DeAngelo Williams end of game rush - chance of a stat correction comin (1 Viewer)

[cday]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

 

[TZMarkie]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

Be aware I have not seen the play, but I hope this works out for you sir.

I noticed your post in the "bragging/grieving" thread also.

Most stat corrections I believe come to light on Tuesday afternoons , but some of the guys here may be more knowledgeable than I am on this matter.

But here is a note straight off of Yahoo -

"EACH WEEK STAT CORRECTIONS POST ON THURSDAY MORNING AND ARE APPLIED TO MATCHUP SCORING".

Good luck.

We all put in far too much time on this crazy hobby to have a championship taken from us in this manner.

Be aware that there could also be other stat corrections that come along that might help you.

I addressed it in another thread earlier, they come along most every week, and often aren't noticed since they don't determine matchups. Here ---> https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?/topic/739479-who-is-your-teams-mvp/?p=18728059

May I ask how much the cash difference could turn out to be?

(hopefully you get something for a tidy second though, which should be commended)

TZM

 

[cday]

It's a small amount, like $100 or so. In 2 leagues with a bunch of long time friends, won the other league (first time), and have a chance for a sweep .. more for bragging rights all year than anything else.

To me it's clear cut but I'm a *little* bit biased.

 

[themitch]

So you're saying it would take away the fumble from Ben and give 2-3 more rushing yards to DeAngelo? I'd be OK with that!

 

[cday]

looks like i'm dead in the water. if they are calling the backwards lateral a fumble, the ball is dead:

FUMBLE AFTER TWO-MINUTE WARNING

Article 6 Fumble After Two-Minute Warning.

If a fumble by either team occurs after the two-minute warning:

(a) The ball may be advanced by any opponent.

(b) The player who fumbled is the only player of his team who is permitted to recover and advance the ball.

© If the recovery or catch is by a teammate of the player who fumbled, the ball is dead, and the spot of the next snap is the spot of the fumble, or the spot of the recovery if the spot of the recovery is behind the spot of the fumble.

 

[davearm]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

We all put in far too much time on this crazy hobby to have a championship taken from us in this manner.

If I understand the situation correctly, then I'd be telling that to cday's opponent.

 

[TZMarkie]

looks like i'm dead in the water.

You are not dead in the water yet sir. (even though you may be with this particular play)

Did you not read the post I wrote I linked to???? https://forums.footb...mvp/?p=18728059

I know its unlikely, but there are stat corrections most every week, and you still have a chance if you lost by "only" .1 .

There is some commotion going on currently about a Denard Robinson correction from week 15 as we speak, if you look through the threads.

I won't ask you to post your entire lineup for obvious reasons, but trust me you are not dead yet.

Maybe you will still get lucky.

TZM

 

[TZMarkie]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

We all put in far too much time on this crazy hobby to have a championship taken from us in this manner.

If I understand the situation correctly, then I'd be telling that to cday's opponent.

Cday's opponent did not post in this thread.

Excellent deletion of the rest of my response though. SMH.

If you understood the situation correctly, then you should know either one shouldn't be surprised by a win or a loss as those stat corrections happen far more often than most players realize, or ever notice.

TZM

 

[cday]

looks like i'm dead in the water.

You are not dead in the water yet sir. (even though you may be with this particular play)

Did you not read the post I wrote I linked to???? https://forums.footb...mvp/?p=18728059

I know its unlikely, but there are stat corrections most every week, and you still have a chance if you lost by "only" .1 .

There is some commotion going on currently about a Denard Robinson correction from week 15 as we speak, if you look through the threads.

I won't ask you to post your entire lineup for obvious reasons, but trust me you are not dead yet.

Maybe you will still get lucky.

TZM

read it and weep (or have a good chuckle): http://imgur.com/4YObrmY

 

[TZMarkie]

read it and weep (or have a good chuckle): http://imgur.com/4YObrmY

Ok, you have 16 players and 2 team defenses to watch for a stat correction for.

Remember, it can happen for either team. (and it can also help you to lose by a bigger margin)

Yes, its unlikely, but as I alluded to in my other post "They happen regularly, and in fact this season on Yahoo there were stat corrections in weeks 1, 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 . "

There was apparently a big debate on one with Denard Robinson last week also, as something occurred after week 15.

