What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chump Kelly (1 Viewer)

As much as I dislike the Eagles, this team is very entertaining to watch.

To me, the most significant issue is this style of offense in year #2; Kelly has proven it can work, but is it sustainable?

Give DCs an off season to study and prepare. I wonder what happens?

I don't know the answer but an anxious to find out.
Ya I actually am usually skeptical of gimmicky offenses, but I don't think this offense is that gimmicky and easy to just adjust your defense to. Defensive co ordinators spend all week trying to adjust and study and prepare the eagles offense, its not like in the offseason they are spending a whole month studying and preparing for ONE team.

I really believe Chip has a brilliant offensive mind and that he will adjust his plays and options in order to outsmart some teams who 'over plan' for him. I think we'll see some fun and creative plays this week that he's been saving.

 
What is Kelly doing that is unique and difficult to stop in the NFL?
He's taking the most logical principle of matchups and made it the whole offensive philosophy. So if one week the team you're playi ng is bad covering the TE, attack their defense using the TE (AZ game). If a team is really bad defending the run, run them over (Chicago). He designs the plays each week to exploit the weaknesses of a defense.

He also has a really good offensive line and scheme for them.
Not to mention perhaps the best training/conditioning/nutrition programs in the NFL. Plus, look at his in-game communication system for getting plays in.
He uses the interpreter guy from Mandela's funeral. :shrug:

 
The funny thing is, they tend to use the same plays over and over, and they keep working. Against Detroit and yesterday against Chicago, pretty much used the same running plays and neither team could stop it.

 
The funny thing is, they tend to use the same plays over and over, and they keep working. Against Detroit and yesterday against Chicago, pretty much used the same running plays and neither team could stop it.
I think I remember Kelly saying they don't have a lot of plays, just a lot of formations and options off each one. Foles just makes the calls at the line based on what look the defense is giving him.

 
The funny thing is, they tend to use the same plays over and over, and they keep working. Against Detroit and yesterday against Chicago, pretty much used the same running plays and neither team could stop it.
It took 7 or 8 double sceeens before they finally caught on.

 
The funny thing is, they tend to use the same plays over and over, and they keep working. Against Detroit and yesterday against Chicago, pretty much used the same running plays and neither team could stop it.
I think I remember Kelly saying they don't have a lot of plays, just a lot of formations and options off each one. Foles just makes the calls at the line based on what look the defense is giving him.
:goodposting: Ill post the all-22 for others to try and understand Chump's offense.

http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/article-1/Eagle-Eye-In-The-Sky-Bears-Review/ed6c4dca-2177-47ad-8c5d-ed189a58c51c

 
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season (although they have had a pretty easy schedule since then too). A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season. A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.
In camp and preseason, Vick was the better QB. Anyone who followed and watched the team in August, even ardent Vick-haters, had to admit that the decision to go with Vick out of the gate, was a reasonable one.

 
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season. A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.
Seems like you're still in that bad-posting phase haha. Again, those 'questionable coaching decisions' comment you are sticking by was totally wrong (hopefully you've learned that you don't go for 2 down 14-12 in the first half). But yes, like all rookie players entering the big league, coaches go through growing pains and improvement as well.

Also, you were one of the FEW who was critical of vick earlier in the year??? haha!!

And Vick was the better QB early in the year and in training camp. Those who watched camp and pre season could see that Vick simply was playing better then Foles. Chip made the right decision to start Vick AT THE TIME. But later Foles proved to be the better QB and really came alive. Not trying to put Chip on a pedestal, but I don't think he made any terrible decisions early in the year and certainly not now. He's brought this team to a new level.

 
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season. A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.
In camp and preseason, Vick was the better QB. Anyone who followed and watched the team in August, even ardent Vick-haters, had to admit that the decision to go with Vick out of the gate, was a reasonable one.
Weird, I was typing the same thing ahha

 
Finished the regular season 2nd in Total yards and 2nd in Points scored.

1st in Rushing yards. Beat the next closest team by 189 yards.

Good start for Kelly. Needs to work on it though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@evansilva: #Eagles O ranked No. 2 in total yards last season & No. 4 in points. Will return all 5 OL starters & add Maclin. Foles & Ertz ascending.

 
@Jeff_McLane: Must read. MT @smartfootball: My feature on how Chip Kelly is influencing the rest of the NFL is up at @Grantland33: http://t.co/2YVbMkbVIX

The below article is great on its own but you're going to have to click the link to see the videos the author used to explain certain points.

