PSILOCYBIN
Footballguy
Thanks.
Last edited by a moderator:
Full speed is optimistic. They were talking about microfracture surgery at one point. He'll be back, but I'm not sure he'll be back to full speed before 2008.It's fairly simple. They would have put him on IR if he didn't have a chance to play this year. There have been numerous reports that are positive. He had one minor setback that I know of, but should be full speed in time for fantasy playoffs.
Hey, he only asked if Walker had a realistic chance of playing again, not when that might occur.
My personal opinion is that it'll be a 1A, 1B situation. When Walker was healthy they were both targetted quite a bit and neither one can really be double-teamed with the other on the field. Add in Scheffler and Graham and someone's bound to be open all the time.My question is when Walker comes back who is the "#1 wr" on the Bronco's? Not that it matters much but Marshall has looked awfully good.
I just finished reading this article and this part stood out. Does anyone recall Walker 'publicly maintaining' that the microfracture talk was drummed up?Walker was aware of the microfracture talk publicly but maintained the substance of the news was patently false.
This offense was built to feature Walker's specific skills. IMO, he's the #1 for as long as he's playing. I doubt he eats into Marshall's value as much as Stokley's, though.Banger said:My question is when Walker comes back who is the "#1 wr" on the Bronco's? Not that it matters much but Marshall has looked awfully good.
I doubt it. Usually doctors don't clear a player to play if there's a significant risk of re-injury. You still have to fear cascade injuries, I suppose (i.e. injuries that result from Javon overcompensating for his existing injury).Giants4Life said:I think he will play and get hurt again.They reccomended that he get microfracture surgery, which wouldve shelved him for the season. He elected not to.It just has that feeling of a "come back, play two games, get hurt, and season over" deal.
It doesn't say that Walker "publicly maintained" anything. It says that there was microfracture talk publicly, and that Javon Walker maintained that it was patently false.redjake said:I just finished reading this article and this part stood out. Does anyone recall Walker 'publicly maintaining' that the microfracture talk was drummed up?packersfan said:Walker was aware of the microfracture talk publicly but maintained the substance of the news was patently false.
What, are you a lawyer?I didn't quote it, I inferred it based on the "maintain(ing)" part suggesting that he's commented on it before.Hadn't read any Walker comments prior about the "substance of the news" being "patently false" and was curious if anyone else had.It doesn't say that Walker "publicly maintained" anything. It says that there was microfracture talk publicly, and that Javon Walker maintained that it was patently false.redjake said:I just finished reading this article and this part stood out. Does anyone recall Walker 'publicly maintaining' that the microfracture talk was drummed up?packersfan said:Walker was aware of the microfracture talk publicly but maintained the substance of the news was patently false.
The media tends to be loose with the phrase "maintaining", in my experience. I suspect that if he said it was bunk, and then the media responded with "there wasn't any truth at all?", and he said that no, it was total bunk, the media would say that he "maintained" that it was bunk. In other words, I don't think you have to hold a stance from one interview to the next in order to be "maintaining" your stance... you just have to hold that stance over the course of repeated questioning, even if that questioning comes during the course of a single interview.What, are you a lawyer?I didn't quote it, I inferred it based on the "maintain(ing)" part suggesting that he's commented on it before.Hadn't read any Walker comments prior about the "substance of the news" being "patently false" and was curious if anyone else had.It doesn't say that Walker "publicly maintained" anything. It says that there was microfracture talk publicly, and that Javon Walker maintained that it was patently false.redjake said:I just finished reading this article and this part stood out. Does anyone recall Walker 'publicly maintaining' that the microfracture talk was drummed up?packersfan said:Walker was aware of the microfracture talk publicly but maintained the substance of the news was patently false.
Makes sense. Thanks SSOG.In other words, I don't think you have to hold a stance from one interview to the next in order to be "maintaining" your stance... you just have to hold that stance over the course of repeated questioning, even if that questioning comes during the course of a single interview.
