What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Dynasty Top 100 Rankings (PPR) (1 Viewer)

RE: Eifert in general and Eifert v. Ebron.

A lot of the value for TEs comes via touchdowns. Eifert has 18 TDs in just 21 games over the past two years (and some of those games,  he was easing back in from an injury). When healthy, he's been at a TD per game pace. That's elite stuff and if you watch the Bengals, it isn't fluky either. Eifert is a major red zone mismatch and Dalton loves looking his way down there. I think the TD production of Eifert gives him some real upside and he has the potential to be a major difference-maker at the position going forward if he can just stay healthy. 

Ebron on the other hand is 40 games into his career and has 7 TDs. He caught just 1 in 13 starts last year. Watching the games, that doesn't appear that fluky either. He's just not a big red zone guy. Even in college, he scored surprisingly few touchdowns. 

Reading between the lines, it seems like there's only a 10-20% chance Alshon is back in Chicago. I think he could get one of the biggest contracts in NFL history at WR and will probably leave. His value is highly dependent upon his landing spot obviously. Somewhere like San Francisco with Kyle Shanahan would be interesting (maybe with Trubisky?). 

I'm actually with you on Meredith vs. White. I've never been a believer in Kevin White and Meredith is a guy worth targeting IMO. But I try to make my rankings kind of a combination of my personal views and the general consensus and market value on players. People still love Kevin White. As I mentioned, I'm partway through a startup auction and it's nice to have some data points of where other owners view these players. White went off the board as a top 35 WR and for ~35% more than Meredith. 
I just wanted to say in arguing against Eifert the past couple of days and in listening to peoples pro stances for him that I have changed my mind about him a bit. I still think he is a bit over rated but that kind of happens to players when there are no other clearly better options. 

My first impression of Jeffrey with the 49ers is yuck. But I suppose with the new coaching staff and GM think is a change of direction and if Jeffrey were the focal point of their offense he could put up some strong numbers. Things could turn out not so well for him with a new team also. Jeffrey is perhaps the most important player in fantasy right now that I am just not sure what is going to happen with him. If he does stay in Chicago there is some uncertainty as well.

With the expectation that Jeffrey is with another team, then having White and Meridith in the top 100 makes snese, as his departure would help both of them. If he stayed with the Bears, then you have to guess which of the two will be the WR 2 behind Jeffrey.

 
Who do you like better? Michael Thomas? That's a close one for me I guess but I like the 2 year sample size with Cooks as a tie breaker and Cooks is actually a little bit younger.

Definitely a case for TY despite the 4 year age difference. At least TY will get his prime years with Luck. I can buy that one and might swap the two on closer consideration.

Then there's the injured guys like Watkins and Allen. Higher upside but they are clearly higher risk.

I don't love Cooks, but as I've mentioned earlier in the thread, there's questions about all the guys in that range and someone has to be higher than the rest. Cooks has had back-to-back seasons of ~240-250 fantasy points at age 22 and 23. That's nothing to sneeze at.
i have no clue, just a feeling.

great post, op!

 
A couple things @Biabreakable

If Allen had 170 targets - the high end of your projection - that would be a pace of 85 per 8 games.  He had 89 in 8 games in 2015. 

Catching over 75% of a large volume of targets is rare. Pick a guy.  Edelman has never had 75%  the closest he came was 61 on 88 which is close to 70%. He's around 67% career. Welker had 112 for 145 once, and had a couple other seasons at just under 75%. Marshall Faulk eclipsed 75% three times in his 12 year career, but he didn't play erode receiver.  It's not easy to search for. I'd welcome help. 

So if his targets are likely to regress, and his catch percentage is likely to regress, 2015 isn't really repeatable. Which is fine - he could still be a wr1 without matching those numbers exactly.  

It's his price that bothers me,because at 15th overall, you're pricing in a better chance to be elite than I think he has 
Yeah for simplicity sake I just went with 150 targets, but if I look deeper into it (coaching changes may lead to more rushing attempts for example as pointed out by JWB) maybe that median range should be something more like 140 instead. I think JWB mentioned 120 targets as a floor for Allen over 16 games, so maybe 120-140-160 targets should be the range for him.

I agree 75% catch rate is exceptional for a WR and not the rate I would project for a player increasing overall volume of targets either, I would expect that to be lower as the average is a lot lower than that.

However Wes Welker did have pretty much a 75% catch rate three seasons in a row from 2007 to 2009. He also did it in 2014 with Denver but on a much smaller sample size.

Doug Baldwin has had that catch rate the last two seasons. It isn't impossible, just seems improbable that it would stay this high, you need a good QB and the types of routes the player wins on has a lot to do with that as well.

Jarvis Landry was at 75% his rookie season, but has since only been at 66% and then 71% his next two seasons. Landrys yards per reception have gone up each of those 2 years as well as the targets being higher.

Some other players to do that recently were Jamison Crowder, Stefon Diggs, Cole Beasley did it is 2014 and 2016. Almost all of these examples do cap out at around 120 targets however, when targets go higher than this, the catch percentage tends to be lower than 75%

For Allen I would use his career catch rate of 69% which at 140 targets would be 96 receptions.

 
For Allen I would use his career catch rate of 69% which at 140 targets would be 96 receptions.
For 1000-1100 yards and 7-8 touchdowns.

His yards per catch have been 14.0, 10.2, 10.8 and the 10.5 he had in one game last year.  10.8 x 96 = 1040. 12.0 x 96=1152. 

He's also consistently been around 8 tds/16 games, 

Those numbers don't look like top 15 numbers to me even without the injury risk.  

 
What do you think top 15 numbers look like?

96 receptions 1152 yards 8 TD = 259 points in PPR.

2016 Julio Jones scored 263 points Michael Thomas 261 Melvin Gordon 259 Doug Baldwin 257

2015 Calvin Johnson 265 Rob Gronkowski 259 Eric Decker 257 Brandin Cooks 257

2014 TY Hilton 263 Golden Tate 262 Jamal Charles 259 

All of the above players have scored in the top 15 or near that in those seasons if you don't count the QB. 

WR scoring was stronger overall in 2014 and Tate was only WR 13. Gronk and the top RB worth more than the WR from a VBD perspective, but I think that is largely offset by the WR longer term career value.

259 points is 70 points higher than the WR 36 baseline of 189 points for the last 3 seasons. 

I agree those yards per reception numbers aren't sexy and always hard to say with TDs what will happen.

 
Lol. I was actually going to post "in before somebody looks up top 15 numbers to argue that point", but now I wouldn't be in before that.  

I've said this a million times and I'll say it again.  I don't want a top 20 running back.  I want a top 10 running back.  There's 20 of those.  Same thing here.  I don't want a guy who has a good chance to live up to his price.  I want a guy who has a good chance to exceed his price.  

You make your edge buying low and selling high.  That might sound trite, but the game is about choosing who to buy.  Sometimes you buy the guy coming off a down year because you think he'll bounce back.  Or the future first round pick because you think it's more valuable later than your veteran now. Or you draft someone that other people passed on.  Or get the guy whose quarterback is improving and seems to lock into him.  Or the guy coming off suspension.  Usually you make your edge from buying guys whose needle is pointing up, before other people realize it, but sometimes you buy guys whose needle is pointing down, but not as badly as it seems.  

Keenan Allen's needle is arguably pointing down, with the coaching change, change and d surrounding talent.  He's also an injury guy, so you should be able to buy him at a discount. 

Pick 15 is not a discount.  You're paying a premium for a guy who you hope earns it back.  Sometimes that works out, but in the long run its usually a mistake.  

 
Lol. I was actually going to post "in before somebody looks up top 15 numbers to argue that point", but now I wouldn't be in before that.  

I've said this a million times and I'll say it again.  I don't want a top 20 running back.  I want a top 10 running back.  There's 20 of those.  Same thing here.  I don't want a guy who has a good chance to live up to his price.  I want a guy who has a good chance to exceed his price.  

You make your edge buying low and selling high.  That might sound trite, but the game is about choosing who to buy.  Sometimes you buy the guy coming off a down year because you think he'll bounce back.  Or the future first round pick because you think it's more valuable later than your veteran now. Or you draft someone that other people passed on.  Or get the guy whose quarterback is improving and seems to lock into him.  Or the guy coming off suspension.  Usually you make your edge from buying guys whose needle is pointing up, before other people realize it, but sometimes you buy guys whose needle is pointing down, but not as badly as it seems.  

Keenan Allen's needle is arguably pointing down, with the coaching change, change and d surrounding talent.  He's also an injury guy, so you should be able to buy him at a discount. 

Pick 15 is not a discount.  You're paying a premium for a guy who you hope earns it back.  Sometimes that works out, but in the long run its usually a mistake.  
So much wrong here, but that's typical of the anti-Keenan rhetoric. He's not really an injury prone guy. The ACL injury sucked, but we've seen enough people come back at full strength recently to dismiss the ACL stigma from 15+ years ago. Or are you worried about him re-injuring his kidney? Personally, I'll bet the farm that he doesn't ever get another lacerated kidney. Keenan is only ranked 15 because of the injuries. Had he been healthy last year he'd have been way over 100 receptions and he'd be in the elite tier. That's the upside I believe you are looking for. He's also only a year older than Michael Thomas, and 3-4 years younger than Julio and AB.

As for the coaching change, the new coach made a concerted effort to bring back Whisenhunt as the OC. There is nothing to worry about the change in coaches. The offense will be the same.

IMO, the injury prone and coaching change arguments are both weak and lazy. Moving on...

Surrounding talent? Maybe you think Tyrell is a top WR, but he's not. He's not bad, but he's not challenging Keenan for the WR1 role on the Chargers. He's a great replacement for Floyd. But he's not stealing significant targets from Keenan.

