What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Crockett signed by the Bucs (1 Viewer)

Capella

Footballguy
PewterReport.com is reporting that the Buccaneers will sign RB Zack Crockett on Wednesday to fill the roster vacancy that was created when the team placed QB Chris Simms on injured reserve. Crockett has experience playing in Jon Gruden's system, having played under Gruden in Oakland from 1999-2001. Crockett visited the Buccaneers last week when he worked out for the team's coaches and scouts.
:P
 
PewterReport.com is reporting that the Buccaneers will sign RB Zack Crockett on Wednesday to fill the roster vacancy that was created when the team placed QB Chris Simms on injured reserve. Crockett has experience playing in Jon Gruden's system, having played under Gruden in Oakland from 1999-2001. Crockett visited the Buccaneers last week when he worked out for the team's coaches and scouts.
:P
This could save my FF season, thanks! :(
 
PewterReport.com is reporting that the Buccaneers will sign RB Zack Crockett on Wednesday to fill the roster vacancy that was created when the team placed QB Chris Simms on injured reserve. Crockett has experience playing in Jon Gruden's system, having played under Gruden in Oakland from 1999-2001. Crockett visited the Buccaneers last week when he worked out for the team's coaches and scouts.
:P
got to love a former FSU player getting signed
 
He is expected to contribute as a fullback, which will help possibly free up Askew to take on some work as a ballcarrier at halfback, in addition to getting some carries in short-yardage and goal-line situations. Askew was a halfback at the University of Michigan.

I dont see a reason to run to pick up crockett

 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised the name Adimchinobe Echemandu

has not been discussed. The Raiders just released him,

and he was the leading pre-season rusher.

I know it's a reach but he looked good albeit against inferior competition.

Worth a shot for the Bucs, imo.

 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
I'm far from arguing that he's the best short yardage back of all time, but in terms of punching it in from the five or less, Crockett was absolutely money for the Raiders.From 1999 through 2005, Crocket had 352 rushing attempts. And 38 TDs. Yes, he was a purely situational back, and those attempts often occurred when the Raiders were inside the 10, but those stats really don't support your hyperbole.
 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
I'm far from arguing that he's the best short yardage back of all time, but in terms of punching it in from the five or less, Crockett was absolutely money for the Raiders.From 1999 through 2005, Crocket had 352 rushing attempts. And 38 TDs. Yes, he was a purely situational back, and those attempts often occurred when the Raiders were inside the 10, but those stats really don't support your hyperbole.
See, don't you all miss Stompin Tom?
 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
I'm far from arguing that he's the best short yardage back of all time, but in terms of punching it in from the five or less, Crockett was absolutely money for the Raiders.From 1999 through 2005, Crocket had 352 rushing attempts. And 38 TDs. Yes, he was a purely situational back, and those attempts often occurred when the Raiders were inside the 10, but those stats really don't support your hyperbole.
Ill admit, I embellished it some. Im just not a fan. Look at his TD totals from 04-06. 147 carries ZERO TDs. His counterparts made him look more effective than his legend projects. Bitter Charlie Garner owner that watched Crockett capitalize on Garners hardwork constantly. Vulturing TDs and acting a fool after he pounded a 3-4 yard run for a 1st down or TD and celebrated with immature arrogance. As if he climbed Mt Everest all by himself staking the flag atop the mountain. Not my style. :popcorn: :rant: :lmao: :2cents: :banned: Yes thats 5 thumbs down.Garner easily could have made those goalline runs. Gruden had an obscene fascination of putting Crockett in the game. Fast forward October 2007, again Chucky is revealing his Crockett fetish. Garner avged over 4-5 yards per carry as a Raider. Generally inexplicably finding himself on the bench at the doorstep. Wheatley saw his share of shortyardage looks and was a better all around runner than Crockett95-98 Indy and Jax saw no value running him behind Faulk and Fred Taylor.
Code:
|		  Rushing		 |		Receiving		|+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year  TM |   G |   Att  Yards	Y/A   TD |   Rec  Yards   Y/R   TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 1995 ind |  16 |	 1	  0	0.0	0 |	 2	 35  17.5	0 || 1996 ind |   5 |	31	164	5.3	0 |	11	 96   8.7	1 || 1997 ind |  16 |	95	300	3.2	1 |	15	112   7.5	0 || 1998 ind |   2 |	 2	  5	2.5	0 |	 1	  1   1.0	0 || 1998 jax |  10 |	 0	  0	0.0	0 |	 1	  4   4.0	0 || 1999 oak |  13 |	45	 91	2.0	4 |	 8	 56   7.0	1 || 2000 oak |  16 |	43	130	3.0	7 |	10	 62   6.2	0 || 2001 oak |  16 |	57	145	2.5	6 |	 2	 10   5.0	0 || 2002 oak |  15 |	40	118	3.0	8 |	 0	  0   0.0	0 || 2003 oak |  16 |	48	145	3.0	7 |	 7	 53   7.6	0 || 2004 oak |  16 |	48	232	4.8	2 |	16	 87   5.4	0 || 2005 oak |  16 |	60	208	3.5	1 |	13	111   8.5	0 || 2006 oak |  16 |	39	163	4.2	0 |	10	 53   5.3	0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+|  TOTAL   | 173 |   509   1701	3.3   36 |	96	680   7.1	2 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------2000+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Zack Crockett		| 16 |   43   130   3.0   7  |   10	62   6.2   0 || Randy Jordan		 | 13 |   46   213   4.6   3  |   27   299  11.1   1 || Napoleon Kaufman	 | 14 |   93   499   5.4   0  |   13   127   9.8   1 || Terry Kirby		  |  1 |   11	51   4.6   0  |	3	19   6.3   0 || Jon Ritchie		  | 11 |	0	 0   0.0   0  |   26   173   6.7   0 || Tyrone Wheatley	  | 14 |  232  1046   4.5   9  |   20   156   7.8   1 |2001+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Name				 |  G |  RSH  YARD   AVG  TD  |  REC  YARD   AVG  TD |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Zack Crockett		| 16 |   57   145   2.5   6  |	2	10   5.0   0 || Charlie Garner	   | 16 |  211   839   4.0   1  |   72   578   8.0   2 || Randy Jordan		 | 16 |   13	59   4.5   0  |	9	63   7.0   0 || Terry Kirby		  | 11 |   10	49   4.9   0  |	9	62   6.9   0 || Jon Ritchie		  | 15 |	0	 0   0.0   0  |   19   154   8.1   2 || Tyrone Wheatley	  | 12 |   88   276   3.1   5  |   12	61   5.1   1 || Jermaine Williams	| 12 |	0	 0   0.0   0  |	2	11   5.5   0 |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+2002+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Name				 |  G |  RSH  YARD   AVG  TD  |  REC  YARD   AVG  TD |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Zack Crockett		| 15 |   40   118   3.0   8  |	0	 0   0.0   0 || Charlie Garner	   | 16 |  182   962   5.3   7  |   91   941  10.3   4 || Randy Jordan		 | 11 |	3	14   4.7   1  |	2	19   9.5   0 || Terry Kirby		  |  6 |   16	51   3.2   0  |   17   115   6.8   1 || Jon Ritchie		  | 16 |	0	 0   0.0   0  |   10	66   6.6   1 || Tyrone Wheatley	  | 14 |  108   419   3.9   2  |   12	71   5.9   0 |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+2003+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Name				 |  G |  RSH  YARD   AVG  TD  |  REC  YARD   AVG  TD |+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+| Zack Crockett		| 16 |   48   145   3.0   7  |	7	53   7.6   0 || Justin Fargas		| 10 |   40   203   5.1   0  |	2	 2   1.0   0 || Charlie Garner	   | 14 |  120   553   4.6   3  |   48   386   8.0   1 || Chris Hetherington   | 14 |	0	 0   0.0   0  |	2	23  11.5   0 || J.R. Redmond		 |  1 |	9	30   3.3   0  |	1	 6   6.0   0 || Tyrone Wheatley	  | 15 |  159   678   4.3   4  |   12   120  10.0   0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I loved Garner as a Raider, one of my favorite plays was in the Wild Card game in 2001 vs the Jets. Jets were making a late game comeback, they had just scored and cut the lead to 31-24, when this happened: Oak--C.Garner 80 run (S.Janikowski kick),