All I'm saying is, there is only a .1 difference.

If a stat correction occurs to any of these players in your matchup, it could easily win you this championship. IF one occurs.

I'm a pretty competitive person by nature, and with FF its no different.

But you might want to remember that you have done very well anyway, if you played in two leagues, won the other one and possibly "just notched" in this one, but still took a solid second.

AND, you still have the remote chance of a stat correction, that could help you here.

Note- You may want to ask around, or run it by the members in your league and see what their thinking is, IF a stat correction does occur.

I did mention in the other post I quoted and linked to, that its happened to me 2 times in the last two years.

I have been on both sides, one time I lost on a stat correction, and the other time I won.

Thankfully it was regular season games, and didn't change a championship.

I'm all out of "likes" for the day, but I think I gave you one in the other thread.

Good luck.

TZM

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Not sure why it was ruled a Roethlisberger fumble, sure looks like a backward pass to me. And per the rules:

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

 

[parasaurolophus]

Not sure why it was ruled a Roethlisberger fumble, sure looks like a backward pass to me. And per the rules:

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

I don't understand that play one bit. That should absolutely be a deangelo fumble. WTF?

 

[parasaurolophus]

Not sure why it was ruled a Roethlisberger fumble, sure looks like a backward pass to me. And per the rules:

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

I don't understand that play one bit. That should absolutely be a deangelo fumble. WTF?

Nevermind. Now I get it. It is because deangelo's fumble went forward and there was no time left on clock. As soon as the ball went forward the play was dead. Didn't matter who recovered. Should still be a deangelo fumble, just not a lost fumble.

 

[davearm]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

We all put in far too much time on this crazy hobby to have a championship taken from us in this manner.

If I understand the situation correctly, then I'd be telling that to cday's opponent.

Cday's opponent did not post in this thread.

Excellent deletion of the rest of my response though. SMH.

If you understood the situation correctly, then you should know either one shouldn't be surprised by a win or a loss as those stat corrections happen far more often than most players realize, or ever notice.

TZM

Not sure why you're shaking your head. I quoted the portion of the post specifically related to this chaotic play that ended the Steelers-Ravens game.

Did you watch the video?

IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship, then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

The former scenario truly would be a horrific way to lose a championship.

Honestly, I don't know how they divvy up the yards between multiple players on plays like this where the ball is lateraled several times. As a team, the Steelers lost like 25 yards on this down (and fumbled the ball away to boot). Finding a reason to give Williams +0.3 out of that mess sounds kinda crazy, quite frankly.

 

[Ladsud]

Dead ball due to 2 minute rule once Williams touched it, so there was no fumble but the backward pass Ben threw that was recovered by Williams. Would this still be possible negative yards for Williams on the play?

 

[Ladsud]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015122712/2015/REG16/steelers@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000609615&tab=videos&analyze=playbyplay

Play begins around 2:10, the end of game laterals

It's scored currently as a Roethlisberger fumble for 8 yards.

To me, it looks like DeAngelo recovers it, rushes forward for 2-3 yards, and the play is blown dead before he fumbles the ball. In real time, the play was briefly ruled a BAL fumble recovery, and then they changed it to the current ruling a few minutes later.

Obviously I have a bit of an interest in this play, considering I lost my fantasy championship by .1

:(

We all put in far too much time on this crazy hobby to have a championship taken from us in this manner.

If I understand the situation correctly, then I'd be telling that to cday's opponent.

Cday's opponent did not post in this thread.

Excellent deletion of the rest of my response though. SMH.

If you understood the situation correctly, then you should know either one shouldn't be surprised by a win or a loss as those stat corrections happen far more often than most players realize, or ever notice.

TZM

Not sure why you're shaking your head. I quoted the portion of the post specifically related to this chaotic play that ended the Steelers-Ravens game.

Did you watch the video?

IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship, then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

The former scenario truly would be a horrific way to lose a championship.

Honestly, I don't know how they divvy up the yards between multiple players on plays like this where the ball is lateraled several times. As a team, the Steelers lost like 25 yards on this down (and fumbled the ball away to boot). Finding a reason to give Williams +0.3 out of that mess sounds kinda crazy, quite frankly.

