I don't understand. You think it's worse to roll over the sick days than use them? As an employer, I would WAY rather my employees use their comp time in the year it is accrued. It's a pain to keep rolling it over and it's going to cost the employer a big chunk of change when the employee leaves if they have to get paid for a bunch of back sick pay.I just sent an email to my staff today telling them how to properly use sick leave as a federal employee. We get 13 days a year and you can carry over every single hour from year to year until you retire.
I average 28 sick hours per year, or about four days. This includes dentist appointments, sick kids, my annual contraction of gonorrhea, etc. I have an employee with 15 years as a fed who has 49 sick hours available, he has accrued 1500+ hours over his career. That's a dirtbag, that's someone cutting corners. I can look at an employee's sick hour status, how long they've been in service, and what they are using their sick hours for in the first 6 months I'm their boss and know what kind of employee they are. If you have 15 years of service and never had cancer, you should have at least 10 weeks of saved sick leave (400 hours). If you don't, you're a dirtbag.
Nope. Sick time is separated from vacation and is technically to be used for actual sick/dependent sick. Plus no short term so cushionI don't understand. You think it's worse to roll over the sick days than use them? As an employer, I would WAY rather my employees use their comp time in the year it is accrued. It's a pain to keep rolling it over and it's going to cost the employer a big chunk of change when the employee leaves if they have to get paid for a bunch of back sick pay.
I would think the exact opposite of you. If a guy has accrued a bunch of back sick days I would think he's gaming the system.
No you should roll over your sick days, that's my point. How would accruing a bunch of sick days be gaming the system if it counts towards your retirement? If you have 2087 sick hours at retirement you get 1% added to your annuity, how is that not genius? If I'm sick I use regular vacation time usually, I only use sick hours for appointments and stuff.I don't understand. You think it's worse to roll over the sick days than use them? As an employer, I would WAY rather my employees use their comp time in the year it is accrued. It's a pain to keep rolling it over and it's going to cost the employer a big chunk of change when the employee leaves if they have to get paid for a bunch of back sick pay.I just sent an email to my staff today telling them how to properly use sick leave as a federal employee. We get 13 days a year and you can carry over every single hour from year to year until you retire.
I average 28 sick hours per year, or about four days. This includes dentist appointments, sick kids, my annual contraction of gonorrhea, etc. I have an employee with 15 years as a fed who has 49 sick hours available, he has accrued 1500+ hours over his career. That's a dirtbag, that's someone cutting corners. I can look at an employee's sick hour status, how long they've been in service, and what they are using their sick hours for in the first 6 months I'm their boss and know what kind of employee they are. If you have 15 years of service and never had cancer, you should have at least 10 weeks of saved sick leave (400 hours). If you don't, you're a dirtbag.
I would think the exact opposite of you. If a guy has accrued a bunch of back sick days I would think he's gaming the system.
But they can roll it over, which usually means if they leave they get reimbursed for that. If that's the case, I'd rather have people take a sick day for a one-beer hangover than carry it over.Nope. Sick time is separated from vacation and is technically to be used for actual sick/dependent sick. Plus no short term so cushion
If you leave federal service without retiring, you don't take your sick time with you. No cash out, you get nothing. The only time this isn't the case is if you die and your spouse will get a payout of your sick time, that's about it. It's not 100% but they get something.But they can roll it over, which usually means if they leave they get reimbursed for that. If that's the case, I'd rather have people take a sick day for a one-beer hangover than carry it over.Nope. Sick time is separated from vacation and is technically to be used for actual sick/dependent sick. Plus no short term so cushion
No short term disability. So you should roll as much over in caseBut they can roll it over, which usually means if they leave they get reimbursed for that. If that's the case, I'd rather have people take a sick day for a one-beer hangover than carry it over.
This. My email today said that you should rollover as much sick leave as possible not only because it may bolster your retirement, but because you actually might get really ####### sick someday! I have 800+ hours, I have it just in case I get some really serious gonorrhea more than anything else.No short term disability. So you should roll as much over in case
I've seen way, way worse. People in the negatives.I just sent an email to my staff today telling them how to properly use sick leave as a federal employee. We get 13 days a year and you can carry over every single hour from year to year until you retire.
I average 28 sick hours per year, or about four days. This includes dentist appointments, sick kids, my annual contraction of gonorrhea, etc. I have an employee with 15 years as a fed who has 49 sick hours available, he has accrued 1500+ hours over his career. That's a dirtbag, that's someone cutting corners. I can look at an employee's sick hour status, how long they've been in service, and what they are using their sick hours for in the first 6 months I'm their boss and know what kind of employee they are. If you have 15 years of service and never had cancer, you should have at least 10 weeks of saved sick leave (400 hours). If you don't, you're a dirtbag.
