Go.
Haha I know rightAnd Vick Ballard gets the start for the coltsNice sign to hold up - Cha-Cha #####es![]()
Exactly what I see happening. Pats probably feel his best football already gone. He's looking to get paid according to his stats. Hard to argue against either side really. It is a business afterall. Pats made their decision already signing Hernandez & Gronk long term. I'm doubtful Welker's willing to sign a team friendly Jordy Nelson type deal.Never understood the people that doubt Edelman can take over the Welker role in that offense in the future. I know a PR TD has little to do with it, but he's talented, tough, smart, quick, and has good hands. Has seemed like a lock to happen for a couple years now, assuming Welker leaves this offseason.
Ankle injury. Return questionable. As pats fan not sure I've ever seen that result in guy coming back in.What happened to Chandler Jones?
No such thing in NEpretty easy interception
Mike Reiss @MikeReissPresumed X-rays on Chandler Jones likely came back negative, as Jones is back on the sideline, in unform.Ankle injury. Return questionable. As pats fan not sure I've ever seen that result in guy coming back in.What happened to Chandler Jones?
Just read same. Will believe it when I see it.Mike Reiss @MikeReissPresumed X-rays on Chandler Jones likely came back negative, as Jones is back on the sideline, in unform.Ankle injury. Return questionable. As pats fan not sure I've ever seen that result in guy coming back in.What happened to Chandler Jones?
Oh I know, was just passing along what I saw. And now this:Greg A. Bedard @GregABedardDon't look like Chandler Jones will be returning to the game, unless they're waiting for halftime. Right foot heavily taped, good limpJust read same. Will believe it when I see it.Mike Reiss @MikeReissPresumed X-rays on Chandler Jones likely came back negative, as Jones is back on the sideline, in unform.Ankle injury. Return questionable. As pats fan not sure I've ever seen that result in guy coming back in.What happened to Chandler Jones?![]()
Ha beat me to it. Hope he's not too seriously hurt given he's their only pass rusher.Oh I know, was just passing along what I saw. And now this:Greg A. Bedard @GregABedardDon't look like Chandler Jones will be returning to the game, unless they're waiting for halftime. Right foot heavily taped, good limpJust read same. Will believe it when I see it.Mike Reiss @MikeReissPresumed X-rays on Chandler Jones likely came back negative, as Jones is back on the sideline, in unform.Ankle injury. Return questionable. As pats fan not sure I've ever seen that result in guy coming back in.What happened to Chandler Jones?![]()
Because they tried it part time for the past few years and it didn't work.Then they tried it full time for the first few games and he was awful.Never understood the people that doubt Edelman can take over the Welker role in that offense in the future. I know a PR TD has little to do with it, but he's talented, tough, smart, quick, and has good hands. Has seemed like a lock to happen for a couple years now, assuming Welker leaves this offseason.
But next year, the Pats can't afford to give Welker the $$$ he is seeking. A combo of Hernandez and Edelman will replace his production just fine.Because they tried it part time for the past few years and it didn't work.Then they tried it full time for the first few games and he was awful.Never understood the people that doubt Edelman can take over the Welker role in that offense in the future. I know a PR TD has little to do with it, but he's talented, tough, smart, quick, and has good hands. Has seemed like a lock to happen for a couple years now, assuming Welker leaves this offseason.
He is most of those things, but he is not talented enough to usurp Welker just because he can kinda maybe sometimes play his role at a reduced level.
It remains to be seen if there is any team in the league that will meet Welker's contract demands.But next year, the Pats can't afford to give Welker the $$$ he is seeking. A combo of Hernandez and Edelman will replace his production just fine.Because they tried it part time for the past few years and it didn't work.Then they tried it full time for the first few games and he was awful.Never understood the people that doubt Edelman can take over the Welker role in that offense in the future. I know a PR TD has little to do with it, but he's talented, tough, smart, quick, and has good hands. Has seemed like a lock to happen for a couple years now, assuming Welker leaves this offseason.
He is most of those things, but he is not talented enough to usurp Welker just because he can kinda maybe sometimes play his role at a reduced level.
Agreed, but I think he would have to take a huge discount to stay in New England. Pats need to spend their money elsewhere.It remains to be seen if there is any team in the league that will meet Welker's contract demands.But next year, the Pats can't afford to give Welker the $$$ he is seeking. A combo of Hernandez and Edelman will replace his production just fine.Because they tried it part time for the past few years and it didn't work.Then they tried it full time for the first few games and he was awful.Never understood the people that doubt Edelman can take over the Welker role in that offense in the future. I know a PR TD has little to do with it, but he's talented, tough, smart, quick, and has good hands. Has seemed like a lock to happen for a couple years now, assuming Welker leaves this offseason.
