What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Come Back Player of the Year. (1 Viewer)

Kevin Jones 2005...664 yards, 3.6 ypc...20 receptions, 109 yards...5 total TD's.2006...584 yards, 4.3 ypc...41 receptions, 296 yards...7 total TD'sOn pace for almost 1800 total yards, 80+ receptions and 14 TD's this season, not too shabby after last years disaster.
:goodposting: thank you. i kept reading on waiting to see his name. not to bash on kitna who has had a great year (except for maybe a few 4th quarters), but Jones return to form has been a much bigger comeback for the Lions. Too bad the Lions blow and neither of these guys will get any love
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if I concede that SSmith was a mistake (which I kind of believe, but SS also did significantly BETTER than his pre-injury status), the league also gave an award to Bruschi that year - bringing up SS does not influence me. It is almost like the league acknowledged SS was a mistake and gave a co-award out.

As to the Marcus Robinson example, he is an exception, not the rule. Edge, JLew, Palmer, C-Pepp - all major names who got ACL injuries and came back in UNDER a year. Two QBs played in game 1 who hurt their ACLs MONTHS after Walker suffered his. If QBs can come back in under a year, why is Walker's comeback special?

 
Even if I concede that SSmith was a mistake (which I kind of believe, but SS also did significantly BETTER than his pre-injury status), the league also gave an award to Bruschi that year - bringing up SS does not influence me. It is almost like the league acknowledged SS was a mistake and gave a co-award out.As to the Marcus Robinson example, he is an exception, not the rule. Edge, JLew, Palmer, C-Pepp - all major names who got ACL injuries and came back in UNDER a year. Two QBs played in game 1 who hurt their ACLs MONTHS after Walker suffered his. If QBs can come back in under a year, why is Walker's comeback special?
I don't think it's the coming back from injury that is special. It is what he has accomplished after coming back. And on a weak passing team thus far. He has been terrific.The more of these injuries there are, the better medicine will get.I'm not a proponent of Walker necessarily, just saying his return has been great.
 
Winslow has never been anyplace to have come back from.

Walker, Grossman, Pennington, Ahman green-if he keeps it up.
Under that criteria. you might as well remove Grossman from your list.
And you might as well take it away from Drew Brees from when he won it a couple years ago.
Ummmm, not true - Brees' second year:320 att. 526 compl. 3284 yards 17 TDs

His third year, he got injured and played only 11 games and had these nmbers:

205 att. 356 compl. 2108 yards 11 TDs

His fourth year he went to the Pro Bowl - I'd call that a comeback.
he was a mediocre, TD-and-a-pick per game QB his first two years as a regular starter. Hardly something to "come back" to. The point is he essentially got it for breaking out, not coming back to a prior level of excellence. Yeah he missed a few games in 03, but he got the 04 award more for "coming back" from the Draft that year, where Rivers was taken and he was already written off because he'd never shown the ability in the first place.
 
The point is he essentially got it for breaking out, not coming back to a prior level of excellence. Yeah he missed a few games in 03, but he got the 04 award more for "coming back" from the Draft that year, where Rivers was taken and he was already written off because he'd never shown the ability in the first place.
I agree 100%.He dealt with the adversity of having a 1st round pick on thebench and played to a Pro Bowl One of the criteria is NOT having been an outstanding player before, but having faced adversity and returning to perform at a high level.
 
It is what it is said:
Maybe you can name some other WR's who were successfull with a quick recovery from the acl, and produced like Walker has the following season after the injury.
I don't need to - nor can I w/o access to a list of players' injuries.See above - I'm not saying his return hasn't been great. Just that he isn't exactly dealing with an injury from which NFL players are not known to recover. in fact, NFL players regularly suffer the injury an dregularly return to their prior form.In short, when the league looks at Walker, they are going to ask "what is the adversity from which Walker is coming back? Oh, an ACL tear for which he had more than a year ro recover? Aren't there a ton of players who return from that injury these days?"Then the voter will move on to another player with more adversity to overcome.
 
I think you made good points IIWII.

I do not believe the league is gonna give it to him, but you make a good case.

