What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Culpepper owners suicide watch (1 Viewer)

hahahhahhaha

culpepper

ahhahahahahhaha

good job projecting him to similiar numbers without moss.

ahahahahhahahahaha
Click to expand...
Good job mocking projections when you rely on a weekly cheatsheet from cbssportsline. Tool factor rising.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
due to my league's incredibly flawed scoring system(1 pt per completion) C-pep scored 27 points today. I played the manning owner(scored 15) so it looks like im gonna survive this disaster
Click to expand...
one of my league i do not get - PTs for INT or FUMB. he scored me 20 PTs in that league, 10 in the other 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
11 interceptions in each of the past two seasons.8 so far this year - in two games.Burleson limping off the field?Somebody put the Culpepper owners on suicide watch.It all starts with the O-Line... and apparently it may end there for the ViQueens this year.

 
,Sep 18 2005, 02:02 PM]Manning and Pepper = total busts this year... no way they even finish in the top 10 QB this year

:o
Click to expand...
Care to put your money where your money is?
Click to expand...
don't waste your time with [toolcon], most of the time he himself doesn't believe what he's saying
 
didnt anyone not see this coming?

you lose your best WR ( one of the top 2 in the game ) along with a probowl center and rg...have 0 defense...and Pencil man coaching lol
Click to expand...
Thats funny, other than Jburb26(I think thats his name) and maybe 2 or 3 others, I was completely alone when I told everyone in the offseason that this would happen. Yet several people accused me of fishing and/or called me an idiot. Wonder where those people are now? See my sig for links to all of those threads.
 
Hey FBG, can you admit now that you put Culpepper at #2 to throw off the masses while you secretly avoided him? I mean, I know you guys are way better than to have invested heavily in Culpepper. OK, perhaps one or two of you drinking the Kool-Aid is cool. But a lot of you just hurts. :bag:

And #2 ranking QB for him was was probably the worst ranking in the history of this site's rankings, IMO. Not because of how it will turn out. But because he was just so clearly not deserving of that much respect given all the changes. I suspect it could be groupthink or the undesirability of respecting Moss and having been wrong about it. But hey, give the man his props where he deserves them. His presence has more effect on an NFL offense than any other non QB in the league, and more than almost all the QBs, too. I would hope you have some sort of discussion, publicly or privately, to understand why you made this huge mistake, and doing something to prevent such mistakes in future rankings. Or, just let us in on the hoax. ;)

If you think it was not a result of a flawed process, then great. But at least check on it...

I only suggest this while at the same time acknowledging your overall dominance of FF sites and your willingness to keep pushing things to the next level. There is no other site I would even think of suggesting something that requires such an unusual level of commitment. Props with hopefully constructive criticism, no matter how much sarcasm I put in it. :yes:
Click to expand...
just to give credit where its due, this guy was also saying the same thing I was all offseason. He is one of those 2 or 3 I spoke of.
 
didnt anyone not see this coming?

you lose your best WR ( one of the top 2 in the game ) along with a probowl center and rg...have 0 defense...and Pencil man coaching lol
Click to expand...
Thats funny, other than Jburb26(I think thats his name) and maybe 2 or 3 others, I was completely alone when I told everyone in the offseason that this would happen. Yet several people accused me of fishing and/or called me an idiot. Wonder where those people are now? See my sig for links to all of those threads.
Click to expand...
I was with you - took a bashing in my projections threads as people told me I was WAY too low on Culpepper, with just 22 passing TDs. I didn't take the sig bet because I'm too superstitious, and didn't want to jink Collins in a bad way. I also have a thread somewhere touting MIN under 9.5 wins at even money as a great bet to make, and again, took heat from many here. The funny thing is that it was so easy to see - you could see what Moss did to other QB's numbers, and we could see what TO did to QBs numbers, but people refused to think that Culpepper would tumble without Randy.

