What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Django Unchained -- new Tarantino film (1 Viewer)

I'm not sure Jamie Foxx was the right guy for this role.
Agree. He didn't seem to work in the trailer. Felt out of place somehow.
I saw Idris Elba auditioned - the whole time I was watching the trailer I couldn't help picturing him in that role instead of Foxx and how much cooler the trailer would have seemed.
Interesting.I just watched the trailer now, and 15 minutes ago I said I think Elba would be great in this role yet now I think Foxx is probably a better fit. Hard to say, but this role looks like it has more humor weaved into the drama than I expected for a QT film, which fits right into the hands of Foxx as Django. I think Elba is somewhat versatile, but he's much stronger in pure drama roles than ones that involve humor/comedy/sarcastic charisma...As much as I love String, I think Foxx mightve been the right pick here, and I certainly trust Tarantino.
Did you see Elba's turn on "The Office"? He was awesome.
Did not
 
Kevin Costner backed out of this flick fo the Hatfield-McCoy miniseries - may have been the right move.

 
'Nugget said:
Kevin Costner backed out of this flick fo the Hatfield-McCoy miniseries - may have been the right move.
Hard to believe Costner would turn down a Tarantino movie. No upside to that move.
 
'Nugget said:
Kevin Costner backed out of this flick fo the Hatfield-McCoy miniseries - may have been the right move.
The right move? Based on what, your opinion of a trailer? Lol. It is true he dropped out because of a scheduling conflict though. Kurt Russell also also dropped out (he had replaced Costner), and Sacha Baron Cohen also had to skip out because of the Dictators press tour (he was scheduled for a breif cameo)

http://collider.com/kurt-russell-sacha-baron-cohen-django-unchained/165244/

 
'Nugget said:
Kevin Costner backed out of this flick fo the Hatfield-McCoy miniseries - may have been the right move.
The right move? Based on what, your opinion of a trailer? Lol. It is true he dropped out because of a scheduling conflict though. Kurt Russell also also dropped out (he had replaced Costner), and Sacha Baron Cohen also had to skip out because of the Dictators press tour (he was scheduled for a breif cameo)

http://collider.com/kurt-russell-sacha-baron-cohen-django-unchained/165244/
Jonah Hill and Joseph Gordon-Levitt also dropped out due to "scheduling conflicts". These are all white guys so you can easily figure out their roles.
 
I loved Basterds for the absurdist historical revenge piece it was but following up with more of the same shtick seems like a bad idea. Tarantino's always been hit or miss for me. Not too stoked for this one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really don't get the hate for Death Proof :shrug:
Death Proof synopsis by Chaka: Boring, boring, boring, hot Rosario Dawson dance, kinda interesting, getting good, cool car crash, BAM the longest most momentum draining, inane, dull, vapid, stilted, awkward, inauthentic, shallow, unnecessary, jam-a-pencil-in-your-ears conversation in the history of film, boring, boring, awesome Zoe Bell stunt, potentially cool car chase that never develops or changes one iota from the inception to the ending removing any and all tension it initially created, step on Kurt Russel's head. The End.
:goodposting: That pretty much nails it. I like Tarantino a lot but I'd view "Death Proof" as a curiosity more than a good film or story. I liked Russell in his role, though. Really looking forward to "Django Unchained." Trailer looks great and the cast is amazing.
While I was watching, I thought, wow, he's got three Academy Award winners. But then I realized that DiCaprio's been nominated multiple times, but never won.
QT considered Leo for the role of Hans Landa but ended hiring Christophe Waltz, who went on to win an Oscar. I doubt Leo has a better chance playing Calvin Candie.
 
Really don't get the hate for Death Proof :shrug:
Death Proof synopsis by Chaka: Boring, boring, boring, hot Rosario Dawson dance, kinda interesting, getting good, cool car crash, BAM the longest most momentum draining, inane, dull, vapid, stilted, awkward, inauthentic, shallow, unnecessary, jam-a-pencil-in-your-ears conversation in the history of film, boring, boring, awesome Zoe Bell stunt, potentially cool car chase that never develops or changes one iota from the inception to the ending removing any and all tension it initially created, step on Kurt Russel's head. The End.
:goodposting: That pretty much nails it. I like Tarantino a lot but I'd view "Death Proof" as a curiosity more than a good film or story. I liked Russell in his role, though. Really looking forward to "Django Unchained." Trailer looks great and the cast is amazing.
While I was watching, I thought, wow, he's got three Academy Award winners. But then I realized that DiCaprio's been nominated multiple times, but never won.
Samuel L. Jackson and Bruce Dern are also former Oscar nominees in the cast.As is Don Johnson. Never nominated but he's Sonny Crockett and Sonny Crockett rules (Johnson version only, no Colin Farrell crap).
Actually, Don Johnson's performance is the only one that I'm eager to see.
 
