wikkidpissah
Footballguy
Bro...Has anyone discussed his nihilism and what role it plays in this?
Bro...Has anyone discussed his nihilism and what role it plays in this?
I dont get perv. I've been with more women at once than some FFAppers have been with in their lifetime, was married to a prostitute and have indulged a lot of behavior just to contribute to sex partners' rocksoff moments and i still don't get perv. Now that somebody threw a bigass bucket of water on him, I expect CK to become as curious about why he did what he did as he has with everything else in his world and i expect the result to finally give me some answers. Nihilism is just curiosity without compunction or restriction, isnt it? Who was it said, "I do what i want til i'm stopped, but no one ever stops me"?Dunno, man. Seems awfully important to bring up.
I'm just thinking that when you think God dies, all is out the window. It's sort of a generalized sentiment, and not much to do with perv. But when your whole act is around God dying and pushing boundaries, you push boundaries in real life. I should make it clear I don't support it -- I don't get perv, either.I dont get perv. I've been with more women at once than some FFAppers have been with in their lifetime, was married to a prostitute and have indulged a lot of behavior just to contribute to sex partners' rocksoff moments and i still don't get perv. Now that somebody threw a bigass bucket of water on him, I expect CK to become as curious about why he did what he did as he has with everything else in his world and i expect the result to finally give me some answers. Nihilism is just curiosity without compunction or restriction, isnt it? Who was it said, "I do what i want til i'm stopped, but no one ever stops me"?
ETA: Shelley/Byron maybe?
I said in the political thread that he's still a pervert and scummy but it's a good statement even if he doesn't mean a word of it and I'll give him credit for it, assuming he doesn't backtrack or change his tune. If he loses his career over it then it is deserved - I won't be crying over it.I don't agree with this. He engaged in this behavior for years, and lied about it until the NYT put the hammer down. Screw his remorse.
i wrote a whole rock opera-type song a year or two about quests and frontiers and what not having any more of them will do to us. kinda like what DFWallace said about addiction being all we have to look forward to on our present courseI'm just thinking that when you think God dies, all is out the window. It's sort of a generalized sentiment, and not much to do with perv. But when your whole act is around God dying and pushing boundaries, you push boundaries in real life. I should make it clear I don't support it -- I don't get perv, either.
I said in the political thread that he's still a pervert and scummy but it's a good statement even if he doesn't mean a word of it and I'll give him credit for it, assuming he doesn't backtrack or change his tune. If he loses his career over it then it is deserved - I won't be crying over it.
Help me understand how this is problematic behaviour but Nicole Kidman trying to date Jimmy Fallon wasn't. https://youtu.be/qtsNbxgPngA
He thought she wanted to talk about work. She was pursuing him romantically. They didn't go out, they met at his apartment.
If they had gone on to have consensual sex, would she be the one making a public apology? What specific line did he cross that she didn't, and what specifically would it have taken for her to become guilty of the same thing Louis is?
Shtick?Help me understand how this is problematic behaviour but Nicole Kidman trying to date Jimmy Fallon wasn't. https://youtu.be/qtsNbxgPngA
He thought she wanted to talk about work. She was pursuing him romantically. They didn't go out, they met at his apartment.
If they had gone on to have consensual sex, would she be the one making a public apology? What specific line did he cross that she didn't, and what specifically would it have taken for her to become guilty of the same thing Louis is?
I'm not kidding. Did Fallon not respect and admire Kidman? Was she not more established in the industry that Fallon was in?
WAT?Would it have mattered if only one of then had an orgasm?
Are single people prohibited from certain consensual sex acts with people in their industry? Which ones?
He said he asked for consentI'm a little afraid to answer fred's questions - I'll stick with, don't whip your #### out of your pants without consent. Seems like a good rule.
I think even requesting consent for such a thing is a horrible idea in 99% of all fields of profession.I'm a little afraid to answer fred's questions - I'll stick with, don't whip your #### out of your pants without consent. Seems like a good rule.
Pretty sure you are bored on a Friday night, but so am I.......He said he asked for consent
I'm talking about all the time - ignoring any specific circumstances (like being with co-workers). I agree with you, although if someone is inclined to do so and is willing to accept the consequences, more power to them.I think even requesting consent for such a thing is a horrible idea in 99% of all fields of profession.
I ended up searching google for his situation in a legal sense. Came back with this...He said he asked for consent
In California, where three women have described instances of C.K. non-consensually masturbating either in front of them or while on the phone with them, this behavior might be deemed criminal under California Penal Code 314. Under this code, anyone who exposes themselves "in any public place, or in any place where there are present other persons to be offended or annoyed" could be found guilty of a misdemeanor. If they're charged more than once, it's considered a felony, according to a California criminal defense lawyer who asked to remain anonymous. "If convicted, [C.K.] would also have to register as a sex offender for 10 years," she said. All the women would have to do is file a police report, and the state could pursue charges from there.
