Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Cooks, Mixon, Diggs for Hyde, Woodhead, D.Thomas (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Hartliner
- Start date
dagman
Footballguy
First of all, thanks for answering my thread.
I'd like to see the other guys roster for possible counter offers. Before last night, I might have pulled the trigger on the trade.I have Cooks, as you know; and after last night's showing, it doesn't appear he and Brady are even close to being on the same page yet.
I like the addition of Mixon, especially if this is a keeper league. If not, you're giving away too much RB scoring for a redraft league IMO.
dagman
Footballguy
Ah, I was wondering about that....if that's the case, this is a pretty sweet deal. I'd like to get something a little more valuable than Diggs though as you're giving away proven scoring for speculative scoring.
az_prof
Footballguy
You are getting two RBs with great upside--both of whom are probably in the top 15 Dynasty RBs, and a decent WR in Diggs and basically you are giving up Thomas, a top 5 WR, and Hyde, who is in an offense that doesn't suit his skills, is often injured, and is a pretty average back when healthy.
Yes, click accept.
Yes, click accept.
Last edited by a moderator:
4th&inches
Footballguy
thanks for the help with mine.
While i'd consider seeing if he'd be willing to sweetin the pot with someone a little better than Diggs, I think i'd just click accept and not make him think twice about this.
I prefer Cook over Hyde, Mixon over Woodhead (both by decent margins).
while Thomas is definitely a better WR than Diggs, the upside you get at RB is worth the gap between the 2 WR's. Also, you still have good WR's to pair up with Diggs as well.
While i'd consider seeing if he'd be willing to sweetin the pot with someone a little better than Diggs, I think i'd just click accept and not make him think twice about this.
I prefer Cook over Hyde, Mixon over Woodhead (both by decent margins).
while Thomas is definitely a better WR than Diggs, the upside you get at RB is worth the gap between the 2 WR's. Also, you still have good WR's to pair up with Diggs as well.
beerbuff
Footballguy
While Hyde, Thomas and Woodhead are proven commodities I'd say it is worth the risk for the potential upside, especially with so many of your other RB's worth squat you need to gamble on a few players at this point.
Tornacl
Footballguy
Yes, I'd take that deal. I think that both Mixon and Cook will be better than Hyde and Woodhead, and Diggs should be close to DT at the worst case.
Please answer mine:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/760023-who-to-trade-and-possible-targets/
Please answer mine:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/760023-who-to-trade-and-possible-targets/
BLOCKED_PUNT
Footballguy
yea, that's good.
Hot Sauce Guy
Footballguy
I would make that trade in a heartbeat.
Fitz is not young, and I like Diggs a lot. Cook/Mixon is likely better value than D.Thomas/Hyde and Woodhead is getting on in years too.
I can't see how you lose in this deal.
Your final roster is much better as a result IMO. Hyde is a talented back on a craptastic team. I think he's a little over-hyped as a "late RB stud" to be honest. Maybe I'm way off, but I don't see the Niners being very competitive this year. I think that hurts Hyde;s overall production.