My girl works for the state and I think they accrue 8+ sick hrs and 12+ vacation hours a month so roughly 250 sick\vaca hrs a year. Some of her finer co workers have been there for 20 or 30yrs and either have used up all their time or some are even negative. She does the time for her unit and some even bang in the day after they accrue a full day.I've seen way, way worse. People in the negatives.
These are the people that will eventually want hours from the voluntary leave program. That's why I won't donate to it, if you are calling out sick so much that you have a negative leave balance, you aren't getting my leave balance.I've seen way, way worse. People in the negatives.
Yes, almost always.These are the people that will eventually want hours from the voluntary leave program. That's why I won't donate to it, if you are calling out sick so much that you have a negative leave balance, you aren't getting my leave balance.
No payout. It just adds time to your retirement calculations. So if you had 20 years of service and a year worth of leave, they would treat it like you had 21 years of service.Not following, do you get paid out for the accrued sick days or not when you leave?
And perfect attendance awards suck balls.I just had a co-worker tell me he's never used a sick day in 13 years. No idea why that's something to be proud of. We have sick days for a reason. Stay home when you're sick so you don't infect everyone else, ####er.
Is this a pension thing? So if you get full pension after 20 years, you're at 19 but have a year worth of leave, then you could retire now and get full pension? And/or is this a pay thing where you're paid based upon your years of service?No payout. It just adds time to your retirement calculations. So if you had 20 years of service and a year worth of leave, they would treat it like you had 21 years of service.
You get yearly pension based on length of service and average of high three year salary. One percent for each year up to 20 than 1.1% thereafter.Is this a pension thing? So if you get full pension after 20 years, you're at 19 but have a year worth of leave, then you could retire now and get full pension? And/or is this a pay thing where you're paid based upon your years of service?
I refuse to approve leave requests that will put someone in the negative. If you can't keep your leave balance well above zero, you should be talking to HR about FMLA. Do that and I will approve (not that I have a choice in that scenario). And if your situation is really bad, HR will talk to you about disability retirement.These are the people that will eventually want hours from the voluntary leave program. That's why I won't donate to it, if you are calling out sick so much that you have a negative leave balance, you aren't getting my leave balance.
I would have liked this twice if the board allowed.I refuse to approve leave requests that will put someone in the negative. If you can't keep your leave balance well above zero, you should be talking to HR about FMLA. Do that and I will approve (not that I have a choice in that scenario). And if your situation is really bad, HR will talk to you about disability retirement.These are the people that will eventually want hours from the voluntary leave program. That's why I won't donate to it, if you are calling out sick so much that you have a negative leave balance, you aren't getting my leave balance.
Then I will post again so you can add another like (even if you don't like this post).I would have liked this twice if the board allowed.
Exactly what I get. I manage to take half of it. As managements says I don't lose it if I hit the cap, I just don't accrue any more.Accrued and capped at 200 hours, general PTO. I've had better.
We let people go for managing sick time (before we went to PTO). In my experience these folks tend to be the least productive when they are there, as well.but less scrupulous people use every hour of sick time available for actual sick days or mental health days. Those people are slackers.
"Unlimited" sick time/PTO is the new thing. Companies don't have to carry the accrued liability on their books.Unlimited. Policy is if you need it, take it. I actually haven't used a true sick day in the year I've been here. Not trying to be a hero, have just been lucky this year. But I've missed a couple hours here and there to go to all of my pregnant wife's appointments, and technically that time goes towards that but it isn't tracked or anything.
I was in federal government for 9+ years previously. Think I accrued 4 hours/PP which all rolled and probably left with about 800 hours banked. I definitely found myself taking a "sick day" maybe every/every other quarter or so.
Right. And believe the numbers reflect that people tend to use less sick time when they don't feel like they are earning/handed a block of time for the year so the employer wins on both ends. Definitely works on me."Unlimited" sick time/PTO is the new thing. Companies don't have to carry the accrued liability on their books.
See Smails post above. It's also a way to avoid paying out unused vacation time when people leave the company/get laid off. A company I was at tried to do this in advance of laying off a lot of people (which was expected to the place) and quickly reversed course, I believe after realizing how they were likely going to get sued to hell.Timely topic. Just last night got a company-wide e-mail stating that we are going to unlimited vacation. Reading between the lines, I think it is a way for them to actually save money because now people won't feel compelled to burn unused vacation at the end of the year so many may simply not use their earned vacation. But, guaranteed we will have a lot of people attempt to abuse the policy and the managers will have their work to do to prevent abuse. Realistically I think most employees will realize how much vacation they should use based on previous standards and use that amount accordingly, but their is potential for people to take way more or way less than they otherwise would have earned in previous policy.
I have not doubt my company will implement this at some point and I will hate it. People won't take as much vacation on that plan and people will be scrutinized more for taking time off. If they do implement it I plan to pretend like they didn't and take what I was already getting.Tech companies are the smartest companies - majority of them offer 'unlimited' time off.
Here is the caveat - studies show employees take less time off in this situation and employees don't acrue time either.