What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Darrius Heyward-Bey, Louis Murphy & Chaz Schilens, WRs, Oakland Ra (1 Viewer)

Jason Wood

Zoo York
2010 Player Spotlight Series

One of Footballguys best assets is our message board community. The Shark Pool is, in our view, the best place on the internet to discuss, debate and analyze all things fantasy football. In what's become an annual tradition, the Player Spotlight series is a key part of the preseason efforts. As many of you know, we consider the Player Spotlight threads the permanent record for analyzing the fantasy prospects of the player in question. This year, we plan to publish more than 140 offensive spotlights covering the vast majority of expected skill position starters.

Each week we will post a list of players to be discussed. Those threads will remain open for the entire preseason, and should be a central point to discussion expectations for the player in question. Importantly, analysis done in the first week of posting will be part of the permanent record in two ways. 1) At the end of the week, we will tally the projections into a consensus. 2) We will select a number of pull quotes from forum contributors who make a compelling statement or observation. Both the projections and pull quotes will be part of a published article on the main website.

Thread Topic: Darrius Heyward-Bey, Louis Murphy & Chaz Schilens, WRs, Oakland Raiders

Player Page Link: Darrius Heyward-Bey Player Page

Player Page Link: Louis Murphy Player Page

Player Page Link: Chaz Schilens Player Page

Each article will include:

[*]Detailed viewpoint from a Footballguys staff member

[*]Highlighted member commentary from the message board threads

[*]FBG Projections

[*]Consensus Member Projections

The Rules

In order for this thread to provide maximum value, we ask that you follow a few simple guidelines:

[*]Focus commentary on the player (or players) in question, and your expectations for said player (or players)

[*]Back up your expectations in whatever manner you deem appropriate; avoid posts that simply say "I hate him" or "He's the best"

[*]Avoid redundancies or :goodposting: ... this should be about incremental analysis or debate

While not a requirement, we strongly encourage you to provide your own projections for the player (players):

Projections should include:

[*]For QBs: Attempts, Completions, Passing Yards, Passing TDs, Ints, Rush Attempts, Rush Yards, Rush TDs

[*]For RBs: Rushes, Rushing Yards, Rush TDs, Receptions, Receiving Yards, Receiving TDs

[*]For WRs & TEs: Receptions, Receiving Yards, Receiving TDs

Now let's get on with the conversation! We look forward to your contributions and let me offer a personal thanks in anticipation of the great debate and analysis.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is he 100% back from injury? Finishing off a deep mock and I think I like his value as a WR5 assuming he is the starter opposite DHB. If he is the WR2 I could see 6-8 TDs from him over a full schedule. Yards and catches are tougher to predict.

 
I'm not sure which one will be the guy this year but I do think one of them is going to give some fanatsy people a very nice deal but the problem is picking the right one of course. I play in fours leagues and own one of them in each because I'm really not sure who will be the guy but if I had to pick I would go Murphy who alteast looked decent with Russell and that's saying something

 
I'm not sure which one will be the guy this year but I do think one of them is going to give some fanatsy people a very nice deal but the problem is picking the right one of course. I play in fours leagues and own one of them in each because I'm really not sure who will be the guy but if I had to pick I would go Murphy who alteast looked decent with Russell and that's saying something
:lmao: I agree...it is hard, but I think what makes is hard is....Schiliens - can he stay healthyMurphy - How much will the "need to give DHB a chance due to draft position" get in the way of Murphy's PT.DHB - this one isn't hard. I don't buy into the OTA hype....real recievers do it with pads on. It is VERY rare that a WR that isn't a natural pass catcher/receiver to turn into a fanatsy worthy producer despite the crazy measurables. It would be interesting to see what list this forum would come up with of talents that have developed.My view is that Murphy is the guy and the Raiders will figure it out before the end of the season. He isn't elite in any part of his game, but he is very good in just about every area an all around WR needs to be. If DHB's draft status wasn't in the way we would be talking about this guy as a potentially solid WR3 this year and a potential low end WR2 in future years. For redraft I prefer Schilens, but only because of the presence on DHB, for dynasty give me Murphy.
 
DHB will get every opportunity to succeed.
That and speed are really the only positives for him...IMO
DHB has EARNED the right to have an opportunity with his off season improvement, regardless of his draft position.
You EARN the opportunity in pads on the field with live contact
No, you earn it year round. People improve. It happens. He was considered a minor reach by the Raiders only because they selected him over Crabtree. Nobody was saying he was a reach over Britt or Maclin.
 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR.

Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.

Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD's

Murphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD's

DHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's

 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR. Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD'sMurphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD'sDHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
Schilens is probably good for 58/780/5Murphy is good for 42/620/6But you are seriously undervaluing DHB who I think breaks out for 65/950/5 and takes the lead WR position.Miller rounds out a talented receiving corps that Campbell can rely on.
 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR.

Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.

Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD's

Murphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD's

DHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
Schilens is probably good for 58/780/5Murphy is good for 42/620/6

But you are seriously undervaluing DHB who I think breaks out for 65/950/5 and takes the lead WR position.Miller rounds out a talented receiving corps that Campbell can rely on.
HOMER...lol
 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR. Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD'sMurphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD'sDHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
Schilens is probably good for 58/780/5Murphy is good for 42/620/6But you are seriously undervaluing DHB who I think breaks out for 65/950/5 and takes the lead WR position.Miller rounds out a talented receiving corps that Campbell can rely on.
Miller will lead the team in catches, and possibly yards. Mcfadden will probably throw in another 40+ receptions and 400+ yards. I dont see enough left after that for what you are projecting.DHB would need 250 targets to catch 65 passes, i dont see it happening.Im sure you Raider fans are excited, but you should really temper your expectations. Campbell is better than Russell, but he is still a below average NFL QB. edit for spelling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR.

Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.

Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD's

Murphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD's

DHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
Schilens is probably good for 58/780/5Murphy is good for 42/620/6

But you are seriously undervaluing DHB who I think breaks out for 65/950/5 and takes the lead WR position.Miller rounds out a talented receiving corps that Campbell can rely on.
HOMER...lol
Great contribution.I agree with the Raider fan that DHB will lead the WRS in catches and yards.

I'll go with

Shillens 45-600-4

Murphy 40-650-4

DHB 60-900-6

 
HOMER...lol
I can see how my prediction makes me look like :hot: But here's why I am optimistic. Chaz Schilens was hurt all last last year, and when he got back he was still struggling with his foot. Now he appears to be all healed up. He is a very talented, fast, athletic huge WR in the mold of Vincent Jackson. Murphy is a big play receiver that always seems to get open and really showed his value in some late games last year. If he had hung onto a few more passes earlier in the year, he'd be discussed with M. Crabtree as far as overall rookie WR impact. But DHB was just terrible last year, we all know. This year, I think he is putting his talent on display. I'm thinking a faster version of Hakeem Nicks. He was very raw last year and the Maryland coaches cautioned the Raiders about throwing him into the mix too early. I don't even want to mention last years QB, it goes without saying that his QB today is a huge improvement. I believe that DHB has the talent, football IQ, work ethic, and motivation to get open and receive well timed, well thrown passes from Jason Campbell, and then leave defenders in the dust with his world class speed. Then you add in elite TE to engages the LBs, and safeties, and the receiving weapons outside are going to be aplenty for Campbell. Sorry for the honest optimism. You can take the high and low opinion and throw them out if you like, but I'll gladly own up to this projection.
 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR.

Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.

Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD's

Murphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD's

DHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
:censored:
 
DHB will get every opportunity to succeed.
That and speed are really the only positives for him...IMO
DHB has EARNED the right to have an opportunity with his off season improvement, regardless of his draft position.
You EARN the opportunity in pads on the field with live contact
No, you earn it year round. People improve. It happens. He was considered a minor reach by the Raiders only because they selected him over Crabtree. Nobody was saying he was a reach over Britt or Maclin.
:confused:
 
