By how much? .. Same % as when he was playing earlier this year? Less, more? Betts?Definitely increase but Bush will cut into his touches.
Link?Not looking good for the Frenchman. Back in a boot and back on crutches. I wouldn't be surprised if he hits IR at some point. With that said, assuming Bush comes back, what is Ivory's value and should he be sought out?
Really? It's beyond you to see how Bush getting touches will hurt Ivory?Let me see if I can help explain it. There are only so many touches available per game. Every time Bush touches the ball it means that Ivory is not touching the ball. Now it remains to be seen if Ivory does more with his touches because Bush is in the game too, but it's certainly not hard to see how Bush getting touches instead of Ivory could hurt Ivory.I think his value goes up when Bush comes back, not down. Bush opens up the offense and it helps, not hurts anyone. Ivory is a big body who can run downhill and I think will take over for PT from here on in. PT's injury isn't getting any better after all these weeks of waiting. If it's this long to see any incremental improvement, I'd think they should just shut him down.
As an Ivory owner, I heartily welcome back a healthy Reggie Bush. How anyone could see that as a negative is beyond me.
http://www.neworleans.com/sports/...I'm always curious when someone asks for a link. Did you try looking for the info and couldn't find it, or do you distrust the poster?Link?Not looking good for the Frenchman. Back in a boot and back on crutches. I wouldn't be surprised if he hits IR at some point. With that said, assuming Bush comes back, what is Ivory's value and should he be sought out?
If you don't think the return of reggie bush helps Ivory, you have a gross misunderstanding of this saints offense. Having Reggie in the game will help the entire Saints offense, meaning more yards and more points. More important than that it will greatly help the Saints downhill rushing attack. The presence of bush forces opposing defenses to hesitate giving blockers and runners a better chance to be succesaful. Someone here did a writeup on the Vikings game that did a good job of explaining what bush does for this team when he doesn't have the ball. Pierre and Ivory owners should read itReally? It's beyond you to see how Bush getting touches will hurt Ivory?Let me see if I can help explain it. There are only so many touches available per game. Every time Bush touches the ball it means that Ivory is not touching the ball. Now it remains to be seen if Ivory does more with his touches because Bush is in the game too, but it's certainly not hard to see how Bush getting touches instead of Ivory could hurt Ivory.I think his value goes up when Bush comes back, not down. Bush opens up the offense and it helps, not hurts anyone. Ivory is a big body who can run downhill and I think will take over for PT from here on in. PT's injury isn't getting any better after all these weeks of waiting. If it's this long to see any incremental improvement, I'd think they should just shut him down.
As an Ivory owner, I heartily welcome back a healthy Reggie Bush. How anyone could see that as a negative is beyond me.
My personal opinion is that Bush will hurt Betts more than Ivory, as Betts seems to be the RB on obvious passing downs, whereas Ivory seems to be the 1st & 2nd down type back. At best I'd call it a wash for Ivory to have Bush playing, but I still think the odds are it hurts more than helps.
If you don't think the return of reggie bush helps Ivory, you have a gross misunderstanding of this saints offense. Having Reggie in the game will help the entire Saints offense, meaning more yards and more points. More important than that it will greatly help the Saints downhill rushing attack. The presence of bush forces opposing defenses to hesitate giving blockers and runners a better chance to be succesaful. Someone here did a writeup on the Vikings game that did a good job of explaining what bush does for this team when he doesn't have the ball. Pierre and Ivory owners should read itReally? It's beyond you to see how Bush getting touches will hurt Ivory?Let me see if I can help explain it. There are only so many touches available per game. Every time Bush touches the ball it means that Ivory is not touching the ball. Now it remains to be seen if Ivory does more with his touches because Bush is in the game too, but it's certainly not hard to see how Bush getting touches instead of Ivory could hurt Ivory.I think his value goes up when Bush comes back, not down. Bush opens up the offense and it helps, not hurts anyone. Ivory is a big body who can run downhill and I think will take over for PT from here on in. PT's injury isn't getting any better after all these weeks of waiting. If it's this long to see any incremental improvement, I'd think they should just shut him down.
As an Ivory owner, I heartily welcome back a healthy Reggie Bush. How anyone could see that as a negative is beyond me.
My personal opinion is that Bush will hurt Betts more than Ivory, as Betts seems to be the RB on obvious passing downs, whereas Ivory seems to be the 1st & 2nd down type back. At best I'd call it a wash for Ivory to have Bush playing, but I still think the odds are it hurts more than helps.
I agree. But as the bye weeks come and go, I see Bush being more valuable going forward with more overall upside.But who would be the better fantasy player once this happens? I would say Bush in ppr and Ivory in non.