(my way of saying there's no point in debating this anymore as we have both made all the points we could make)

 
They were discussing this on ESPN today, I think it was Salisbury and Hodge, one of them picked Pennington, one of them picked Alex Smith, the QB.

 
Marc, you make it seem like everyone knew Javon would come back from that injury and immediately find pre-injury form. If that were the case, the Packers would have easily snagged a mid-first round pick for him. Javon really is that good.

The fact is, many thought that a high second round pick was too much to give up for him given the uncertainty surrounding his recovery, and that Denver would have been better off keeping the pick and taking "a sure thing" like Chad Jackson.

Granted, it took Javon about two games to find his form, but he has clearly found it and he is establishing himself once again as one of the elite WRs in the NFL.

Now, I'm not saying he deserves the award, but you are so adamently suggesting that it's silly to even consider him, and that's where you're really burying yourself. To suggest that any injury that sidelines an NFL player for a full season is a cakewalk to return from is a serious misconception on your part.

 
They were discussing this on ESPN today, I think it was Salisbury and Hodge, one of them picked Pennington, one of them picked Alex Smith, the QB.
did they reference Walker, Deuce or AGReen?
I really only saw it in passing and didn't even catch their reasoning. But I don't think they brought up any runner ups, just the one guy who they each thought was most deserving.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now, I'm not saying he deserves the award, but you are so adamently suggesting that it's silly to even consider him, and that's where you're really burying yourself.
Never said it was silly to consider him, just that I didn't think he was the "clear" frontrunner as IIWII thought.The more I looked at past winners, the less I thought he deserved consideration. But to say I am "admantly suggesting it is silly to consider him" is you reading something into my posts that is not there.
 
Now, I'm not saying he deserves the award, but you are so adamently suggesting that it's silly to even consider him, and that's where you're really burying yourself.
Never said it was silly to consider him, just that I didn't think he was the "clear" frontrunner as IIWII thought.The more I looked at past winners, the less I thought he deserved consideration. But to say I am "admantly suggesting it is silly to consider him" is you reading something into my posts that is not there.
The more I think about it, the more Walker doesn't DESERVE the award - he did nothing more than any player who got an ACL injury did - he recovered after a year. He diodn;t surprise anyone with a comeback - he got injured, he got well, he played as expected - end of story.This statement seems like a suggestion that Walker is undeserving entirely, and really ought not be considered. Couple that with numerous others, all to the tune of "Walker did nothing special, Walker doesn't DESERVE this award" makes me believe you're adament about your stance.

 
"Doesn't deserve the award" and "adamanatly suggesting it is silly to consider him" are two radically different things.

As I mentioned, it appears you attributed something to me that was not there.

I STILL believe he doesn't deserve the award, and I definitely think it was way overstating it to say Walker is the frontrunner for the award, but IIWII and I both made all the points we need to make on that subject.

 
Fair enough.

I say 'adamently' because you are taking such a strong position, arguing when anyone suggests otherwise. That makes me think you're 'adament' about your stance.

And the way in which you suggest matter of factly that what he has done is nothing special makes me think that you view his garnering any consideration as 'silly', since this award is given to someone who the voters believe has done something very special.

I admit I may have have been too strong in my appraisal of your stance (which was really just lazy writing), but I think you're now suggesting that your stance is weaker than it actually was.

In any case, no worth arguing semantics. I think it's fair to say we disagree.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might also address the other issues I brought up, instead of arguing semantics with me.

Like, if it was such an easy injury to recover from, why did many think that Denver giving up a second round pick for him was such a gamble?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You might also address the other issues I brought up, instead of arguing semantics with me.Like, if it was such an easy injury to recover from, why did many think that Denver giving up a second round pick for him was such a gamble?
I'm not sure why folks thought that way - I didn't experience any of that here in Denver. Folks were straight up BEAMING about the trade - the guy DID pass a physical before the trade was completed.Not even sure why it was such a gamble given the Broncos had two picks for each of the first three rounds.He was on schedule with his rehab when he was traded and he was just about 8 months removed from the surgery. I don't think there were many question marks in the Denver organization on whether he'd be ready by game one - I know none of the fans or radio folks were even suggesting he woudl not be ready.Either way, a high second is a pretty high price to pay for a WR - and was the only way the Pack would get a trade done - the team could have used either of its first round picks on a WR - trading for Walker was a coup for the team b/c it allowed them to trade up for Cutler and not worry about filling their need at WR.
 