HOMER...lol
I can see how my prediction makes me look like :thumbup: But here's why I am optimistic. Chaz Schilens was hurt all last last year, and when he got back he was still struggling with his foot. Now he appears to be all healed up. He is a very talented, fast, athletic huge WR in the mold of Vincent Jackson. Murphy is a big play receiver that always seems to get open and really showed his value in some late games last year. If he had hung onto a few more passes earlier in the year, he'd be discussed with M. Crabtree as far as overall rookie WR impact. But DHB was just terrible last year, we all know. This year, I think he is putting his talent on display. I'm thinking a faster version of Hakeem Nicks. He was very raw last year and the Maryland coaches cautioned the Raiders about throwing him into the mix too early. I don't even want to mention last years QB, it goes without saying that his QB today is a huge improvement. I believe that DHB has the talent, football IQ, work ethic, and motivation to get open and receive well timed, well thrown passes from Jason Campbell, and then leave defenders in the dust with his world class speed. Then you add in elite TE to engages the LBs, and safeties, and the receiving weapons outside are going to be aplenty for Campbell. Sorry for the honest optimism. You can take the high and low opinion and throw them out if you like, but I'll gladly own up to this projection.
Not a :hot: at all but I see reason for optimism, or maybe its better to say I don't see the reason for all the pessimism. DHB being a reach made people expect year one production. But that's the only reason for that. Everyone knew he was going to be completely raw and suck his first year. And now that what everyone expected came true, people are down on him? Also heard him interviewed and he seemed to be A) intelligent and B) realistic. He wants to be the best in the league, but realizes that it won't come easy and it will take him giving his absolute all for years to make it happen. I never heard him make a single excuse about his production (even though catching balls from JaMarcus So Fat provided an excellent opportunity to do so) which makes me like his chances to avoid the bust curse of the Raiders.I'm not as optimistic as some on here but I think:50 x 17 ypc = 850 and 3decent WR3 for this year, with a downside of, well, zero.Stay away in redraft, throw out an aging vet for him in dynasty if you are rebuilding.
 
You guys just might be inadvertently predicting Campbell to have a top 10 season.Just to give you some perspective on the amount of WR receptions you guys are expecting, San Diego had 153 last year, 131 the year before, and only 113 in 07. In the last 3 years, Dallas has had 170, 142, & 155. Although Washington has had 174, 159, and 163. There are even a few teams hovering around 200 WR receptions (Min, GB, NYG), so I'm not saying your projections are unheard of, but I don't think they are realistic for a team that is likely to be pounding the ball whenever they can AND utilizing the TE quite frequently. Just food for thought. I apologize that I don't have a firm enough grip on the situation to make projections. I'm just here to be a devil's advocate for now.
Appreciate the devils advocate take. It's good to hear the flip side. I don't think that Campbell starts and finishes all 16 games. I think that Gradkowski will find his way on the field and have his share of stats. I like M Bush to have a great year this year, but really don't have much too faith in McFadden. Injuries will likely change the pecking order as you can expect the workload will have to be managed to keep them both fresh. The improvement of the O Line is going to be critical, and I can't say with certainty that is altogether that improved.I think that the defense will be greatly improved this year, but it will take time to gel, and it will just be porous enough to require Campbell to be aggressive with the ball. So I think that the passing game will open up. Al Davis loves the vertical game, and Campbell has a big arm, but a ponderous slow windup that does concern me. Again, key is the O Line. The skill positions are talented enough to do big things this year. I am optimistic that the Raiders find a way to learn how to put 4 quarters of quality play together, and make a push for the playoffs. I didn't really believe that the last few years. Only the Chiefs have had an improved offseason in the AFC west, but I think the Raiders have easily had the best offseason in conference, and maybe the entire league from a year ago. Why can't the Raiders WR corp catch 165 balls? I certainly think it's possible. I'd only downgrade that if Miller has a phenominal year.
 
Even if DHB improved, that still doesnt make him good. He was terrible last year, and couldnt get any worse, so pretty much no matter what, he was going to get some praise this offseason if he showed up and caught the ball. He might be an OK stash on a deep dynasty roster, but i wouldnt touch him in redraft. Louis Murphy clearly outplayed him last year, but i dont think he is good enough to be a #1 WR. I think they will both be fighting for the same spot all season, neither ever establishing themselves as the #2 WR.

Chaz Schilens is the real #1 of the bunch, if he can stay healthy, he can put up solid #2 numbers with Campbell at QB.

Schilens 67 rec, 897 yards, 6 TD's

Murphy 32 rec. 455 yards, 3 TD's

DHB 36 rec, 502 yards, 2 TD's
Schilens is probably good for 58/780/5Murphy is good for 42/620/6

But you are seriously undervaluing DHB who I think breaks out for 65/950/5 and takes the lead WR position.Miller rounds out a talented receiving corps that Campbell can rely on.
HOMER...lol
Great contribution.

I agree with the Raider fan that DHB will lead the WRS in catches and yards.