Saw it on the big screen in DLP, really fantastic piece of entertainment, 2 hours and 45 minutes flew by for my wife and I. I won't give away anything although the previews show quite a lot. There is some over the top violence at different points but that is not the meat and potatoes of the movie.

Chirstoph Waltz plays a dentist turned bounty hunter and he is so smooth and so awesome, the beginning of the movie he gets himself in so much hot water in about 30 seconds, you think how is he gonna get out of this but he has all the answers and he could easily get an Oscar nod. He makes Jamie Foxx look good and that isn't easy.

Samuel Jackson appears about halfway into the movie and just about steals the film. The audience i was sitting in about laughed themselves to death with a few of his lines. I'm not sure anyone else could have even played the same role he did. It's almost like QT said to him just do your thing and he did. This was the best Samuel Jackson I have seen on film in probably a decade.

My wife and I wanted to see it again, it was easily one of the 5 best films I saw this year. I liked it so much better than the mainstream crap this year including the likes of all the comic book movies, this film sizzles and it has some fantastic dialogue along the way. If you love QT films, you're gonna enjoy this a lot. It's not as good as Kill Bill and many will like IB better but it is still a fantastic film and worthy of QT.

Oh and Leonardo eats up the screen and has a delightful time playing a dirty rotten *******. There is a KKK scene that you gotta see to believe and it had the audience howling and rolling int he aisle, it was tough to hear all the jokes the laughter got so loud. Enjoy yourself.

 
Chirstoph Waltz plays a dentist turned bounty hunter and he is so smooth and so awesome, the beginning of the movie he gets himself in so much hot water in about 30 seconds, you think how is he gonna get out of this but he has all the answers and he could easily get an Oscar nod. He makes Jamie Foxx look good and that isn't easy.
So who made Jamie Foxx look good in Ray? Was it Willow?! What about Ali? That must have been Will Smith who made him appear to be able to act. Then there's the underrated Collateral which Foxx was also very good in, I guess Tom Cruise made him look like a decent actor there as well. I dont know if you just see Jamie Foxx and think of In Living Color, his own sitcom, or his early movie career that was dominated by comedic roles, but at this point IMO he has proven himself to be quite a good actor. More importantly, if Tarantino thought otherwise, Im guessing he wouldnt have put Foxx as the star of his new film.
Oh and Leonardo eats up the screen and has a delightful time playing a dirty rotten *******. There is a KKK scene that you gotta see to believe and it had the audience howling and rolling int he aisle, it was tough to hear all the jokes the laughter got so loud. Enjoy yourself.
:unsure: Im glad you enjoyed the movie, and I have few doubts about it being good, but these 2 statements really stood out as idiotic about a film you are calling Top 5 for the year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chirstoph Waltz plays a dentist turned bounty hunter and he is so smooth and so awesome, the beginning of the movie he gets himself in so much hot water in about 30 seconds, you think how is he gonna get out of this but he has all the answers and he could easily get an Oscar nod. He makes Jamie Foxx look good and that isn't easy.
So who made Jamie Foxx look good in Ray? Was it Willow?! What about Ali? That must have been Will Smith who made him appear to be able to act. Then there's the underrated Collateral which Foxx was also very good in, I guess Tom Cruise made him look like a decent actor there as well. I dont know if you just see Jamie Foxx and think of In Living Color, his own sitcom, or his early movie career that was dominated by comedic roles, but at this point IMO he has proven himself to be quite a good actor. More importantly, if Tarantino thought otherwise, Im guessing he wouldnt have put Foxx as the star of his new film.
Oh and Leonardo eats up the screen and has a delightful time playing a dirty rotten *******. There is a KKK scene that you gotta see to believe and it had the audience howling and rolling int he aisle, it was tough to hear all the jokes the laughter got so loud. Enjoy yourself.
:unsure: Im glad you enjoyed the movie, and I have few doubts about it being good, but these 2 statements really stood out as idiotic about a film you are calling Top 5 for the year.
I could list twice as many awful films Fox has done along the same timeline. His Oscar win was a joke and actually takes a little away from winning the award IMO, he is not a good actor normally but if you like him so be it. He is good in this role but he is allowed to be Jaime Foxx in the role and sometimes being yourself on film can look like the best acting because it is natural. The KKK scene is a riot and yes this was a top5 film, I'm sure many will agree as the next few weeks roll on.