You might also address the other issues I brought up, instead of arguing semantics with me.Like, if it was such an easy injury to recover from, why did many think that Denver giving up a second round pick for him was such a gamble?
I'm not sure why folks thought that way - I didn't experience any of that here in Denver. Folks were straight up BEAMING about the trade - the guy DID pass a physical before the trade was completed.Not even sure why it was such a gamble given the Broncos had two picks for each of the first three rounds.He was on schedule with his rehab when he was traded and he was just about 8 months removed from the surgery. I don't think there were many question marks in the Denver organization on whether he'd be ready by game one - I know none of the fans or radio folks were even suggesting he woudl not be ready.Either way, a high second is a pretty high price to pay for a WR - and was the only way the Pack would get a trade done - the team could have used either of its first round picks on a WR - trading for Walker was a coup for the team b/c it allowed them to trade up for Cutler and not worry about filling their need at WR.
Yeah, as a Denver fan, I was ecstatic. But I think everyone was holding their breath up until he took his first few hits in preseason. I don't think that a high second round pick is a lot to give up for one of the game's elite WRs, especially if, as you say, the injury is easy to recover from and everyone expected him to regain his pre-injury form. If that were the case, I think he would gave gone for a first round pick. He didn't go for a first round pick because there were still questions, justified or not, regarding his ability to regain his elite status. The Steelers took Santonio Holmes in the first. The Pats took Chad Jackson early in the second. Given those comparisons, Walker should have been worth at least a mid first round pick.
 
To really evaluate this fairly you have to look at what Walker has done after a season ending injury and compare him to other players at his position. Walker is among the elite WR's in the game at this point in the season. He is not just putting up WR 2 numbers that have been ok. He is putting up elite WR numbers and his team is winning because of it.

In addition you must take note of how good he has been for his team and he is easily the offensive MVP for his 6 and 2 team. This is something that can't be said for someone like Duece. In fact Duece has been good but not nearly as good as Brees and Colston (the ROY).

Furthermore, Javon has switched teams after being out for a year and had to learn a new offense with a new QB and new schemes. All things that are very extremely difficult to do even if you have not taken a year off.

I think Javon is the front runner at this time, and if he stays at a pace similar to what he is on and his team continues to win I can't see this award going to anyone else.

 
Marc Levin said:
"Doesn't deserve the award" and "adamanatly suggesting it is silly to consider him" are two radically different things. As I mentioned, it appears you attributed something to me that was not there.I STILL believe he doesn't deserve the award, and I definitely think it was way overstating it to say Walker is the frontrunner for the award, but IIWII and I both made all the points we need to make on that subject.
Even after reading this entire thread I can't think of anyone even close to Walker, in my mind he's hands down the front runner so far.
 
I seriously don't think any of the other players being mentioned hold a candle to what Javon has done.

Pennington - Yeah, after two serious shoulder injuries, almost everyone had written him off. And he's proven them wrong, but he's not exactly playing stellar ball. 9 TDs to 8 INTs is pretty pedestrian. A very solid case can be made for him just because of the seriousness of his injuries, but I think he'll have to pick up his play a bit before he garners serious consideration in my book. He's not really close to playing at the level he was at before his first shoulder injury.

DNabb - He was playing at a high level last season before his injury problems, but the organization went temporarily to shambles and they shut him down.

Rex Grossman - Certainly a case can be made for him, but as many have said, he never really showed anything prior to his injuries, so he's really just finally showing what he's capable of. Still, I think he warrants some consideration. I guess we'll have to see how he plays in the second half, but I anticipate a large dropoff in his production.

Kellen Winslow - See Grossman, comeback player suggests a returning to form of sorts, but his lack of a history doesn't give us much to go by. For all intents and purposes, this is his rookie year. I think his reputation as being an ####### won't help his case much, either (while I don't think this should be a factor, I think it will be).