The Influencer

The NFL has gone from doubting Chip Kelly to trying to mimic his innovations. Can the question-everything coach and his Eagles stay ahead?

by CHRIS B. BROWN ON AUGUST 14, 2014

When the Philadelphia Eagles hired Chip Kelly away from Oregon in January 2013, they thought they were getting a coach whod field an innovative offense run at a madcap pace. What they probably didnt realize, and what the rest of the league surely didnt know, was that they were also getting a coach who intended to rethink much about how NFL teams operate, from huddling (why bother?), to traditional practices (too much wasted time), to player nutrition habits (bye-bye, Andy Reids Fast Food Fridays).

If they didnt realize this, they should have, because Kelly has always challenged the status quo. I was probably a pain in the ### as a little kid, Kelly said recently. I questioned everything. Ive always been a why guy, trying to figure out why things happen and what they are and just curious about it from that standpoint.

The result of all of that questioning was a successful debut season for Kelly, whose Eagles went 10-6 and won the NFC East one year after going 4-12 under Reid. And they did so thanks largely to approaching things just a little differently from the rest of a league that largely likes to leave well enough alone. But the NFL has a conflicted relationship with new concepts, as defiance often gives way to rapid-fire assimilation. And unsurprisingly, thats already happening with Kellys ideas.

So far, most of the attention surrounding Kelly has centered on his spread offense, particularly the way in which he gives his quarterbacks multiple run, keep, or pass options on the same play, all from a no-huddle, up-tempo pace. And those ideas are certainly having an impact. The Dolphins hired Kellys quarterbacks coach, Billy Lazor, to implement a version of Kellys scheme in Miami; the league in general is trending toward more no-huddle; and several NFL coaches have told me their teams will be using Chip Kelly plays this season.

But Kellys influence extends far beyond read-options and the no-huddle, and into the subtler and more fundamental aspects of the game. In just one year, Kellys question-everything approach has caused many smart NFL coaches and executives to ask themselves why theyve been doing things the same way for so long. And many are realizing that Kelly has better answers.

Click here for more from our 2014 NFL preview.

Its hard to get a first down in the NFL. The defenders are fast, the tactics are sophisticated, and the state-of-the art technology and exhaustive scouting reports mean there are no secrets. Whats innovative one week is passé the next. As a result, modern NFL game planning is an arms race of minutiae, with coaches sleeping on couches and sifting through hours of film in an effort to find even the smallest advantages.

Over the last 25 years, however, there have been increasingly diminishing returns on spending 35 hours a week engineering a situation in which theres a 41 percent chance that a receiver who runs a 4.43 40 will match up against a cornerback who runs a 4.47 on a seven-yard route. NFL offenses have begun changing drastically in the last few years to find a better way, and Kellys teams have been at the forefront of that evolution, first at Oregon and now in the NFL.

Now that Kellys Eagles have found success they led the NFL in rushing and yards per carry and finished second in total offense in 2013 the conversation has shifted away from whether his offense would work in the NFL to whether that success is sustainable, and particularly whether defenses will have figured out the attack over the offseason. This line of questioning misses the mark, however: Kellys offense isnt unique because of specific schemes; its unique because of how he organizes and implements them.

Ive said it since day one: We dont do anything revolutionary offensively, Kelly said recently. We run inside zone, we run outside zone, we run a sweep play, we run a power play. Weve got a five-step [passing] game, weve got a three-step game, we run some screens. Were not doing anything thats never been done before in football.

Instead of drawing up a new play to get that one-on-one matchup for that seven-yard pass, Kelly, like some football hacker, is attacking the very logic of defenses by deploying two-on-one, three-on-two, and four-on-three advantages, whether in run-blocking schemes or pass patterns. This is why the Eagles led the NFL in plays of more than 20 yards last season. Kelly is actually trying to break defenses.

Take, for example, Philadelphias 2013 season opener. Before the game, Washington defensive coordinator Jim Haslett said hed watched not only the Eagles preseason games, but also 23, 24 Oregon films. He thought hed seen it all. He hadnt.

Early in the game, Kelly identified a particular weakness for Washington: an inability to properly defend Phillys unbalanced offensive line sets. Throughout last season, Kelly frequently put offensive tackles Jason Peters and Lane Johnson to the same side while keeping only the offensive guard and a tight end on the other.1 And in that Week 1 contest, which the Eagles won 33-27, the Redskins repeatedly failed to account for interior gaps when the Eagles went unbalanced.

As bad as Washingtons defense was last season, few opponents fared much better against the Eagles unbalanced sets, which remained a key part of Philadelphias offense throughout the season, with Kelly continually devising new iterations, particularly on the sweep.

