Bojang0301
Omar4Heisman
Kyler Murray has a broken tackle rate higher than Benny Snell, Trayveon Williams and Damien Harris: https://twitter.com/haydenwinks/status/1095498958925787136?s=21
Only 7 WRs the last 15 years have posted a 42 inch vertical or better at the NFL Scouting Combine.Bojang0301 said:N’Keal Harry... good godhttps://twitter.com/jtoosonlaw/status/1094377440216940545?s=21
It seems to me like the WR he rated as overrated and underrated both have the same stated strengths and weaknesses.
Do you think that members of this group have as good or better chance of being a hit than those taken in the 1st round?I’ve seen people suggesting to trade up into the beginning of the first before positions get solidified... when I see stuff like this I have to wonder why. I believe people should be trading down rather than hoping a fringe prospect like Jacobs lands a prime spot.
Sure but he's probably going to clear 40. I don't get why people think he won't test well. He won't blaze the 40 but for a big strong guy, he looks very athletic to me.Only 7 WRs the last 15 years have posted a 42 inch vertical or better at the NFL Scouting Combine.
(Jarrett Dillard, Trindon Holliday, Jon Baldwin, Kashif Moore, Jaelen Strong, Chris Conley, Speedy Noil)
I'll take the under here https://t.co/Cej6L0MTZn
Where the players are right now? Ya, I don’t see the risk profile as much different between Mike Weber and Josh Jacobs but that’s just my opinion. Most around here don’t like it.Do you think that members of this group have as good or better chance of being a hit than those taken in the 1st round?
Looks to me if you're a WR and post a 42 inch vertical, then you should be undraftable. LOLOnly 7 WRs the last 15 years have posted a 42 inch vertical or better at the NFL Scouting Combine.
(Jarrett Dillard, Trindon Holliday, Jon Baldwin, Kashif Moore, Jaelen Strong, Chris Conley, Speedy Noil)
I'll take the under here https://t.co/Cej6L0MTZn
The Draft Network's Jon Ledyard called Washington State RB James Williams an "electric playmaker."
Williams (6'0/205) will likely end up as a mid-round pick, which lowers his chances, but he has the potential to be an above average pass-catching running back. Williams led this year’s RB class in targets (93), receptions (83), receiving yards (613), and receiving touchdowns (4) and graded well in YPT (4th) and Marginal Explosion (4th). However, if he is going to be a playmaker, Williams has to improve his pass protection skills. If Williams lands on a team that utilizes their running backs as receivers, watch out.
SOURCE: The Draft Network
Feb 13, 2019, 6:41 PM
Reese's Senior Bowl director Jim Nagy put Clemson WR Hunter Renfrow on his all-value team.
Renfrow (5'10/175) joins West Virginia WR Gary Jennings on the former NFL scout's imaginary team. At Senior Bowl practices, Renfrow showed off his route-running prowess and his sure-fire hands. Of course, there are limitations with Renfrow, but he has a higher floor than other Day 3 wide receiver prospects. If he tests better than expected, Renfrow could be flirting with a Day 2 selection.
SOURCE: Jim Nagy on Twitter
Feb 14, 2019, 4:41 PM
Reese's Senior Bowl director Jim Nagy put Michigan RB Karan Higdon on his all-value team.
Higdon (5'9/203) was largely forgettable at Senior Bowl practices and he only had 18 rushing yards in the game, so this listing by Nagy is surprising. Where Higdon needs to make some noise as at the NFL Combine or else he risks being a Round 6 or 7 prospect. For now, Higdon is closer to the Round 5 range after clearing the 900-yard mark in back to back seasons for the Wolverines.
SOURCE: Jim Nagy on Twitter
Feb 14, 2019, 4:37 PM
Reese's Senior Bowl director Jim Nagy listed West Virginia WR Gary Jennings on his all-value team.
Jennings (6'1/213) had a nice showing at Senior Bowl practices, and he was underrated at West Virginia with QB Will Grier getting a lot of the attention. However, Jennings is a legit NFL prospect and Nagy's listing is more evidence as so. As a senior, Jennings scored 13 touchdowns (17.8 TD%) and averaged 12.6 yards on his 73 targets (917 yards). As of now, Jennings sits on the Day 2/3 borderline.
SOURCE: Jim Nagy on Twitter
Feb 14, 2019, 4:32 PM
NFL.com's Lance Zierlein says Miami RB Travis Homer in "plenty of dog to him in pass pro."
Homer (5'11/195) can "thump it out" while in pass protection, according to Zierlein. Of all of the attributes a running back can have, pass protection always seems like the biggest hindrance to seeing playing time as a rookie, so this is good news for Homer. As a runner, Homer averaged 6.0 yards per carry, but he only had four touchdowns on 164 carries, scoring only two touchdowns on 24 red zone carries. While there's not a huge ceiling with Homer on the surface, he has the skills to potentially carve out a role in the NFL but that is dependant on where and when he is drafted.
SOURCE: Lance Zierlein on Twitter
Feb 14, 2019, 3:54 PM
The Draft Network's Trevor Sikkema mocked Ohio State WR Parris Campbell to Round 6.
Two weeks ago, Bleacher Report's Matt Miller sent Campbell (6'1/208) to the Jaguars with the No. 38 overall pick, but Sikkema and others aren't as bullish when it comes to Campbell's draft stock. However, the NFL Combine is right around the corner and Campbell is expected to perform at a high level with reports of a sub-4.40 forty and a 40-inch vertical. Those numbers would indicate that Campbell could be a deep threat despite being used as a short-yardage YAC receiver at the Ohio State University.
