What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dwayne Bowe (1 Viewer)

Isn't the Clayton parallel a warning example?
I think it is unwise to use Clayton as an "example."He was quite a unique situation...a statistical anomaly.
What is your evidence? How many rookies WRs post years like him, Colston, Moss? Aren't they all statistical anomalies?I am not saying Bowe will be the next Clayton necessarily; I am just trying to add some perspective by showing that just because a rookie has a great rookie year does not mean they will necessarily keep improving; they could regress significantly.
 
Isn't the Clayton parallel a warning example?
I think it is unwise to use Clayton as an "example."He was quite a unique situation...a statistical anomaly.
What is your evidence? How many rookies WRs post years like him, Colston, Moss? Aren't they all statistical anomalies?I am not saying Bowe will be the next Clayton necessarily; I am just trying to add some perspective by showing that just because a rookie has a great rookie year does not mean they will necessarily keep improving; they could regress significantly.
I don't want to turn this into a Clayton thread, but the discussion may be good for the discussion about Bowe. Has anyone ever heard a good description from someone about why Clayton declined like he did from his rookie performance? I never have.
 
Isn't the Clayton parallel a warning example?
I think it is unwise to use Clayton as an "example."He was quite a unique situation...a statistical anomaly.
What is your evidence? How many rookies WRs post years like him, Colston, Moss? Aren't they all statistical anomalies?I am not saying Bowe will be the next Clayton necessarily; I am just trying to add some perspective by showing that just because a rookie has a great rookie year does not mean they will necessarily keep improving; they could regress significantly.
He finished 24, so it's not like the guy finished 8 or 4. How far can he really decline from 24 with his ability without getting injured? He came into camp on the later side last year, which to me is why he started off a little slow and he came on making some very athletic plays.There's no scientific fact I can give you that would mean 100 percent sure thing, but just like handicapping a horse race....you go on probability. By looking at this guy, he looks like a candidate for improvement and maybe long term substantial improvement. Because Moss or Clayton did or did not regress has nothing to do with Bowe. Just like Secretariat and Arazi didn't have anything to do with the Green Monkey.
 
Because Moss or Clayton did or did not regress has nothing to do with Bowe. Just like Secretariat and Arazi didn't have anything to do with the Green Monkey.
I generally agree with you, but there is something IMHO to the "sophomore slump" that can affect players. If you're prominent your rookie year, opposing teams will scheme more for you the following year causing you to have to adjust. Things often don't come as easily to 2nd year players as they did during their first year. Unlike Secretariat, you have players not just competing with you but actually defending against you, so it's a little different. I definitely agree, though, that to assume that a 2nd year decline is guaranteed is silly, and I happen to believe that Bowe is a supremely talented guy who will have an excellent career. My concern with Bowe is more centered around the relative lack of talent in that lineup overall that might take some focus away from him, especially because of the weak QB position.

 
Although not a lot of players excelled during Chiefs training camp, Pro Football Weekly hears that WR Dwayne Bowe was one of the standouts. Entering a critical fourth season, Bowe routinely made impressive plays, drawing praise from his coaches and teammates. He still was up to a few of the usual antics that rub some people in K.C. the wrong way, but for the most part he looked like one of the team’s better players. The Chiefs will need major production from him if they hope to improve on their No. 25-ranked passing attack.
Maybe LHUCKS was just a couple years too early on this prediction. :goodposting:
 
Bowe is a stud elite talent. He just needs to put it all together and this is the critical year...no question. He can be a great value this season.

 
Isn't the Clayton parallel a warning example?
I think it is unwise to use Clayton as an "example."He was quite a unique situation...a statistical anomaly.
What is your evidence? How many rookies WRs post years like him, Colston, Moss? Aren't they all statistical anomalies?I am not saying Bowe will be the next Clayton necessarily; I am just trying to add some perspective by showing that just because a rookie has a great rookie year does not mean they will necessarily keep improving; they could regress significantly.
I don't want to turn this into a Clayton thread, but the discussion may be good for the discussion about Bowe. Has anyone ever heard a good description from someone about why Clayton declined like he did from his rookie performance? I never have.
No link but I know that I have read/heard things from multiple sources that after Clayton's rookie season he fell in love with the night life. Drinking, clubbing, staying out instead of taking care of your body and putting in the work tend to expose you pretty quickly when you are competing against other elite athletes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top