Perhaps best of all is ESPN the magazine. They picked the Vikings to win the Superbowl. They did a whole article about Culpepper, and repeatedly mentioned "The Distraction" and how much better things will be without "him". Up yours, ESPN!

 
Matt Hasselback is my backup.

Starting next week, Culpepper rides the bench until he does something good on the football field. :hot:
Click to expand...
Never drafted a 2nd QB.....figured i could pick up some scrub for his bye week........DUH :wall: :wall: :wall:
 
Culpepper thought O'Neal was on his team...he was in on 4 of them...(2:01) (No Huddle, Shotgun) D.Culpepper pass intended for N.Burleson INTERCEPTED by T.James at CIN 42. T.James to CIN 47 for 5 yards (J.Wiggins). {Pass deflected off the hands of N.Burleson (MIN #81) to T.James (CIN #20)}(14:37) (No Huddle) D.Culpepper pass intended for N.Burleson INTERCEPTED by D.O'Neal at CIN 10. D.O'Neal to CIN 10 for no gain (N.Burleson).(9:47) (No Huddle, Shotgun) D.Culpepper pass intended for T.Williamson INTERCEPTED by K.Kaesviharn (D.O'Neal) at CIN 17. K.Kaesviharn to CIN 23 for 6 yards (T.Williamson). {The pass was defensed and tipped in the air by D.O'Neal (CIN #24)}(2:24) (No Huddle, Shotgun) D.Culpepper pass intended for M.Moore INTERCEPTED by D.O'Neal at MIN 43. D.O'Neal to MIN 16 for 27 yards (D.Culpepper).(13:18) (Shotgun) D.Culpepper pass intended for M.Robinson INTERCEPTED by D.O'Neal at CIN -5. Touchback.

 
Here's my thoughts on Pep. I think everyone should not panic. No QB in the league, especially one with the talent he has is that bad. He looks like he has no rhythm back there cuz his offensive line is terrible. It should improve hopefully with some time. I think there is no way Pep becomes the QB#2 but there's no way you can trade him for low. And unless you have a stud backup there's not much you can do. He'll definately finish in the top 10 this year. Anybody who think otherwise is nuts. So best case scenario he turns it around. Worse case scenario he plays bad but he should still put up top 10 #s and maybe you can play matchups with him and your backup. Im sticking it out with him for 1 more week (vs NO) and if he stinks it up again I'll play matchups with him and my backup (Plummer). He still put up 19 pts in my league this week (thankfully no negative pts. for turnovers).

 
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...

He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.

Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:
 
Somehow in my stupid league, this guy was worth 20 pts this week.

:shrug:
Click to expand...
Yep, he had 16 in my league. It can't get much worse than this, and he STILL managed passable fantasy numbers. Don't get hosed into trading him for nothing this week.

 
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...

He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.

Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.
Click to expand...
:thumbup: Someone around here is still using their brain
 
Somehow in my stupid league, this guy was worth 20 pts this week.

:shrug:
Click to expand...
Culpepper got 6 points in my league-which seems about right. Still, in real NFL terms I think Manning had a better game than Culpepper, yet Manning only tallied 2 points in my league.
 
Here's my thoughts on Pep. I think everyone should not panic. No QB in the league, especially one with the talent he has is that bad. He looks like he has no rhythm back there cuz his offensive line is terrible. It should improve hopefully with some time. I think there is no way Pep becomes the QB#2 but there's no way you can trade him for low. And unless you have a stud backup there's not much you can do. He'll definately finish in the top 10 this year. Anybody who think otherwise is nuts. So best case scenario he turns it around. Worse case scenario he plays bad but he should still put up top 10 #s and maybe you can play matchups with him and your backup. Im sticking it out with him for 1 more week (vs NO) and if he stinks it up again I'll play matchups with him and my backup (Plummer). He still put up 19 pts in my league this week (thankfully no negative pts. for turnovers).
Click to expand...
I hope you are right. The INTs have to stop. Lucky for me in 1 league I don’t get -PTs for INTs but the other 2 leagues I get -2 PTs. Minus 10 PTs could mean the difference in a win and lose.
 