SOURCE: The Draft Network
Feb 14, 2019, 3:40 PM
SB Nation's Crissy Froyd reports that Mississippi State QB Nick Fitzgerald is "expected to be selected in the third or fourth round" of the 2019 NFL Draft.
What? Reportedly, Fitzgerald (6'5/230) would be an option to serve in the Saints Taysom Hill role, which would allow Fitzgerald to run and occasionally pass. Here are the issues with that. First of all, Fitzgerald does not have NFL passing ability, and secondly, there are only a few teams who would even be open to utilizing it. It seems unlikely that Fitzgerald will actually be drafted as high as the report indicates, but NFL teams have drafted kickers in the second round, so we can't rule it out.
SOURCE: Crissy Froyd on Twitter
Feb 14, 2019, 3:17 PM
Go to the above LINK to see the entire article w/charts and explanations but some good stuff.NFL DRAFT ANALYTICS FOR WR
...the NFL data is for NFL seasons two through four (not the rookie season) because that’s when an NFL team is seeing the biggest returns on the draft pick,
STATISTICS THAT HAVE HISTORICALLY NOT BEEN CORRELATED TO EARLY NFL SUCCESS (AV/G) FOR WRS:
1. NFL Combine Vertical Jump (R-squared = 0.00)
2. College YPR vs. Teammates (0.00)
3. NFL Combine 40-Yard Dash (0.00)
4. NFL Combine Broad Jump (0.00)
5. College YPR (0.00) ...
---------------------------
STATISTICS THAT HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN CORRELATED TO EARLY NFL SUCCESS (AV/G) FOR WRS:
1. College Market Share of Receptions (R-squared = 0.06)
2. College Dominance Rating (0.06)
3. College Market Share of Receiving Yards (0.06)
4. College Market Share of Receiving TDs (0.05)
-----------------------------
...to take advantage of the small correlations here, you definitely want to focus on the market share data. In general, the market share data outperformed the total production and per game production. In fact, the four top metrics in this sample were the market share metrics -- dominance rating adds up market share of receiving yards and market share of receiving touchdowns.
CONCLUSION: ...
The NFL Draft has not been great at evaluating wide receivers relative to other positions. The r-squared for the position is only 0.14, meaning that only 14% of the variation in early NFL success for wide receivers can be explained by the overall draft pick. That’s not very good, but I’m expecting this number to improve with college football analytics starting to improve.
...the NFL Combine has been little to zero correlation, meaning that it’s smart to buy-low on receivers who did mediocre (not terrible) at the combine.
Benjamin Allbright calls Northwestern QB Clayton Thorson a "future journeyman" and "spot start" quarterback.
Allbright equates that to a Day 2 or early Day 3 pick, which aligns with Senior Bowl director Jim Nagy's report that no GM gave Thorson below a third-round grade. However, we aren't going to lock Thorson into a Day 2 selection at all. In fact, he's probably closer to Round 5 or 6 than Round 2 or 3. Allbright continues to categorize Will Grier, Jarrett Stidham, and Ryan Finley as future journeymen and spot start quarterbacks.
SOURCE: Benjamin Allbright on Twitter
Feb 15, 2019, 7:26 PM
I dont see the hit rate for wrs. but the above list is impressiveTo go with the Marcus Mosher Tweet of the first WR drafted dating back to 2000. The replies to his tweet asked about context of other skill positions. He said he would dig into that and just Tweeted the first RB selected dating back to 2000. The hit rate is much higher than the first WR's taken.
-----------------------
LINK to first RBs drafted dating back to year 2000 to compare  hit rates with WRs
Marcus MosherVerified account @Marcus_Mosher
Here is the first RB picked in each draft since 2000:
9:31 AM - 15 Feb 2019
Awesome that’s what I like to see. Every year is different but when data like this is measured in the right perspective it can help with your decision making.To go with the Marcus Mosher Tweet of the first WR drafted dating back to 2000. The replies to his tweet asked about context of other skill positions. He said he would dig into that and just Tweeted the first RB selected dating back to 2000. The hit rate is much higher than the first WR's taken.
-----------------------
LINK to first RBs drafted dating back to year 2000 to compare  hit rates with WRs
Marcus MosherVerified account @Marcus_Mosher
Here is the first RB picked in each draft since 2000:
9:31 AM - 15 Feb 2019
A TE ranking I agree with, maybe Wilson higher but out of this top 3 two of them will be on my team.
I’m not really sure how I feel about this article. Maybe because it’s only analyzing data for “early” success that’s throwing it off. IIRC three cone and bench press had a correlation for TE success.
Not this year and I wouldn't bother with Murray. Haskins is the only QB (non-QB2 leagues) worth drafting IMO and that's not until rd 2 of rookie drafts.What is everyone's opinion of the QBs after Murray and Haskins?
Anyone worth grabbing end of round 2/round 3?
Stidham had round 1 buzz... any thoughts? Wait for 2020?
Originally I was planning on grabbing him at 2.1. and I still could I think. But I may pass for 2020. I am not in desperate need for a qb, and 2.1 could be a top te. I would rather have that than a qb I think. I have my reservations on Haskins, but he is my favorite in this class.Not this year and I wouldn't bother with Murray. Haskins is the only QB (non-QB2 leagues) worth drafting IMO and that's not until rd 2 of rookie drafts.