I'll go with

Shillens 45-600-4

Murphy 40-650-4

DHB 60-900-6
The "HOMER...lol" quote is not a terrible contribution. I mean, raiderfan is talking about 165 receptions for the top 3 WR and you are talking about 145. Add in a meager 10 receptions for Higgins & Co. and you both have a significant increase in WR production. Not just significant but we're talking 99 receptions last year to 155-175 this year. As a huge supporter of the Michael Bush bandwagon I'm as optimistic about Campbell's presence as anyone (or so I thought) but I think this will be a pretty balanced attack. The fact that Zach Miller is a great option at TE can't be ignored, either. I'd like to see what you two project for him and the RBs. You guys just might be inadvertently predicting Campbell to have a top 10 season.Just to give you some perspective on the amount of WR receptions you guys are expecting, San Diego had 153 last year, 131 the year before, and only 113 in 07. In the last 3 years, Dallas has had 170, 142, & 155. Although Washington has had 174, 159, and 163. There are even a few teams hovering around 200 WR receptions (Min, GB, NYG), so I'm not saying your projections are unheard of, but I don't think they are realistic for a team that is likely to be pounding the ball whenever they can AND utilizing the TE quite frequently. Just food for thought. I apologize that I don't have a firm enough grip on the situation to make projections. I'm just here to be a devil's advocate for now.
"The "HOMER...lol" quote is not a terrible contribution. "

ty...I thought it was accurate :lmao:

 
Are we any closer on a depth chart here? It would seem pretty wide open. I could pick any Raider wideout right now in my 3rd year dynasty and was wondering if there is any with an edge.

 
Are we any closer on a depth chart here? It would seem pretty wide open. I could pick any Raider wideout right now in my 3rd year dynasty and was wondering if there is any with an edge.
Ive been trying to pay attention to the Raider fans (who are obviously enthralled) that are not fantasy concerned.So far Ive come to these current conclusions, though they could change.

1- Schillens keeps getting hurt. He has had the trainers around him all camp and its always something different. Everytime he takes a hard hit or fall he stays down and the medics come over and take a look-see. He is receiving very well though. Showing good jumping and physicality. He tends to catch and muscle his way for a few extra yards if he can. Despite some long catches > playing speed has not been a current facet on display.

2- After Schilens and Murphy returned from injuries recently... DHB has gotten more reps with the second string then the other two. If it wasnt for Chaz's inability to stay on the field, DHB might have even more time with the second unit (Boller) then he has. Though thats a bit unclear. DHB has shown a problem getting open (away from CBs) on routes.

3- Camp watchers say that Murphy is becoming Campbells favorite target of the wide outs. And Murphy keeps catching the ball, including far-and-away the most TD connections. Though TE Zach Miller seems to be every bit the favorite as anyone else, as has been reported for awhile.

4- Rookie Jacoby Ford is climbing the chart and may eventually put pressure on everyone, but especially those that aren't "getting it done".

5- Both McFadden and Bush are getting lots of time in the backfield and both are being used in the pass game. Bush is surprising people with his receiving ability. Though McFadden speed/agility really shines when he is the one getting the dumps and screens -- and he also gets the occasional deep pattern, unlike Bush.
Good stuff, thanks. Is McFadden still getting moved out wide like a WR like he was last year at times? I think Oak could very well use both McFadden and Bush on the field at the same time a good deal this year if they are pleased with both guys. I'd imagine McFadden would get motioned out of the backfield in situations like that.

 
Are we any closer on a depth chart here? It would seem pretty wide open. I could pick any Raider wideout right now in my 3rd year dynasty and was wondering if there is any with an edge.
Ive been trying to pay attention to the Raider fans (who are obviously enthralled) that are not fantasy concerned.So far Ive come to these current conclusions, though they could change.

1- Schillens keeps getting hurt. He has had the trainers around him all camp and its always something different. Everytime he takes a hard hit or fall he stays down and the medics come over and take a look-see. He is receiving very well though. Showing good jumping and physicality. He tends to catch and muscle his way for a few extra yards if he can. Despite some long catches > playing speed has not been a current facet on display.

2- After Schilens and Murphy returned from injuries recently... DHB has gotten more reps with the second string then the other two. If it wasnt for Chaz's inability to stay on the field, DHB might have even more time with the second unit (Boller) then he has. Though thats a bit unclear. DHB has shown a problem getting open (away from CBs) on routes.

3- Camp watchers say that Murphy is becoming Campbells favorite target of the wide outs. And Murphy keeps catching the ball, including far-and-away the most TD connections. Though TE Zach Miller seems to be every bit the favorite as anyone else, as has been reported for awhile.

