What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Divisional Round- Green Bay @ Dallas Thread (1 Viewer)

I don't see DAL holding Rodgers off for 15 minutes. At this point short of a miracle, Packers should be able to lock up this W with 3 more points,

 
pretty impressive overcoming that 2nd & 21 

gotta get a couple stops to win though gonna be tough

 
Last edited by a moderator:
depends on McCarthy's play calling. if he goes into his usual shell gb should be punting rather quickly and Dallas will tie. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
depends on McCarthy's play calling. if he goes into his usual shell gb should be punting rather quickly and Dallas will tie. 
I don't think he does.  Let Rodgers win this.  Randall is too much of a liability to give Dallas a chance to tie.  You need to let Rodgers win.  

 
They fail the conversion, it automatically becomes a 2 possession game without GB having to lift a finger.
They fail it later and it becomes another possession without Green Bay lifting a finger.

Impressive moonlogic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They fail the conversion, it automatically becomes a 2 possession game without GB having to lift a finger.
At some point they have to make the 2 point conversion.  Wouldn't it be good to have the knowledge that you need 2 scores sooner than later?   :shrug: . This exact scenario has been a big debate on FBGs and I can understand both point of views.

 
At some point they have to make the 2 point conversion.  Wouldn't it be good to have the knowledge that you need 2 scores sooner than later?   :shrug: . This exact scenario has been a big debate on FBGs and I can understand both point of views.
How do you know they're going to need a 2-pt conversion?

 
At some point they have to make the 2 point conversion.  Wouldn't it be good to have the knowledge that you need 2 scores sooner than later?   :shrug: . This exact scenario has been a big debate on FBGs and I can understand both point of views.
It's a 1 score game right now.  They miss the PAT or the 2pt its a 2 score game. They feel the odds of making the PAT are higher than the 2pter.  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top