What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ebola (4 Viewers)

So...a random person that used the same toilet, rode in the same taxi, sat next to on a plane, or stood in line at Starbucks with an infected person hasn't caught Ebola yet?
Right. According to all the internet memes, an infected person really has to vomit or defecate directly into someone else's mouth in order to pass it on.

 
So...a random person that used the same toilet, rode in the same taxi, sat next to on a plane, or stood in line at Starbucks with an infected person hasn't caught Ebola yet?
there are no such reported cases, and unless something with the virus changes significantly, there won't be.

 
Baloney Sandwich said:
Heading to Dallas next week, should I get my affairs in order?
Me too - at least its for work so if I should die the wife ought to have a great workers compensation claim.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mr. Ham said:
shader said:
Sinn Fein said:
Well, if all the chicken littles were correct before, the bird flu would have killed us all, so we are just happy to be living on borrowed time.

Hell I am more worried about the enterovirus

which is killing more kids than Ebola ever will in the US.
No one is saying for you to worry. I'm not worried about me or my family. I am, however, worried about this disease exploding through the 3rd world, killing millions and causing a major travel problem that could potentially devastate the economy. If you don't think it's possible, you aren't paying attention. It's being taken far more seriously than the bird flu. This isn't a bunch of conspiracy sites and a mass media dying for a story. This is the CDC, WHO, and many governments sounding the alarm of a potential catastrophe if it's not squashed soon.
I don't get the confidence that it cannot spread in the US. It's early yet.
I'm not saying it cannot spread in the US. The virus itself doesn't give a crap where it is. It can spread anywhere.

But I'm not "currently" worried about it spreading. The virus itself doesn't spread easy. For instance, even the kind of casual contact that I have with co-workers isn't likely to spread the disease. Why? Because I don't get in their faces all that often. I know it's early, but it appears that none of the original guy in Texas' family or any other casual contacts got the disease. It was spread to a health worker.

I think an unbelievable amount of resources are going to quickly go to Texas to head this off. They will also go to New York, LA, or any other big city that gets this. The US isn't going to allow this to get out of control this early. I firmly believe this. If they have to get to the point of quarantining all potential people who catch it, they will.

The concern right now isn't Dallas, it's Africa. If this thing explodes, if it gets all over Africa, if it makes it's way to India...it's going to be a virus that becomes endemic, or entrenched in the world. At this point, Ebola is going to be coming in all over the country at many different times. Over time, resources will be stretched thin, people will get lazy because they'll get used to working with Ebola, and it will continue to spread slowly...until enough people get it. If this thing gets to the point where there are hundreds of thousands infected (not that far off if the rate of infections continues as is), quarantines, flight restrictions and other economic problems will cause far more problems to us than the risk of Ebola.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we know that body fluids of an ebolite will infect a human. Do we know if ebolite farting will also infect a human if he breaths in the ebola fart?

 
Commentary, not a study. Especially dubious with "Unrestricted financial support" and accompanying photo provided by 3M who just happen to manufacture the filters used in the PAPR units.

Rather distastefully packaged shill.
:lmao:
that's absolutely what it is. The basis for this commentary is a paper published on a respiratory virus, not viral hemorragic fever like ebola.

 
ntz08 said:
The Commish said:
ntz08 said:
Bucky86 said:
Has anyone gotten it that hasn't been in direct contact with those with Ebola?
uh, i think you missed something about how it is transmitted. It is only transmitted through direct contact, so the answer to your question is 'No'
Hope this is sarcasm because it's patently false and reason I posted my concerns above.
Only if you're making the distinction between "direct contact" with symptomatic infected individual and being in direct contact with their residual bodily fluids.

We can come up with countless scenarios, but your 'doorknob' scenario would be extremely unlikely as is outlined in your own quoted text regarding survival outside the host.
Not sure what you mean that it's unlikely. Indirect contact, as illustrated in my example, is how we get 90% of the "bugs" we get today and this is a pretty significantly resilient virus outside the body being able to exist for hours. It's "unlikely" right now because few people in the states have it. Imagine a place like NYC. It takes one person "infecting" a few doors unknowingly and you have the beginnings of an epidemic on your hands.