4- Rookie Jacoby Ford is climbing the chart and may eventually put pressure on everyone, but especially those that aren't "getting it done".

5- Both McFadden and Bush are getting lots of time in the backfield and both are being used in the pass game. Bush is surprising people with his receiving ability. Though McFadden speed/agility really shines when he is the one getting the dumps and screens -- and he also gets the occasional deep pattern, unlike Bush.
Is Chaz's surgically repaired foot still holding him back because of actual pain or a physical issue, or are they purposefully being overly cautious? It seems that Louis Murphy is the OAK WR to grab? Last round flier, or is he going earlier?

 
Are we any closer on a depth chart here? It would seem pretty wide open. I could pick any Raider wideout right now in my 3rd year dynasty and was wondering if there is any with an edge.
Ive been trying to pay attention to the Raider fans (who are obviously enthralled) that are not fantasy concerned.So far Ive come to these current conclusions, though they could change.

1- Schillens keeps getting hurt. He has had the trainers around him all camp and its always something different. Everytime he takes a hard hit or fall he stays down and the medics come over and take a look-see. He is receiving very well though. Showing good jumping and physicality. He tends to catch and muscle his way for a few extra yards if he can. Despite some long catches > playing speed has not been a current facet on display.

2- After Schilens and Murphy returned from injuries recently... DHB has gotten more reps with the second string then the other two. If it wasnt for Chaz's inability to stay on the field, DHB might have even more time with the second unit (Boller) then he has. Though thats a bit unclear. DHB has shown a problem getting open (away from CBs) on routes.

3- Camp watchers say that Murphy is becoming Campbells favorite target of the wide outs. And Murphy keeps catching the ball, including far-and-away the most TD connections. Though TE Zach Miller seems to be every bit the favorite as anyone else, as has been reported for awhile.

4- Rookie Jacoby Ford is climbing the chart and may eventually put pressure on everyone, but especially those that aren't "getting it done".

5- Both McFadden and Bush are getting lots of time in the backfield and both are being used in the pass game. Bush is surprising people with his receiving ability. Though McFadden speed/agility really shines when he is the one getting the dumps and screens -- and he also gets the occasional deep pattern, unlike Bush.
Is Chaz's surgically repaired foot still holding him back because of actual pain or a physical issue, or are they purposefully being overly cautious? It seems that Louis Murphy is the OAK WR to grab? Last round flier, or is he going earlier?
I'm in a 10 team dynasty and he's on the waiver wire. 22 man rosters. If that gives you any indication.
 
Is Chaz's surgically repaired foot still holding him back because of actual pain or a physical issue, or are they purposefully being overly cautious?
Soreness, and they are proceeding cautiously. No reports of a re-injury to his foot, and he has been practicing. When they were doing two-a-days, he practiced once.I am not sure anyone other than Zach is going to be reliable, but the one I would take is the cheapest-Murphy.
 
Im just finishing up my 5th redraft this year. Schilens has been the first Raiders WR drafted in each one. He has actually been the only Raider WR drafted in 12 team, 18 round drafts. Shilens is also far ahead of the other Raider WR's on the MFL ADP list.

 
Aug 19 - WR Darrius Heyward-Bey has had his left leg wrapped, but coach Tom Cable said the reason he has been missing practice is “fatigue.” WR Chaz Schilens has still not fully recovered from a broken left foot suffered last year in camp, despite undergoing surgery twice. Raiders RapidReports
DHB missing for fatigue sounds about right.Last night in our redraft league not one Oakland WR was drafted. There is just not enough upside in that passing attack outside of Miller to really waste a roster spot on any of these guys at this time.

In dynasty I would probably go with Murphy ahead of the others, but even then with little expectaions.

 
Im just finishing up my 5th redraft this year. Schilens has been the first Raiders WR drafted in each one. He has actually been the only Raider WR drafted in 12 team, 18 round drafts. Shilens is also far ahead of the other Raider WR's on the MFL ADP list.
That doesn't meant they are right.
 
Aug 19 - WR Darrius Heyward-Bey has had his left leg wrapped, but coach Tom Cable said the reason he has been missing practice is “fatigue.” WR Chaz Schilens has still not fully recovered from a broken left foot suffered last year in camp, despite undergoing surgery twice. Raiders RapidReports
DHB missing for fatigue sounds about right.
Then you haven't been paying attention to DHB.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top