What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Do you play meaningful FF games in week 17? (1 Viewer)

Meaningful games or not?

  • I only play in leagues that don't play any meaningful games in week 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most of the leagues I play in do not play meaningful games in week 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Most of the leagues I play in play meaningful games in week 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I only play in leagues that play meaningful games in week 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Ghost Rider

Footballguy
Vote now.

By meaningful, I obviously mean your championship game is in week 17, or week 17 is the second week of a two-week championship, or something to that effect.

 
Vote now. By meaningful, I obviously mean your championship game is in week 17, or week 17 is the second week of a two-week championship, or something to that effect.
I have one superbowl that im in (free league) and another league where we play for weekly money. I have something, not much tho... :cry:
 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.

 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.
That's a good point. I suspect plenty of FF players who seasons will still be checking the site and the forum out throughout the day when the games are going on, if for no other reason than out of habit.
 
3 leagues, 2 have week 16 championships, 1 has a week 17 championship. I'm scouring for info on certain players, I have $300 on the line today.

 
Technically no since our Championship is done in week 16, but....

The loser of the two playoff games plays the winner of both games from 5th-8th place for 4th place in week 17 ($250).

Scores in week 17 also determine our NFL Playoffs League draft order.

 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.
That's a good point. I suspect plenty of FF players who seasons will still be checking the site and the forum out throughout the day when the games are going on, if for no other reason than out of habit.
I'm not sure what this means. Did you omit a word/words somewhere? But the fact remains that this poll will be skewed in that it will only be responded to by people who frequent this message board, on the Sunday of the last week of the regular season. A better poll would be conducted during the early part of the season, but even that would not be very accurate, because while FBG is a great place for FF info, it's not an accurate representation of the FF "world."

The fact is that (I'm assuming) you are intending to use this poll as "proof" for your assertion that "the norm" is NOT to play in week 17, and no matter what the results of this poll are, it would not be "proof" of that assertion.

 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.
That's a good point. I suspect plenty of FF players who seasons will still be checking the site and the forum out throughout the day when the games are going on, if for no other reason than out of habit.
I'm not sure what this means. Did you omit a word/words somewhere? But the fact remains that this poll will be skewed in that it will only be responded to by people who frequent this message board, on the Sunday of the last week of the regular season. A better poll would be conducted during the early part of the season, but even that would not be very accurate, because while FBG is a great place for FF info, it's not an accurate representation of the FF "world."

The fact is that (I'm assuming) you are intending to use this poll as "proof" for your assertion that "the norm" is NOT to play in week 17, and no matter what the results of this poll are, it would not be "proof" of that assertion.
Is that a fact?
 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.
That's a good point. I suspect plenty of FF players who seasons will still be checking the site and the forum out throughout the day when the games are going on, if for no other reason than out of habit.
I'm not sure what this means. Did you omit a word/words somewhere? But the fact remains that this poll will be skewed in that it will only be responded to by people who frequent this message board, on the Sunday of the last week of the regular season. A better poll would be conducted during the early part of the season, but even that would not be very accurate, because while FBG is a great place for FF info, it's not an accurate representation of the FF "world."

The fact is that (I'm assuming) you are intending to use this poll as "proof" for your assertion that "the norm" is NOT to play in week 17, and no matter what the results of this poll are, it would not be "proof" of that assertion.
Is that a fact?
No, that's my opinion. I believe FBG is a great place for FF info (I never said it was a fact), but in the 3 leagues I played in this year (33 different owners-some guys played in multiple leagues), only 9 used FBG, and almost all are serious FFers.
 
Serious owners generally don't play in Week 17 from my experience.
And in my experience, they do. This kind of statement doesn't bother me as much as ones like "if you're in a week 17 championship game, you league isn't a real league," or "all leagues should end before week 17, if the owners are serious," or "it's the norm to have a week 16 championship game."In your experience, serious leagues/owners don't play in week 17. In my experience, they do. I'm not saying that my way is right & yours is wrong, and (I hope) you're not saying yours is right and mine is wrong.
 