 
The outbreak has killed more than 3,860 people, mainly in West Africa.
Sub-Saharan Africa has the most serious HIV and AIDS epidemic in the world. In 2012, roughly 25 million people were living with HIV, accounting for nearly 70 percent of the global total. In the same year, there were an estimated 1.6 million new HIV infections and 1.2 million AIDS-related deaths. 1 - See more at: http://www.avert.org/hiv-aids-sub-saharan-africa.htm#sthash.mrhUPy3E.dpuf
More people die in Africa from AIDS in two days than the total number of people who have died from ebola.
So this is what the African Nations have to offer the rest of the world.... :no:
this is a phenomenally ignorant perspective. well done
Oh yeah...I got a like off of it.

 
Mr. Ham said:
shader said:
Sinn Fein said:
Well, if all the chicken littles were correct before, the bird flu would have killed us all, so we are just happy to be living on borrowed time.

Hell I am more worried about the enterovirus

which is killing more kids than Ebola ever will in the US.
No one is saying for you to worry. I'm not worried about me or my family. I am, however, worried about this disease exploding through the 3rd world, killing millions and causing a major travel problem that could potentially devastate the economy. If you don't think it's possible, you aren't paying attention. It's being taken far more seriously than the bird flu. This isn't a bunch of conspiracy sites and a mass media dying for a story. This is the CDC, WHO, and many governments sounding the alarm of a potential catastrophe if it's not squashed soon.
I don't get the confidence that it cannot spread in the US. It's early yet.
I'm not saying it cannot spread in the US. The virus itself doesn't give a crap where it is. It can spread anywhere.

But I'm not "currently" worried about it spreading. The virus itself doesn't spread easy. For instance, even the kind of casual contact that I have with co-workers isn't likely to spread the disease. Why? Because I don't get in their faces all that often. I know it's early, but it appears that none of the original guy in Texas' family or any other casual contacts got the disease. It was spread to a health worker.

I think an unbelievable amount of resources are going to quickly go to Texas to head this off. They will also go to New York, LA, or any other big city that gets this. The US isn't going to allow this to get out of control this early. I firmly believe this. If they have to get to the point of quarantining all potential people who catch it, they will.

The concern right now isn't Dallas, it's Africa. If this thing explodes, if it gets all over Africa, if it makes it's way to India...it's going to be a virus that becomes endemic, or entrenched in the world. At this point, Ebola is going to be coming in all over the country at many different times. Over time, resources will be stretched thin, people will get lazy because they'll get used to working with Ebola, and it will continue to spread slowly...until enough people get it. If this thing gets to the point where there are hundreds of thousands infected (not that far off if the rate of infections continues as is), quarantines, flight restrictions and other economic problems will cause far more problems to us than the risk of Ebola.
That's by January, given present doubling every 3 weeks (current rate). I'm not looking at this in terms of what will happen this month. I'm hoping the world gets wise and throws everything we can at it, because I'm projecting out to 2016 - and if this isn't stamped out it's going to pose ongoing risks. We frankly appear ill equipped to handle a single patient in Dallas, in terms of preparedness, resources and confidence in response.

Point is, this is some very serious #### as long as the multiple of new infections is 2+. Right now it's around 2.8. That must stop, or we're going to see some #### next year that we've only imagined. This is why WHO is saying this is the most serious health crisis in modern times. The instinct that this shouldn't interrupt our regularly scheduled programming is short sighted.

If this thing overruns healthcare systems in major population centers, that's a nightmare.

 
Last edited:
ntz08 said:
The Commish said:
ntz08 said:
Bucky86 said:
Has anyone gotten it that hasn't been in direct contact with those with Ebola?
uh, i think you missed something about how it is transmitted. It is only transmitted through direct contact, so the answer to your question is 'No'
Hope this is sarcasm because it's patently false and reason I posted my concerns above.
Only if you're making the distinction between "direct contact" with symptomatic infected individual and being in direct contact with their residual bodily fluids.

We can come up with countless scenarios, but your 'doorknob' scenario would be extremely unlikely as is outlined in your own quoted text regarding survival outside the host.
Not sure what you mean that it's unlikely. Indirect contact, as illustrated in my example, is how we get 90% of the "bugs" we get today and this is a pretty significantly resilient virus outside the body being able to exist for hours. It's "unlikely" right now because few people in the states have it. Imagine a place like NYC. It takes one person "infecting" a few doors unknowingly and you have the beginnings of an epidemic on your hands.
90% of our "bugs", huh?

Not that i think this is going to change your perspective, but you can be directly in contact with a person who is infected and not become infected if the virus is not present at levels necessary for transmission. For each individual, this is different which explains the 2-21 day incubation period.