He is most of those things, but he is not talented enough to usurp Welker just because he can kinda maybe sometimes play his role at a reduced level.
The Pats and Welker were not that far apart before the deadline hit on re-signing him to a long term deal. That was after Gronk signed but before Hernandez got his deal. I am not so sure the Pats won't make a concerted effort to keep Welker, but it would depend on how many years, the guaranteed money involved, and how much per year. I openly wonder what the market will be for a 32 year old slot receiver.Agreed, but I think he would have to take a huge discount to stay in New England. Pats need to spend their money elsewhere.
Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?
Luck's making some great throws, even when under pressure. He made a few bad throws and Patriots took two of them to the house. Wilfork has been very disruptive and the Pats are blitzing a lot. But, the Colts have about 400 yards of offense with 2 minutes left in the fourth. Luck is very good.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?
His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?
first time watching a Patriots game?Why is Brady throwing the ball with 5 minutes left in the game, ahead by 4 TDS? Why is he even in the game?
The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also
first time watching a Patriots game?Why is Brady throwing the ball with 5 minutes left in the game, ahead by 4 TDS? Why is he even in the game?![]()
So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
because he's a rookie and, therefore, needs to be on the field.Why is Luck still in the game?
Ok, I'm wrong on the games against the worst teams in the league. When you're averaging a 55% completion rate you're throwing just above JaMarcus Russell. Just because the guy gets yardage doesn't mean he's doing it particularly well.Fantasy football really screws with people's perception of what is a great performance I guess.So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
![]()
Yeah, garbage time is really crucial to his development.because he's a rookie and, therefore, needs to be on the field.Why is Luck still in the game?
If you watch the games, you know that Luck is playing well. At the beginning of the year, everyone said the Colt o-line sucks and the receiving core was bad. Luck has the made the Colt offense and WRs much better than anyone expected. Plus,one of the best metrics is 3rd and 4th down conversions. Luck rates fourth in the league behind Manning, Rothlesberger, Ryan and Brees. Put Luck in GB and he'd be all-pro. Put Rodgers in Indianapolis and he'd struggle.Ok, I'm wrong on the games against the worst teams in the league. When you're averaging a 55% completion rate you're throwing just above JaMarcus Russell. Just because the guy gets yardage doesn't mean he's doing it particularly well.Fantasy football really screws with people's perception of what is a great performance I guess.So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
![]()
You're welcome to check the game log stats with me next time.Ok, I'm wrong on the games against the worst teams in the league. When you're averaging a 55% completion rate you're throwing just above JaMarcus Russell. Just because the guy gets yardage doesn't mean he's doing it particularly well.Fantasy football really screws with people's perception of what is a great performance I guess.So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
![]()
So are you actually saying Luck is better than Rodgers? I think your homer is showing a little. A sub-60% completion rate is rarely considered good.If you watch the games, you know that Luck is playing well. At the beginning of the year, everyone said the Colt o-line sucks and the receiving core was bad. Luck has the made the Colt offense and WRs much better than anyone expected. Plus,one of the best metrics is 3rd and 4th down conversions. Luck rates fourth in the league behind Manning, Rothlesberger, Ryan and Brees. Put Luck in GB and he'd be all-pro. Put Rodgers in Indianapolis and he'd struggle.Ok, I'm wrong on the games against the worst teams in the league. When you're averaging a 55% completion rate you're throwing just above JaMarcus Russell. Just because the guy gets yardage doesn't mean he's doing it particularly well.Fantasy football really screws with people's perception of what is a great performance I guess.So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
![]()
If you watch the games, you know that Luck is playing well. At the beginning of the year, everyone said the Colt o-line sucks and the receiving core was bad. Luck has the made the Colt offense and WRs much better than anyone expected. Plus,one of the best metrics is 3rd and 4th down conversions. Luck rates fourth in the league behind Manning, Rothlesberger, Ryan and Brees. Put Luck in GB and he'd be all-pro. Put Rodgers in Indianapolis and he'd struggle.Ok, I'm wrong on the games against the worst teams in the league. When you're averaging a 55% completion rate you're throwing just above JaMarcus Russell. Just because the guy gets yardage doesn't mean he's doing it particularly well.Fantasy football really screws with people's perception of what is a great performance I guess.So.... you're saying you were wrong?The games against the Jags, Dolphins, and Titans? Well, I suppose you can get excited about beating those teams.His last 3 games have been pretty good...Luck really hasn't played good all year. He just gets so many attempts that he puts up big yardage.is the Pats defense playing well or is Luck playing that bad?![]()
Had a solid game vs. the Vikes early in the year also![]()
![]()