actions.

"There were less distractions, as far as discipline," left tackle Bryant McKinnie said.

During the exhibition season, Childress backed up his "culture of accountability" speech by releasing receiver Koren Robinson after his highly-publicized DWI arrest, despite pleas from some players to give him another chance.

More recently, Childress cut receiver Marcus Robinson, a popular veteran who led the Vikings in touchdown catches. Players have wondered about the timing of the move — Robinson was informed on Christmas Eve — and whether the receiver's questioning of the offense and communication of Childress led to his dismissal.

"It just goes to show that no one is above the team," said one player, who wished to remain anonymous. "If you say anything bad, you can get your walking papers."

TWO WORLDS

After his release, Robinson insisted that communication was his biggest issue with Childress. The receiver said he didn't know whether he was playing until he saw his shoulder pads in his locker on game days.

"I think communication is a key for everybody," Robinson said. "It's hard enough to get that many guys to buy into a system and do the right thing. You have to be able to communicate with every guy.

"Players are going to listen to other players quicker than they're going to listen to a coach," Robinson said. "Mike Tice could always communicate with you. He listened. Even if he made his own decision, you felt he listened to you."

Tice also afforded his veterans more clout, and he asked for their input. That was one of the primary differences between Childress and veteran quarterback Brad Johnson, who declined to be interviewed for this story.

Johnson signed a four-year deal with the Vikings last year, partly because of his relationship with Tice, and the quarterback's insight was welcomed in 2005.

This season, Childress insisted on Johnson executing the offense the coach's way.

Johnson likely will be released during the offseason and is expected to pursue an opportunity to play elsewhere.

McKinnie said Childress had a "vision" for his West Coast offense.

"He knows what he has in mind, and he wants to run it the way he has it planned out," McKinnie said. "He has a vision, and he wants everyone else to follow his lead."

McKinnie said the transition from Tice's offense to Childress' took time.

"Some people don't like change, and it takes a while for people to come around. I think eventually we got better," Mc-Kinnie said. "But it took time, because a lot of stuff we did was different."

Wiggins didn't mind change. But he grew frustrated with his role when the team was struggling to score and losing games.

Wiggins, who led the Vikings in receptions in 2004 and '05, suggested ways he could help the offense. But he says he was rebuffed.

"Believe me, I let people know what I can do," Wiggins said. "You know, I've kind of put my two cents in. But I just go out there and do what I'm asked to do. And if I catch one ball, I catch one ball. I definitely feel I could have done a lot more, but we go in a different direction."

The defense was run differently, and players on that side of the ball said they could not relate to the frustrations of their offensive teammates.

Henderson said Childress empowered coordinator Mike Tomlin to "basically be the head coach of the defense."

"He kind of stays away and lets him run the show," Henderson said. "Some offensive (head) coaches want to stick their head in and put their input in."

Tice was one of those head coaches, Henderson said.

"He did it, when things were rocky with the defense," Henderson said of Tice. "He felt he needed to dip in and dip out."

Players said Childress does not meddle with the defense.

Players said there are no issues with knowing who is active on the defense, with that made clear on a depth chart and in practices on Wednesdays.

"(Tomlin) has been the same the whole year, even during the four-game losing streak," cornerback Antoine Winfield said. "Mike Tomlin just holds everyone to one standard. The one thing he says: 'Make sure your tape is hot.' "

WARM AND FUZZY?

Some players groan that Childress is hard to read and not too genial. But many of those same players admitted that Childress repeatedly has said he has an "open-door" policy.

When he was placed on the physically unable to perform list at the start of training camp, veteran defensive tackle Pat Williams said he was "angry" with Childress. But the two talked about their differences.

"He explained to me why he was doing it, and I told him what I think," Williams said. "After that, we were on the same page."

Now, they joke with each other before practices, Williams said.

Guard Artis Hicks has played for Childress longer than any other Viking, and he said the coach knows a lot about his personal life.

Hicks requested a meeting with the coach two days before the Vikings' game against the Green Bay Packers on a Thursday night.

"I was skeptical of how that was going to go, because we had that Thursday night game," Hicks said.

During the meeting, Hicks told Childress that he was about to become a father.