On the topic of YPR, it's due to his role on offense. Maybe the surrounding talent allows him to run more diverse routes? Maybe not and he just keeps beasting in PPR formats. Harmon states it best:

It’s true that in 2015, Allen did play a hyper-specific possession receiver role. Of the 298 routes charted for his Reception Perception sample, 58.4 percent were slants, curls, and posts.

 
Thanks for the rankings. FWIW, I can see your rankings for QBs when I click on forecast->dynasty but if I try to sort by WR or RB it only shows Jeff's rankings. Very odd. Anyway, I just sorted them myself in a spreadsheet because I have a hard time ranking different positions against each other and find it much easier to view when sorted by a single position. These are my positional thoughts:

It's a nitpick, but with Bell being younger than David Johnson and more proven I'd rank Bell higher. Gordon and Freeman are too high for my taste. Both are set for major regressions next year (Gordon will have a 3rd down back to contend with and Freeman is losing his OC) and Gordon has yet to finish a season healthy. Ryan Mathews had a much better start to his career than this guy yet never got half the love. Prosise seems really high for a guy who has barely carried the ball in the NFL and can't stay healthy. Crowell is waaay too low for a guy who is 24 and coming off 4.8 ypc on one of the worst blocking AND passing teams in the league. Speaking of Cleveland, I'd have Duke somewhere on there especially with the likes of Theo Riddick and Paul Perkins making the cut (I would not have them in the top 100). Abdullah is a guy way down on the list that I'd much rather have than Prosise. He seems like a very talented player being subjected to unfortunate use. The most prevalent missing name on this list is Kenneth Dixon. I have him ranked in the teens for RBs, but he's not one of the 33 RBs listed.

I'm convinced Cooks and Thomas are products of Drew Brees. With Brees looking to play out his contract, I suspect he'll be aiming to pack his bags to head to a contender in 2018 and Cooks and Thomas will plummet down these lists by October 2018. Similarly, Davante Adams only has one year left of Rodgers carrying him. It's refreshing to see Hopkins ranked outside the top 12 WR. It'll be interesting to see where Cooper ends up in the rankings next year if Crabtree outshines him again. Speaking of Crabtree, he seems kind of low. I've mentioned it before, but it's crazy people still rank Demaryius Thomas above him. They're the same age and Crabtree is the much more complete WR with a more stable situation. I'd much rather have Sterling Shepard than the likes of Crowder, Tyreek Hill, or Parker. I know he doesn't have the WR1 upside people see in Parker, but in a year or two he'll still be in starting lineups as a rock solid WR2 whereas Parker will be at the end of rosters. His 1st year was better than Parker's 2nd. To me he's similar to Cobb, but 4 years younger and less disappointing. Landry's fantasy relevance is the product of the PPR scoring system. If he's not extended, I'm not sure he'll find another QB as willing to check down to him as Tannehill and he'll become just another 60/700/3 slot WR. The Detroit WRs seem low. 

Reed's injuries scare me too much to ever invest in him. Just the concussions alone could force him into retirement soon, but it seems like those are only half his injury problems. Henry seems high considering Gates is likely going to stick around another year. By the time Henry is in his prime, the poorly managed Chargers will be looking for a new QB. Kelce's TE2 ranking feels like recency bias. With injuries to Charles and Maclin last year, it felt like a perfect storm for him, yet I read that his TE1 finish in 2016 would've placed him like TE5 in 2015. Without the extra targets next year (and a normal year of TE scoring), he'll likely be back to his usual TE6-8 finish. I'm all about the budding Ertz-Wentz connection for the next few years.

Mariota at QB5 was surprising. Maybe it shouldn't be, but I'd have him at least 4-5 spots lower.

Again, thanks for posting these rankings in the SP. My comments aren't meant to rag on them or nitpick them, just doing my best to fit the requirement from your statement: "will definitely adjust my rankings if anyone has convincing arguments"
@Dan Hindery If I had to boil down my curiosity to one point that I'd like addressed, it would be Dixon's absence. I'm still aghast Paul Perkins (among others) made the cut above Dixon. Dixon's team/situation, pedigree, and rookie season are all better than Perkins.

 
As for the coaching change, the new coach made a concerted effort to bring back Whisenhunt as the OC. There is nothing to worry about the change in coaches. The offense will be the same.
The new coach had no choice on Whisenhunt. The team required the new coach to keep him, which is one of the reasons the Chargers are a lousy franchise, because they make stupid decisions like that.

I disagree that the offense will be the same. Allen's role may very well be the same, and I think he will lead the team in targets if he stays healthy, which may be more in line with the point you were addressing. But I don't think he will reach 100 receptions next season, or maybe ever in any season in his career.

 
The new coach had no choice on Whisenhunt. The team required the new coach to keep him, which is one of the reasons the Chargers are a lousy franchise, because they make stupid decisions like that.

I disagree that the offense will be the same. Allen's role may very well be the same, and I think he will lead the team in targets if he stays healthy, which may be more in line with the point you were addressing. But I don't think he will reach 100 receptions next season, or maybe ever in any season in his career.
Has this been confirmed? I haven't been reading about it lately, but right after Lynn was hired he made a comment that he hoped to be able to convince Whisenhunt to stay. Maybe that was BS and I shouldn't have taken it at face value. If you've got something to confirm it was BS, let me know.

I don't think a change in offense would be bad for Allen. He's got Rivers' trust and his ability isn't limited to a few routes (like DT, for example), so I think he's going to draw targets and catch them no matter what offense is being run. I just feel like the continuity of OC should ease people's minds, but instead I keep hearing that this change in coaching staff is going to hurt him. So if that were true, I'd disagree, but it simply isn't true, so I don't see the issue.

Taking into account Keenan's career catch rate, 9 targets per game should be enough to eclipse 100 receptions. Given that his previous pace was 12 targets per game, I think 9 targets per game is very realistic.

I'm kind of curious who people would rank ahead of him. I could make a case for Keenan being similarly valued with the ~6 guys ahead of him.

 
I don't think a change in offense would be bad for Allen. He's got Rivers' trust and his ability isn't limited to a few routes (like DT, for example), so I think he's going to draw targets and catch them no matter what offense is being run. I just feel like the continuity of OC should ease people's minds, but instead I keep hearing that this change in coaching staff is going to hurt him. So if that were true, I'd disagree, but it simply isn't true, so I don't see the issue.

Taking into account Keenan's career catch rate, 9 targets per game should be enough to eclipse 100 receptions. Given that his previous pace was 12 targets per game, I think 9 targets per game is very realistic.

I'm kind of curious who people would rank ahead of him. I could make a case for Keenan being similarly valued with the ~6 guys ahead of him.
I like Allen, but I think there his odds of getting 9 targets per game (144 on the season if he plays 16 games) are very low. Even assuming he and Rivers both stay healthy, here is his worst case scenario:

  • Coaching philosophy:

    Coaching staff seeks more balanced offense. There is reason to believe this is desired by the coaching staff:

    Compare Whisenhunt's two years as OC (2013 and 2016) in San Diego.
  • Look at Lynn's offense in Buffalo: last in pass attempts, first in rushing. Obviously, Lynn has wholly different personnel now, but he has been a coach focused on the running game for his entire coaching career.


[*]Offensive skill personnel:

  • Woodhead is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Williams improves in his third year and stays healthy.
  • Benjamin improves in his second year in SD and stays healthy.
  • Inman (RFA) is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Gates returns rather than retiring.
  • Henry improves in his second year and stays healthy all season.

[*]OL:

  • OL is improved via draft and free agency, and possibly via bounce back performance(s).

    Enabling Henry to run more routes.
  • Creating a stronger running game, which leads to more offensive balance and fewer passing attempts.


[*]Defense:

  • The young defensive core (Bosa, Reid, Brown, Perryman, Verrett, Hayward, et al.) continues to improve.
  • The defensive scheme and utilization of talent improves with the long overdue departure of DC Pagano.
  • The defense is further improved via draft and free agency.

All of that probably won't happen, but most of it is likely IMO except for everyone staying healthy, since injuries are unpredictable. Collectively all of this should be expected to reduce targets for Allen. :shrug:  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the rankings. FWIW, I can see your rankings for QBs when I click on forecast->dynasty but if I try to sort by WR or RB it only shows Jeff's rankings. Very odd. Anyway, I just sorted them myself in a spreadsheet because I have a hard time ranking different positions against each other and find it much easier to view when sorted by a single position. These are my positional thoughts:

It's a nitpick, but with Bell being younger than David Johnson and more proven I'd rank Bell higher. Gordon and Freeman are too high for my taste. Both are set for major regressions next year (Gordon will have a 3rd down back to contend with and Freeman is losing his OC) and Gordon has yet to finish a season healthy. Ryan Mathews had a much better start to his career than this guy yet never got half the love. Prosise seems really high for a guy who has barely carried the ball in the NFL and can't stay healthy. Crowell is waaay too low for a guy who is 24 and coming off 4.8 ypc on one of the worst blocking AND passing teams in the league. Speaking of Cleveland, I'd have Duke somewhere on there especially with the likes of Theo Riddick and Paul Perkins making the cut (I would not have them in the top 100). Abdullah is a guy way down on the list that I'd much rather have than Prosise. He seems like a very talented player being subjected to unfortunate use. The most prevalent missing name on this list is Kenneth Dixon. I have him ranked in the teens for RBs, but he's not one of the 33 RBs listed.