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...

He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.

Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.
Click to expand...
Moore should be the starting RB. If the Viking could stop hurting them selves, Culpepper should be able to turn it around and put up some good fantasy #s. Last week they had 2 passing TDs called back because of penalties.

 
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...

He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.

Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.
Click to expand...
I don't know how you score, but in our league Palmer was worth 19 points and Daunte worth 8. That's a huge difference. Palmer has 29 points on the year. Daunte has 8.

Considering where they were drafted I would have a hard time saying you are getting good "value" for Daunte. "He is a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly" is an opinion backed up by no evidence.

Next week he will have the same OC, the same O-line and one less reciever to work with. Why should we believe next week will be any different? The one reason you cited "talent" is constant as well. In order for a different outcome something has to change, what is changing?

Changing running backs is going to compensate for 5 ints?

 
And yet, in my league and most others, he gives you value no matter what he does on the real field. He's got the X-factor that showed up today, he'll run them in. He only scored 6 points less than Palmer, who by anyone's standards had a great game...

He's a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly...if you dump him now you'll be making a big mistake.

Bennett's fumbles made this game a no-winner right off the bat, I do believe that he'll ride the pine for the rest of the year and the team will get itself together...Withrow will be out of the lineup next week and my guess is that they'll go to a more quick rythem scheme.
Click to expand...
I don't know how you score, but in our league Palmer was worth 19 points and Daunte worth 8. That's a huge difference. Palmer has 29 points on the year. Daunte has 8.

Considering where they were drafted I would have a hard time saying you are getting good "value" for Daunte. "He is a huge talent and will turn it around rather quickly" is an opinion backed up by no evidence.

Next week he will have the same OC, the same O-line and one less reciever to work with. Why should we believe next week will be any different? The one reason you cited "talent" is constant as well. In order for a different outcome something has to change, what is changing?

Changing running backs is going to compensate for 5 ints?
Click to expand...
Not by itself, no. But keep in mind, Culpepper is adapting to his new offense, which almost always takes time. At least a few of those INTs looked like he expected the WR to make a play that (go figure) a top WR could have or the WR to zig instead of zag. On others, he was simply trying too hard. If Minnesota can establish the running game, and keep the score close, he wouldn't have thrown a couple of those. FWIW, I just made offers in most of my leagues for him. two rejections, without a counter. The offers were Marc Bulger and Chris Brown for CPep, and Bulger and Thomas Jones for CPep (I have Bulger in two leagues)

 
I am calling it now. Culpepper has a good week. 250 passing yards and 2 TDsCulpepper owners start your STUD QB.

 
Think that's bad?Someone in my league drafted Culpepper #6 overall. He's now trying to unload him on his brother, who is a first time FF player.I waited until the 7th round to draft a qb, and while most of the elite were gone, I still managed to take Hasselbeck.Great value, and it allowed be to load up at WR and RB.I refused to drink the Kool Aid this year and draft a qb in the first two rounds. Now it's paying off.So far.

 
I am calling it now. Culpepper has a good week. 250 passing yards and 2 TDs

Culpepper owners start your STUD QB.
Click to expand...
I am glad I started him in all 3 of my leagues. :thumbup: Did you bench Culpepper? :wall:

 
300 passing yards, 36 rushing yards and 3 TDs :thumbup: NO INTs :lmao: 36 fantasy points in my 3 dynasty league :excited: Maybe there should be a Manning owners suicide watch thread :unsure:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't started him since week 2. Made a trade for Bledsoe, and picked up McNair off the waiver wire, and will ride these two QBs the rest of the season, hopefully.This is a dynasty league, otherwise I may have already dropped Culpepper. Looking forward, I'll probably grab Schaub next week and stash him for the future.