Kitna - Going from Carson Palmer's backup to a solid QB doesn't really seem to fit the criteria for the award. And like Pennington, his 10 TD to 10 INT isn't exactly good.

Ahman Green - A case can be made for him certainly. Playing at a very high level, but not nearly as high a level as Walker. Walker IS what has made the Denver offense go all season long.

Deuce - Aside form his YPC, he really isn't doing anything more than he did last season prior to his injury, and his supporting cast this season is far superior. He's playing his role in that offense, but Brees is the main reason for the Saints success.

Brees - Played great last season. Had a week 17 injury, changed teams, and picked up where he left off. While not worthy of consideration for this award, I think he certainly warrants some MVP consideration.

Andre Johnson - Definitely a case can be made for him as well. He's played lights out. But most of this can be attributed to a new coach who has been able to get that offense somewhat on track. The addition of Moulds has also helped as defenses can't key entirely on him.

TO - He too was playing very well last season prior to his suspension. He has 6 drops on the season, at least two of which came at critical times and could very easily have cost Dallas those games. He has done arguably as much bad for that organization as good.

Kevin Jones - In my opinion, he definitely warrants consideration. He seems to have picked up where he left off in 2004. Much of this has to be attributed to the addition of Martz and Kitna (though the fact that he is fully healthy is also a big reason). With that passing game on track, he has had much more running room.

As for Walker, he tore his ACL in week 1 of 2005. Despite Marc suggesting that this is nothing more than a boo boo, it is actually an injury that can take some time to recover from. It baffles me that Marc writes it off entirey as nothing more than a minor setback. ACL injuries can significantly impact a player's speed and ability to make cuts (something that is integral to any WRs success). Furthermore, there is the mental aspect of getting back on the field after an injury of this nature without being tentative and holding back. This is obvious with Culpepper, who had almost as much time to recover as Javon did. Carson, too, was very tentative at first, and it's possible that this is still impacting his play somewhat. As I've said, there was clearly doubt among most as to whether he would return to his pre-injury form. Otherwise, Denver wuld not have been able to get him for only a 2nd round draft pick. Branch, who I think in most people's eyes is nowhere near the WR that Walker is, went for a first round pick. Chad Jackson, a WR who had never played a down in the NFL, went the pick after the pick that Denver traded. Santonio Holmes went in the first round. Walker, pre-injury, had established himself as elite, and thus would have warranted a mid first round draft pick or better if the consensus was that his injury was a mere boo boo and would not alter his ability to return to form. And, in spite of the doubt, Walker has already established himself as one of the game's best WRs, again. I won't bother posting his numbers, as that's already been done, but I suspect they will only improve in the second half now that Denver's offense seems to be back on track. I think 1400+ receiving yards and 12+ TDs is very much within reach. He is the most important player on Denver's offense, and a large reason that they are currently 6-2. I just don't see how any of the other players mentioned have "come back" from injury, poor play, or whatever, and so quickly re-established themselves among the game's elite while being so key to their respective team's success.

My 2 cents.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
thatguy - :goodposting:

detailed and complete analysis across the board. just because that post was so good, I am changing my position.

Seriously.

:bow: :grad:

 
I am often (certainly not usually or always) open to Kerrying on an issue (that is flip flopping) - esp, when someone puts forth such a convincing and complete argument.

You did a tremendous job of swaying me from a fairly entrenched position. Kudos.

 
I think your reply was a little bias "ThatGuy".

You say some players deserve consideration, then throw them aside because you attribute their newfound success because of new cordinators, and coaches,..well wouldn't that be a comback player? and you also say that some of these players were doing well and got hurt, and now are playing good, so thats not really a comeback. The whole time i was reading it, i was thinking "sounds like Javon Walker" and you disregard what you said about the other guys and judge Javon on a different scale. I think he's had a good year, but he's already been a pro-bowl player. He's just coming back and showing you more of what he does. He didn't have any "not so good" stretches. I give the comeback player of the year to Kevin Jones. I'm not a Martz fan, Detriot fan or a Kevin Jones fan. I think he didn't have a good year, and he's got things moving in his direction, if comeback player of the year mean,...having a bad year last year, and now having a great year, then he deserves it more then anyone. Period.