Williams wasnt awarded any yards for that. He had 100 at the snap and ended the game at 100.

 

[Joe Summer]

In any event, Williams would not get any credit for rushing yards. He'll either get credit for receiving yards (from retrieving Roethlisberger's backwards pass), or he'll get credit for fumble return yards (if Roethlisberger's pass counts as a fumble).

I don't think Williams will be charged with a fumble because the ref blew the play dead (even though by rule he should have allowed the play to continue).

 

[davearm]

Characterizing Rothlisberger's 40 yard heave across the field as a fumble is rather curious.

 

[Ladsud]

In response to the Holy Roller, the league passed new rules in the off-season, restricting fumble recoveries by the offense. If a player fumbles after the two-minute warning in a half, or on fourth down at any time during the game, only the fumbling player can recover and advance the ball. If that player's teammate recovers the ball during those situations, it is placed back at the spot of the fumble, unless it was a recovery for a loss, in which case the ball is dead and placed at the point of recovery.

The backwards pass by Ben hit the ground, then Williams picked up the ball. It was a dead ball the moment Williams picked it up, so Williams couldnt have fumbled, since the ball was dead.

 

[Ladsud]

Characterizing Rothlisberger's 40 yard heave across the field as a fumble is rather curious.

He threw the ball backwards, it landed on the ground. How else would that be characterized?

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Not sure why it was ruled a Roethlisberger fumble, sure looks like a backward pass to me. And per the rules:

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

I don't understand that play one bit. That should absolutely be a deangelo fumble. WTF?

Nevermind. Now I get it. It is because deangelo's fumble went forward and there was no time left on clock. As soon as the ball went forward the play was dead. Didn't matter who recovered. Should still be a deangelo fumble, just not a lost fumble.

I'm not sure if that's the reason, or if it's just because the refs blew the play dead as if his progress had been stopped before he fumbled.

Either way, I think OP's question was a different one - why didn't Williams get credit for 2-3 receiving yards? It looks like he should have, and very well might after a stat correction to change Ben's throw from a fumble to a backward pass.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Characterizing Rothlisberger's 40 yard heave across the field as a fumble is rather curious.

He threw the ball backwards, it landed on the ground. How else would that be characterized?

It's a backward pass, per the rule I quoted above.

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

 

[Ladsud]

Not sure why it was ruled a Roethlisberger fumble, sure looks like a backward pass to me. And per the rules:

SECTION 7 BACKWARD PASS AND FUMBLE

ARTICLE 1. BACKWARD PASS. A runner may throw a backward pass at any time (3-22-5). Players of either team may advance after catching a backward pass, or recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

I don't understand that play one bit. That should absolutely be a deangelo fumble. WTF?

Nevermind. Now I get it. It is because deangelo's fumble went forward and there was no time left on clock. As soon as the ball went forward the play was dead. Didn't matter who recovered. Should still be a deangelo fumble, just not a lost fumble.

I'm not sure if that's the reason, or if it's just because the refs blew the play dead as if his progress had been stopped before he fumbled.

Either way, I think OP's question was a different one - why didn't Williams get credit for 2-3 receiving yards? It looks like he should have, and very well might after a stat correction to change Ben's throw from a fumble to a backward pass.

Why would he get receiving yards, call it a backwards pass if you like, the pass went backwards, it wasnt caught by Williams, therefore it is a fumble and due to the 2 minute holy roller rule the ball was dead the moment Williams touched it.

 

[TZMarkie]

Not sure why you're shaking your head. I quoted the portion of the post specifically related to this chaotic play that ended the Steelers-Ravens game.

Did you watch the video?

IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship, then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

The former scenario truly would be a horrific way to lose a championship.

Honestly, I don't know how they divvy up the yards between multiple players on plays like this where the ball is lateraled several times. As a team, the Steelers lost like 25 yards on this down (and fumbled the ball away to boot). Finding a reason to give Williams +0.3 out of that mess sounds kinda crazy, quite frankly.

"Not sure why you're shaking your head."

It doesn't matter really. It really doesn't.

I've noticed a common theme in many of your posts, you generally want to argue, or nitpick over semantics instead of truly adding something positive to the board or people's threads most of the time.

