matttyl
Footballguy
So I've been in a 10 team dynasty league for over a decade now, and I think I've built up a pretty good team. Being a 10 teamer, start 1 rb, 2 wr, 1 e, and 2 flex - looking at my week 1 starting lineup, I still have quite a bit of depth on my bench (Ingram, Watkins, K White, Kelce....). That comes in handy with injuries and bye weeks and such, though does nothing for me when they are bench in favor of someone else.
That got me thinking - in these "smaller leagues" (10 or fewer teams), is it more important to have top end studs rather than depth? In 12+ team leagues, the talent is spread around more, so having too much depth isn't as much of an issue. Having that stud, though, makes it really tough when that stud goes down with an injury, as you likely gave up a lot of your depth in order to acquire him.
So, which do you tend to lean toward in 10 team leagues - depth or top end talent?
That got me thinking - in these "smaller leagues" (10 or fewer teams), is it more important to have top end studs rather than depth? In 12+ team leagues, the talent is spread around more, so having too much depth isn't as much of an issue. Having that stud, though, makes it really tough when that stud goes down with an injury, as you likely gave up a lot of your depth in order to acquire him.
So, which do you tend to lean toward in 10 team leagues - depth or top end talent?