https://twitter.com/heathcummingssr/status/1388228826317066247?s=21Heath Cummings @heathcummingssr
Hoping for Fantasy fireworks early tonight. Hard to imagine Javonte Williams makes it past 37 w/ Jets-Falcons-Dolphins lined up. VERY interested in landing spots for Rondale/Elijah Moore & Terrace Marshall. Trey Sermon & Dyami Brown could crack rookie top-12 w/ right landing spot
Exactly. RB-needy teams (me) might reach on a player like Sermon or Carter since there seem to be so many WRs with either questions or in the same big tier, so why go WR when you can likely get a similar WR later in the round or in the next round, and take the position-scarce RB early.I can tell you now that the draft rankings by writers and the ones by players in the other thread of "post your rookie drafts" are very, very different. Sermon is 1.08-1.12 and in the rankings never tops the top twelve, other than Bloom's. A lot of the rankers and drafts are different. It would behoove people to check that thread if they want an idea of where players are really going.
And analysts would claim that given those backs' draft capital, long-term it's a bad reach for them. I see their point. But they're not playing with your team. They're usually analysts that have tons of teams and can be dispassionate about scoring in the long-run over a large range of outcomes with a bunch of squads. That's part of the reason why there's a disconnect there.Exactly. RB-needy teams (me) might reach on a player like Sermon or Carter since there seem to be so many WRs with either questions or in the same big tier, so why go WR when you can likely get a similar WR later in the round or in the next round, and take the position-scarce RB early.
Exactly.And analysts would claim that given those backs' draft capital, long-term it's a bad reach for them. I see their point. But they're not playing with your team. They're usually analysts that have tons of teams and can be dispassionate about scoring in the long-run over a large range of outcomes with a bunch of squads. That's part of the reason why there's a disconnect there.
It's interesting, the disconnect between people that have the teams and people that rank the players that way. It would seem to me that neither side is stupid, per se, as some analysts would make you feel, but that there really is a different set of circumstances for each selection made.
That's surely a defense of somebody like myself, who might reach at RB, but when so many people are doing it (and I've looked at twelve or thirteen drafts and Sermon never leaves the top twelve) you have to wonder if it's a gigantic collective mistake, or whether there's a darn good reason for it that isn't quantifiable.
Check that rookie draft thread and you'll get a better idea of where the guys are going. Even check the Superflex ones and discount the QBs. Get a raw count on the players and you'll have a better idea than most ADP or, especially, ranking sources will give you (depending on when your draft is, of course. Mine is soon and I can't wait for monthly ADPs to reflect the changes. There may be searchable ADP sources by date, I'm just not aware of them). I'm not sure what to tell you about your particular team or what a good analyst would say about your starting requirements and long-term success. I heard one analyst discounting Sermon because you might miss out on Elijah or Rondale Moore.Exactly.
And in my specific circumstance, I am RB-needy, I hold the 1.6, 1.10 and 1.11 and 2.5 picks. So I read I "should" take one of Devonta or Waddle (even with questions around their size) at 6, assuming 3RB/Pitts/Chase go to 1-5.
But when I run the scenarios for MY TEAM (with Hill/Claypool/CDavis/Shenault/Pittman at WR), I can see myself missing out on BOTH Sermon and Carter between my 1.6 and 1.10 picks, so I’d rather grab a Sermon and hope Carter makes it to 1.10, and/or take the best of the remaining WR prospects, of which there seems to be a big old tier of similarly rated guys to chose from.
It used to be better (you could select draft date ranges and you'd see how many drafts participated) but you can get a somewhat time relevant ADP for dynasty rookie drafts at myfantasyleague.com.Check that rookie draft thread and you'll get a better idea of where the guys are going. Even check the Superflex ones and discount the QBs. Get a raw count on the players and you'll have a better idea than most ADP or, especially, ranking sources will give you (depending on when your draft is, of course. Mine is soon and I can't wait for monthly ADPs to reflect the changes. There may be searchable ADP sources by date, I'm just not aware of them).
Wow. Thanks. Yep, that looks about right and about what I'm seeing in the mocks posted here, too. Looks like you need to have a first-round pick to grab him in 1 QB settings. Carter is a few spots below him, so beginning of the second, looks like. Draft capital be damned, it seems.It used to be better (you could select draft date ranges and you'd see how many drafts participated) but you can get a somewhat time relevant ADP for dynasty rookie drafts at myfantasyleague.com.
You can't filter scoring or SF/non-SF, but it's something. Looks like there's a lot of SF leagues drafting early. If you take out the QB's Sermon is going neck and neck with E. Moore at 1.09-1.10 in drafts conducted post-NFL Draft.