Kellys sweep is an updated version of a football classic: the old Green Bay Packers Vince Lombardi sweep, but with a particular wrinkle a pulling center whod lead the way for the runner.2 By the end of last season, the copycats had already sprouted, with the Chargers and Broncos running Kellys version of the sweep. Philadelphia running back LeSean McCoy delivered numerous huge runs on this play, and the Eagles ran it three times on the game-winning drive in their Week 17, division-clinching win against Dallas. The best example of Kellys take on the Lombardi sweep, however, came against Lombardis old team.

Were in two tight ends on this

side, so theres concerns from a passing standpoint, but we have two tackles to the other side, Kelly explained after the game. With two tight ends to the left, the secondary support is on that side, so theres no secondary [run] support to [the right] side. In other words, because defenses try to match the strength of an offenses formation, Green Bays safeties followed the tight end and wide receiver left, which gave the Eagles a numbers advantage to the right: four blockers to handle just three defenders.

This breakdown occurred not because Packers defensive coordinator Dom Capers doesnt know how to match up against an unbalanced set. (He does. I think.) It happened because, against Kellys offense, it doesnt matter what the other coaches know. The 11 defenders on the field need to be able to identify the unbalanced set and call the right adjustments, on the fly, at a super-fast tempo, while worrying about 50 other things.

Through our formations and adjustment, we want the defense to show us how they are adjusting and playing us. We may go unbalanced or use motion to make the defense adjust, Mark Helfrich, Kellys offensive coordinator and successor at Oregon said at a coaching clinic in 2013. Early in a game we want to show things we saw on film and watch the defensive adjustments. Defenses do not have time to adjust too much when you push the tempo. What the quarterback sees is what he generally gets.

With Kelly, its usually about more than what we see. What makes him so interesting is his ability to seamlessly mesh old-school tactics and NFL-style attention to detail with an approach that attacks the very structure of defenses. College football has produced a lot of innovation over the last 10 years or so, but many of the great college innovators lack the attention to detail to succeed in the NFL. At the same time, many NFL coaches are too ingrained in the old ways to adapt to an evolving game. Kelly has always been at home blending the old and the new. Thats where the NFL is going, but Kelly is already there.

Despite his reputation for both innovation and secrecy, Kelly is surprisingly open about his Xs and Os. He even participated in a series of videos for the Eagles team website last season in which he candidly explained specific plays and the strategies behind them. But there are two subjects he refuses to openly discuss: his no-huddle communication system and the particulars of how the Eagles use sports science.

The former makes sense: Why would Kelly give out his signals so that opponents could steal them? Kellys secrecy over his teams sports performance and recovery methods, however, points to his belief in the powerful competitive advantage that sports science provides.

From top to bottom in the Eagles organization, the first rule of sports science seems to be Dont talk about sports science. Despite the limited information at our disposal, however, heres what we know:

While coaching at Oregon, Kelly began investing significantly in sports science, both by bringing in outside consultants and by developing in-house expertise and technology. He built principally on research first conducted for Australian-rules football.

Many of those studies, which have since been expanded to cover a range of sports, used heart rate, GPS, accelerometers, and gyroscope monitors worn by players in practice to determine how to train for peak game-day performance3 and how to prevent injuries.4 These studies also tracked the movements that players made in games5 so teams could mold practices and training to what players did on an individualized and position-by-position basis.

When Kelly arrived in Philadelphia, the Eagles invested huge sums into their sports science infrastructure, and Kelly hired Shaun Huls, a sports science coordinator whod worked for the Navy Special Warfare Command for nearly five years, training SEALs and focusing on reducing the incidence of their noncombat injuries.6

Kellys team uses the latest wearable player-tracking technology, and his staff monitors the resulting data in real time to determine how players should train and when they become injury risks. On an individualized basis we may back off, Kelly said recently. We may take [tight end] Brent Celek out of a team period on a Tuesday afternoon and just say, because of the scientific data we have on him, We may need to give Brent a little bit of a rest. We monitor them very closely.

At least so far, its worked. In addition to their on-field success, the Eagles were also the second-least-injured team in the NFL last season, according to Football Outsiders.

Just as important, the players think it works. What happened with our players is all of a sudden when we started to get to game day every week they were like, Wow, Ive never felt this good, said Kelly. And I know every guy, to a man, in December Todd Herremans, DeMeco Ryans, Trent Cole, guys whove been around a long time said Ive never felt this great in December.

Of course, other NFL teams have begun using sports science, and every NFL team can afford to buy the same equipment and hire the same Australian rules consultants to churn out similar data. But theres a difference between having the data and knowing what to do with it, and Kelly and his inner circle have years of experience analyzing performance information for football. This is why Kelly is so tight-lipped: He knows that, eventually, other teams will catch up.7 But hes not going to help them get there.