 
I wasn't going to play him against Chicago as I figured he'd have a rough day.I was planning to start him for the next few weeks, but I'm just not sure anymore. :unsure:I'm holding out hope that he bounces back, but it may not be this year.

 
I haven't started him since week 2. Made a trade for Bledsoe, and picked up McNair off the waiver wire, and will ride these two QBs the rest of the season, hopefully.

This is a dynasty league, otherwise I may have already dropped Culpepper. Looking forward, I'll probably grab Schaub next week and stash him for the future.
Click to expand...
I will go with McCown in 2 leagues and Leftwich in the otherCulpepper looks lost

 
i think people fail to see that the 2 worst things that happened to Cpeps progress is: 1: Scott Linehan 2: Matt Birk obviously moss hurts some but i would rate those 2 other losses more severe.

 
I am now including a new team to my DEF by committee approach each week. ANY teams facing Minnesota? C Pep is lost.
Click to expand...
He plays the Pack. The Pack D tore the sh it out of the Aints last week. It could be a good pickup. Should be a fun game to watch in the dome...
 
2005 Vikings: 3-13 (two wins over GB :P ) 2006 Vikings: New coach + GM + Reggie Bush + a couple more quality defensive free agents = RESPECTIBILITY!!!!! :thumbup:

 
2005 Vikings: 3-13 (two wins over GB :P )

2006 Vikings: New coach + GM + Reggie Bush Ferguson + a couple more quality defensive free agents = RESPECTIBILITY!!!!! :thumbup:
Click to expand...
They really don't need Reggie Bush. Before anyone screams at me for being :loco: , I understand that Moore isn't as talented as Bush, but it won't matter if the Vikings don't get help on the line. They are actually ok with Fason/Moore/Whiz for RB, but that line rivals Detroit's and Houston's. I'm not sure this will bring "respectability", but it's a start.

Let me rephrase the first part. Reggie Bush isn't their BIGGEST need.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2005 Vikings: 3-13 (two wins over GB  :P   )

2006 Vikings: New coach + GM + Reggie Bush Ferguson + a couple more quality defensive free agents = RESPECTIBILITY!!!!!  :thumbup:
Click to expand...
They really don't need Reggie Bush. Before anyone screams at me for being :loco: , I understand that Moore isn't as talented as Bush, but it won't matter if the Vikings don't get help on the line. They are actually ok with Fason/Moore/Whiz for RB, but that line rivals Detroit's and Houston's. I'm not sure this will bring "respectability", but it's a start.

Let me rephrase the first part. Reggie Bush isn't their BIGGEST need.
Click to expand...
They wont get the 1st pick in the draft anyway. Houston has that wrapped up...
 
2005 Vikings: 3-13 (two wins over GB :P )

2006 Vikings: New coach + GM + Reggie Bush Ferguson + a couple more quality defensive free agents = RESPECTIBILITY!!!!! :thumbup:
Click to expand...
They really don't need Reggie Bush. Before anyone screams at me for being :loco: , I understand that Moore isn't as talented as Bush, but it won't matter if the Vikings don't get help on the line. They are actually ok with Fason/Moore/Whiz for RB, but that line rivals Detroit's and Houston's. I'm not sure this will bring "respectability", but it's a start.

Let me rephrase the first part. Reggie Bush isn't their BIGGEST need.
Click to expand...
They wont get the 1st pick in the draft anyway. Houston has that wrapped up...
Click to expand...
This is getting dangerously close to another topic. ;) You're right, but as much as I like Bush, Leinart is going to be the top pick.

Then again, they need OL as much or more than Minnesota, so do they take Ferguson? Is that your point?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Guillotine leagues...why do rosters lock on Thursday night?
Replies
1
Views
332
FreeBaGeL
FreeBaGeL
P
  • Question Question
Dynasty Roster Construction
Replies
22
Views
1K
Gally
G
G
Lineup Mistake - What is a Commish to do?
2 3
Replies
130
Views
2K
togo
togo

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top