What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

David Hawthorne (1 Viewer)

owen21

Footballguy
Does anyone have an up to date information on how healthy David Hawthorne will be for this game?

 
That's good news. I'm pretty happy with my LB4, but I would rather roll with Hawthorne, Maualuga and Daryl Washington every week that I can.

I assume Aaron Curry would be the LB to pick up if Hawthorne were to miss time?

 
Running back Marshawn Lynch and middle linebacker David Hawthorne will both practice full-speed, Carroll said.
This was after Wed practice.http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2011/09/07/seahawks-injuries-updates-on-robert-gallery-sidney-rice/
 
Running back Marshawn Lynch and middle linebacker David Hawthorne will both practice full-speed, Carroll said.
This was after Wed practice.http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2011/09/07/seahawks-injuries-updates-on-robert-gallery-sidney-rice/
http://blog.seattlepi.com/football/2011/09/09/seahawks-injuries-robert-gallery-sidney-rice-both-doubtful-for-season-opener/Good updates here on the Seahawks. Main IDP news- Hawthorne is probable but they say KJ Wright may start over Hawthorne, and Chris Clemons tweaked an ankle Thursday but should be good to go. There is a video on the blog as well where Carroll gives an update on all things related to injured Hawks as of today.As a Hawthorne owner, disappointing news. Unless I get a warmer, fuzzier feeling, I've gotta think benching him is the right move. And maybe Wright is sneaky, but if they split snaps, neither is probably worth starting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is giving me a very bad feeling. Hawthorne was probably drafted high by most here because of the move back to MLB, playing FT with Tatupa now gone. The team is so impressed by Wright's play that they have little problem starting him and playing him all game even though Hawthorne may be probable? I don't like the sounds of this.

 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
Yeah, it takes some work to be good with IDP. I went with Levy this morning over Hawthorne, I didn't want to take a chance. Levy didn't do much, but better than a goose egg. The good news is that I haven't heard or seen much of anything from Wright, so I gotta think they go back to Hawthorne when he's healthy.
 
I checked on Hawthorne's status 5 minutes too late. Cost me a chance at our weekly high team defense score. Kicking myself for not checking it sooner, as I would have been able to put Thomas Davis in there for him.

 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
Hawthorne had not played since preseason week2 - SEA coaching staff just has refused to say what exactly was wrong with his knee (deep bruise or cartilage tear/tweak) but its been out there for a long time that he hasn't practiced.
 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
Yeah, it takes some work to be good with IDP. I went with Levy this morning over Hawthorne, I didn't want to take a chance. Levy didn't do much, but better than a goose egg. The good news is that I haven't heard or seen much of anything from Wright, so I gotta think they go back to Hawthorne when he's healthy.
Actually Wright had a rock-solid performance, and for a rookie starting in the middle he did a superb job marshaling the defense. I assume Hawthorne resumes his job when he's ready, but Wright was fantastic all preseason and is a great dynasty stash.
 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
Yeah, it takes some work to be good with IDP. I went with Levy this morning over Hawthorne, I didn't want to take a chance. Levy didn't do much, but better than a goose egg. The good news is that I haven't heard or seen much of anything from Wright, so I gotta think they go back to Hawthorne when he's healthy.
Actually Wright had a rock-solid performance, and for a rookie starting in the middle he did a superb job marshaling the defense. I assume Hawthorne resumes his job when he's ready, but Wright was fantastic all preseason and is a great dynasty stash.
Not much in the box score
 
David Hawthorne - LB - Seattle Seahawks Sep 12, 2011

Seahawks MLB David Hawthorne (knee) is expected to return for Week 2 and be "100 percent" against the Steelers.

The Seahawks were surprisingly stout against the San Francisco run game without Hawthorne in Week 1, despite only five tackles (three solo) from replacement middle linebacker K.J. Wright. Realistically, Seattle should have a very good run defense this season. They just don't do anything else well. Source: John Boyle on Twitter

 
The goose egg he gave me as a "probable" scratch when I lost by less than a point is going to lead me to drop him, healthy or not.

 
The goose egg he gave me as a "probable" scratch when I lost by less than a point is going to lead me to drop him, healthy or not.
The coaching staff said they would make a decision on whether he would play, right before gametime. In situations like that with 4pm games, its better to play it safe and put in a sub. Dropping him now because he didn't play seems a bit silly. I think you will regret that move.
 
