Another Pac-10 WR who will dominate!Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
Maybe they will bring Trent Green back.Is that with Croyle chucking it?
maybe they will trade for pennington. Hes better than CroyleIs that with Croyle chucking it?
Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
When you consider his lengthy hold out and the QB shuffling this year in KC, I think his rookie year was just as impressive as Colston's and Clayton's.Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
When you consider his lengthy hold out and the QB shuffling this year in KC, I think his rookie year was just as impressive as Colston's and Clayton's.Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
His point is that the holdout and the QB shuffle affected the numbers, but considering the great numbers he did put up....puts him in the same boat.When you consider his lengthy hold out and the QB shuffling this year in KC, I think his rookie year was just as impressive as Colston's and Clayton's.Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.Bowe's 70/995/5 was impressive but the two you mentioned were on another level.--Clayton had 80/1193/7, with Griese starting 10 games, Johnson starting 2 and Simms starting 4.--Colston had 70/1038/8 in 14 games, and hobbling for a few too.Bowe had a good season, a great one for a rookie, but those other two were on another tier.
My point was that since Clayton had superior numbers and (even more) shuffling QBs and Colston had far superior numbers in 14 games overcompensates for what was holding Bowe back.Bizkiteer said:His point is that the holdout and the QB shuffle affected the numbers, but considering the great numbers he did put up....puts him in the same boat.Chunky Soup said:Sweet Love said:When you consider his lengthy hold out and the QB shuffling this year in KC, I think his rookie year was just as impressive as Colston's and Clayton's.LHUCKS said:Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.suchislife said:Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.Bowe's 70/995/5 was impressive but the two you mentioned were on another level.--Clayton had 80/1193/7, with Griese starting 10 games, Johnson starting 2 and Simms starting 4.--Colston had 70/1038/8 in 14 games, and hobbling for a few too.Bowe had a good season, a great one for a rookie, but those other two were on another tier.
Already came to this conclusion mate as he finished around WR 25 last year. The guy for the most part can only do better unless he gets hurt and you can't really predict that.So, if you take Bowe anywhere around WR 22-28 consider that a very solid pick.LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
One more thing, when you say next Superstar, could you be a little more specfic in terms of when and maybe how big is big.Next season, are you projecting top 10, top 15? In 3 seasons from now, are you predicting top 5?For the record, in his current situation I have him in the 15-20 range.LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.
is this a inside joke? or did the Pac 10 Drastically realign to add LSU and i hadn't heard?redman said:Another Pac-10 WR who will dominate!LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.![]()
King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.It's seems obvious, but many forget in their off-season rankings that talent means little without opportunity. For receivers, they need a QB and an offensive system to get them the ball.Just ask Randy Moss.
With that said, he finished 24 last year in fantasy points as WR. He was only a rookie and pretty much got better as the season went on. You mentioned he doesn't have much to work with, but he didn't have much to work with last year.I only see him getting better. I'd agree that if you're talking about an elite status, meaning top 5 in the NFL he'll probably have to get a better QB but my feeling is that this guy has the type of athleticism to be a top 5 guy.If I were in a dynasty league. I'd make some off season moves to get him BEFORE they do end up getting someone who we consider a quality passer, because as you'd imagine, by then it's too late.King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.It's seems obvious, but many forget in their off-season rankings that talent means little without opportunity. For receivers, they need a QB and an offensive system to get them the ball.Just ask Randy Moss.
I think it is when you're talking about the WR 20-25 range. I'd take talent over opportunity.Now, if you're talking about top 10.....then that's where you have to take a step back and say, maybe not. It really depends on what specfically we're talking about and what time frame.cant wait for the kevin walter thread :WINK:I like BoweBut his QB stinks. Talent >> opportunity at this point
I don't really disagree with anything your saying here.With that said, he finished 24 last year in fantasy points as WR. He was only a rookie and pretty much got better as the season went on. You mentioned he doesn't have much to work with, but he didn't have much to work with last year.I only see him getting better. I'd agree that if you're talking about an elite status, meaning top 5 in the NFL he'll probably have to get a better QB but my feeling is that this guy has the type of athleticism to be a top 5 guy.If I were in a dynasty league. I'd make some off season moves to get him BEFORE they do end up getting someone who we consider a quality passer, because as you'd imagine, by then it's too late.King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.It's seems obvious, but many forget in their off-season rankings that talent means little without opportunity. For receivers, they need a QB and an offensive system to get them the ball.Just ask Randy Moss.
