This is really neither here nor there, may not really belong here, and was just a passing thought, but figured this was the best place to generate decent discussion on it and in a roundabout way it does pertain to dynasty values of players. Am I the only person who feels the standard scoring for quarterbacks has become archaic and outdated? As more and more "running" quarterbacks enter the league and the NFL begins what feels like a slow transition from "prototypical pocket quarterback" to the Vick, RGIII, Cam, Kaeprnick, Tebow, Rodgers, etc... mold- players who are equally as good/dangerous running as they are throwing- it feels like the balance between fantasy points awarded for passing stats and fantasy points awarded for rushing stats has gotten too out of whack.I guess I am not even entirely sure where I am going with this, but it feels silly to me that a quarterback who rushes for 100 yards and throws for 100 yards produces points on par and/or better than a quarterback who throws for 300 yards and rushes for 0 yards in most leagues. In what universe is 200 yards better than 300? Why are rushing stats such a huge elevator for quarterbacks? It doesn't seem to follow reason for me. As an example, we don't reward receiving yardage anymore than rushing yardage for a running back or vice versa for a receiver, so why do we reward rushing yardage more than passing yardage for a quarterback? This also has a LARGE impact on long term dynasty rankings of players, as the values of Cam, RGIII, Kaeprnick, Luck (to a lesser extent), etc... are greatly influenced by the fact that they accumulate a sustainable and consistent level of rushing statistics.We have already seen an evolution of sorts in this area, as the days of awarding 4 points for passing touchdowns and 6 points for rushing touchdowns as the accepted norm and/or way all leagues run are a thing of the past. More and more, you see leagues awarding 6 points for all touchdowns and it continues to grow closer to the "standard" for leagues.With that in mind, is it time to start scoring quarterbacks on a total yardage scale, rather than individual scoring for rushing and passing statistics? Rather than award 1 point per 25 passing yards(or whatever is your leagues standard) and 1 point per 10 rushing yards (or whatever is your standard), why not just award 1 point per 25 total yards (or whatever your leagues standard)? Additionally, what would that do to people's rankings and how much fluctuation and volatility would some of the quarterbacks who rely on rushing statistics to buoy their value/ranking see?Also, if this is actually just totally useless drivel, and there is a 75% chance it is, then just disregard and carry on with the thread!