"He was like, 'That's the most important thing in the world. Take care of your responsibilities, and cherish that moment,' " Hicks said. "He was there for the birth of his kids, and he wanted me to have that same experience. That really meant a lot to me."

The two talked for 20 minutes.

STAKE IN PHILLY

In 1999, Childress accepted rookie head coach Andy Reid's offer to become the offensive coordinator of the Philadelphia Eagles. Coming off a 3-13 season, the Eagles' offense — and the entire team — was in shambles.

The Eagles lost their first four games that season, and fans threw batteries and expletives on Reid as he entered the locker room of Veterans Stadium trailing 10-0 to the Dallas Cowboys. The offense, which followed Reid's play calling, failed to get a single first down.

"Philadelphia is one of the most negative (NFL) cities," LaMonte said. "They booed Santa Claus. Every paper said he should be fired, and that (the Eagles) hired the wrong guy."

Spurred by a fumble forced and recovered by the defense, the Eagles rallied to win 13-10.

"He let them know, he was going to do it his way," LaMonte said of Reid. "The leader has to know the plan."

LaMonte, who talks to Childress once a week, said his client is well aware of Reid's experiences in Philadelphia.

"Brad is fine," LaMonte said. "Brad lived this. He saw Andy in Philadelphia."

Reid made unpopular decisions, like releasing popular veteran defensive lineman Bill Johnson, and he resisted demands to start Donovan McNabb, the second overall pick in the 1999 draft before that season.

"I would have played McNabb," LaMonte said. "But I didn't know Andy's plan like Andy did."

LaMonte said Childress, like Reid, knew that the strength of the team was on defense. LaMonte also said the Vikings clearly did not have enough "playmakers" this season.

"If you look at the Vikings and ask 31 organizations, 'Who is their game-breaker?' they'll say zero people," LaMonte said. "There is no game-breaker who can take it to the house. Even if they made the playoffs, they were not good enough. There are no pretenses in Minnesota that this is a great football team."

That is where ownership comes in, LaMonte said, pointing out Wilf as one of the primary reasons Childress chose the Vikings.

"There are two types of owners. There are owners that are Band-Aid owners, and then there are builders," LaMonte said. "The Wilfs are builders. They understand they're in it for the long haul. They understand that you can't get to the moon with the first shot."

THE OUTLOOK

The Vikings may not be popular with the fans right now, but the club will be like the homecoming king in a few months. Free agents — or at least their agents — have taken note of the Wilf way, which is not to use a lack of revenue as excuse for building his franchise. Wilf has rewarded his own players (see Kevin Williams and E.J. Henderson), as well as free agents from other clubs (see Steve Hutchinson).

The Vikings have tapped their salary cap space for 2006, and they're in excellent shape for 2007. The Vikings could increase their salary cap space to about $23 million, a surprisingly high figure given the lucrative contracts the club has handed out recently.

"We've got a lot of talent in place, and I definitely think we have the coaching staff, and good owners, who want to upgrade the facility and the whole franchise," Henderson said. "That's been a long time since that's happened around here. I definitely feel we're headed in the right direction."

The Vikings obviously drafted well, even with their top pick, linebacker Chad Greenway, sidelined for the season with a knee injury, and their free-agent acquisitions performed well. The team needs pick up a veteran quarterback, a defensive end, and some playmaking receivers or tight ends this offseason.

Players are looking forward to next year.

"We didn't win as many games as we wanted to, and we didn't get into the playoffs," Hicks said. "But the most important thing is that you establish a foundation so next year you can build on those things. There were a lot of positives to take from this year."

Williams broke in two rookie head coaches in Buffalo, Mike Mularkey and Gregg Williams, whom the Vikings considered before hiring Childress. But Pat Williams said Childress has them beat.

"Each of them was different," Williams said, "but I think he did a better job than my other coaches did in their first year. If we fix the minor pieces, I think we'll be fine. Next year is going to be our year."

Sean Jensen can be reached at sjensen@pioneerpress.com.
If you don't like Childress, then you will enjoy ANY article in the Pioneer Press by Tom Powers.
 
Joe Senser quits as radio broadcaster due to Childress:

http://www.startribune.com/510/story/908318.html

Former Vikings tight end Joe Senser said Sunday he will not return next season as the team's radio analyst, citing coach Brad Childress' media restrictions as playing a key part in his decision.

