Fear & Loathing said:
awesomeness said:
Burning Sensation said:
What is Hightowers current value? Would it be insulting to offer him to someone for what should be a top 3 rookie pick?
That's a pretty lowball offer imo.
I don't think that's lowball at all. We don't know what Hightower's future holds in Arizona yet. If somebody wants to gamble on him being a workhorse back in a top-flight offense, you could certainly argue that it's a more worthwhile gamble than the No. 3 rookie pick in most Dynasty drafts.Edit to add: just look at the flameout rate among No. 3 picks. Just off the top of my head, the last five years have seen guys like Chris Perry, Cedric Benson, J.J. Arrington, Laurence Maroney, and Rashard Mendenhall. Too early to call Mendenhall a flameout, but his owners certainly haven't gotten anything out of him yet while his value has dropped.
If it's too early to call Mendenhall a bust, then its too early to call Hightower the next coming. Would you really take Tim Hightower over Beanie Wells, Knowshon Moreno, or Michael Crabtree?
I'm not calling Hightower the next coming, but I know there are people out there who believe he's going to have a ton of value as the workhorse back in a high-scoring offense. Personally, I agree that he's a second-rate talent, but you don't need to be a supreme talent to succeed at RB in the NFL. There are only 32 starting RB jobs. If you find somebody that you believe can keep the job for a couple of years, can catch passes, and will get in the end zone, then you've got some good value there. Like I said, I don't necessarily believe Hightower is all that, but it's realistic that an owner would believe he is. It's also realistic that Hightower could have major value for the next couple of years.Re: Beanie Wells, Knowshon Moreno, or Michael Crabtree. I don't know enough about them. I do know that guys like Chris Perry, J.J. Arrington, and Cedric Benson were just as hyped in college and looked just as good against college competition. I'm not saying I would or wouldn't take that deal. I'm just saying the offer is plenty fair because you could make a legit argument for either side. It's also clear both sides would simply be gambling on what they believed has a better chance of happening.