parasaurolophus
Footballguy
I linked a different study. The one in the article he cited was only based on 4 subjects.But he said they weren't effective, the actual study you linked said they were...did he just not read the study
I have no idea how a study with 4 subjects with plenty of holes in methodology ever got published. Especially one with such out of left field conclusions. I have my suspicions why, but I have already voiced those enough. If you read the comments on the annals site plenty of doctors that clearly have peer review experience have the same questions.