Possible sleeper if he gets the starting nod? Also could hurt M. Huffs value if he gets moved to FS.
http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2007/05...first-practice/
Definitely a sleeper. This was a shocker on the first day of camp, came out of nowhere.The logic might be that Huff goes to FS, with Bing at SS, at first glance. I am not sure if I buy that. Bing at SS, and Huff at FS does two things I don't like:
1. Takes Huff away from the action. I think he can make more impact at SS, blitzing, covering the AFC West TE's (which are no joke), and making plays on passes in the short game. He'll just be more involved. A player can still be an impact player at FS, but it's tougher, IMO.
2. Takes away a lot of athleticism. Huff vs. Gonzales, gates, Tomlinson in the passing game? I feel OK. Bing? Not as much. Coverage was a weakness of his coming out of college.
Schweigert is no Pro Bowler, and I've heard some complaints about him from Raider fans. I am not one of them. You don't hear his name much during the games, which is fine by me. Means he's not getting beat for a bomb. He makes a lot of tackles for a FS, and rarely gets caught out of position. That's enough for me.
I am guessing the thinking might be that Bing would have a better shot at his natural position, especially with WLB locked down by Howard. Which is a shame, because he looked real good as a LB last August, before his "injury".
Ryan had used a 4-2-5 out of necessity before, with Gibson as the big nickel, when we had no linebackers. So it is possible they are envisioning a rover position for him, for use on certain downs.
Unclear what the plan is for him, hopefully Kiff will address it during mini-camp.