13:33, and that was that. Course then we went on to get robbed by the officials in NE, and life goes on.

I also thought Crockett was overrated and I hated that stupid thing he did after every score.

 
Crockett added to bolster Buccaneers' backfield

By PFW staff

Oct. 10, 2007

Tampa Bay shuffled its roster Tuesday and again Wednesday, first placing QB Chris Simms on injured reserve to make room for this morning’s announced signing of FB Zack Crockett. Crockett, a 13-year veteran, was a free agent after spending last season with Oakland. He started nine games in 2006, his eighth with the Raiders, and rushed 39 times for 163 yards. The Buccaneers were in dire need of a veteran running back after Cadillac Williams suffered a season-ending knee injury in Week Four and his backup, Michael Pittman, was lost for 6-8 weeks Oct. 7 with a severe ankle sprain.

The PFW spin

After talk of a trade for Minnesota backup RB Mewelde Moore, jokes about calling Tiki Barber, and a “thanks, but no thanks” from Corey Dillon, the best Tampa Bay could do was sign the 34-year-old Crockett?

Absolutely not.

This was a preliminary move, and another one will be announced shortly, if Bucs GM Bruce Allen relents on his refusal to trade a first-day draft pick for a running back.

Crockett will be utilized as a fullback in Jon Gruden's complex offensive scheme. The former Raider was the coach’s fullback from 1999-2001, when Gruden roamed the sidelines in Oakland. Crockett's familiarity with the system made him an attractive option in Tampa Bay's suddenly desperate backfield situation.

Before Williams went down, Pittman had been starting at fullback, so his ailment led to a need to add depth to both backfield positions. If Tampa Bay doesn’t make another move by Sunday, it could start Crockett at fullback, assuming he is in shape, mentally and physically, and RB Earnest Graham, who has moved into the No. 1 role by default.