I'm convinced Cooks and Thomas are products of Drew Brees. With Brees looking to play out his contract, I suspect he'll be aiming to pack his bags to head to a contender in 2018 and Cooks and Thomas will plummet down these lists by October 2018. Similarly, Davante Adams only has one year left of Rodgers carrying him. It's refreshing to see Hopkins ranked outside the top 12 WR. It'll be interesting to see where Cooper ends up in the rankings next year if Crabtree outshines him again. Speaking of Crabtree, he seems kind of low. I've mentioned it before, but it's crazy people still rank Demaryius Thomas above him. They're the same age and Crabtree is the much more complete WR with a more stable situation. I'd much rather have Sterling Shepard than the likes of Crowder, Tyreek Hill, or Parker. I know he doesn't have the WR1 upside people see in Parker, but in a year or two he'll still be in starting lineups as a rock solid WR2 whereas Parker will be at the end of rosters. His 1st year was better than Parker's 2nd. To me he's similar to Cobb, but 4 years younger and less disappointing. Landry's fantasy relevance is the product of the PPR scoring system. If he's not extended, I'm not sure he'll find another QB as willing to check down to him as Tannehill and he'll become just another 60/700/3 slot WR. The Detroit WRs seem low. 

Reed's injuries scare me too much to ever invest in him. Just the concussions alone could force him into retirement soon, but it seems like those are only half his injury problems. Henry seems high considering Gates is likely going to stick around another year. By the time Henry is in his prime, the poorly managed Chargers will be looking for a new QB. Kelce's TE2 ranking feels like recency bias. With injuries to Charles and Maclin last year, it felt like a perfect storm for him, yet I read that his TE1 finish in 2016 would've placed him like TE5 in 2015. Without the extra targets next year (and a normal year of TE scoring), he'll likely be back to his usual TE6-8 finish. I'm all about the budding Ertz-Wentz connection for the next few years.

Mariota at QB5 was surprising. Maybe it shouldn't be, but I'd have him at least 4-5 spots lower.

Again, thanks for posting these rankings in the SP. My comments aren't meant to rag on them or nitpick them, just doing my best to fit the requirement from your statement: "will definitely adjust my rankings if anyone has convincing arguments"
In a dynasty ranking I don't see the reasoning for going with bell over dj is citing he is younger and more proven.  For rbs in dynasty, youth is very good but there has to be a logical cut off point.  Johnson out scoring bell by 100 this year suggests he is proven enough, especially when you can say that every.single.game., DJ was as steady as they come. He was an automatic "here's your 25 or so for starters" just by playing him.  Proven also goes hand in hand with availability, whether that be due to injury or suspension.  

It's a thin, thin line but I don't understand how people seem to gloss very DJ when it comes to bell.  If either of these two players has a red flag to consider, it's probably not DJ being a bit older.

I wouldn't cry if I had to settle for either but I think I'd feel more comfortable with DJ. 

 
I like Allen, but I think there his odds of getting 9 targets per game (144 on the season if he plays 16 games) are very low. Even assuming he and Rivers both stay healthy, here is his worst case scenario:

  • Coaching philosophy:

    Coaching staff seeks more balanced offense. There is reason to believe this is desired by the coaching staff:

    Compare Whisenhunt's two years as OC (2013 and 2016) in San Diego.
  • Look at Lynn's offense in Buffalo: last in pass attempts, first in rushing. Obviously, Lynn has wholly different personnel now, but he has been a coach focused on the running game for his entire coaching career.


[*]Offensive personnel:

  • Woodhead is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Williams improves in his second year and stays healthy.
  • Benjamin improves in his second year in SD and stays healthy.
  • Inman (RFA) is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Gates returns rather than retiring.
  • Henry improves in his second year and stays healthy all season.

[*]Defense:

  • The young defensive core (Bosa, Reid, Brown, Perryman, Verrett, Hayward, et al.) continues to improve.
  • The defensive scheme and utilization of talent improves with the long overdue departure of Pagano.
  • The defense is further improved via draft and free agency.

[*]OL:

  • OL is improved via draft and free agency, and possibly via bounce back performance(s).

    Enabling Henry to run more routes.
  • Creating a stronger running game, which leads to more offensive balance and fewer passing attempts.


All of that probably won't happen, but most of it is likely IMO except for everyone staying healthy, since injuries are unpredictable. Collectively all of this should be expected to reduce targets for Allen. :shrug:  
Good post. I don't really disagree with any particular line of logic. However, I do think you're overstating Lynn as an OC. The guy was never hired as an OC. He was promoted as the result of a mid-season firing, so he doesn't even have a full season under his belt. I wouldn't go looking for patterns in that. I think Williams and Benjamin can help open things up for Keenan and the offense as a whole. They'll be competing with each other to stay on the field for 2WR sets, but neither is in competition with Keenan to make this a 1a/1b situation. So bottom line, it isn't uncommon for a WR1 to get a 25%+ target load and that's all he needs to get to 100 receptions. You make a case that SD could decrease passing attempts, but they ranked 15/32 last year and they have one of the better QBs in the league. I don't think it's realistic to expect them to drop down that ranking very much. If the OL improves then maybe Rivers' performance improves. Woodhead has never been a very good runner and Gordon has yet to (1) finish a season healthy (2) crack 4.0 ypc. The lack of a legit running game has only made the job harder for Rivers and his WRs. A balance would be good for everyone.

The thing is that I don't think anybody is expecting 12 targets/game for Keenan. We all expect those things to collectively reduce his target load, but what I'm saying is that even reducing it down 25% to 9 per game is still going to result in huge numbers for Keenan. Probably top 5 PPR numbers. Which brings me to the fact that you did say 144 seems unlikely, but you don't really back that up. You certainly make a case for why he won't get as many as before (89 in 7.5 games in 2015, 6 in 0.5 games in 2016) but you don't really say why 144 isn't possible. 192 certainly seems unlikely, but 144 seems quite doable.

He was on pace for right around 144 in 2014 (121 through 13.5 games) when Floyd, Royal, and Gates were all present and healthy for every game. Rivers threw 570 passes that year which is a very reasonable amount. By all accounts Keenan had made some strides in the offseason between 2014 and 2015, so I think 2014 is a decent floor for targets. 

 
Just curious, since I don't really know that much about Allen, but why was his nearly full season where he wasn't very good completely ignored?  Why is all of his risk assumed to be via injury when the fact of the matter is that he's really only had half a season of really good production, which we've seen out of many players that never come close to those numbers again.

 
@Dan Hindery If I had to boil down my curiosity to one point that I'd like addressed, it would be Dixon's absence. I'm still aghast Paul Perkins (among others) made the cut above Dixon. Dixon's team/situation, pedigree, and rookie season are all better than Perkins.
I have Dixon 34th at RB, so he barely missed the cut. He's a tough case because I suspect that Baltimore will address the RB position in the draft again this year, but we don't know the round. Plus, West is a RFA and should be back so it's no sure thing that Dixon ends up a fantasy starter even if the Ravens don't address the position. 

I think part of my hesitancy might also come from overrating Javorius Allen around this time last offseason. He was also a 4th round pick who had a couple decent fantasy games down the stretch where he caught a bunch of passes. 

I also think you're overrating Dixon's pedigree and his rookie season compared to Perkins and in general. Dixon was the 134th pick in the draft. Perkins went 15 picks later. There were a whole bunch of RBs who went in that late 4th/early 5th range, but Dixon was singled out for some reason as the one to own by fantasy owners (not by NFL teams). As for his rookie season, he averaged less than 4.0 yards per target and that was supposed to be his calling card. He was at 4.3 YPC but never had more than 57 rushing yards in any single game and I don't know that the Ravens view him as a feature back.

 
I like Allen, but I think there his odds of getting 9 targets per game (144 on the season if he plays 16 games) are very low. Even assuming he and Rivers both stay healthy, here is his worst case scenario:

  • Coaching philosophy:

    Coaching staff seeks more balanced offense. There is reason to believe this is desired by the coaching staff:

    Compare Whisenhunt's two years as OC (2013 and 2016) in San Diego.
  • Look at Lynn's offense in Buffalo: last in pass attempts, first in rushing. Obviously, Lynn has wholly different personnel now, but he has been a coach focused on the running game for his entire coaching career.


[*]Offensive skill personnel:

  • Woodhead is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Williams improves in his third year and stays healthy.
  • Benjamin improves in his second year in SD and stays healthy.
  • Inman (RFA) is re-signed and stays healthy.
  • Gates returns rather than retiring.
  • Henry improves in his second year and stays healthy all season.

[*]OL:

  • OL is improved via draft and free agency, and possibly via bounce back performance(s).

    Enabling Henry to run more routes.
  • Creating a stronger running game, which leads to more offensive balance and fewer passing attempts.


[*]Defense:

  • The young defensive core (Bosa, Reid, Brown, Perryman, Verrett, Hayward, et al.) continues to improve.
  • The defensive scheme and utilization of talent improves with the long overdue departure of DC Pagano.
  • The defense is further improved via draft and free agency.

All of that probably won't happen, but most of it is likely IMO except for everyone staying healthy, since injuries are unpredictable. Collectively all of this should be expected to reduce targets for Allen. :shrug:  
JWB how many total offensive plays and passing attempts will the Chargers have under this scenario? Which btw all seems reasonable for each item in isolation having an effect on Allens opportunity. It seems unlikely that all of these things would align themselves in one season though. That would be as you describe a worst case scenario for Allen. I really doubt that Benjamin and Inman improve on their numbers from last season when Allen was injured. He will get a lot of those same looks when healthy and they won't, especially if they are also playing a lot of 2 TE.

If they do scale down the passing attempts as a result of running the ball more successfully and frequently, and also improving on defense enough to be able keep scores low enough to keep running the ball.  This could be a winning formula for the Chargers as it has been for a lot of teams. Dallas and the Dolphins being some recent examples. This would definitely limit the opportunity for receivers compared to recent years.

Woodhead returning or another pass catching RB (McCaffrey?) replacing him would I think have the biggest impact on Allen getting high target volume as well as the percentage of those targets conversion, as that RB may get some of those looks instead. What I see when looking at the offense from 2013-2016 is that when Woodhead was healthy and involved with the offense that they had more total plays, so an overall benefit to the offense, that doesn't take away opportunities from other players as much, because it adds more total plays to the offense. In 2013 with Wiz as the OC they had 1060 plays 544 passing attempts 486 rushing attempts. When Woodhead hasn't been a major part of the offense, they are running only 1000 plays but generally throwing the ball quite a bit more.