Big goose egg, from probable to inactive. Should be a rule against that.
There's been talk about him not playing for days. I've been burnt way too many times in the past not checking on all of my players who show up on the injury report. Even probable.
Yeah, it takes some work to be good with IDP. I went with Levy this morning over Hawthorne, I didn't want to take a chance. Levy didn't do much, but better than a goose egg. The good news is that I haven't heard or seen much of anything from Wright, so I gotta think they go back to Hawthorne when he's healthy.
Actually Wright had a rock-solid performance, and for a rookie starting in the middle he did a superb job marshaling the defense. I assume Hawthorne resumes his job when he's ready, but Wright was fantastic all preseason and is a great dynasty stash.
Interesting- I'll watch him more carefully next time. Per the other guy, box score wasn't heavy but of course that doesn't always tell the story.
 
'Sleeperz said:
The goose egg he gave me as a "probable" scratch when I lost by less than a point is going to lead me to drop him, healthy or not.
The coaching staff said they would make a decision on whether he would play, right before gametime. In situations like that with 4pm games, its better to play it safe and put in a sub. Dropping him now because he didn't play seems a bit silly. I think you will regret that move.
If he's a GTD then why list him as probable? I'll admit it was my fault for not checking his status but probable scratches are rare IMO and I don't want to deal with a headache like this all year long. If I can pick up Vilma, who an owner foolishly dropped in our league in his place I think that's a reasonable thing to do. Admittedly I'm clouded by my emotions here, but that move seems like a no-brainer.
 
'Sleeperz said:
The goose egg he gave me as a "probable" scratch when I lost by less than a point is going to lead me to drop him, healthy or not.
The coaching staff said they would make a decision on whether he would play, right before gametime. In situations like that with 4pm games, its better to play it safe and put in a sub. Dropping him now because he didn't play seems a bit silly. I think you will regret that move.
If he's a GTD then why list him as probable? I'll admit it was my fault for not checking his status but probable scratches are rare IMO and I don't want to deal with a headache like this all year long. If I can pick up Vilma, who an owner foolishly dropped in our league in his place I think that's a reasonable thing to do. Admittedly I'm clouded by my emotions here, but that move seems like a no-brainer.
Hawthorne will have a better season that Vilma barring an injury.I would stick w/ Hawthorne.
 
My prediction Hawthorne goes for 9 tackles 7 solo and a deflection. Keep him there smart there in Seattle didn't throw him to the wolves like jon beason. A must start against Pittsburgh they kept him out because of this game

 
Updates since you guys talked me off the ledge? Full practice participant this week? Any reason to doubt his ability to start tomorrow?

 
Traded Lofton for him because I have Weatherspoon too and wanted to diversify. Hope he and Chancellor both have big games. Any misses and Kam should clean up.

 
I watched a fair amount of this game, but I was flipping between all games. Have an unusual high number of Hawks in one league (Clemons, Hawthorne, Chancellor) so watched more of it than I wish I did. :)

Hawthorne was in there on a lot of plays, but they definitely took him out in some passing situations. He didn't seem in attack mode from my viewpoint. Pittsburgh mixed it up a fair amount, Brandon Browner is worst NFL CB, but Hawthorne just didn't play too instictively and missed some plays too. I'm curious to read about him this week and what the Seahawks sentiment was. Hoping he shook some rust off and will improve (and play all 3 downs), one to watch closely.

 
I watched a fair amount of this game, but I was flipping between all games. Have an unusual high number of Hawks in one league (Clemons, Hawthorne, Chancellor) so watched more of it than I wish I did. :) Hawthorne was in there on a lot of plays, but they definitely took him out in some passing situations. He didn't seem in attack mode from my viewpoint. Pittsburgh mixed it up a fair amount, Brandon Browner is worst NFL CB, but Hawthorne just didn't play too instictively and missed some plays too. I'm curious to read about him this week and what the Seahawks sentiment was. Hoping he shook some rust off and will improve (and play all 3 downs), one to watch closely.
They may have been rotating him out because of the knee, but I'll confess I haven't seen much of this game yet so I'm not gonna speculate too much.Last week everyone was Chicken Little-ing about McClain, Barnett, and Maualuga, and all 3 bounced back this week. IDPs can be inconsistent, it was his first game back from an injury, and I'm not grabbing a shovel just yet.
 