Graham, a 5-9, 225-pounder, and Crockett, a 6-2, 240-pounder, form one of the league’s most bruising tandems, but neither will run away from anyone. On Sunday, the pair faces Tennessee, which has erased the opposition’s ground game all season and ranks third in the league in run defense.

The offense will continue to rely on the efficiency of QB Jeff Garcia, who has four TD passes and zero interceptions thus far. The team has started 3-2 without any real firepower in the passing game, and if Garcia is given time, he has shown he can lead Tampa Bay to the goal line. From there, it’s up to Crockett and Graham to power into the endzone.

Our fantasy take

If the offense works like it’s supposed to, either Crockett, Graham, or both could turn into TD machines for Tampa Bay. Still, neither will get you much in terms of yardage. If the pair has success in the next week or two, and your roster could use some scoring punch, Graham or Crockett could be a solid fit.

:shrug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
RavensUNFL said:
I loved Garner as a Raider, one of my favorite plays was in the Wild Card game in 2001 vs the Jets. Jets were making a late game comeback, they had just scored and cut the lead to 31-24, when this happened: Oak--C.Garner 80 run (S.Janikowski kick), 13:33, and that was that. Course then we went on to get robbed by the officials in NE, and life goes on. I also thought Crockett was overrated and I hated that stupid thing he did after every score.
Garner and Gannon won me my first FFB Championship.
 
greyone said:
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
I'm far from arguing that he's the best short yardage back of all time, but in terms of punching it in from the five or less, Crockett was absolutely money for the Raiders.From 1999 through 2005, Crocket had 352 rushing attempts. And 38 TDs. Yes, he was a purely situational back, and those attempts often occurred when the Raiders were inside the 10, but those stats really don't support your hyperbole.
See, don't you all miss Stompin Tom?
Yes. STC = legend :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised the name Adimchinobe Echemanduhas not been discussed. The Raiders just released him,and he was the leading pre-season rusher.I know it's a reach but he looked good albeit against inferior competition.Worth a shot for the Bucs, imo.
I think he signed with Houston if I read the news blogger correctly.
 
FWIW

As someone else posted, much of the TALK out there is they'll sign Barlow soon

Talk's talk and who knows if they will but if you're winning and far down on the WW order, I think ya might have to pick Barlow up now and hope it works out; since next week you'll be at the end of the WW order again.

I did. I see an Sjax owner I could probably unload him onto as he's desperate for a RB and......I figure it's worth a shot for one week.

/FWIW

 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
Which part of NorCal are you from?
Nice catch. Socal is more like it.
SoCal people hate that word. you must be a transplant.
Nope. Socal born and raised. Im just not a hater like most LA people.
So, either way, if I start using "hella", people will assume I'm from Cali? :ool.
 
i read mewelde is "definitely" getting moved by the deadline. has that died down or do you still expect it to happen?

 
Wheels are coming of the Bucs bus...
Speaking of wheels.............PITTMAN'S NEW WHEELS: RB Michael Pittman found a great way to get around after injuring his right ankle against Indianapolis on Sunday.Pittman purchased a blue scooter at Pep Boys and has been riding it around town. He has a Bucs sticker on the front, plus a second Tampa Bay sticker on the back of his seat and the number 32 on it. Pittman also has a giant foam Bucs finger on his scooter.'I took it into Publix Wednesday and everybody knew who I was,' Pittman said. 'Everybody just keep saying 'ah, ah, ah.' I just kept saying stop ah'ing, I'm going to be all right. Everybody just wished me the best.'Pittman expects to be out at least six weeks with his injury. The Bucs claimed he suffered a high ankle sprain, but Pittman said he actually tore ligaments in his ankle.He describes himself as a fast healer, but he has no intentions of rushing back onto the field until he's ready.'My first year here, I hurt my ankle in 2002, and when I came back I just wasn't myself,' Pittman said. 'Anybody would hit my leg and I was quick to fall because I wasn't confident in my ankle. I'm not going to do that. What I want to do is make sure it heals and let Earnest Graham and everyone else carry the weight. If I come back at 80 percent, I can't do what I want to do.'Pittman said he has no intention of riding his scooter on Tampa Bay's sideline this week and is looking forward to putting his scooter away, although he is having fun.'I may put some low profile tires on there,' he said. 'Chrome out my rims.' :mellow:
 
Crockett sucks. Most overrated shortyardage back ever! Gruden must be freakin hella desperate.
Which part of NorCal are you from?
Nice catch. Socal is more like it.
SoCal people hate that word. you must be a transplant.
Nope. Socal born and raised. Im just not a hater like most LA people.
NoCal here, higher education in SoCal and LoCal... they hated hella... but there were enough of us to say tough sh_ ...Crockett isn't the most overrated. Ummmm, 3 TDs on 10 carries in the postseason. And once a fullback dude avg'd a TD every 10 carries... I don't have his redzone stats.. but imagine that goes up to about a TD every 3 or 4 carries. He was money for awhile.

He's only 35 which isn't much for a fullback. Zo Neal just went to the ProBowl at 37.

What this means is Gruden knows/trusts him, and goalline snipes are DEFINITELY in order... crack off 2-3 TDs to Grahams projections here on out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top