Kelly makes the most practical use of his research where players spend the vast majority of their time: in training and at practice. By this point, its common knowledge that Eagles practices are the most unique in the league: They feature blaring music (the team kicked off training camp by playing Return of the Mack over the loudspeakers), weird contraptions, and passing drills with every quarterback dropping back and throwing simultaneously. When Kelly took over, many commentators, former players, and coaches wondered whether his frenzied practices and up-tempo style in games would wear down his own players, particularly the veterans. Kelly, always one step ahead, accounts for this in his practice design and real-time workload monitoring.

Yet Kellys practices are also frenetic because he believes thats the best way for his players to learn. When we teach, we implement it in the classroom. We talk about what we are putting in that day, he explained at a coaching clinic in 2011. After that, we go to the practice field and do it. The practice field is not where we talk. It is where we do the skills. We want to keep the words there to a minimum. The words you do use must have meaning. [Players] do not want to hear you give a 10-minute clinic in the middle of the field.

Kellys chief commitment isnt to running a no-huddle offense; his goal is for the Eagles to be a no-huddle organization. For Kelly, the benefits extend far beyond the effect on opposing defenses. One of the benefits we have from practice and the no-huddle offense, where every period is no-huddle, is our second and third [teams] and Ive gone back and charted this get almost twice as many reps as other teams Ive been at when youre sitting in the second or third spot, explained Eagles defensive coordinator Billy Davis, a longtime NFL veteran. That has a recruiting benefit when it comes to attracting backup players, which in turn helps the Eagles discover hidden gems. If youre [second or third string], you want to be in our camp because you get more reps than anyone else, said Kelly. Because of the reps we get in practice, our guys get a chance to develop a little more. You go to some teams and the threes arent getting many reps they are losing time compared to our guys.

The Eagles are different in how they practice, and also in when they practice: On the day before games, Kellys Eagles conduct a full-speed, up-tempo practice, rather than the leisurely walk-throughs run by essentially every other team in the league. Through our research, through science, [we learned] that you need to get the body moving if youre going to be playing, Kelly explained. We used the same formula at Oregon and I spent a lot of time on how to go about it, how we think you should train, and it worked for us there and it worked for us here.

Specifically, while at Oregon, Kelly visited with trainers of elite Olympic athletes, and those trainers balked at the idea of doing next to nothing physically taxing in the 48 hours prior to competing. Kelly switched his approach and began conducting full-speed practice the day before games, and the results speak for themselves.

No NFL team practices more efficiently than the Eagles, and its these little details that accumulate to help Kelly achieve big advantages in the untapped peak performance arena. Doing anything that much better, especially something as fundamental as practice, will eventually spawn copycats. And sure enough, following the 2011 collective bargaining agreement, which puts significant limits on the number and length of organized practices, other teams have been forced to play catch-up to methods Kelly has been using for years.

Shortly after Kelly took the Eagles job, one Oregon staff member gave me his read on Kelly: What people think Bill Belichick is like thinks about football nonstop, all day, every day is how Chip actually is. Hes a bachelor and has no kids. Football is what hes about. Focusing on football so completely, and questioning everything about the game, cant be the most peaceful way to live. But thats how Kellys wired. He once told a room full of high school coaches who were eager to hear his wisdom on how to coach the spread offense and draw up cool plays that it bothers him when he visits a high school practice and sees the coaches are standing around talking to one another or throwing the ball around while the team is stretching. Kellys sense of humor is well documented, but when it comes to football, hes all business.

He knows his business is never finished. I give myself a 58.8 percent, Kelly said this spring, grading his first season as an NFL head coach. Thats winning 10 games out of 17. Kelly knows that if his team stumbles, hell quickly stop being Chip Kelly, successful innovator and become Chip Kelly, latest college coach to fail in the NFL. And he knows theres always another question to ask, another long-accepted belief to challenge.

Regardless of what happens in 2014 and beyond, Kelly has already sparked change that will outlast whatever his tenure in Philadelphia winds up being. Coaching is one thing and one thing only: It is creating an environment so the player has an opportunity to be successful, Kelly told those high school coaches. That is your job as a coach. When you teach him to do that, get out of his way. In turning a 4-12 team into a division winner, Kelly also reminded a lot of his NFL peers of that lesson, and then showed them some new ways to act on it. Now its up to the rest of the league to catch up and up to Kelly to stay one step ahead.

 
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season (although they have had a pretty easy schedule since then too). A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.
looool isn't this the fire ted thompson guy?