But I do admit I was surprised by your relatively interesting (good?) post earlier in the "RB position is essentially worthless" thread earlier.

" Did you watch the video?"

This in itself is a funny question.

I was going to ask you if you read my post (or any in this thread), but I'm guessing not, since it WAS THE VERY FIRST THING I SAID IN THIS THREAD.

In fact I am now seriously questioning your comprehension altogether. But, that really doesn't matter either.

The point of my posts, was to tell the original poster that since his match was so close, he still "has a chance".

He was sweating the particular play he alluded to, and I get why judging from everyone's posts, but there are plenty of other ways he can still win. (and also lose by a larger margin)



IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

How you feel is irrelevant to the OP's question.

The thread title is " DeAngelo Williams end of game rush - chance of a stat correction comin" .

If he gets a stat correction on this particular play, is obviously his point of interest. But the fact is, his match is so close, he may well get a stat correction win anyway .....which is what I have been explaining all along. The chance that he gets one on this exact play in question is an even greater chance.

Regardless of all this, I am done responding to you "davearm".

I vaguely remember one or two of these type posts in the past, but I have a solution.

I'll just put you on ignore and that will just be less time I have to break out the crayons here.

Sorry to clutter your thread Cday, maybe you get a break in your favor.

Congrats on the win in one league, and a 2nd (at least) in this one.

TZM

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Why would he get receiving yards, call it a backwards pass if you like, the pass went backwards, it wasnt caught by Williams, therefore it is a fumble

ARTICLE 5. BACKWARD PASS. It is a Backward Pass if the yard line at which the ball is first touched by a player or the ground is parallel to or behind the yard line at which the ball leaves the passer’s hand.

ARTICLE 5. FUMBLE. A Fumble is any act, other than passing, handing, or legally kicking the ball, which results in a loss of player possession.

By definition, a backward pass isn't a fumble.

Players of either team may advance after ... recovering a backward pass after it touches the ground.

Williams didn't have to catch it. Any player can recover and advance a backward pass that hits the ground.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

After more digging I found this:

NOTE: statistically, an exchange of the ball does not qualify as a backward pass unless the exchange is completed to a teammate without first touching the ground. If the ball touches the ground, or is intercepted by an opponent, the player who attempted the backward pass is credited with a fumble.

So that's probably what we're seeing here. Per NFL rules, a backward pass is not a fumble, and may be recovered and advanced even if it hits the ground. But per the NFL's guide for statisticians, a backward pass that touches the ground is indeed recorded as a fumble, statistically.

So now it seems unlikely to me that there would be a stat correction on the play.

Edited to add links:

Rule Book

Guide for statisticians

 

[davearm]

Not sure why you're shaking your head. I quoted the portion of the post specifically related to this chaotic play that ended the Steelers-Ravens game.

Did you watch the video?

IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship, then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

The former scenario truly would be a horrific way to lose a championship.

Honestly, I don't know how they divvy up the yards between multiple players on plays like this where the ball is lateraled several times. As a team, the Steelers lost like 25 yards on this down (and fumbled the ball away to boot). Finding a reason to give Williams +0.3 out of that mess sounds kinda crazy, quite frankly.

"Not sure why you're shaking your head."

It doesn't matter really. It really doesn't.

I've noticed a common theme in many of your posts, you generally want to argue, or nitpick over semantics instead of truly adding something positive to the board or people's threads most of the time.

But I do admit I was surprised by your relatively interesting (good?) post earlier in the "RB position is essentially worthless" thread earlier.

" Did you watch the video?"

This in itself is a funny question.

I was going to ask you if you read my post (or any in this thread), but I'm guessing not, since it WAS THE VERY FIRST THING I SAID IN THIS THREAD.

In fact I am now seriously questioning your comprehension altogether. But, that really doesn't matter either.

The point of my posts, was to tell the original poster that since his match was so close, he still "has a chance".

He was sweating the particular play he alluded to, and I get why judging from everyone's posts, but there are plenty of other ways he can still win. (and also lose by a larger margin)



IF Williams was awarded 3 yards on that play, and IF that decided the outcome of a FF championship then I would feel 1000x worse for the guy that was up against Williams than if the 3 yards wasn't credited, and the Williams owner lost.