 
Chirstoph Waltz plays a dentist turned bounty hunter and he is so smooth and so awesome, the beginning of the movie he gets himself in so much hot water in about 30 seconds, you think how is he gonna get out of this but he has all the answers and he could easily get an Oscar nod. He makes Jamie Foxx look good and that isn't easy.
So who made Jamie Foxx look good in Ray? Was it Willow?! What about Ali? That must have been Will Smith who made him appear to be able to act. Then there's the underrated Collateral which Foxx was also very good in, I guess Tom Cruise made him look like a decent actor there as well. I dont know if you just see Jamie Foxx and think of In Living Color, his own sitcom, or his early movie career that was dominated by comedic roles, but at this point IMO he has proven himself to be quite a good actor. More importantly, if Tarantino thought otherwise, Im guessing he wouldnt have put Foxx as the star of his new film.
I could list twice as many awful films Fox has done along the same timeline. His Oscar win was a joke and actually takes a little away from winning the award IMO, he is not a good actor normally but if you like him so be it. He is good in this role but he is allowed to be Jaime Foxx in the role and sometimes being yourself on film can look like the best acting because it is natural.
I wont debate a scene from a movie I haven't seen yet, but if you think Foxx is a terrible actor something is wrong. What timeline are you talking about, because Foxx took a pretty obvious career change into being taken seriously as an actor - for the most part - at the turn of the century, and making that his primary career as opposed to comedies. Since 2001:Good movies:

Ali

Shade

Collateral

Ray

Jarhead (weak for a war movie, but I wouldnt call it bad)

The Kingdom (overlooked movie)

Law Abiding Citizen

Due Date + Horrible Bosses (I wouldnt give him much credit for these, but he was money in both)

Bad movies:

Stealth (just a hunch this is bad)

Miami Vice (didnt think this was terrible, but probably more deserving in this category)

The Soloist (only performance he has had this decade that bothered me)

No Clue:

Stan Tookie Williams Story

Breakin All The Rules

Dreamgirls (he got nominated for it, but I dont do musicals)

Valtentine's Day

To me, that looks like he has done pretty damn good for the last decade. His performance as Ray Charles made everyone realize that Jamie Foxx has a ton of talent all around, but apparently he was a joke to you in that movie. Love that movie, and Walk The Line. I still cant decide which is my favorite, or if Foxx does a better Charles or Joaquin a better Cash. Whichever Ive watched more recently usually wins.

 
I thought the over-the-top blood effects took a little away from the movie. I thought the same thing about Inglourious Basterds. I don't know, it's just kind of stupid.

Yes, the KKK seen was hilarious. One of the funniest scenes I've seen in a while.

Another great performance by Waltz. I thought every character was done well except Tarantino's.

 
I enjoyed this movie but the almost 3 hours didn't fly by for me. It felt way too long. To me the best QT scene is the pub scene in IB. He knows how to build up the intensity in a scene. In Django, he tries very hard to do the same. Just seems to fall short and some of the scenes seemed to drag on for me.

Waltz is an exceptional actor and really carried this movie for the first half. Sam Jackson was great too. The best thing about Foxx's character is that he didn't have really that many talking scenes. Waltz and Leo make this movie. The only thing about Leo that stumbled just a little bit was his accent seemed to go in and out (he was a Mississippi slaver). One moment he was a southerner, the next, someone trying in vain to play a southerner. But man, that kid can act.

Don Johnson and his mob were very funny.

I could see Will Smith playing the lead, though. Just don't care much for Foxx.

I also loved the music used in the film. Very cool. Anyone who has seen "They call me Trinity" will recognize one tune in particular.

Like any other QT movie, there is lots of blood and the damage from an ordinary bullet is over-exaggerated.

But the one thing that I never got comfortable with was the overly excessive use of the N word. I understand it is set in the south just before the civil war, but it was just uncomfortable.

