What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***David Wilson Bandwagon*** (1 Viewer)

Wilson unstartable now, he will have to score 40 & 50 yard tds to be relevant. When ##### coughlin brings 250 year old jacobs in it's time to close the book.

 
Wouldn't now be the time to get him in there and let him pass block and get some confidence for the rest of the year? They aren't winning this game

 
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sinn Fein said:
monk said:
Tango said:
irish eyes said:
Awesome...and Wilson's day id done! Scott now that they are playing catch up. FU coughlin, i hope they lose every game this year.
Seems like now would be a good time for reps :shrug:
Just came to post the same thing ... This doesnt make any sense ... I hope he is not hurt
He was just in to return kicks...its what he does. Ironically, its not what elite RBs do.
That's about as ironic as rain on your wedding day or a free ride when your already late.

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
Are you really that obtuse?

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
lmao that one 2 yard run was impressive where he did a little spin.

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.
:shrug: I've seen the whole game. He was in when Eli was sacked, he had one good 2-yard run, where he went sideline to sideline. What do you want to point to as his highlights for the game?

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.
Who cares if you think he's electric. How can you argue with production? He not as good of a RB as advertised.

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.
:shrug: I've seen the whole game. He was in when Eli was sacked, he had one good 2-yard run, where he went sideline to sideline. What do you want to point to as his highlights for the game?
Wilson 2.43 yds per carry

Jacobs .53

Scott .4

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.
Who cares if you think he's electric. How can you argue with production? He not as good of a RB as advertised.
If you don't care what I think, I have no idea why you are responding to a post I made.

Furthermore, I think it is absolutely ridiculous based on the split of Giants RB workload and the flow of the game to try to evaluate Wilson as a RB based on this.

 
Avery said:
cstu said:
Avery said:
All the people who say he is just a speed guy clearly haven't watched him run the ball.
True, he doesn't look like a speed guy either.
It's always tough to read "intent" on the Internet but I'm not sure if your being quippy, obtuse or if you genuinely think Wilson has no skills as a RB. :unsure: In the limits chances he had, he looked solid in pass protection and looked dynamic as a runner.
Today? 7 carries for 17 is "dynamic" now? Or are you just so excited about his two yard gain, that you think he can run north-south, as well as he can run east-west?
I'm not talking about stats.

I'm talking about watching him run and watching him play.

He runs strong and is electric as a ball carrier. If you have watched him and aren't just checking in on the stats, we are having such a disconnect on talent evaluation, I don't see how any discussion is worthwhile.

People tend to get so locked in their position of loving or hating a player they often can't take information and revise their position.

I get that his fumbling issues and blocking issues may relegate him to a lesser roll but I honestly don't understand how anyone can watch him run and not see the innate skillet and running talent there.
:shrug: I've seen the whole game. He was in when Eli was sacked, he had one good 2-yard run, where he went sideline to sideline. What do you want to point to as his highlights for the game?
Wilson 2.43 yds per carry

Jacobs .53

Scott .4
Yeah!!! He's better than the 3rd string guy! Is that about the sum of your argument?

If those other guys had 2 TDs, Wilson surely would have had a baker's dozen, no?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top