Anyhow the floor for Rivers looks like 550 passing attempts in 2017 even in a scenario where the Chargers run the ball closer to 500 times. The yards per reception numbers may improve due to play action being more effective and some more explosive plays in the passing game as a result of that as well, which could benefit Allen.

If Allen gets 25% of the targets at 550 attempts, that is 137 targets, which is very close to the 140 median target rage of previous projection. Same scenario at 600 passing attempts would be 150 targets. I would expect Rivers to throw the ball somewhere between 550 and 600 times, even if they are running the ball well.

There are quite a few ways I could see Allen only having 120 targets in 2017 season, which might cause him to only be a WR 2 or possibly a WR 3 for fantasy, but most of those would include him missing a few games and I would still expect his per game numbers to be consistent and pretty strong.

 
you did say 144 seems unlikely, but you don't really back that up
I haven't given this deep thought, but that case goes something like this:

  • Assume 550 team passing attempts.
  • Assume everyone plays 16 games since we cannot predict who will not.
  • Assume Stevie Johnson is released, and Gates, Woodhead, and Inman are all back in 2017.
  • Notional target breakdown:

    45 Gordon
  • 70 Woodhead
  • 10 other RBs
  • 55 Gates
  • 75 Henry
  • 5 other TEs
  • 120 Allen
  • 90 Williams
  • 50 Benjamin
  • 25 Inman
  • 5 other WRs

Aside from health, what is implausible about this breakdown?

They may not re-sign Woodhead, in which case the 125 targets I am showing for RBs might be a bit high. The team only had 106 RB targets on 580 pass attempts last season... but that was playing most of the season with no player in the Woodhead role. Woodhead himself got hurt, and Oliver, the player who would have filled that role, got hurt in preseason and missed the entire season. They signed McCluster, and he immediately got hurt. So it was a set of circumstances that largely denied the offense an important role for much of the season. I doubt that will happen again. In 2013, under Whisenhunt and with Allen playing 15 games, the Chargers had 133 RB targets in 544 pass attempts.

Gates could retire, in which case the 135 targets I am showing for TEs might be a bit high. I expect Gates will be back to play the final year of his contract and break the TE TD record. And look at Whisenhunt with the Chargers. In 2013, Allen played 15 games, yet the Chargers had 150 TE targets in 544 pass attempts. In 2016, with the same 2 primary TEs as I projected above, the Chargers had 146 TE targets in 580 pass attempts. The fact that I am projecting just 135 shows some regression, which I would attribute to (a) projecting non-TE targets all stay healthy and (b) some continuing regression from Gates that cannot be fully absorbed by Henry.

Is it unreasonable to project 50 targets to Benjamin? He signed a $24M contract last offseason and had 75 targets in 2016 despite playing most of the season with a PCL injury and missing a couple games. I think 50 targets is conservative.

Inman has had 160 targets over the past 2 seasons, though mostly due to injuries to others. Still, 25 targets doesn't seem unrealistic, especially when you consider he is the best run blocker among the top 4 WRs, so he will get snaps.

So does it come down to shifting 20+ targets from Williams to Allen? Hard for me to project Williams at 70 or fewer targets after the way he emerged this season. I don't think he will ever surpass Allen, but he should be good enough for 5.6 targets per game, no?

Maybe a better way to look at the WRs is, is it truly reasonable that Williams, Benjamin, and Inman will combine for less than 165 targets total? If not, then the extra targets for Allen would have to come from RB/TE, or the team would have to have more than 550 pass attempts to make the numbers work.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JWB how many total offensive plays and passing attempts will the Chargers have under this scenario? Which btw all seems reasonable for each item in isolation having an effect on Allens opportunity. It seems unlikely that all of these things would align themselves in one season though. That would be as you describe a worst case scenario for Allen. I really doubt that Benjamin and Inman improve on their numbers from last season when Allen was injured. He will get a lot of those same looks when healthy and they won't, especially if they are also playing a lot of 2 TE.

If they do scale down the passing attempts as a result of running the ball more successfully and frequently, and also improving on defense enough to be able keep scores low enough to keep running the ball.  This could be a winning formula for the Chargers as it has been for a lot of teams. Dallas and the Dolphins being some recent examples. This would definitely limit the opportunity for receivers compared to recent years.

Woodhead returning or another pass catching RB (McCaffrey?) replacing him would I think have the biggest impact on Allen getting high target volume as well as the percentage of those targets conversion, as that RB may get some of those looks instead. What I see when looking at the offense from 2013-2016 is that when Woodhead was healthy and involved with the offense that they had more total plays, so an overall benefit to the offense, that doesn't take away opportunities from other players as much, because it adds more total plays to the offense. In 2013 with Wiz as the OC they had 1060 plays 544 passing attempts 486 rushing attempts. When Woodhead hasn't been a major part of the offense, they are running only 1000 plays but generally throwing the ball quite a bit more.

Anyhow the floor for Rivers looks like 550 passing attempts in 2017 even in a scenario where the Chargers run the ball closer to 500 times. The yards per reception numbers may improve due to play action being more effective and some more explosive plays in the passing game as a result of that as well, which could benefit Allen.

If Allen gets 25% of the targets at 550 attempts, that is 137 targets, which is very close to the 140 median target rage of previous projection. Same scenario at 600 passing attempts would be 150 targets. I would expect Rivers to throw the ball somewhere between 550 and 600 times, even if they are running the ball well.

There are quite a few ways I could see Allen only having 120 targets in 2017 season, which might cause him to only be a WR 2 or possibly a WR 3 for fantasy, but most of those would include him missing a few games and I would still expect his per game numbers to be consistent and pretty strong.
I believe I addressed most of this in my previous post.

As for Woodhead and total plays, the reason is that Woodhead moves the chains, which extends drives.

At this point, IMO the most reasonable issue to take with the projections I threw out above is that we know everyone won't play 16 games. But Allen is one of the biggest injury risks mentioned, given he has played 38 of a possible 64 games in his career, and has never played 16 games in a season. I'm not saying I think his past injuries are predictive, just pointing out that if we start altering projections due to likelihood of injuries, he is one of the guys you would have to say is most likely to miss time.

Bottom line, I expect the 2017 offense to much more closely resemble the 2013 offense under Whisenhunt than the 2016 offense under Whisenhunt.

 
I appreciate your insight on the Chargers JWB. I was only able to catch a few of their games last year.

It might be interesting to look at Allens use when Woodhead was healthy, and see if there was a difference in his targets or not.

As far as the 2013 season being the model the Chargers will try to use in 2017 this was Allens rookie season, so not a good example of how he will perform now, as he has gained experience and developed his skill set. The players such as Gates and Woodhead were closer to their primes back then than they are now.

 
I appreciate your insight on the Chargers JWB. I was only able to catch a few of their games last year.

It might be interesting to look at Allens use when Woodhead was healthy, and see if there was a difference in his targets or not.

As far as the 2013 season being the model the Chargers will try to use in 2017 this was Allens rookie season, so not a good example of how he will perform now, as he has gained experience and developed his skill set. The players such as Gates and Woodhead were closer to their primes back then than they are now.
Regarding 2013 vs. 2017, you are saying:

  • 2017 Allen > 2013 Allen (rookie)
  • 2013 Woodhead > 2017 Woodhead
  • 2013 Gates > 2017 Gates
I agree with all of those points. But you are ignoring other points that favor the other direction:

  • 2017 Gordon > 2013 Mathews
  • 2017 Henry >> 2013 Ladarius Green
  • 2017 WR2 Williams >> 2013 WR2 Vincent Brown ( :X  )
  • 2017 WR3 Benjamin >= 2013 WR3 Royal
  • 2017 WR4 Inman > 2013 WR4+ (Floyd played 2 games, Ajirotutu played 4 games... they literally had no other WRs play)
  • 2017 defense >= 2013 defense
  • 2017 coaching staff >= 2013 coaching staff
The point I was really making is that the Chargers will strive for the type of balance they had in 2013. Balance running vs. passing and also balance in spreading the targets around to RBs, TEs, and WRs.

 
In a dynasty ranking I don't see the reasoning for going with bell over dj is citing he is younger and more proven.  For rbs in dynasty, youth is very good but there has to be a logical cut off point.  Johnson out scoring bell by 100 this year suggests he is proven enough, especially when you can say that every.single.game., DJ was as steady as they come. He was an automatic "here's your 25 or so for starters" just by playing him.  Proven also goes hand in hand with availability, whether that be due to injury or suspension.  

It's a thin, thin line but I don't understand how people seem to gloss very DJ when it comes to bell.  If either of these two players has a red flag to consider, it's probably not DJ being a bit older.

I wouldn't cry if I had to settle for either but I think I'd feel more comfortable with DJ. 
TDs are a highly volatile stat, plus Arizona had WR and pass protection troubles. I expect DJ's targets to take a hit next year. Like you said, it's a thin line, but I'm not using "most TDs last year" as the tie breaker. The fact Bell has three seasons in a row of 4.7 ypc or better is a good enough tie breaker for me.

 
Just curious, since I don't really know that much about Allen, but why was his nearly full season where he wasn't very good completely ignored?  Why is all of his risk assumed to be via injury when the fact of the matter is that he's really only had half a season of really good production, which we've seen out of many players that never come close to those numbers again.
This is a good question. My own (possibly faulty) memory was that he admitted he wasn't very dedicated or in shape or something after his rookie season, but put in extra work after his 2nd season which appeared to pay off as he looked rather dominant in his 3rd season. By all accounts he continued this work ethic going into his 4th season. We only got a glimpse, but 6 receptions in 27 snaps was quite a tease.