There's going to be serious selection bias in this poll - given that a ton of people whose fantasy season is over won't be checking fantasy football boards for 8 months, and anyone with a week 17 championship will be all over looking for info on who they can plug into their lineps due to half of the top ffl players being out, questionable, or playing a few snaps at best.
That's a good point. I suspect plenty of FF players who seasons will still be checking the site and the forum out throughout the day when the games are going on, if for no other reason than out of habit.
I'm not sure what this means. Did you omit a word/words somewhere? But the fact remains that this poll will be skewed in that it will only be responded to by people who frequent this message board, on the Sunday of the last week of the regular season. A better poll would be conducted during the early part of the season, but even that would not be very accurate, because while FBG is a great place for FF info, it's not an accurate representation of the FF "world."

The fact is that (I'm assuming) you are intending to use this poll as "proof" for your assertion that "the norm" is NOT to play in week 17, and no matter what the results of this poll are, it would not be "proof" of that assertion.
Is that a fact?
No, that's my opinion. I believe FBG is a great place for FF info (I never said it was a fact), but in the 3 leagues I played in this year (33 different owners-some guys played in multiple leagues), only 9 used FBG, and almost all are serious FFers.
I don't think the OP is basing his dissertation on the outcome of this poll. I think he is just curious...regardless, he is correct in his assumption that there will be those who check in out of habit...Personally, I have no games on the line and went as far as scouring the injury report before it hit me that "it just doesn't matter" for another 36 weeks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think the OP is basing his dissertation on the outcome of this poll. I think he is just curious...regardless, he is correct in his assumption that there will be those who check in out of habit...Personally, I have no games on the line and went as far as scouring the injury report before it hit me that "it just doesn't matter" for another 36 weeks.
I know, and that thought sucks. That is one of the reasons I enjoy playing week 17-it gives me another week where I can convince myself it is "necessary" to read the FF message boards, search injury reports, etc.
 
I'm happy none of my leagues have meaningful games in week 17, look at the massive amount of injuries this week! Lots of players sitting from teams that are already in the playoffs but have banged up guys too.

 
I took option 1, although I'm not vehemently opposed to week 17 title games, I just happen to not have any leagues that do. Just clarifying, since option 1 kind of sounds like "Child please, I don't play in week 17 leagues" which isn't necessarily what I was choosing.

 
My $5k money league comes down every year to the last play. Last year I lost the championship because of one touchdown. Played D. Jackson and E. Manning (among other "starters") and didn't get it. Lost by less than one touchdown. It didn't go the way I wanted to, but it sure was fun. We continually change our rules to make sure that happens.

Swamp

 
Week 17 is only meaningful because we have a "free-for-all" format based on our roster requirements with the yearly due fee as the prize... Kind of a play for free opportunity. Pick whoever you want and top scoring roster wins. It's also a great way to get everyone together one last time to go over league issues/suggestions and to basically have a fun time.

I'd hate to have a championship game in week 17. Too much chance with inactives to rest players for playoffs... not enough skill involved... ;)

 
Serious owners generally don't play in Week 17 from my experience.
And in my experience, they do. This kind of statement doesn't bother me as much as ones like "if you're in a week 17 championship game, you league isn't a real league," or "all leagues should end before week 17, if the owners are serious," or "it's the norm to have a week 16 championship game."In your experience, serious leagues/owners don't play in week 17. In my experience, they do. I'm not saying that my way is right & yours is wrong, and (I hope) you're not saying yours is right and mine is wrong.
I fully support your constitutional right to be wrong, Bayhawks.On the bright side, your league can fix it next year.Too many teams rest or limit the snaps of their starters in week 17 for any league to decide a champion this week.
 
Pro bowl, where division runner up managers select best division players for each team. Losing division buys the beer at our winter meeting. It eases the FF withdrawal symptoms. :goodposting:

 
Serious owners generally don't play in Week 17 from my experience.
And in my experience, they do. This kind of statement doesn't bother me as much as ones like "if you're in a week 17 championship game, you league isn't a real league," or "all leagues should end before week 17, if the owners are serious," or "it's the norm to have a week 16 championship game."