I liked IB and Kill Bill better, but I enjoyed this one too. I'd give it 3.5 out of 5.

 
Just got back. Fun movie but it seemed a little like Tarantino couldn't make his vision clear. Some gruesome violence for sure but much of the movie was joyless. The subject matter is just so oppressive. The mandingo fighting scenes were kind of difficult to watch because you just know you are seeing something that men have been forcing other men to do for thousands of years. Just kind of made me sad and unhappy. Leonardo is so good, as was Jackson.

 
I dont think jamie foxx is a good actor either :shrug: cant wait to see this :thumbup:
I'm not a big Jamie Foxx fan, but I think he did great. I love QT, and thought this movie was another home run. I had seen some complaints about the length, but I didn't think it was too long at all. The slower scenes in most QT movies keep me engaged rather than bored, and this was no different. Christoph Waltz is just awesome.A few minor nitpicks:
1. I didn't like the way that Dr. Shultz went out. I didn't think it was in character for him to just sacrifice himself to kill a guy who was just pissing him off. If he thought he could win the engagement/gun fight, yes, but he knew he'd catch a shotgun to the back as soon as he did it, and it didn't fit imo. He just got done telling Django on the way to the Candie land that it wasn't his intention to die in bum#### Mississippi.2. The Samuel L. Jackson character took away from the movie rather than adding to it for me. Candie kept on telling Shultz they had never seen a guy like Django before, then they get to the plantation and there's this over the top slave character being extremely snarky to everyone, even the white folk.
 
I think Jamie Foxx can be a great actor but got pretty full of himself around the Any Given Sunday movie. He's as talented as they come but it's clearly gone to his head.

 
Top 3 QT movie IMO. Has all the classic QT elements..great dialogue, dark humor, the shootouts...

Leonardo and Chris Waltz were terrific, the KKK scene had the place rolling. Samuel L. was good too, pretty funny at times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saw this last night. I enjoyed it for sure but I found myself very uncomfortable during a lot of the slave stuff. I imagine that was QT's goal and it worked.

I kept waiting for Samuel Jacksons character to go a different way. I was surprised when it did not happen.

 
Just saw this last night, everyone I know that had seen it was calling it the western kill bill and the slavery inglorious basterds - I hated Kill Bill so I had mixed expectations.

I loved it. Foxx, Waltz and Dicarprio were all great.

 
I really found this movie to be fun and very entertaining. In typical Qt fashion, the music was good, the violence was over the top, the dialoge was great and the acting was exceptional. Chris Waltz was fantastic, Leo and Sammy L were great & Foxx was solid.

As much as I enjoyed this movie though, when comparing to other QT films, this ranks pretty low. (Just above Jackie Brown and Deathproof) The flow of it seemed pretty disconnected. Tarantino seemed to throw all of his shtick at you from all angles.

Still, it was a pretty awesome movie.

 
Saw it last night. Liked it, didn't love it, but for me Tarantino movies always need to be watched a 2nd or 3rd time to take everything in. Waltz, Leo and Jackson were all great, Fox wasn't bad, and Don Johnson was good as Big Daddy (I wish he had a bigger part).

I had heard going in that the use of the n-word was excessive, but wow. You'd think they'd use 'slave' a bit more over it. I also thought the ending was over the top, but that's Tarantino for ya.

QT's cameo was cool, he has packed on a few pounds. It was also cool to see Tom Wopat (Luke Duke) as the US Marshall. Recognized him right away.

Ill wait til I see it at least one more time before I rank it among Tarantino flicks.

 
Saw it last night. Liked it, didn't love it, but for me Tarantino movies always need to be watched a 2nd or 3rd time to take everything in. Waltz, Leo and Jackson were all great, Fox wasn't bad, and Don Johnson was good as Big Daddy (I wish he had a bigger part).

I had heard going in that the use of the n-word was excessive, but wow. You'd think they'd use 'slave' a bit more over it. I also thought the ending was over the top, but that's Tarantino for ya.

QT's cameo was cool, he has packed on a few pounds. It was also cool to see Tom Wopat (Luke Duke) as the US Marshall. Recognized him right away.