I agree 110% with you LHUCKS.LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.
I disagree with this posting completely. For one Moss was injured in his time with Oakland plus he pretty much quit on the team. If Moss had played his heart out for the team, sucky team or not I wager his numbers would have been much better. As long as Bowe doesn't let the success go to his head and keeps on playing hard I think he can improve on his numbers, even on a crappy team.King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.It's seems obvious, but many forget in their off-season rankings that talent means little without opportunity. For receivers, they need a QB and an offensive system to get them the ball.Just ask Randy Moss.
Randy Moss in Oakland Averages:779 yards, 5.5 TDs. 14 games played. Keep in mind he did this at 27 and 28 years old. What should be his absolute prime. Bowe may have a ton of talent, but he could be stuck as a low end #2 WR until his situation improves....drastically.
What do you agree with, that he's going to be a star next year or sometime in the future.I guess as I think more about his statement, he is saying BEFORE people work on their projections, which I'm assuming means next year I guess unless he's speaking of dynasty ranking where most people would probably have him ranked higher due to his young age.I agree 110% with you LHUCKS.LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.![]()
Dynasty I loveRe-draft this season? unless something changes at QB, and even if they go Matt Ryan round1 or Chad Henne round2 or keep the bums they have. I dont like his situation. Im letting someone else overpay for him this year in redraftI think it is when you're talking about the WR 20-25 range. I'd take talent over opportunity.Now, if you're talking about top 10.....then that's where you have to take a step back and say, maybe not. It really depends on what specfically we're talking about and what time frame.cant wait for the kevin walter thread :WINK:I like BoweBut his QB stinks. Talent >> opportunity at this point
you wont get him that cheapBowe ==even with Brodie slinging it. If you can get him for WR3 prices or cheaper I think he'll end up as a very nice bargain.
Maybe not, but it's possible - the ? at QB, the ? about how the offense will work with LJ on the come back trail, and Herm should keep the price down. I'm pretty sure he'd earn his keep if taken as the 20th or later WR. Obviously the position will change through the offseason.you wont get him that cheapBowe ==even with Brodie slinging it. If you can get him for WR3 prices or cheaper I think he'll end up as a very nice bargain.
Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson, Tory Holt come to mind, same with Lee Evans, Roy Williams.I can't recall, but when is the last time that a rookie WR who had a "promising" first year improved in his sophomore year? All the "hot" rookie WRs I can think of of the top of my head:BoldinColstonClaytonGardnerAll regressed their second season.I'm sure there is a study that shows rookie WRs who finished Top 30 and then their stats their sophomore year. My guess is most did not do better.The only guy I can think of is Randy Moss.
If Colston regressed I'll take that kind of regression every yearI can't recall, but when is the last time that a rookie WR who had a "promising" first year improved in his sophomore year? All the "hot" rookie WRs I can think of of the top of my head:BoldinColstonClaytonGardnerAll regressed their second season.I'm sure there is a study that shows rookie WRs who finished Top 30 and then their stats their sophomore year. My guess is most did not do better.The only guy I can think of is Randy Moss.
King of the Jungle said:Big fan of Bowe. Not a big fan of Herman Edwards and the offensive system he supports. Until that changes, Bowe will not have the opportunity to become a #1-type FF producer.It's seems obvious, but many forget in their off-season rankings that talent means little without opportunity. For receivers, they need a QB and an offensive system to get them the ball.Just ask Randy Moss.
I got him as my WR#3 in a recent 16 team survivor draft.you wont get him that cheapBowe ==even with Brodie slinging it. If you can get him for WR3 prices or cheaper I think he'll end up as a very nice bargain.
he was wr31 off the board. sounds about right. he went at 25 & 26 in WSL2,3.I also think come August his value will steadily increase in H2H.Bowe is a great survivor pick cause you can handle his bad games better.I got him as my WR#3 in a recent 16 team survivor draft.you wont get him that cheapBowe ==even with Brodie slinging it. If you can get him for WR3 prices or cheaper I think he'll end up as a very nice bargain.