 
As much as we would like to see the award go to a player who was not injured, since 1990, the award has been given almost exclusively to players who were injured the previous year.

There are a few notable exceptions - Marcus Allen, for example. However, there are so many players coming back from injury this year who are performing very well and helping their team to victories that the award is most likely to go to one of them.

 
I agree, i don't see it being awarded to a player who's been healthy. I just don't think it should go to one who was doing great before they were hurt,...recovered...and are now doing what they've always done. I consider a "comeback" someone who was losing credibility as a good player, and because of whatever reasons,...newfound faith,...new coach,..new shoes,...starts performing like the person they were drafted to play like should get it. Thats why i vote for Kevin Jones instead of a Ahman Green, Deuce or Walker.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I understand it, it is awarded to a player who plays at a high level after either a down season (when they have previously been very good) or a serious injury. So both Javon and KJ are worthy of consideration.

I think you're referring to DNabb when you say you thought "that sounds like Javon". The difference in their situation is that DNabb had a bunch of nagging injuries that were affecting his play, but they weren't incredibly serious. He probably could have continued to play (albeit in pain), but because Philly was in a downward spiral of sorts, they made the smart choice and shut him down. His injuries weren't of the nature that a return to his previous form was in doubt. Javon had a fairly serious knee injury, and missed the entire season. It is often difficult to quickly regain one's previous form following an ACL tear, especially for a WR, who relies on his speed and ability to make cuts (and as I said, the mental aspect of recovery can often be very debilitating and can't be overlooked). Therefore, Javon's injury was far more likely to hinder his ability to once again play at a high level. He also switched teams, had to learn a new system, and is now receiving the ball from a new QB.

I agree with you that KJ is up there, and very worthy of consideration. However, I tend to attribute his success largely to that Detroit offense being much more open than it was last season. Kitna has forced defenses to remain honest, thus giving KJ a lot more running room than he had last year. Basically, I'm saying that KJ is probably the same RB that he was last year, but this new system has led to far more success. But again, he is definitely in the top three of four as far as I'm concerned.

Javon has overcome all the adversity I mentioned (serious knee injury, new team, new system, new QB) and already re-established himself as one of the league's top WRs. What sets him apart from the other players who are returning from serious injuries is his increasingly high level of play. He is hands down his team's offensive MVP.

Pennington, Deuce, and Green have all played fairly well, but they simply aren't on the same level as Javon. Grossman is playing at a very high level, but to me he is a special case because this is really the first time he's ever shown much, and I fully expect him to slow down in the second half. He's been very bad two of the last three games.

 
Even if I concede that SSmith was a mistake (which I kind of believe, but SS also did significantly BETTER than his pre-injury status), the league also gave an award to Bruschi that year - bringing up SS does not influence me. It is almost like the league acknowledged SS was a mistake and gave a co-award out.As to the Marcus Robinson example, he is an exception, not the rule. Edge, JLew, Palmer, C-Pepp - all major names who got ACL injuries and came back in UNDER a year. Two QBs played in game 1 who hurt their ACLs MONTHS after Walker suffered his. If QBs can come back in under a year, why is Walker's comeback special?
Add Rodney Harrison to that List, who not only tore the ACL, but also the LCL and MCL. Twenty years ago, this was a career ending injury, ten years ago, two years off, and maybe you could play at 80% of your former self. Now, a year and your playing, 114-16 months, if you work hard, you're at 100%. The science has improved that fast. Why didn't Marcus Robinson come back. See the qualifier about working hard. Science can only do so much. I think all of the players mentioned are in play for the award. It's a sappy award, and they give it based on audience, not really on who deserves it. Steve Smith came back from a run of the mill broken leg. Career threatening? Maybe? IIRC, it was broken in 3 places, but we have to remember these guys see the best doctors. It would end our days of playing in the flag football league, or at least slow us down, because our HMO wouldn't get us in to the best doctor, but not these guys. My pick goes to Hamlin. Coming back from what he did showed great character. If Roethlisberger can put together a solid season from here on out, he has to get consideration. There's half a season of football left. Winslow? Maybe. All the guys mentioned deserve mention, but there's half a season left. Walker deserves mention too, but unless he leads the league, I think it'll go to somebody else, because it's such a run of the mill injury. He's expected to return to form. Grossman is excelling. Brees is returned to form, that's a neutral. Deuce is back to form. Donovan is back to form, but he deserves consideration for the whole TO situation, the sports hernia, being a sissy and all, though his performance has been diminishing as the season has gone on. There's a lot of season left. A lot of stock to rise and fall from here to the finish.
 
