California's poverty rate isn't the highest in the country.
So your logic seems to be that because democratic representatives can't single handedly lift largely minority populated parts of cities out of poverty through policies, they don't care about minorities?
Look, I've lived through years of Bobby Jindal pushing through an incredibly conservative agenda in Louisiana, culminating in the privatization of the public health care system in the state. Almost every side of what Jindal did with the conservative agenda hurt Louisiana, hurt minorities, and hurt our future.
I've seen first hand how devastating policies about giving tax breaks to companies and cutting healthcare and education works for minorities. I've seen first hand how minorities are the ones who suffer most when you privatize public healthcare in an area where many of the poor and sick are minorities. You're coming to the wrong person preaching that republican values are the best for minorities, because that dog simply won't hunt.
Republican's aren't interested in helping minorities. They want a smaller federal government, less taxes, and let the chips fall where they may. If that means cutting social security, cutting medicare, cutting entitlements...so be it. They're against the safety net that many minorities rely on, not to mention white men.
And please, minorities know who is looking out for them, that's why they overwhelmingly vote democratic and are represented by democrats. If republicans had better plans, or cared more, you'd see more republicans representing minorities RATHER than what you see...which is Republicans try to gerrmander districts to AVOID minorities. The truth on this issue is incredibly clear.