 
There's also the possibility he's not that great and was just the best receiver rivers had by a long shot for a couple short stretches.  He really has two half seasons of great production, one of which was the second half of his rookie year, and the other was the first half of 2015 when he was peppered with short range targets. The assumption that the offense will continue to revolve around him is probably safe, but Allen is slow, so there's no reason to think he'll start running more deep routes. 

He's also coming off an ACL. And yeah, I know those aren't a death sentence these days, but I haven't heard the normal chorus of sources telling us how far ahead of schedule he is.  Maybe he isn't recovering well.  Maybe he's doing fine for a normal person but not an elite athlete. I don't know. 

There's risk.  That's all I'm saying

 
It's JMO but Allen is the new Miles Austin in my book. A good football player but perennial FFB tease that we wait and wait to break out/match his peak we saw one season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have Dixon 34th at RB, so he barely missed the cut. He's a tough case because I suspect that Baltimore will address the RB position in the draft again this year, but we don't know the round. Plus, West is a RFA and should be back so it's no sure thing that Dixon ends up a fantasy starter even if the Ravens don't address the position. 

I think part of my hesitancy might also come from overrating Javorius Allen around this time last offseason. He was also a 4th round pick who had a couple decent fantasy games down the stretch where he caught a bunch of passes. 

I also think you're overrating Dixon's pedigree and his rookie season compared to Perkins and in general. Dixon was the 134th pick in the draft. Perkins went 15 picks later. There were a whole bunch of RBs who went in that late 4th/early 5th range, but Dixon was singled out for some reason as the one to own by fantasy owners (not by NFL teams). As for his rookie season, he averaged less than 4.0 yards per target and that was supposed to be his calling card. He was at 4.3 YPC but never had more than 57 rushing yards in any single game and I don't know that the Ravens view him as a feature back.
You suspect they'll draft a running back based on Harbaugh's quote about adding a game breaker? I took that to mean they'd draft a Dri Archer type guy, but I guess time will tell.

You're right that West is a RFA and I'd bet the farm he'll be back next year, but I still expect Dixon to get the largest share of the work. West did better than any of us expected, so I gotta hand it to him there. But he still barely managed 4 ypc which was actually a career high. He shouldn't pose a significant threat to a healthy Dixon. Which brings me to my next point...

To ding Dixon for his performance is to ignore context. He was coming off a preseason knee injury which required him to wear a brace and visibly slowed him down. Have a quick glance at his splits. He missed 4 games and in his first 4 games he averaged 1.5 YPC and 1.2 YPR. Over his last 8 games he averaged 4.9 YPC and 6.2 YPR. Over his last 6 games (his snap count was pretty low for his first 6 games) he averaged 10.2 carries and 4.5 targets. That alone should be enough to make him fantasy startable even if his role doesn't continue to increase.

You're right about draft position - I didn't realize how close they were drafted together. I guess I just view Perkins as a JAG and was more impressed with Dixon's college dominator rating and target share. But I've got to disagree that receiving alone was supposed to be Dixon's calling card. Dixon appeals to me because he's got 3 down back potential. Everything is his calling card. Short yardage, receiving, blocking.. I expect him to showcase it all next year and make it difficult for the staff to take him off the field.

The Allen thing... He was pretty clearly a JAG, at least as a runner. If you realize you are rating Dixon based on Allen, I guess that's the first step to correcting the problem, right?

 
There's also the possibility he's not that great and was just the best receiver rivers had by a long shot for a couple short stretches.  He really has two half seasons of great production, one of which was the second half of his rookie year, and the other was the first half of 2015 when he was peppered with short range targets. The assumption that the offense will continue to revolve around him is probably safe, but Allen is slow, so there's no reason to think he'll start running more deep routes. 

He's also coming off an ACL. And yeah, I know those aren't a death sentence these days, but I haven't heard the normal chorus of sources telling us how far ahead of schedule he is.  Maybe he isn't recovering well.  Maybe he's doing fine for a normal person but not an elite athlete. I don't know. 

There's risk.  That's all I'm saying
Is he actually slow? http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000158580/article/keenan-allen-clocks-471-in-40-mayock-doesnt-care

He was coming off injury. Probably shouldn't have even run at his pro day. But either way, combine numbers have shown no correlation to WR success. Even if 40 time was really important, Boldin, who ran a 4.72, averaged over 13 YPR in seven seasons, his final one coming in at 13.9 at age 33.

As for the ACL, you're right, he could pull a Jamaal Charles on us, but at this point of the season, I'm not going to rank him lower due to that unlikely outcome based on the lack of fluff pieces in February. 

It's JMO but Allen is the new Miles Austin in my book. A good football player but perennial FFB tease that we wait and wait to break out/match his peak we saw one season.
Ah, poor Miles Austin. To me the case of Miles Austin was pretty clear - hamstring injuries are simply debilitating. You need them to run. I think he had major hamstring injuries every year for about 4-5 years. Keenan, however, had a lacerated kidney and an ACL. Neither of which are likely to recur. 

 
Thanks for the rankings. FWIW, I can see your rankings for QBs when I click on forecast->dynasty but if I try to sort by WR or RB it only shows Jeff's rankings. Very odd. Anyway, I just sorted them myself in a spreadsheet because I have a hard time ranking different positions against each other and find it much easier to view when sorted by a single position. These are my positional thoughts:

It's a nitpick, but with Bell being younger than David Johnson and more proven I'd rank Bell higher. Gordon and Freeman are too high for my taste. Both are set for major regressions next year (Gordon will have a 3rd down back to contend with and Freeman is losing his OC) and Gordon has yet to finish a season healthy. Ryan Mathews had a much better start to his career than this guy yet never got half the love. Prosise seems really high for a guy who has barely carried the ball in the NFL and can't stay healthy. Crowell is waaay too low for a guy who is 24 and coming off 4.8 ypc on one of the worst blocking AND passing teams in the league. Speaking of Cleveland, I'd have Duke somewhere on there especially with the likes of Theo Riddick and Paul Perkins making the cut (I would not have them in the top 100). Abdullah is a guy way down on the list that I'd much rather have than Prosise. He seems like a very talented player being subjected to unfortunate use. The most prevalent missing name on this list is Kenneth Dixon. I have him ranked in the teens for RBs, but he's not one of the 33 RBs listed.

I'm convinced Cooks and Thomas are products of Drew Brees. With Brees looking to play out his contract, I suspect he'll be aiming to pack his bags to head to a contender in 2018 and Cooks and Thomas will plummet down these lists by October 2018. Similarly, Davante Adams only has one year left of Rodgers carrying him. It's refreshing to see Hopkins ranked outside the top 12 WR. It'll be interesting to see where Cooper ends up in the rankings next year if Crabtree outshines him again. Speaking of Crabtree, he seems kind of low. I've mentioned it before, but it's crazy people still rank Demaryius Thomas above him. They're the same age and Crabtree is the much more complete WR with a more stable situation. I'd much rather have Sterling Shepard than the likes of Crowder, Tyreek Hill, or Parker. I know he doesn't have the WR1 upside people see in Parker, but in a year or two he'll still be in starting lineups as a rock solid WR2 whereas Parker will be at the end of rosters. His 1st year was better than Parker's 2nd. To me he's similar to Cobb, but 4 years younger and less disappointing. Landry's fantasy relevance is the product of the PPR scoring system. If he's not extended, I'm not sure he'll find another QB as willing to check down to him as Tannehill and he'll become just another 60/700/3 slot WR. The Detroit WRs seem low. 

Reed's injuries scare me too much to ever invest in him. Just the concussions alone could force him into retirement soon, but it seems like those are only half his injury problems. Henry seems high considering Gates is likely going to stick around another year. By the time Henry is in his prime, the poorly managed Chargers will be looking for a new QB. Kelce's TE2 ranking feels like recency bias. With injuries to Charles and Maclin last year, it felt like a perfect storm for him, yet I read that his TE1 finish in 2016 would've placed him like TE5 in 2015. Without the extra targets next year (and a normal year of TE scoring), he'll likely be back to his usual TE6-8 finish. I'm all about the budding Ertz-Wentz connection for the next few years.

Mariota at QB5 was surprising. Maybe it shouldn't be, but I'd have him at least 4-5 spots lower.

Again, thanks for posting these rankings in the SP. My comments aren't meant to rag on them or nitpick them, just doing my best to fit the requirement from your statement: "will definitely adjust my rankings if anyone has convincing arguments"
Missed this post earlier. A few comments on some of the disagreements:

1. Johnson over Bell... They're in the same tier and will be pretty close when I assign trade values. Not going to try to talk anyone out of Bell if they have him over DJ. He's a beast when he is healthy. But for me personally, I'm a bit more concerned about Bell's durability than DJs. DJ made it through 17 weeks with a huge workload (before getting a minor injury in Week 17) in his first season as a starter. Bell has been hurt in every single one of his four seasons. He's facing offseason surgery. Predicting injuries is always a tricky business, but if trying to assign some sort of injury risk to players, Bell's has to be pretty high after all of the lower body injuries he has had.

I also think that Bell is an "older" 25 than DJ despite being 10 months younger. Bell had 414 touches his final year at MSU, which is serious punishment in the Big Ten. He's taken 4 years of abuse in the NFL, including a 370+ touch season in 2014 and over 400 touches last season (including playoffs). I worry that Pitt is just going to go year to year with him contractually and absolutely run him into the ground over the next year or two. Meanwhile, DJ has only had one season of heavy workload in the NFL and played at a lower, less physical level in college. 

2. Crowell and Duke...I actually like Crowell as a trade target this offseason and feel like 23 is higher than most have him. But I don't know if I get the argument for both him and Duke in the top 30. Is the Cleveland offense one that can support two top 30 backs? They hold each other back in the same way that Hill and Bernard do in Cincy, especially in full PPR where one back steals most of the catches and the other steals most of the TDs. I prefer Crowell of the two and I feel like you have to pick one or the other, because that offense isn't going to support multiple top fantasy options any time soon.