In your experience, serious leagues/owners don't play in week 17. In my experience, they do. I'm not saying that my way is right & yours is wrong, and (I hope) you're not saying yours is right and mine is wrong.
I don't know anyone playing today. Why would you play 16 weeks toward a championship game played on a week when many many top starters are taking the day off? Our leagues reason that if the players aren't playing, neither are we.This link might help set your lineup.

http://www.nfl.com/fantasy/playernews?news...amp;pageIndex=1

 
No. Never will I play in any league that has a championship game going in week 17.

It's a joke.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They play 17 weeks in the NFL. Not playing 17 weeks in your fantasy league is cheapening the fantasy football experience, imo. Adds in more strategy with rosters and lineups.

 
They play 17 weeks in the NFL. Not playing 17 weeks in your fantasy league is cheapening the fantasy football experience, imo. Adds in more strategy with rosters and lineups.
Many starters do not play week 17, any league playing their championship on week 17 is cheapening the fantasy football experience, imo.WE also have a playoff draft and play through the SB. Any league that doesn't do this is cheapening the fantasy football experience, imo.
 
In my main two leagues we do a pro bowl in week 17, losing division buys beer & food at next year's draft.

 
Serious owners generally don't play in Week 17 from my experience.
And in my experience, they do. This kind of statement doesn't bother me as much as ones like "if you're in a week 17 championship game, you league isn't a real league," or "all leagues should end before week 17, if the owners are serious," or "it's the norm to have a week 16 championship game."In your experience, serious leagues/owners don't play in week 17. In my experience, they do. I'm not saying that my way is right & yours is wrong, and (I hope) you're not saying yours is right and mine is wrong.
I fully support your constitutional right to be wrong, Bayhawks.On the bright side, your league can fix it next year.Too many teams rest or limit the snaps of their starters in week 17 for any league to decide a champion this week.
Well I appreciate your support, but I'm not sure what I'm wrong about.Since players are limited or rested in week 17, thus making it silly to play that week, I'm guessing that your leagues that "do it right" don't play games during the bye weeks, either, correct? Because that wouldn't make sense-to play games in some weeks when all your players aren't available, but not to play games in others?Care to explain that?
 
...but I'm not sure what I'm wrong about.
I know you're not.
Since players are limited or rested in week 17, thus making it silly to play that week, I'm guessing that your leagues that "do it right" don't play games during the bye weeks, either, correct? Because that wouldn't make sense-to play games in some weeks when all your players aren't available, but not to play games in others?Care to explain that?
Apples and oranges, but nice try.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
...but I'm not sure what I'm wrong about.
I know you're not.
Since players are limited or rested in week 17, thus making it silly to play that week, I'm guessing that your leagues that "do it right" don't play games during the bye weeks, either, correct? Because that wouldn't make sense-to play games in some weeks when all your players aren't available, but not to play games in others?Care to explain that?
Apples and oranges, but nice try.
So you can't explain it?You said It's silly to play in week 17 when many players might be rested. How is that "apples and oranges" to playing during bye weeks when you KNOW players won't play? If that's your logic for not playing week 17, then that same logic should be applied to not playing during bye weeks. Otherwise, your logic is selectively applied, and therefore, not logical.
 
If that's your logic for not playing week 17, then that same logic should be applied to not playing during bye weeks. Otherwise, your logic is selectively applied, and therefore, not logical.
You still can't see the forest for the trees there Spock.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If that's your logic for not playing week 17, then that same logic should be applied to not playing during bye weeks. Otherwise, your logic is selectively applied, and therefore, not logical.
You still can't see the forest for the trees there Spock.
And you still haven't answered the question. I'd wonder why that is, except I already know. It's because your reasoning for not playing week 17 should also apply to the bye weeks. Since you can't think of a good answer, you choose to ignore the question by posting little quips like "apples and oranges," and "you can't see the forest for the trees."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top