Ill wait til I see it at least one more time before I rank it among Tarantino flicks.
I’m not surprised by this at all. Sometimes I get the impression that QT makes movies just so that he can use the N-word
 
Saw it last night. Liked it, didn't love it, but for me Tarantino movies always need to be watched a 2nd or 3rd time to take everything in. Waltz, Leo and Jackson were all great, Fox wasn't bad, and Don Johnson was good as Big Daddy (I wish he had a bigger part).

I had heard going in that the use of the n-word was excessive, but wow. You'd think they'd use 'slave' a bit more over it. I also thought the ending was over the top, but that's Tarantino for ya.

QT's cameo was cool, he has packed on a few pounds. It was also cool to see Tom Wopat (Luke Duke) as the US Marshall. Recognized him right away.

Ill wait til I see it at least one more time before I rank it among Tarantino flicks.
I’m not surprised by this at all. Sometimes I get the impression that QT makes movies just so that he can use the N-word
Better that then horrific Australian accents.
 
Saw it last night. Liked it, didn't love it, but for me Tarantino movies always need to be watched a 2nd or 3rd time to take everything in. Waltz, Leo and Jackson were all great, Fox wasn't bad, and Don Johnson was good as Big Daddy (I wish he had a bigger part).

I had heard going in that the use of the n-word was excessive, but wow. You'd think they'd use 'slave' a bit more over it. I also thought the ending was over the top, but that's Tarantino for ya.

QT's cameo was cool, he has packed on a few pounds. It was also cool to see Tom Wopat (Luke Duke) as the US Marshall. Recognized him right away.

Ill wait til I see it at least one more time before I rank it among Tarantino flicks.
He is such a terrible actor. I hate when he appears in his movies.

 
Saw it last night. Liked it, didn't love it, but for me Tarantino movies always need to be watched a 2nd or 3rd time to take everything in. Waltz, Leo and Jackson were all great, Fox wasn't bad, and Don Johnson was good as Big Daddy (I wish he had a bigger part).

I had heard going in that the use of the n-word was excessive, but wow. You'd think they'd use 'slave' a bit more over it. I also thought the ending was over the top, but that's Tarantino for ya.

QT's cameo was cool, he has packed on a few pounds. It was also cool to see Tom Wopat (Luke Duke) as the US Marshall. Recognized him right away.

Ill wait til I see it at least one more time before I rank it among Tarantino flicks.
He is such a terrible actor. I hate when he appears in his movies.
He is terrible, but I dont mind him as long as his screen time is short.Don't f***ing 'Jimmy' me, Jules, okayyy? Dont f***ing 'Jimmy' me.

 
Saw this last night. I enjoyed it for sure but I found myself very uncomfortable during a lot of the slave stuff. I imagine that was QT's goal and it worked.

I kept waiting for Samuel Jacksons character to go a different way. I was surprised when it did not happen.
This right here. The reason it makes you and everyone else feel so uncomfortable is because actual true depictions of slavery are rare in America film. I love how he went there with it. I also liked the fact that the only time anyone was nice to Jamie Foxx, it was not a natural born American. Top 3 QT film. Some over the top stuff, but I don't think the violence was over the top. Shiet was rough back then and human life was value so much. Lots of revisionist history again in a playful way. For instance, I believe the KKK did not form until the 1900's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lots of revisionist history again in a playful way. For instance, I believe the KKK did not form until the 1900's.
The Klan was founded in 1865, and was big for the remainder of that decade.For those of you who like Christopher Waltz and/or Tarantino, here's a long interview that Adam carolla conducted with Waltz during the time of InGlorious Basterds. Waltz really gets into Tarantino's process.http://adamcarolla.com/cristoph-waltz/
 
Lots of revisionist history again in a playful way. For instance, I believe the KKK did not form until the 1900's.
The Klan was founded in 1865, and was big for the remainder of that decade.For those of you who like Christopher Waltz and/or Tarantino, here's a long interview that Adam carolla conducted with Waltz during the time of InGlorious Basterds. Waltz really gets into Tarantino's process.http://adamcarolla.com/cristoph-waltz/
Oh ok. :cool: Film did take place in 1858 though, so a few years still before it existed officially? Getting into Tarantino's brain can be a scary adventure by the way.
 
Saw this today, great flick. Agree that the Samuel L. Jackson role took away from it. Anyone else in that role would have been better.

Also, watching it on the near south side of Chicago with the whole slavery thing made it a bit uncomfortable. Had to make sure it was ok to laugh at some parts.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top