"My role as an analyst consists of my ability to interact with players and coaches, and because of Brad Childress' policy relating to watching practice and talking to those inside the organization, my ability to do this job effectively had been severely limited," said Senser, who has served as analyst on KFAN (1130 AM) since the station reacquired the team's rights in 2001.

Childress fulfilled the minimum requirements when it comes to allowing the media to watch practices, and since late October reporters and broadcasters were only given access to special-teams drills. Childress' position coaches are off limits, and coordinators talked only after games and on Thursdays.

Although he played for the Vikings from 1979 to 1984, Senser said his access was no greater than anyone else's. Broadcasters for teams often face fewer restrictions because the team sees its radio affiliate as a partner and the additional access enables announcers to provide better insight during games.

"I'm severely disappointed that we didn't have the ability to really, effectively do this job," Senser said. "I'm disappointed that we were not allowed the opportunity to interact. I do believe Brad Childress will be a very, very good head coach. But I can't wait and stick around for the rules to change. I'll leave that for somebody else."

Senser, 50, was in his second stint and 10th season overall as the Vikings analyst for the all-sports station.

"Joe has done a terrific job," said Mick Anselmo, president/market manager of Clear Channel Radio Twin Cities. "I think he has represented the Vikings and the station very well. He's one of the best people you could know in the Twin Cities. ... Whatever Joe wants to do, I support it."

Anselmo made it clear that if Senser has a change of heart that he would be welcomed back. A replacement probably won't be hired until springtime, and it's possible that sideline reporter Greg Coleman could move to the booth to join play-by-play man Paul Allen. KFAN employs the announcers, but the decisions are made by both the station and the Vikings.

Senser, who owns several sports-themed restaurants in the Twin Cities, was always very clear on the air about his loyalty to the Vikings but also was willing to criticize when necessary. Such was the case during the Vikings' 41-21 loss to St. Louis on Sunday. After Steven Jackson of the Rams ran 59 yards for a fourth-quarter touchdown, Senser called it "embarrassing because there was no effort whatsoever."

But criticizing the team isn't something he enjoys. "In order to do this job effectively you have to be able to criticize, and I'm at the stage of my life where I really don't want to be critical of this organization that I played for and care a lot about," Senser said.

"I have the utmost respect for the Vikings' top management, such as [vice presidents] Kevin Warren and Rob Brzezinski, and realize this situation is out of their hands."

 
More Childress speak a.k.a. "I take responsibility for it being your fault."

More on the play callingTuesday, January 2nd, 2007 At one point during his news conference Tuesday, Brad Childress was asked what he could have done differently.“Probably call better plays that work,” he said. “I’m serious. I know things come down to execution most of the time, but that’s what I would say.”Asked to elaborate, Childress said: “You know what, you always go back on plays that maybe games hinge on. As long as I’ve been doing this you probably unfortunately zero in and remember the negatives more than you remember the positives; the game-changing plays. I can remember a couple of those. [The] call against the Bears to not have that football on the ground. Could you have done something different? Yeah, you could have called a different play, but I guess you can always say that if a play doesn’t work.”Childress was talking about Chester Taylor’s fumble that led to the Bears’ winning touchdown in the first meeting this season. A trap play was called by Childress.
Jerkweed. :thumbup:
 
Seriously. What the heck is this guy saying?!