How you feel is irrelevant to the OP's question.

The thread title is " DeAngelo Williams end of game rush - chance of a stat correction comin" .

If he gets a stat correction on this particular play, is obviously his point of interest. But the fact is, his match is so close, he may well get a stat correction win anyway .....which is what I have been explaining all along. The chance that he gets one on this exact play in question is an even greater chance.

Regardless of all this, I am done responding to you "davearm".

I vaguely remember one or two of these type posts in the past, but I have a solution.

I'll just put you on ignore and that will just be less time I have to break out the crayons here.

Sorry to clutter your thread Cday, maybe you get a break in your favor.

Congrats on the win in one league, and a 2nd (at least) in this one.

TZM

Wow, I wouldn't have imagined I post frequently enough to garner much of a reputation around here whatsoever, let alone one that provokes such a hostile response.

What I'm sensing is that you're not really interested in discussing this particular play from the end of the Steelers game, and the fairness of having a championship hinge on its interpretation. That was my interest in this thread, but if it's not yours too, no big deal. I hope you have a great day.

 

[davearm]

After more digging I found this:

NOTE: statistically, an exchange of the ball does not qualify as a backward pass unless the exchange is completed to a teammate without first touching the ground. If the ball touches the ground, or is intercepted by an opponent, the player who attempted the backward pass is credited with a fumble.

So that's probably what we're seeing here. Per NFL rules, a backward pass is not a fumble, and may be recovered and advanced even if it hits the ground. But per the NFL's guide for statisticians, a backward pass that touches the ground is indeed recorded as a fumble, statistically.

So now it seems unlikely to me that there would be a stat correction on the play.

Edited to add links:

Rule Book

Guide for statisticians

So if I'm interpreting all of this right... it was legal for Williams to attempt to advance the ball, because it wasn't a fumble but rather a backward pass. (As we know, he could not have advanced another player's fumble due to the under-2:00-in-a-half rule.)

But statistically, any yards gained (or TD scored) would have been categorized as fumble recovery for statistical purposes.

 

[cday]

After more digging I found this:

NOTE: statistically, an exchange of the ball does not qualify as a backward pass unless the exchange is completed to a teammate without first touching the ground. If the ball touches the ground, or is intercepted by an opponent, the player who attempted the backward pass is credited with a fumble.

So that's probably what we're seeing here. Per NFL rules, a backward pass is not a fumble, and may be recovered and advanced even if it hits the ground. But per the NFL's guide for statisticians, a backward pass that touches the ground is indeed recorded as a fumble, statistically.

So now it seems unlikely to me that there would be a stat correction on the play.

Edited to add links:

Rule Book

Guide for statisticians

So if I'm interpreting all of this right... it was legal for Williams to attempt to advance the ball, because it wasn't a fumble but rather a backward pass. (As we know, he could not have advanced another player's fumble due to the under-2:00-in-a-half rule.)

But statistically, any yards gained (or TD scored) would have been categorized as fumble recovery for statistical purposes.

That seems nuts. You're telling me if he broke that for a touchdown, he's getting credit for a 83 yard fumble recovery?

humbug

 

[davearm]

He'd get credit for an 83 yard fumble recovery that wasn't a fumble. (If it was indeed a fumble, he wouldn't be permitted to advance it, if Ladsud's info is correct.)

 

[cday]

He'd get credit for an 83 yard fumble recovery that wasn't a fumble. (If it was indeed a fumble, he wouldn't be permitted to advance it, if Ladsud's info is correct.)

finkle is einhorn

 

[smcindoe]

Not to be that guy, or to complicate this any more than it already is, but: Don't assume that any cases of the NFL getting it wrong will actually result in a stat correction.

(Learned that lesson back in week two, when a Jeremy Hill fumble mistake was never fixed. Cody me a title in hindsight, which is great because I mainly play fantasy these days for the bitterness and grudges.)

