What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Colts at Steelers**(+3, 50.5) 1:00 (2 Viewers)

Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
 
I gave up on the Steelers last week, and then they go an do this, and the Panthers beat the Packers in GB. IDK whats going on this year. And it shows in my FF teams records.
Now all eyes are on the trade deadline, will the Steelers actually get a WR2 or just dance around the fire more?
I still am out on the Steelers. Pittman and Pierce had solid days, DBs are still a mess. The front 7 won the game for Steelers. Kinda of surprised by that TBH.
there is not one team who should want to run vs the Steelers, throw it 50 times.
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
Oh yeah I hear ya, just curious what the defense looked like , stacked boxes etc.

On the turnovers, yeah you aint winning those games hardly ever
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
Oh yeah I hear ya, just curious what the defense looked like , stacked boxes etc.

On the turnovers, yeah you aint winning those games hardly ever
Never say never. The Colts had 7 turnovers in Super Bowl V and won the game.
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
Oh yeah I hear ya, just curious what the defense looked like , stacked boxes etc.

On the turnovers, yeah you aint winning those games hardly ever
Never say never. The Colts had 7 turnovers in Super Bowl V and won the game.
Thats why I said hardly ever, I love your knowledge of the history. My dad was still at fan at this time, but then ya know the Mayflower trucks happened...
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
Oh yeah I hear ya, just curious what the defense looked like , stacked boxes etc.

On the turnovers, yeah you aint winning those games hardly ever
Never say never. The Colts had 7 turnovers in Super Bowl V and won the game.
Thats why I said hardly ever, I love your knowledge of the history. My dad was still at fan at this time, but then ya know the Mayflower trucks happened...
As for the Mayflower trucks, I grew up in Ky, so my loyalty traveled with them to Indy. Yes, I would have preferred they stayed in Baltimore because of tradition, but it wasn't end all for me personally. The biggest mistake the city of Baltimore made was not do like Cleveland did and retain the name and let the team walk. Instead they approached it from eminent domain and that was a losing approach.
 
Did not watch. Did Daniel Jones just play bad or the Steelers D played out of their minds? Guessing the latter considering the Taylor stat line.
The Colts had a lousy offensive game plan in my opinion. For some reason they wanted to feature Daniel Jones instead of pounding Jonathan Taylor.
Taylor wasn't finding a lot of daylight. It seemed as if every yard was hard.
Would you say the Pitt kinda of gameplanned "Let DJ beat us, but no way JT does"??
I'm not saying that at all, but 6 turnovers will beat most teams. That's something you don't gameplan for.
Oh yeah I hear ya, just curious what the defense looked like , stacked boxes etc.

On the turnovers, yeah you aint winning those games hardly ever
Never say never. The Colts had 7 turnovers in Super Bowl V and won the game.
Thats why I said hardly ever, I love your knowledge of the history. My dad was still at fan at this time, but then ya know the Mayflower trucks happened...
As for the Mayflower trucks, I grew up in Ky, so my loyalty traveled with them to Indy. Yes, I would have preferred they stayed in Baltimore because of tradition, but it wasn't end all for me personally. The biggest mistake the city of Baltimore made was not do like Cleveland did and retain the name and let the team walk. Instead they approached it from eminent domain and that was a losing approach.
I feel ya there. With that said, my Dad now is a hardcore Ravens fan, with what memory he still has. But 2 Super Bowls before my Eagles got 2...lol he reminds me...often..

Thanks for the insight!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top