As for Duke vs. Theo Riddick, Riddick had an 80 catch season in 2015 followed by 53 in just 10 games last year. Duke had the exact same # of catches in 16 games. In his last 16 games played, Riddick has 83 catches, 30 more than Duke. With RB2 types, projecting 5 to 5.5 receptions per game vs. 3.5-4.0 is a big difference.

3. Cooks and Thomas...They are obviously products of Brees to some extent. It's easier to put up 1200 yards with a 5,000 yard QB than a 4,000 yard QB. It's possible Brees leaves after this year, but I'd put the over/under on his time in New Orleans at 2.5 or 3 years (and probably bet the over). Short term, they both have great projections. Longer term, if they go from a 5,000 yard QB to a 4,000 yard QB, their projections will go down some, but it's not like they'll just disappear from fantasy relevance. Even with awful QB play in Denver in 2016, Sanders and Thomas were still WR2s. So I think you can project a couple more WR1 seasons for these two with Brees. And after that, they're still relatively talented 25 year olds with long careers ahead. If they stay in NO, they're at least playing a bunch of games in a dome every year with whoever the new QB is. Compared to the other guys in that 10-20 range, I think they both project well. I haven't run all the projections yet for my trade value numbers, but it'll be interesting to see how they come out with these guys. I probably feel good about top 15 numbers for a couple years and top 30 numbers for quite a few after that. How many WRs can you say that about?

4. Sterling Shepard...He was pretty good as a rookie, but still had just 685 yards. Those aren't fantasy WR2 numbers. He came in under 12 PPG this season, which is about replacement level, low-end WR3 numbers. He needs to make a pretty big jump to really be worth anything as a weekly fantasy asset. And he came in as an older guy with a lot of polish. He's locked in as the #2 WR on his own team with an aging QB. What are the chances he makes the leap to a 1,000 yard guy in 2017? I think you rank him in terms of what % chance you think he has of making that kind of leap in production.

5. Tight Ends...Reed is almost impossible to rank because the concussion risk is such an unknown. When healthy, he's a huge difference maker. If you could guarantee me 16 games in 2017, I'd happily take him round 2 in redraft. I don't know what to do with him really. I think you're really underrating Hunter Henry. I was high on him last offseason and ranked him as a top 10 rookie and I think you're seeing that play out. It's so rare to see a 21-year old rookie tight end come in and score 8 touchdowns and look as good as Henry did. He's going to be a huge offseason riser in the ADP and rankings in my opinion. In the dynasty startup auction I'm doing, he was actually the 2nd most expensive TE behind only Gronk. A lot of dynasty owners really like him and I think you'll see his trade value spike this offseason. If you can get him relatively cheaply now, I'd jump all over it. 

I like Ertz a lot too, but I'm not going to go too far out on a limb ranking him because I thought he was going to break out in 2015 and 2016 too and he got off to really slow starts both years. 

 
Longer term, if they go from a 5,000 yard QB to a 4,000 yard QB, their projections will go down some, but it's not like they'll just disappear from fantasy relevance. Even with awful QB play in Denver in 2016, Sanders and Thomas were still WR2s.
The big difference here being that Demaryius and Sanders were starting from 1650/11 and 1400/10 seasons in a 5,000 yard passing offense before they regressed.  Someone like Cooks is looking at an 1150/8 type season in a 5,000 yard passing offense which doesn't leave much room for regression while still being a valuable fantasy player.

It's one thing if we're talking about Calvin Johnson regressing 20% from his 1900 yard season, Antonio Brown regressing 20% from a 1700/16 season, Demaryius regressing 20% from a 1600/11 season, Sanders regressing 20% from a 1400/10 season, etc.  But if our starting point is 1150/8 and we're expecting a 20% regression, well, that doesn't leave us with very exciting fantasy numbers.  And a big majority these guys, regardless of their starting points, saw some kind of regression in that range.

 
Missed this post earlier. A few comments on some of the disagreements:

1. Johnson over Bell... They're in the same tier and will be pretty close when I assign trade values. Not going to try to talk anyone out of Bell if they have him over DJ. He's a beast when he is healthy. But for me personally, I'm a bit more concerned about Bell's durability than DJs. DJ made it through 17 weeks with a huge workload (before getting a minor injury in Week 17) in his first season as a starter. Bell has been hurt in every single one of his four seasons. He's facing offseason surgery. Predicting injuries is always a tricky business, but if trying to assign some sort of injury risk to players, Bell's has to be pretty high after all of the lower body injuries he has had.

I also think that Bell is an "older" 25 than DJ despite being 10 months younger. Bell had 414 touches his final year at MSU, which is serious punishment in the Big Ten. He's taken 4 years of abuse in the NFL, including a 370+ touch season in 2014 and over 400 touches last season (including playoffs). I worry that Pitt is just going to go year to year with him contractually and absolutely run him into the ground over the next year or two. Meanwhile, DJ has only had one season of heavy workload in the NFL and played at a lower, less physical level in college. 

2. Crowell and Duke...I actually like Crowell as a trade target this offseason and feel like 23 is higher than most have him. But I don't know if I get the argument for both him and Duke in the top 30. Is the Cleveland offense one that can support two top 30 backs? They hold each other back in the same way that Hill and Bernard do in Cincy, especially in full PPR where one back steals most of the catches and the other steals most of the TDs. I prefer Crowell of the two and I feel like you have to pick one or the other, because that offense isn't going to support multiple top fantasy options any time soon.

As for Duke vs. Theo Riddick, Riddick had an 80 catch season in 2015 followed by 53 in just 10 games last year. Duke had the exact same # of catches in 16 games. In his last 16 games played, Riddick has 83 catches, 30 more than Duke. With RB2 types, projecting 5 to 5.5 receptions per game vs. 3.5-4.0 is a big difference.

3. Cooks and Thomas...They are obviously products of Brees to some extent. It's easier to put up 1200 yards with a 5,000 yard QB than a 4,000 yard QB. It's possible Brees leaves after this year, but I'd put the over/under on his time in New Orleans at 2.5 or 3 years (and probably bet the over). Short term, they both have great projections. Longer term, if they go from a 5,000 yard QB to a 4,000 yard QB, their projections will go down some, but it's not like they'll just disappear from fantasy relevance. Even with awful QB play in Denver in 2016, Sanders and Thomas were still WR2s. So I think you can project a couple more WR1 seasons for these two with Brees. And after that, they're still relatively talented 25 year olds with long careers ahead. If they stay in NO, they're at least playing a bunch of games in a dome every year with whoever the new QB is. Compared to the other guys in that 10-20 range, I think they both project well. I haven't run all the projections yet for my trade value numbers, but it'll be interesting to see how they come out with these guys. I probably feel good about top 15 numbers for a couple years and top 30 numbers for quite a few after that. How many WRs can you say that about?

4. Sterling Shepard...He was pretty good as a rookie, but still had just 685 yards. Those aren't fantasy WR2 numbers. He came in under 12 PPG this season, which is about replacement level, low-end WR3 numbers. He needs to make a pretty big jump to really be worth anything as a weekly fantasy asset. And he came in as an older guy with a lot of polish. He's locked in as the #2 WR on his own team with an aging QB. What are the chances he makes the leap to a 1,000 yard guy in 2017? I think you rank him in terms of what % chance you think he has of making that kind of leap in production.

5. Tight Ends...Reed is almost impossible to rank because the concussion risk is such an unknown. When healthy, he's a huge difference maker. If you could guarantee me 16 games in 2017, I'd happily take him round 2 in redraft. I don't know what to do with him really. I think you're really underrating Hunter Henry. I was high on him last offseason and ranked him as a top 10 rookie and I think you're seeing that play out. It's so rare to see a 21-year old rookie tight end come in and score 8 touchdowns and look as good as Henry did. He's going to be a huge offseason riser in the ADP and rankings in my opinion. In the dynasty startup auction I'm doing, he was actually the 2nd most expensive TE behind only Gronk. A lot of dynasty owners really like him and I think you'll see his trade value spike this offseason. If you can get him relatively cheaply now, I'd jump all over it. 

I like Ertz a lot too, but I'm not going to go too far out on a limb ranking him because I thought he was going to break out in 2015 and 2016 too and he got off to really slow starts both years. 
Yeah, sorry, I probably shouldn't have even brought up DJ/Bell. It was a very minor quibble.

As for Crowell and Duke, I agree they will limit each other this year to some extent (more on that in a sec), but I'd rank them higher due to it being dynasty rankings. Crowell will probably get tendered and be on the team for 1 more year (unless they make it a low tender and someone bites - unlikely), so that's not terrible enough to kill their dynasty value to me. And Duke really didn't hurt Crowell too much, as Crowell finished RB14 (iirc) last year in PPR. Things can't get worse in Cleveland, right? If things get even a little better, he's got top 10 upside. For the Duke vs. Riddick, I guess I see Duke as a potential lead back, whereas Riddick is clearly just a one trick pony (career ypc of 3.5) that could be rendered useless if Abdullah stays healthy.

How can you project "a couple more WR1 seasons with Brees" when Brees has said he's going to play out his contract? He's an unrestricted FA in 2018. Plus, the drop for Sanders (6->18) and DT (4->13) was significant. Personally, I price this drop into my rankings for guys like Cooks, Thomas, and Davante. Sure, their trade value this year is still good to people who don't look ahead, but that means you'd have to flip them during the season. Planning on a half season rental doesn't equate to a lot of value to me because you never know for sure what the trade market will be like. So to beat around the bush of your question, first I don't feel good about Cooks and Thomas being top 15 for more than 1 year (if that), but you're right that top 30 seems feasible - however, I don't want to weigh that one season too heavily when thinking about the next 5+. 