 

[Don Quixote]

MFL tweeted this:

Awful Week 16 stat correction coming down the pipe: Steelers RB DeAngelo Williams now credited with lost fumble on final play of game.

https://twitter.com/MyFantasyLeague/status/682442794754011137

 

[BroadwayG]

http://football30.myfantasyleague.com/2015/site_news?CATEGORY=Official+Statistics+Changes&L=20551

Pittsburgh Steelers at Baltimore Ravens

• Javorius Allen: from 18 Rushes for 79 Yards to 17 Rushes for 77 Yards.
• Terrance West: from 13 Rushes for 42 Yards to 14 Rushes for 44 Yards.
• Ben Roethlisberger: from 215 to 220 Passing Yards.
• Steelers: from 215 to 220 Passing Yards.
• Steelers: from 193 to 198 Net Passing Yards.
• Ben Roethlisberger: from -8 to -3 Receiving Yards.
• DeAngelo Williams: from 0 to 1 Fumbles.
• DeAngelo Williams: from 0 to 1 Fumbles Lost.
• Steelers: from 1 to 2 Fumbles.
• Steelers: from 0 to 1 Fumbles Lost.
• Ryan Shazier: from 5 to 6 Tackles.
• Ryan Shazier: from 8 to 7 Assists.
• Lawrence Timmons: from 7 to 6 Assists.
• Ramon Foster: from 0 to 1 Miscellaneous Tackles.
• C.J. Mosley: from 6 to 7 Tackles.
• C.J. Mosley: from 0 to 1 Forced Fumbles.
• Courtney Upshaw: from 2 to 3 Tackles.
• Courtney Upshaw: from 3 to 2 Assists.
• Courtney Upshaw: from 0 to 1 Fumble Recoveries.
• Za'Darius Smith: from 2 to 1 Assists.
• Ravens Defense: from 0 to 1 Forced Fumbles.
• Ravens Defense: from 0 to 1 FumbleRecoveries.

 

[Native]

Yikes!

 

[rick6668]

Yikes!

Yeah, tons of corrections this week.

Yahoo credited these corrections to the 2 teams in the Championship

Dec 31
DeAngelo Williams Pit - RB Fum Lost 1 -2

Dec 31
Ben Roethlisberger Pit - QB Pass Yds 5 0.25

Dec 31
Ben Roethlisberger Pit - QB Rec Yds 5 0.5

Dec 31
Javorius Allen Bal - RB Rush Yds -2 -0.2

Dec 31
Todd Gurley StL - RB Rush Yds -2 -0.2

Dec 31
Allen Hurns Jax - WR Rec Yds 1 0.1
Thank goodness it was a blowout and didn't matter.

Why was Roethlisberger credited with 5 receiving yards?

 

[cday]

well, the stat correction came! at least now i lost by a not as soul crushing 2.2 instead of .1

kinda BS since the ref was clearly blowing the play dead for lack of forward progress it looked like, but whatever

 

[JoeSteeler]

lost championship due to Mosely getting +5 points

 

[sho nuff]

Yikes!

Yeah, tons of corrections this week. Yahoo credited these corrections to the 2 teams in the Championship

Dec 31

DeAngelo Williams Pit - RB Fum Lost 1 -2

Dec 31

Ben Roethlisberger Pit - QB Pass Yds 5 0.25

Dec 31

Ben Roethlisberger Pit - QB Rec Yds 5 0.5

Dec 31

Javorius Allen Bal - RB Rush Yds -2 -0.2

Dec 31

Todd Gurley StL - RB Rush Yds -2 -0.2

Dec 31

Allen Hurns Jax - WR Rec Yds 1 0.1

Thank goodness it was a blowout and didn't matter.

Why was Roethlisberger credited with 5 receiving yards?

Opponent has big Ben and I have gone from a .42 win to a .28 loss with his extra receiving and passing.

Was holding out hope Latavius would get his end the f the half stuff credited back and it wouldn't matter.

 

[TheBigHouse]

The Roethlisberger change was enough to turn my bitter tears into tears of joy. Victory is Mine

 

[kegger]

I could have been seriously hurt by this to, wshoooo..

Had Ben, Deangelo and Denard Robinson going for me in the final.

Was up .07 going into the MNF game with E. Sanders of Den left for me and nothing for him.

Sanders got 9.35 points, I won by 6, the minus for Deangelo's stat corrections woulda killed me.

(that woulda sucked and I feel for others who lost on the stat corrections, real but still sucks)