As I understand it, it is awarded to a player who plays at a high level after either a down season (when they have previously been very good) or a serious injury.
Nobody had more of a down season last year than Morten Andersen. Using some of the criteria mentioned in this thread you could say Mort was the least likely player to be on a roster this year so that only should merit some consideration. ;)
 
As much as we would like to see the award go to a player who was not injured, since 1990, the award has been given almost exclusively to players who were injured the previous year.

There are a few notable exceptions - Marcus Allen, for example. However, there are so many players coming back from injury this year who are performing very well and helping their team to victories that the award is most likely to go to one of them.
i know they were nothing major but injuries played a big part (not bigger than mooch but...) in KJs struggles last year. A shoulder, thigh and elbow injury cost him 3 games and kept him ineffective in several others. 10/23/2005 RB Shoulder questionable (10/23) Bothered him for 4 weeks

12/4/2005 RB Thigh Probable (12/4) DNP, 9 carries following week

12/18/2005 RB Elbow questionable (12/18) DNP

12/24/2005 RB Elbow questionable (12/24) DNP

Plus the way Mooch handled him, KJs gotta qualify for overcoming adversity too

 
Ken Hamlin...guy had his brain kicked in and the doctotrs thought we would never play football again, and now he is back starting with the Hawks and throwing nice hits again.

He doesn't have the stats like Javon Walker, but coming back from almost dying and having brain hemorraging is more astounding to me than coming back from a knee injury.

 
I think that all of this talk really raises the question of what voters actually take into consideration. What is more important in their eyes: coming back from a "run of the mill" injury (ACL, broken leg, separated shoulder, torn achilles, etc.) to play at an extremely high level, or coming back from a very serious and career- or life-threatening injury to play again at all.

The comparison between Hamlin and Walker is similar to the comparison last season between Steve Smith and Bruschi, and we all saw how that worked out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that all of this talk really raises the question of what voters actually take into consideration. What is more important in their eyes: coming back from a "run of the mill" injury (ACL, broken leg, separated shoulder, torn achilles, etc.) to play at an extremely high level, or coming back from a very serious and career- or life-threatening injury to play again at all.

The comparison between Hamlin and Walker is similar to the comparison last season between Steve Smith and Bruschi, and we all saw how that worked out.
They both won the award.
Past Winners

* 2005 Tedy Bruschi, New England Patriots LB and Steve Smith, Carolina Panthers WR

* 2004 Drew Brees, San Diego Chargers QB

* 2003 Jon Kitna, Cincinnati Bengals QB

* 2002 Tommy Maddox, Pittsburgh Steelers QB

* 2001 Garrison Hearst, San Francisco 49ers RB

* 2000 Joe Johnson, New Orleans Saints DE

* 1999 Bryant Young, San Francisco 49ers DT

* 1998 Doug Flutie, Buffalo Bills QB
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_Comeback_..._the_Year_AwardHamlin doesn't have the media name of Bruschi though, and why I think he probably won't win it, even though I believe he deserves moreso than someone like Walker. Not to discredit Walker, because he is playing well considering he had major surgery on his knee last year, but coming back to play contact football after being in serious condition in the ICU with a fractured skull, blood clots in the brain, hemorrhaging, etc. and being told by doctors that you may never play again, is more of a feat in my eyes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bump.

He had an off week, but I still think T. Henry could be the surprise winner here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top