![]()
I agree, which is why I'm notifying this messageboard now...get your projections right the first time fellas!!I also think come August his value will steadily increase in H2H.
Bowe, because he's more of a TD threat...plus I'm not totally enamored with Rice.It seems like the top 2 rookie WR's from last year Bowe and Rice are in similar situations, running teams with weak QB play. Which one do you think has a better chance to produce in the next few years considering the conditions.
Chunky Soup said:Sweet Love said:When you consider his lengthy hold out and the QB shuffling this year in KC, I think his rookie year was just as impressive as Colston's and Clayton's.LHUCKS said:Just starting a discussion topic dedicated to Bowe for the offseason...he's a rare talent.suchislife said:Its info like this that keeps me coming back to the 'Pool during the offseason. Where else can you get this kind of in-depth analysis?LHUCKS said:Just wanted to get that out before everybody starts working on their projections.Bowe's 70/995/5 was impressive but the two you mentioned were on another level.--Clayton had 80/1193/7, with Griese starting 10 games, Johnson starting 2 and Simms starting 4.--Colston had 70/1038/8 in 14 games, and hobbling for a few too.Bowe had a good season, a great one for a rookie, but those other two were on another tier.
I think it is unwise to use Clayton as an "example."He was quite a unique situation...a statistical anomaly.Isn't the Clayton parallel a warning example?
I'll second that. Colston needs to come off that list, his numbers were better across the board except YP catch.If Colston regressed I'll take that kind of regression every yearI can't recall, but when is the last time that a rookie WR who had a "promising" first year improved in his sophomore year? All the "hot" rookie WRs I can think of of the top of my head:BoldinColstonClaytonGardnerAll regressed their second season.I'm sure there is a study that shows rookie WRs who finished Top 30 and then their stats their sophomore year. My guess is most did not do better.The only guy I can think of is Randy Moss.
If Colston regressed I'll take that kind of regression every yearI can't recall, but when is the last time that a rookie WR who had a "promising" first year improved in his sophomore year? All the "hot" rookie WRs I can think of of the top of my head:BoldinColstonClaytonGardnerAll regressed their second season.I'm sure there is a study that shows rookie WRs who finished Top 30 and then their stats their sophomore year. My guess is most did not do better.The only guy I can think of is Randy Moss.
Was posted in the "The D. Bowe Show" thread.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=343977Bowe now @
69/982/5
I just used our historical Data Dominator and found that the # of rookie WRs who have had 70/1000 since the merger is very few (assuming Bowe gets 1 catch 18 yards vs. the Jets)
Marques Colston wr 2006 70 1038 14.83 8 - missed 2 games
Michael Clayton wr 2004 80 1193 14.91 7
Anquan Boldin wr 2003 101 1377 13.63 8
Terry Glenn wr 1996 90 1132 12.58 6 - missed 1 game
Also of note...
Randy Moss wr 1998 69 1313 19.03 17
And one pre-Modern era - in only 14 games!
Bill Groman wr 1960 72 1473 20.46 12
Some pretty good company right there.......
In our draft we just had, he went around WR 23 or something like that, maybe 24. You think that was overpaying? I don't, not when he was 24 already last season. I remember when he was drafted because I wanted him and he was taken right before me.Dynasty I loveRe-draft this season? unless something changes at QB, and even if they go Matt Ryan round1 or Chad Henne round2 or keep the bums they have. I dont like his situation. Im letting someone else overpay for him this year in redraftI think it is when you're talking about the WR 20-25 range. I'd take talent over opportunity.Now, if you're talking about top 10.....then that's where you have to take a step back and say, maybe not. It really depends on what specfically we're talking about and what time frame.cant wait for the kevin walter thread :WINK:I like BoweBut his QB stinks. Talent >> opportunity at this point
I think Bowe, mainly because he's better.It seems like the top 2 rookie WR's from last year Bowe and Rice are in similar situations, running teams with weak QB play. Which one do you think has a better chance to produce in the next few years considering the conditions.