I fully agree that Shepard's 2016 numbers aren't WR2 numbers. What I meant was that they were quite healthy numbers for a 2nd round rookie. I feel like a progression to WR2 numbers is likely and WR3 numbers are a near lock. I can't say the same about Hill with Maclin returning (just as I'd be concerned about Shepard if OBJ had missed time)... and Parker and Crowder already had their chance for a 2nd year breakout but both performed similarly in their 2nd year to Shepard's rookie year. As for age and polish, I didn't consider him an old rookie. A few months older than Coleman, over a year younger than Doctson. Treadwell was younger, but Shepard is younger than Parker and Crowder who entered a year earlier, so I think his age is in-line and his college breakout age was right around the 50th percentile. All he needs is a moderate bump (~10%) in targets and a higher YPR to make the leap to WR2. His red zone presence as a rookie (16 targets, 6 TDs) can only be seen as a positive.

I feel least confident about my TE evaluations, so I don't want to make a strong stand on Henry. I just don't feel like there was a huge sample size (53 targets as the TE2) and there's quite a bit of hype about this year's class, so let's just say I'd have loved watching him get bid up. I'd gladly have settled for Eifert or Ertz, maybe snag one of 2017's rookies on the cheap next year (2018) after they fail to breakout, as TEs tend to do.

Again, thanks so much for continuing to be one of FBG's more prolific dynasty rankers and for discussing them in the SP. Definitely helps pass the offseason!

 
FF Ninja said:
Yeah, sorry, I probably shouldn't have even brought up DJ/Bell. It was a very minor quibble.

As for Crowell and Duke, I agree they will limit each other this year to some extent (more on that in a sec), but I'd rank them higher due to it being dynasty rankings. Crowell will probably get tendered and be on the team for 1 more year (unless they make it a low tender and someone bites - unlikely), so that's not terrible enough to kill their dynasty value to me. And Duke really didn't hurt Crowell too much, as Crowell finished RB14 (iirc) last year in PPR. Things can't get worse in Cleveland, right? If things get even a little better, he's got top 10 upside. For the Duke vs. Riddick, I guess I see Duke as a potential lead back, whereas Riddick is clearly just a one trick pony (career ypc of 3.5) that could be rendered useless if Abdullah stays healthy.

How can you project "a couple more WR1 seasons with Brees" when Brees has said he's going to play out his contract? He's an unrestricted FA in 2018. Plus, the drop for Sanders (6->18) and DT (4->13) was significant. Personally, I price this drop into my rankings for guys like Cooks, Thomas, and Davante. Sure, their trade value this year is still good to people who don't look ahead, but that means you'd have to flip them during the season. Planning on a half season rental doesn't equate to a lot of value to me because you never know for sure what the trade market will be like. So to beat around the bush of your question, first I don't feel good about Cooks and Thomas being top 15 for more than 1 year (if that), but you're right that top 30 seems feasible - however, I don't want to weigh that one season too heavily when thinking about the next 5+. 

We'll just agree to disagree on Brees. If there was an online gambling site that allowed set the line at 2 more years with the Saints, I would easily bet on the over. It's not a slam dunk, but I would like my chances of winning that bet. If you would bet the under, that's fine. It makes sense why you think they're overrated. But I think you're in the minority on that.

Brees said he wants to retire with the Saints. It's very rare for a top QB to change teams. The only few examples I can think of are when there was a clear heir apparent on the same team (Favre/Rodgers, Peyton/Luck, Montana/Young, etc.). 

I fully agree that Shepard's 2016 numbers aren't WR2 numbers. What I meant was that they were quite healthy numbers for a 2nd round rookie. I feel like a progression to WR2 numbers is likely and WR3 numbers are a near lock. I can't say the same about Hill with Maclin returning (just as I'd be concerned about Shepard if OBJ had missed time)... and Parker and Crowder already had their chance for a 2nd year breakout but both performed similarly in their 2nd year to Shepard's rookie year. As for age and polish, I didn't consider him an old rookie. A few months older than Coleman, over a year younger than Doctson. Treadwell was younger, but Shepard is younger than Parker and Crowder who entered a year earlier, so I think his age is in-line and his college breakout age was right around the 50th percentile. All he needs is a moderate bump (~10%) in targets and a higher YPR to make the leap to WR2. His red zone presence as a rookie (16 targets, 6 TDs) can only be seen as a positive.

Crowder jumped up to 847 yards last year. This year both DJax and Garcon are free agents. I personally like his chances of making that leap to 1,000 yards more than Shepards, though both have the potential. Maybe I'm wrong, but I view Shepard as more of a finished product than the average 2nd round rookie. That was part of what made him such an attractive draft prospect was his experience and polish. 

I feel least confident about my TE evaluations, so I don't want to make a strong stand on Henry. I just don't feel like there was a huge sample size (53 targets as the TE2) and there's quite a bit of hype about this year's class, so let's just say I'd have loved watching him get bid up. I'd gladly have settled for Eifert or Ertz, maybe snag one of 2017's rookies on the cheap next year (2018) after they fail to breakout, as TEs tend to do.

I have him 5th behind Eifert and slightly ahead of Ertz. Comes back to TD upside. Ertz has never had more than 4 TDs in any season. Henry already has a season of 8 and has legit 10+ TD upside in that Chargers offense that loves TEs in the red zone. 

Again, thanks so much for continuing to be one of FBG's more prolific dynasty rankers and for discussing them in the SP. Definitely helps pass the offseason!

Thanks! Love the back and forth.

 
One more note on Hunter Henry. While I'm not ready to jump him up to TE2 or TE3, I don't think it's all that crazy an idea either and won't argue if someone else puts him way up there. Going back to 2000, the only 3 TEs to score more than 5 TDs as a rookie are Hunter Henry, Gronk and Aaron Hernandez. With the steep learning curve at the position, his 8 TDs as a 21-year old rookie are super impressive in hindsight. With the serious injury concerns of guys like Reed and Eifert, there's a real case to be made for the younger Henry ahead of them. In fact, I might have to re-evaluate where I have Reed and Henry ranked. In the leagues I own Henry, I think I would have a hard time pulling the trigger on a straight up offer for Reed.

There was some discussion about Henry (who I had 9th overall) and rookie TEs in my rookie rankings thread here last year:

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/742908-ppr-rookie-rankings/#comment-19078434

 
We'll just agree to disagree on Brees. If there was an online gambling site that allowed set the line at 2 more years with the Saints, I would easily bet on the over. It's not a slam dunk, but I would like my chances of winning that bet. If you would bet the under, that's fine. It makes sense why you think they're overrated. But I think you're in the minority on that.

Brees said he wants to retire with the Saints. It's very rare for a top QB to change teams. The only few examples I can think of are when there was a clear heir apparent on the same team (Favre/Rodgers, Peyton/Luck, Montana/Young, etc.). 

Crowder jumped up to 847 yards last year. This year both DJax and Garcon are free agents. I personally like his chances of making that leap to 1,000 yards more than Shepards, though both have the potential. Maybe I'm wrong, but I view Shepard as more of a finished product than the average 2nd round rookie. That was part of what made him such an attractive draft prospect was his experience and polish. 

I have him 5th behind Eifert and slightly ahead of Ertz. Comes back to TD upside. Ertz has never had more than 4 TDs in any season. Henry already has a season of 8 and has legit 10+ TD upside in that Chargers offense that loves TEs in the red zone. 
As a standalone statement, I fully agree with your logic about franchise QBs not changing teams, but Brees is super competitive so you know he wants a crack at a 2nd super bowl. He's 38 this year. Next year might be his last chance. If things don't improve tremendously in NO, I think he's gone. I mean, why else is he playing out his contract instead of extending it? Additionally, this could very well be Sean Payton's last chance in NO, too. Will a rebuilding team/new staff want to bring back an expensive 39 yo QB? Will Brees want to come back to a new coaching staff? Might as well just change teams at that point. Payton might convince him to follow him to his next team, too. I really think this particular case is no greater than 50/50 odds that he's back. Plus, he'll be 39 next year, so even if he's back in 2018, his play could deteriorate which would also hurt Thomas and Cooks. And like FreeBagel said, Thomas and Cooks aren't starting as high as Sanders and Thomas, so the drop off could bump them from fringe top 12 down to WR3 range.

Crowder is 5'8" 185 lbs. Unless he turns into Steve Smith, I am going to bet against him being anything more than your typical slot WR. If Doctson doesn't step up, then I'm sure they'll find someone who will. Maybe nobody steps up in 2017, giving him one nice season, but I don't like his longterm outlook. You're scaring me a bit on Shepard, though. You're right that his polish was part of his appeal, but you don't expect him to improve at all? I read somewhere that he really struggled against press coverage. If he can improve that, maybe it'll help. His YPR did decrease in the 2nd half of the season. Maybe teams were starting to figure that out. Shepard was in the 78th percentile in college in terms of YPR (17.0). Crowder on the other hand was in the 18th percentil (12.3 YPR).

I hear you about Ertz, but he's got a new OC and a new QB from his first 3 years. Things certainly looked headed in the right direction after a slow start (largely due to injury) and given his torrid PPR pace in the 2nd half, TDs would just be a bonus if that keeps up. And given the volatile and unpredictable nature of TDs, I can't say I fully understand the focus on them in the TE rankings, especially since these are PPR rankings. Given Dalton and Brady's use of Eifert and Gronk, I can understand projecting TDs for them, but I wouldn't use Henry's TDs as a predictor of future greatness. I'm not saying he won't be great, but what he did in a limited role as a TE2 doesn't sell me on him. 

 
Regarding Henry, consider:

1. He was a rookie TE last season. We know that rookie TEs usually don't do much. His 36/478/8 is pretty impressive for a rookie TE. How many rookie TEs have outperformed that?

2. And he did that while playing behind a first ballot HOF TE. And once the season entered death spiral, it was a clear objective of the team to get Gates the TE TD record, which makes Henry's 8 TDs even more impressive.