I think people assume Ivory can't pass protect or catch because that's not how they use him, but that's not entirely true. Ive never seen him whiff on a block, and he has done pretty well in pass protection when used that way. I also think he can catch and be used in the receiving game, but I just don't think his routes are sharp enough to run anything more than a screen, but he's caught two passes since he's been with the team one was a poorly thrown ball by Brees that he took 17 yards and they other was a dump off in preseason that went 76The problem is that Ivory doesn't get receptions. He's almost useless in my leagues since they are PPR. They clearly replaced Pierre with a gross combination of Ivory and Betts. Perhaps Ivory can magically learn pass protection in the next couple of weeks and get more receptions - but im not holding my breath.When Reggie comes back, not much will change. He only gets a few rush attempts per game and even those few were likely replacing would-be pass plays.
I think it will come down to either him or Hamilton coming back from injury.For Keeper leagues, does Ivory have a shot at being the guy next year? Some people have said Pierre Thomas will probably be moving on to another team.
ivory needs to be healthy and hold onto the ball. fwiw, i think he does look good against weaker competition. pierre looks good against pretty much everyone.I think it will come down to either him or Hamilton coming back from injury.For Keeper leagues, does Ivory have a shot at being the guy next year? Some people have said Pierre Thomas will probably be moving on to another team.
um, in 8 games for the saints he has exactly 1 td. in those 8 games, he has exactly one game over 100 yards but i'll give him credit for the 99 yards this week. so he has 2 games where he's about 100 yards. he also has only 1 reception. so he's torn up two teams - Tampa and Seattle - while be very pedestrian otherwise. he looks good because he runs hard but i'm not ready to anoint him as the future.what hurts his value is that he isn't a 3 down back. payton likes to pass to his RB's either on screens or out of the backfield. ivory hasn't shown anything like that capacity yet.I dont think anyone is saying he is better then Thomas But Thomas is hurt and Ivory has been above average to really good at times. And again he impressed the heck out of me the way he just rammed over people. Was such power.
i think payton likes ivory. he calls him "special" and whatnot. pierre would be well served to be all-pro while he's on the field because he surely looks to be the odd man out in NO. if he's not playing for a contract in NO then he's playing for a contract elsewhere (like NE who has shown interest). i like ivory; he's fun to watch. he just hasn't shown enough to me to think he is an upgrade over pierre.Ivory had holes and blocking for the most part but even when he didnt he made things happen himself like the first and short carry where he ran through and bounced off the pile and ran for a nice gain. I can only see Ivory's stock rising and even when/if PT comes back I would expect to see Ivory involved. Where he has the most value is dynasty and I expect an Ivory / Bush backfield next season.
tigerz said:I'm hesitant to say he has any value this year. I don't think Thomas is coming back any time soon but if he does then that caps Ivory's upside. New Orleans absolutely slaughtered Seattle so there were enough plays and enough of a lead to make Ivory a valid play. I see it like Mike Bell last year. He's a good finisher when the Saints are ahead and perhaps to set the tone at the beginning of the game with some hard running. However, when they are catching up, Ivory will barely see the field as they preferred to use their committee with Jones and Betts. With Bush coming in next week, most likely, I think it means that we won't see 15+ carries from Ivory unless the Saints start going on a tear like they were last year, build up a lead, and Ivory gets to run against a soft defense. I think that's a tall order, especially seeing as the Saints haven't been as dominating on offense though perhaps they are on an upswing. The next two weeks are decent matchups for RBs with Dallas and Bengals but not nearly as good as Seattle and Tampa Bay were and the three weeks after that will be tough with STL, BAL, and ATL so that's one point against him already. I'd still take a flyer if I had the room but I'm holding onto Bush over Ivory right now. Not feeling too great about either so it would be nice to have them both but we'll see if the saints can produce a viable RB this year.
i would argue that it is payton's playcalling or the RBBC they use that is holding him back from the 1000 season. that said, he is largely feasting on weaker opponents and seems to struggle against more credible ones.Rookie rushing yards:
Ivory: 636 yards (5.2 YPC)
Blount: 599 yards (4.5 YPC)
Best: 447 yards (3.3 YPC)
Matthews: 382 yards (4.4 YPC)
Spiller: 199 yards (4.1 YPC)
Just as expected before the season started.![]()
This Ivory kid is a player - seems like the only thing between him and a rookie 1000 yard season is Pierre Thomas.
Maybe, but you could probably say the same about all but the top RBs.If you look at his game logs, just about every time he's gotten more than 10 carries, he's had a solid YPC. I would agree it's the RBBC situation that holds him back - he's a guy that seems to thrive with more rather than few carries.i would argue that it is payton's playcalling or the RBBC they use that is holding him back from the 1000 season. that said, he is largely feasting on weaker opponents and seems to struggle against more credible ones.Rookie rushing yards:
Ivory: 636 yards (5.2 YPC)
Blount: 599 yards (4.5 YPC)
Best: 447 yards (3.3 YPC)
Matthews: 382 yards (4.4 YPC)
Spiller: 199 yards (4.1 YPC)
Just as expected before the season started.![]()
This Ivory kid is a player - seems like the only thing between him and a rookie 1000 yard season is Pierre Thomas.