This is an interesting statement. Can you be more specific as to why you think the offense is built to feature Walker's skills?This offense was built to feature Walker's specific skills. IMO, he's the #1 for as long as he's playing. I doubt he eats into Marshall's value as much as Stokley's, though.Banger said:My question is when Walker comes back who is the "#1 wr" on the Bronco's? Not that it matters much but Marshall has looked awfully good.
I think it revolves around the deep ball which is Walker's/Cutler's strong suit.This is an interesting statement. Can you be more specific as to why you think the offense is built to feature Walker's skills?This offense was built to feature Walker's specific skills. IMO, he's the #1 for as long as he's playing. I doubt he eats into Marshall's value as much as Stokley's, though.Banger said:My question is when Walker comes back who is the "#1 wr" on the Bronco's? Not that it matters much but Marshall has looked awfully good.
I think the first practice would be today. I sure hope he does. My trade deadline is tonight and I have a shot at a WR but would cost me future resources. If he comes back I don't need to make the trade. If he doesn't I roll with Edwards, Crayton, Curtis, and Mason at WR for the playoffs.Did he practice Tuesday?
Exactly in your situation and I pulled the trigger on the deal. I've clinched my division so I've got a little leeway until Week 14. IMO, the motivation for me was watching Andre Johnson come back and light it up. I'm confident in Walker coming back with a vengeance during the Broncos playoff run. At the end of the day, it's a risk / reward scenario, and I thought the reward was far greater than the risk.I think the first practice would be today. I sure hope he does. My trade deadline is tonight and I have a shot at a WR but would cost me future resources. If he comes back I don't need to make the trade. If he doesn't I roll with Edwards, Crayton, Curtis, and Mason at WR for the playoffs.Did he practice Tuesday?![]()
Sure. Denver said in the offseason that they were going to put an emphasis on the deep ball. Their free agent signings supported this- they went after the strong-armed Patrick Ramsey, who can handle a deep passing offense, while completely ignoring the mobile Jeff Garcia, who wasn't just ideally suited to their old offensive scheme, he was a guy they had made a serious run at the last time he was a free agent. Even in the game against Tennessee, you saw Brandon Stokley going deep down the field a lot more than he historically has in his career.Anyway, when he's healthy, Javon Walker is synonymous with the deep ball. He's the fastest receiver on the roster, the best leaper, and he's the best at tracking the ball in flight. Unless the injury is dramatically impacting his performance (in which case, I don't think the coaches would let him see the field, although certainly they know better than I in this matter), I expect Walker to once again be the focal point of Denver's passing game once he returns to the lineup.This is an interesting statement. Can you be more specific as to why you think the offense is built to feature Walker's skills?This offense was built to feature Walker's specific skills. IMO, he's the #1 for as long as he's playing. I doubt he eats into Marshall's value as much as Stokley's, though.My question is when Walker comes back who is the "#1 wr" on the Bronco's? Not that it matters much but Marshall has looked awfully good.
He's my #3 as well...behind AJ and Braylon!!I'm glad I picked him up he'd be my WR3 then
AJ and Roy Williams for me.Berrian is currently my WR 3He's my #3 as well...behind AJ and Braylon!!I'm glad I picked him up he'd be my WR3 then![]()
I'm benching Walker for Calvin Johnson. However, I have a trade pending which would leave me with Reggie Brown as my #3. If Brown becomes my #3 I'll send him to the bench and hope Javon puts in a good effort. Hope that helps give you an idea how I value him this weekend.ASSUMING Walker plays, how much do you expect from him.I'd have to sit either Driver vs Det or Berrian vs Den to play him.Not sure I trust him enough to do that. What are you guys going to do (play him over who?)
Construxboy did a study of how players did when they appeared on the injury report compared to how they did when they didn't appear on the injury report. He found that players listed as "questionable" who wound up playing actually scored marginally MORE fantasy points per game than they did in games where they didn't appear on the report at all. I always base my decisions on players returning from injury on this information, now. If he plays, I project him as if he were 100% healthy. Worked pretty well last week for Schaub and Andre Johnson.The big question, of course, is if he will actually play.ASSUMING Walker plays, how much do you expect from him.I'd have to sit either Driver vs Det or Berrian vs Den to play him.Not sure I trust him enough to do that. What are you guys going to do (play him over who?)