 
Sorry all, this thread was created back in my bad-posting days. However, at the time he had a couple bad games in a row with some very questionable coaching decisions as well. Obviously this team has done a complete 180 since then and looks much better than it did earlier in the season (although they have had a pretty easy schedule since then too). A big part of that is also they have a real QB now instead of that joke named Mike Vick (who I was one of the few who were critical on Vick earlier in the year). I'm not sure if the organization told Kelly that he had to start Vick or if he really thought Vick was the better QB, for his sake, I hope it was the former.
looool isn't this the fire ted thompson guy?
I think so yeah.

 
Interesting anecdote I heard on the radio the other day. Chris Maragos, who came over from Seattle this off-season, said that going into the playoffs last year, the one team the Seahawks absolutely did not want to face was the Eagles.

 
The nice thing about DFS is that when I'm wrong it is only for a week. He did get off to a rough start and this thread was created in haste after what I thought was a poorly coached game, I'm glad he is having success now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At least you weren't alone in your thought, you were in good company with Steven A.:

"I think Chip Kelly is going to be humbled quick, fast & in a hurry. This is not college football." - @stephenasmith

10:10am - 20 Sep 13

 
Heath Evans:

Now that the Philadelphia Eagles have reeled in perhaps the biggest fish on the coaching market, I am going on the record calling Chip Kelly one of the worst hires in pro football history.
 
Heath Evans:

Now that the Philadelphia Eagles have reeled in perhaps the biggest fish on the coaching market, I am going on the record calling Chip Kelly one of the worst hires in pro football history.
Heath Evans:

Now that the Philadelphia Eagles have reeled in perhaps the biggest fish on the coaching market, I am going on the record calling Chip Kelly one of the worst hires in pro football history.
:lmao:

c'mon, man

 
The nice thing about DFS is that when I'm wrong it is only for a week. He did get off to a rough start and this thread was created in haste after what I thought was a poorly coached game, I'm glad he is having success now.
Nothing personal AT ALL with the bumps. The thread just makes me laugh... that's all.
I thought it was funny when i made it, now it lives in infamy, lol
You should bump your TRich thread sometime.

 
Kind of sucks that you can't change your username - then you could pretend that it wasn't you that posted something that you wish would just go away. :hey:

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.

Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?
It's not just if Morris happens to think of it. Every coach on their sideline is telling them the same. Us fans on the couch aren't catching something they aren't aware of.

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?
It's not just if Morris happens to think of it. Every coach on their sideline is telling them the same. Us fans on the couch aren't catching something they aren't aware of.
I guarantee, GUARANTEE that not one coach mentioned it to him. NFL coaches are so bad in late game situations and so rarely ever think forward towards anything non-traditional that I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the thought never even crossed Gruden's mind that it might happen.

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?
It's not just if Morris happens to think of it. Every coach on their sideline is telling them the same. Us fans on the couch aren't catching something they aren't aware of.
I guarantee, GUARANTEE that not one coach mentioned it to him. NFL coaches are so bad in late game situations and so rarely ever think forward towards anything non-traditional that I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the thought never even crossed Gruden's mind that it might happen.
Morris was running hard, he wasn't going to break a few arm tackles then suddenly decide to fall on the 1. If the defense is taught well, they don't just stand there and make it obvious, that actually might signal the RB to actually go down..

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?
It's not just if Morris happens to think of it. Every coach on their sideline is telling them the same. Us fans on the couch aren't catching something they aren't aware of.
You are completely missing the point. Chip Kelly made a mistake regardless of what you expect that WAS would have done.

 
CHUMP is right, after all.

Way to not let the Redskins score, bozo.
and if wash recognized this and just went down?
Then good for them. However, Kelly didn't give them to chance to do the right thing because he did the wrong thing in this case.
Or said a different way, Kelly didn't give them a chance to make a mistake and score.
They would go down on the 1 ala the Westbrook run years back that got replayed a billion times.
maybe, maybe not..Morris was running hard, I doubt he stops. Besides, a good coach would teach that you make it look like you are trying to stop them, and let the RB think he is breaking tackles. It's something you have to go over in practice. I'm sure the forward thinkers like Bellichick have gone over it.Blocking a chip shot FG or scoring a TD with a little over a minute with 3 time outs? What is the best option?
It's not just if Morris happens to think of it. Every coach on their sideline is telling them the same. Us fans on the couch aren't catching something they aren't aware of.
You are completely missing the point. Chip Kelly made a mistake regardless of what you expect that WAS would have done.
So maybe if they try that it increases their chances 5%. What it comes down to is game was over when Sanchez threw another horrible pick, he sucks.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top