Yep . They have zero offense .
A decent Qb ( chokes in pressure situation ) a decent RB ( since he is the only weapon on offense , he will be held in check this year )
No NFL talent at WR , it is worse then Pinkston , Trash and Mitchell.
And the defense is nowhere as good as it was in 2003 ( this is the big difference )
So i keep my prediction they are by far the worst team of the division.
This guy is funny. McNabbs a decent QB. If McNabb is only a decent QB, then what is Bledsoe because Bledsoe isn't even close to McNabb. Bledsoe couldn't win crap with NE. He had the Pats 0-2 in 2001 then Brady comes in and they win 3 out of the next 4 Superbowls. Then he goes to Buffalo and lights it up there

Now all the Dallas fans think he's good enough to take them to the promised land? As long as he is the QB of Dallas they have no, none, nil, zilch, zero chance of ever getting to, let alone winning a superbowl. I love how people say McNabb chokes in pressure situations. The only NFC Championship game I thought he played bad in was in 2002 against the Bucs. Every other one it was just bad team play and not McNabb. In fact without McNabb the Eagles wouldn't even be in the playoffs. But it is only March, come January all the Dallas fans will realize that Bledsoe isn't good enough. Westbrook a decent RB? He's better than anyone the Cowboys will be trotting out there carrying the ball.
No NFL talent at WR? Do you even know what you're talking about? Jabbar Gaffney and Reggie Brown are waaaayyyyyy better than what Thrash and Mitchell gave you. Not even close.
Defensively we won't know how good the Eagles will be in 2006. That will depend on the development of Trent Cole and Mike Patterson. They also added Darren Howard and Shawn Barber. Plus Jerome McDougal hopefully will play and contribute. Plus they'll probably add someone on the DL in the first or second round of the draft. On defense I really don't know how good they'll be, but I do know they will be better than last year.