Childress, Brad Johnson to meetTuesday, January 2nd, 2007 One piece of information Brad Childress offered up at his season-ending news conference was that he was headed upstairs to talk to veteran quarterback Brad Johnson about the future. “He’ll be in the mix if he wants to be here,” Childress said of Johnson. “He’s under contract right.”Childress made it clear that Tarvaris Jackson and Brooks Bollinger are his top two quarterbacks and that if Johnson does return it would be, “in a mentoring role.” If the Vikings bring in a new quarterback Childress said it will be a “developmental guy,” or “lower-round draft pick.”“I don’t think we’re going the free-agent market, we’re not close to thinking about going for a free-agent quarterback,” Childress said. “I like the guys that are here right now. We kept three of the quarterbacks on this squad. If I didn’t feel like there was a viable third, possibly go with two next year.”And here’s a note that won’t make Vikings fans very happy. Right now, he said he plans on continuing to call plays.
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
So tell me how you feel about Artis Hicks.Or the fact that Brooks Bollinger is going to be the starting QB for your Vikings squad next year. :lmao:
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
So tell me how you feel about Artis Hicks.Or the fact that Brooks Bollinger is going to be the starting QB for your Vikings squad next year. :D
Other great examples. Also wasting time bringing in QB Mike McMahon when you are already rolling with an iffy guy like Brad Johnson was a huge red flag for me. One would assume Childress had ample data on all of those guys and should have concluded they were worthless, but he reached the opposite conclusion.
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
McMullen caught 23 passes this season and Baskett caught 22 this year. They both caught 2 TD's and McMullen didn't play near as much as Baskett. I guess I don't see how this was a bad trade for the Vikings?!?!?
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
McMullen caught 23 passes this season and Baskett caught 22 this year. They both caught 2 TD's and McMullen didn't play near as much as Baskett. I guess I don't see how this was a bad trade for the Vikings?!?!?
Ok, it does look like I was a bit off. I'd thought it was 23 recs for Baskett and 22 for McMullen. However, I still feel you are not looking at the big picture if you think there is any evidence the Vikes won that trade. In McMullen's first 3 seasons with literally zero WR competition in Philly he amassed 1, 3 and 18 receptions, playing behid guys like Stinkston. His yardage totals were 2, 24, 268. In Baskett's rookie season he caught 22 for over 464 yards and 2 TDs. I think it is safe to say he has a higher ceiling than McMullen when as a rookie he compiled better stats than McMullen's cumulative 1-3 seasons. 464 yards receiving as a rookie is very impressive IMHO. Time will tell, but what bothers me is that a guy like McMullen would be targetted and traded for at all, rather than being picked off a scrap heap. Effectively giving away a guy many felt to be a viable project made it worse.
 
I would like to see what Hank Baskett looks like since you are cutting MRob for "fresh legs" that can help us in the future.
I'm glad this name got raised in this thread. How Childressesque was it to trade away Hank Baskett (a rookie they liked enough to sign as a street FA) for a proven nobody like Billy McMullen? When Baskett went (surprisingly) undrafted and the Vikes were able to land him as a project, I thought that was a great sign. Trading him away for an absolute nobody still makes little sense to me. I'm guessing we see this sort of "bring in losers I used to work with" time and time again throughout Childress' tenure. Couldn't help but think of that as Baskett was catching 7 balls for 170+ yards and a TD in week 17 of his rookie season. By no means am I saying Baskett is a future pro-bowler, but he caught more balls in his rookie season than McMullen has in any of his 4 NFL seasons. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest Baskett's ceiling is somewhat higher.
McMullen caught 23 passes this season and Baskett caught 22 this year. They both caught 2 TD's and McMullen didn't play near as much as Baskett. I guess I don't see how this was a bad trade for the Vikings?!?!?
Ok, it does look like I was a bit off. I'd thought it was 23 recs for Baskett and 22 for McMullen. However, I still feel you are not looking at the big picture if you think there is any evidence the Vikes won that trade. In McMullen's first 3 seasons with literally zero WR competition in Philly he amassed 1, 3 and 18 receptions, playing behid guys like Stinkston. His yardage totals were 2, 24, 268. In Baskett's rookie season he caught 22 for over 464 yards and 2 TDs. I think it is safe to say he has a higher ceiling than McMullen when as a rookie he compiled better stats than McMullen's cumulative 1-3 seasons. 464 yards receiving as a rookie is very impressive IMHO. Time will tell, but what bothers me is that a guy like McMullen would be targetted and traded for at all, rather than being picked off a scrap heap. Effectively giving away a guy many felt to be a viable project made it worse.
In his first year, Reid brought in some retreads from Green Bay, most notably Doug Pedersen. They all stunk and Reid never did such things again. We'll see if Childress learns the same lesson. The difference, though, is that Reid knew the Iggles weren't going to be competitive in his first year -- they were 3-13 the year before he arrived. So perhaps he wanted to bring in "character guys" to set an example for the young guys around whom he was gonna build the franchise. Whereas Childress and Minny's fans and management thought the Vikes could be competitive this year -- and you can't waste roster spots if that's the case.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top