"Mind if I smoke?" - maybeI think Fred's point is that if you ask consent and don't hear "No", and the person doesn't leave, then perhaps it's reasonable to assume that consent was given.
Maybe?
But it happened too fast for them to process. And then his #### was out, and their lives forever altered, their budding comedic careers thwarted. After seeing Louis CK's ****, they could not find the humor in anything anymore.I think Fred's point is that if you ask consent and don't hear "No", and the person doesn't leave, then perhaps it's reasonable to assume that consent was given.
Maybe?
Who keep our masturbation to ourselves.Uruk-Hai said:As I said, we are all hypocrites.
He took... it outHelp me understand how this is problematic behaviour but Nicole Kidman trying to date Jimmy Fallon wasn't. https://youtu.be/qtsNbxgPngA
He thought she wanted to talk about work. She was pursuing him romantically. They didn't go out, they met at his apartment.
If they had gone on to have consensual sex, would she be the one making a public apology? What specific line did he cross that she didn't, and what specifically would it have taken for her to become guilty of the same thing Louis is?
What about Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis and most of the 70s rock acts eg Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath etc?Uruk-Hai said:It'll be interesting to see how far folks take this.
For instance - judging by stories that have been out there forever - just about every Hollywood mogul or male star in the Golden Age was a sexual harasser/predator/abuser and it wasn't even hidden. Do we stop watching Wizard Of Oz or Adventures Of Robin Hood?
Or how about music? Give up enjoying James Brown or The Beatles?
I'm not making a judgement, but I find it fascinating where people draw their lines in the sand and how hypocritical we all can be.
It’s the same reason we make light of teacher-student sex stories in here when teacher is female and kid is a dude. Yes, there’s a double standard, same as day one, won’t change.So the issue here is that people don't believe he asked for consent, or that they believe he asked and it wasn't given.
So if Nicole Kidman had ripped her shirt open and said take me I'm yours, but didn't wait for consent, same thing?
Just to be clear, I'm not condoning anything. I'm asking where the line is.I thought the “it’s Not that bad” thing in here was shtick at first.
Yikes.
It’s hard to believe some of the things humans do
Presidents you voted for too, right?It’s hard to believe some of the things these celebrities do. The apology after you’re caught means nothing. Total sickos.
Been following this guy around for years waiting to use this.General Malaise said:
You sure this is the thread you want to admit to being a stalker in?Been following this guy around for years waiting to use this.
I ended up searching google for his situation in a legal sense. Came back with this...
Uh oh." . . . or while on the phone with them, "
Didn't the story say he aplogized to a few of them a long time ago?EYLive said:F'ing up... 5 times doing the same thing? He seems genuinely contrite because he's a wordsmith. He's just sad for being publicly humiliated.
It's not like any of these sickos are voluntarily coming forward with apologies without victims outing them first.
I don't believe you.General Malaise said:Was he just skeeting all over the place or did he have the common decency to use a Kleenex? What a weird fetish. I can't even spank it if there's a mirror in the room.
I don't believe you.
In this city ladies look prettyLet's say you are a single guy who works in business. You meet a girl who also works in business in an entry level position at another company. You talk for a while and ask her up to your room.
Once you get there, you ask her if you can kiss her. Then you lean in and give her a quick kiss. She doesn't leave. Then you lean in and give her another kiss.
Ten years later, you've gotten a couple of promotions. She comes out and says you took advantage of her. She agrees that you asked consent for the kiss, and that she didn't leave right away when you kissed her. As a result of the allegations, and before any evidence is presented in court, you lose your job and are black listed in your industry for years.
Are you guys ok with this?
That's not what happened. He invited them to his room, while fully clothed, he asked them if it was ok to do, and then he undressed.question for the apologists...in what ####### universe it ok to whip out your hard **** and start jacking off, without it being crystal ####### clear that the people you're JACKING OFF in front of, are interested in watching you jack off?
so lame. i hope the ####er rots
Consent is a really big part of this. All parties seem to agree that he asked for consent, and at a minimum that they didn't say no or leave. It's not totally clear whether they said ok, but let's assume they did for this thought exercise.Maurile Tremblay said:These stories are true. At the time, I said to myself that what I did was O.K. because I never showed a woman my #### without asking first, which is also true. But what I learned later in life, too late, is that when you have power over another person, asking them to look at your #### isn’t a question. It’s a predicament for them.
This is the exact reaction his “apology” (in which he never apologizes) is meant to generate. He’s telling everyone it was consensual, that’s the main point. It almost certainly wasn’t. That and humble bragging about his power and how much he’s admired, and talking about his ####.This is not an attempt to defends him or his specific actions. It seems like there's agreement on these things
They didn't work for him
He asked if they wanted to come up to his room and they agreed
He asked if he could do a sexual thing
They did not leave
He undressed
They did not leave
He began to do a sexual thing
3 of them left, 2 stayed
He did a sexual thing
Pitchforks
At which step did he cross a line, and at which step would you be crossing a line if you did the same thing?