Verbal Kint
Footballguy
For the past couple years, a couple guys in my redraft league have requested that we switch to a double serpentine draft, arguing that the guys who draft 8-12 generally have marginal teams compared to those who draft 1-4. In looking at the total points by division for the last couple years, there point is valid. the average team in division 3 has approx. 150 points less/season than the average team in division 1.
I'm interested to see if others do this in their leagues and what the results are. Does it balance out or swing it too much in favor of guys that draft last?
TIA
I'm interested to see if others do this in their leagues and what the results are. Does it balance out or swing it too much in favor of guys that draft last?
TIA
So the same guys that pick 1 - 4 win every year? If a team is scoring more points than the rest of the guys, wouldn't they be winning more therfore putting them at the bottom of the draft? I don't understand their point. I actually like picking at the bottom because there is always value there with the back to back picks. Sure it would be nice to have a top 4 pick, but would you rather have a top 4 pick or be winning?
Auction is the only way to truly remove draft order variability. Being #5 this year is worse than being #3. That's not skill, that's luck.