3. It has been reported that Henry will be featured much more next season. No big surprise, as this is the progression everyone expected.

ESPN reports Hunter Henry will be the Chargers' "featured tight end" next season.
Antonio Gates plans to play next year, but ESPN reports the veteran is "well aware" he will take a backseat to Henry. The Chargers might also ask Gates to take a pay cut from the $5 million he is owed in salary and bonuses next year. Henry caught seven touchdowns and looked surprisingly comfortable for a rookie tight end in a limited role this season. If he is able to lock up a decent target share, he will be squarely in the TE1 discussion. Sat, Dec 31, 2016 10:17:00 AM

Source: ESPN


4. Per PFF, Henry played 574 snaps last season. But he was a run blocker on 281 of those snaps, and a pass blocker on 39 of those snaps. Leaving him just 254 snaps on which he ran routes. Compare that to Gates' breakdown: 585 total snaps, 415 routes, 145 run blocking snaps, 25 pass blocking snaps. A lot of those routes will shift to Henry in 2017, and then Gates will be gone, and Henry could get all of them. He could double his 2016 targets by 2018.

 
 
 
JWB thanks for the discussion regarding the Chargers offense. After considering your comments (and I didn't ignore any of them, just didn't comment on them all) I have decided to revise my median range projection for Allen to 120 targets. This causes him to fall a full tier in my dynasty rankings (still a work in progress).

Other WR in his tier would be Brandin Cooks, Doug Baldwin, Jarvis Landry, Dez Bryant, DeMarius Thomas, Michael Thomas. I previously had Allen in the same tier as Watkins, Robinson, Hopkins, AJ Green, Hilton, Cooper.

I hope you are right as I am not entirely comfortable with this downgrade of Allen. 

One of the things I thought about recently regarding Allen is how he was considered to be the best WR of the 2013 draft and while most of the other WR from that draft class have busted, Allen has shown himself to be very good when he is healthy. I think people were right about his relative talent and ability.

Keenan Allen wasn't drafted until the 3rd round of the 2013 draft because of injury concerns. If not for those concerns, I think he would have been the first WR drafted, or at least 3rd (after Austin and Hopkins). if not for the injury concerns, which have turned out to be legitimate as Allen has missed a lot of time already in his young career.

It is a difficult way to try to value a player. He is a 1st round talent when he plays, but he fell to the 3rd round of the draft for a good reason.

 
Sure I don't know nothing but who and when was he considered the #1 WR in that class?
I said a top WR in his class, as in top 3. By basically everyone until he didn't participate in the combine.

This is a truly stupid thing to argue about, but ok here are some examples since you seem completely unaware of this (which I think you know better than this but act like you don't)

Matt Waldman apears to have had Allen number two.

Mike Mayock pre 2013 top 5

Dan Kadar pre 2013 draft WR rankings

Chris Burke Sports Illustrated

Due to a lingering knee injury, Allen has had to delay his pre-draft workouts until an April 9 Pro Day. A shaky performance there could drop him down a few more notches -- he flip-flopped with Austin here. When all's said and done, Austin could wind up the top receiver picked, and both he and Patterson may be top-10 selections.
Your previous statement suggests that what I am talking about was not common and pretty universally accepted knowledge. Like I am from another planet or something. I'm not and it wasn't.

 
I said a top WR in his class, as in top 3. By basically everyone until he didn't participate in the combine.

This is a truly stupid thing to argue about, but ok here are some examples since you seem completely unaware of this (which I think you know better than this but act like you don't)

Matt Waldman apears to have had Allen number two.

Mike Mayock pre 2013 top 5

Dan Kadar pre 2013 draft WR rankings

Chris Burke Sports Illustrated

Your previous statement suggests that what I am talking about was not common and pretty universally accepted knowledge. Like I am from another planet or something. I'm not and it wasn't.
The quote he was responding was where you said Keenan Allen was considered THE BEST WR in his class.  Not one of the top 3.  It's literally right there in the quote above his text.

 
I said a top WR in his class, as in top 3. By basically everyone until he didn't participate in the combine.

This is a truly stupid thing to argue about, but ok here are some examples since you seem completely unaware of this (which I think you know better than this but act like you don't)

Matt Waldman apears to have had Allen number two.

Mike Mayock pre 2013 top 5

Dan Kadar pre 2013 draft WR rankings

Chris Burke Sports Illustrated

Your previous statement suggests that what I am talking about was not common and pretty universally accepted knowledge. Like I am from another planet or something. I'm not and it wasn't.
That's not what you said. What you said was something I've never heard from anyone, which is why I mentioned it. But hey don't let that stop you from being petty or anything.

 
The quote he was responding was where you said Keenan Allen was considered THE BEST WR in his class.  Not one of the top 3.  It's literally right there in the quote above his text.
I'll stick up for Biabreakable here.  I play in 2 Dynasty Leagues that have Developmental Players.  We can pick one player that will be draft-eligible the following year.  In one league Keenan Allen was the #1 overall devy player picked, in the other league he was the #3 overall player picked after Robert Woods and Marcus Lattimore.  This was in August 2012.  So obviously, one year prior to the draft many people had Allen as the #1 WR in the draft.  He then had a PCL strain during the 2012 season and did not work out at the combine which dropped his stock. 

Many of the WRs that were picked before Allen in the 2013 draft "came out of no where."  You probably couldn't find many people mentioning Tavon Austin as a possible first-round draft pick before that and Cordarelle Patterson was just a sleeper and well-behind his teammate Justin Hunter.

Here's some discussion in FBG Forum where Allen is rated #1 or 2 Junior WR.

 https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/632990-2012-devy-draft-prospects/

Here's another one-year-out that lists Justin Hunter #1 and Keenan Allen #2 (for Juniors)

https://dynastyleaguefootball.com/2012/11/03/dynasty-college-prospect-stock-watch-week-nine-results-and-updated-rankings/

 
Dan, thanks for the work here! I don't have any major quibbles other than I think Moncrief is overrated. As a Colts fan, I know he's going to get red zone looks, but he disappears a lot between the 20s. Maybe that improves this year with improved offensive line play.I have him 20 spots lower on my top 100 FWIW.

 
I'll stick up for Biabreakable here.  I play in 2 Dynasty Leagues that have Developmental Players.  We can pick one player that will be draft-eligible the following year.  In one league Keenan Allen was the #1 overall devy player picked, in the other league he was the #3 overall player picked after Robert Woods and Marcus Lattimore.  This was in August 2012.  So obviously, one year prior to the draft many people had Allen as the #1 WR in the draft.  He then had a PCL strain during the 2012 season and did not work out at the combine which dropped his stock. 

Many of the WRs that were picked before Allen in the 2013 draft "came out of no where."  You probably couldn't find many people mentioning Tavon Austin as a possible first-round draft pick before that and Cordarelle Patterson was just a sleeper and well-behind his teammate Justin Hunter.

Here's some discussion in FBG Forum where Allen is rated #1 or 2 Junior WR.

 https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/632990-2012-devy-draft-prospects/

Here's another one-year-out that lists Justin Hunter #1 and Keenan Allen #2 (for Juniors)

https://dynastyleaguefootball.com/2012/11/03/dynasty-college-prospect-stock-watch-week-nine-results-and-updated-rankings/
Well, not to get pedantic but he actually said "the best WR of the 2013 draft" which pretty plainly says we're talking around draft time, not various points among his career as a junior, high school prospect, etc.

Regardless, I was mostly just commenting on this exchange.

Bia: Allen was considered the best WR of the 2013 draft
Meno: No he wasn't considered the best
Bia: Yes he was considered the best
Meno: No he wasn't considered the best
Bia: I never said he was considered the best, I simply said near the top 3

Bia is a good guy with good and valuable insight so don't mean to seem like I'm picking on him, but he does tend to do this sometimes.  Argue a point, then just totally change that point and deny he ever said it even though it's right there in the quote box that he's replying to.

 
If not for those concerns, I think he would have been the first WR drafted, or at least 3rd (after Austin and Hopkins). if not for the injury concerns, which have turned out to be legitimate as Allen has missed a lot of time already in his young career.
I don't understand why this bickering is even happening.  This isn't august in the shark pool.  You guys are here all the time and I like hearing from all you guys. Let's all try to be better than these kinds of arguments, myself included.

 
This is probably the third time in two weeks menobrown has approached me with statements similar to the above, For what?  The only point is to try to prove me wrong, nothing else. Then he calls me petty.  Well look in the mirror.

I misspoke if I didn't put a qualifying statement, which doesn't really matter except that Keenan Allen has missed so many games in the NFL that I still have to go back to college evaluation about him to try to complete the picture on him still after he has been in the league four seasons.

 
Let's get back on track.  Talk to me about the following group of backs 

Paul Perkins

Kenneth Dixon

Cj prosise

Thomas Rawls

Fat Rob

Dion Lewis

Doug Martin

Eddie lacy

Terrance west

Spencer ware

Jerrick McKinnon

Jeremy hill

Giovanni Benard

Pick your top 5

 
This is probably the third time in two weeks menobrown has approached me with statements similar to the above, For what?  The only point is to try to prove me wrong, nothing else. Then he calls me petty.  Well look in the mirror.
You were being petty. Sorry but the shoe fits, you said something wrong and than tried to back it down. I have no idea what else you are talking about but I'm sure you'll change that story up as well.

 
Let's get back on track.  Talk to me about the following group of backs 

Paul Perkins

Kenneth Dixon

Cj prosise

Thomas Rawls

Fat Rob

Dion Lewis

Doug Martin

Eddie lacy

Terrance west

Spencer ware

Jerrick McKinnon

Jeremy hill

Giovanni Benard

Pick your top 5
Hmmmmmmm!  The only guy I REALLY like in this group is Prosise.  I think he's a star and takes over in Sea.  I like Ware but I'm not sold that they don't draft another RB or bring back Charles on the cheap. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top