What happened here?
Overhyped/Overrated
Right. And his stats last year even with Lofa playing are too.
We are talking about this year, aren't we?! Two tackles (in a 4/3) does not make this guy the super stud that many have hoped he would be. Can things change? Sure they can. But I watched the game and the guy wasn't around the ball at all. He looked slow. Perhaps he's still hurt. My point is... Many thought this guy would be tearing it up to the tune of a Top-5 LB. While their defense is on the field a lot, this guy looked pathetic.Last year was last year. We'll see how he bounces back. But, I'll guarantee he is nowhere near a must start LB. Right now, he's not even a LB3.
 
:angry:

Hawthorne is not fully healthy and not currently playing on passing downs.

Didn't want to comment yesterday until I watched the game again. Only caught glimpses during the day yesterday, but it was clear from the brief snippets on RedZone that Matt McCoy was replacing him in the nickel defense.

Looks like Hawthorne, who has a large brace on his knee, feels okay moving in a straight line, but not laterally. He didn't get up to speed when dropping into zones or chasing plays to the sideline, but he (usually) moved quickly enough between the tackles and the knee didn't seem to bother him when breaking down to make a tackle in those situations. But his lateral agility was really limited -- taking extra steps to change directions -- and kept him from making plays he's made in the past.

Unfortunately, other than watching his progress in the coming weeks, there's no way to predict how soon the health issue resolves. It was somewhat reassuring to see him play late in the fourth quarter despite being down three scores. It's also reassuring that Matt McCoy is his primary competition for snaps.

For now, however, Hawthorne is a borderline fantasy starter.

I'm still driving the bandwagon, but I'm getting worried about one of its axles.

 
Thanks, Jene. Hawthorne almost cost me two games yesterday. :hot: I started him over Sean Weatherspoon and Woodyard in both leagues. I won't make this mistake again. I will start him if (or when) he gets healthy.

 
:angry: Hawthorne is not fully healthy and not currently playing on passing downs.Didn't want to comment yesterday until I watched the game again. Only caught glimpses during the day yesterday, but it was clear from the brief snippets on RedZone that Matt McCoy was replacing him in the nickel defense.Looks like Hawthorne, who has a large brace on his knee, feels okay moving in a straight line, but not laterally. He didn't get up to speed when dropping into zones or chasing plays to the sideline, but he (usually) moved quickly enough between the tackles and the knee didn't seem to bother him when breaking down to make a tackle in those situations. But his lateral agility was really limited -- taking extra steps to change directions -- and kept him from making plays he's made in the past.Unfortunately, other than watching his progress in the coming weeks, there's no way to predict how soon the health issue resolves. It was somewhat reassuring to see him play late in the fourth quarter despite being down three scores. It's also reassuring that Matt McCoy is his primary competition for snaps.For now, however, Hawthorne is a borderline fantasy starter. I'm still driving the bandwagon, but I'm getting worried about one of its axles.
Do you see him as a buy low in dynasty formats currently?
 
:angry: Hawthorne is not fully healthy and not currently playing on passing downs.Didn't want to comment yesterday until I watched the game again. Only caught glimpses during the day yesterday, but it was clear from the brief snippets on RedZone that Matt McCoy was replacing him in the nickel defense.Looks like Hawthorne, who has a large brace on his knee, feels okay moving in a straight line, but not laterally. He didn't get up to speed when dropping into zones or chasing plays to the sideline, but he (usually) moved quickly enough between the tackles and the knee didn't seem to bother him when breaking down to make a tackle in those situations. But his lateral agility was really limited -- taking extra steps to change directions -- and kept him from making plays he's made in the past.Unfortunately, other than watching his progress in the coming weeks, there's no way to predict how soon the health issue resolves. It was somewhat reassuring to see him play late in the fourth quarter despite being down three scores. It's also reassuring that Matt McCoy is his primary competition for snaps.For now, however, Hawthorne is a borderline fantasy starter. I'm still driving the bandwagon, but I'm getting worried about one of its axles.
Do you see him as a buy low in dynasty formats currently?
Bear in mind, I'm extremely stubborn about my player evaluations. I try not to be blind about things, but I recognize that I can be at times. In this case, there's evidence that suggests that Pete Carroll and company aren't sold on Hawthorne's coverage skill (Will Herring last year, Matt McCoy yesterday).But if Hawthorne comes available in any of my leagues, I'm grabbing him. Buy low? Sure, but I'm probably not paying more than LB3/LB4 prices. That's where he is for the foreseeable future.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top