When you're talking about surface contamination,

SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: Filoviruses have been reported capable to survive for weeks in blood and can also survive on contaminated surfaces, particularly at low temperatures (4°C). One study could not recover any Ebolavirus from experimentally contaminated surfaces (plastic, metal or glass) at room temperature. In another study, Ebolavirus dried onto glass, polymeric silicone rubber, or painted aluminum alloy is able to survive in the dark for several hours under ambient conditions (between 20 and 250C and 30–40% relative humidity) (amount of virus reduced to 37% after 15.4 hours), but is less stable than some other viral hemorrhagic fevers (Lassa).

The longest and highest rate of survival on a contaminated surface is under refrigerated temperatures and very low humidity levels, and appears to be on more porous surfaces.

Let's say the metal doorknob was still noticeably wet after immediately being contacted by the rather sweaty palm of a symptomatic, infected individual, and then you touched it. In that case, transmission would be more likely to take place if you had an open wound and/or then touched your mouth, eyes, nose, etc.

A virus needs a host or a suitable environment or it begins to die. Hard surfaces are not suitable environments even if you think what is stated here qualifies as "resilient".

 
And then there's THIS:

Health workers scrambling to contain the deadly Ebola virus in Liberia now have to contend with an outbreak of corruption among those detailed to collect the bodies of victims.

The Wall Street Journal reports that retrieval teams are accepting bribes from families of Ebola victims to issue death certificates that say their loved ones died of other causes, allowing them to keep their bodies for a traditional burial.

“The family says the person is not an Ebola patient, and [the retrieval team] pull them away from the other people," Vincent Chounse, a community outreach worker on the outskirts of Monrovia, told the paper. "Then they say, ‘We can give you a certificate from the Ministry of Health that it wasn’t Ebola.' Sometimes it is $40. Sometimes it is $50. ... Then they offer bags to them and [the family] carry on their own thing.” A teenager in Montserrado told the Journal he saw the father of his neighbor pay $150 for a certificate that said his son's corpse was Ebola-free.
:wall:

 
And then there's THIS:

Health workers scrambling to contain the deadly Ebola virus in Liberia now have to contend with an outbreak of corruption among those detailed to collect the bodies of victims.

The Wall Street Journal reports that retrieval teams are accepting bribes from families of Ebola victims to issue death certificates that say their loved ones died of other causes, allowing them to keep their bodies for a traditional burial.

“The family says the person is not an Ebola patient, and [the retrieval team] pull them away from the other people," Vincent Chounse, a community outreach worker on the outskirts of Monrovia, told the paper. "Then they say, ‘We can give you a certificate from the Ministry of Health that it wasn’t Ebola.' Sometimes it is $40. Sometimes it is $50. ... Then they offer bags to them and [the family] carry on their own thing.” A teenager in Montserrado told the Journal he saw the father of his neighbor pay $150 for a certificate that said his son's corpse was Ebola-free.
:wall:
can't cure stupid either

 
ntz08 said:
The Commish said:
ntz08 said:
Bucky86 said:
Has anyone gotten it that hasn't been in direct contact with those with Ebola?
uh, i think you missed something about how it is transmitted. It is only transmitted through direct contact, so the answer to your question is 'No'
Hope this is sarcasm because it's patently false and reason I posted my concerns above.
Only if you're making the distinction between "direct contact" with symptomatic infected individual and being in direct contact with their residual bodily fluids.

We can come up with countless scenarios, but your 'doorknob' scenario would be extremely unlikely as is outlined in your own quoted text regarding survival outside the host.
Not sure what you mean that it's unlikely. Indirect contact, as illustrated in my example, is how we get 90% of the "bugs" we get today and this is a pretty significantly resilient virus outside the body being able to exist for hours. It's "unlikely" right now because few people in the states have it. Imagine a place like NYC. It takes one person "infecting" a few doors unknowingly and you have the beginnings of an epidemic on your hands.
90% of our "bugs", huh?

Not that i think this is going to change your perspective, but you can be directly in contact with a person who is infected and not become infected if the virus is not present at levels necessary for transmission. For each individual, this is different which explains the 2-21 day incubation period.

When you're talking about surface contamination,

SURVIVAL OUTSIDE HOST: Filoviruses have been reported capable to survive for weeks in blood and can also survive on contaminated surfaces, particularly at low temperatures (4°C). One study could not recover any Ebolavirus from experimentally contaminated surfaces (plastic, metal or glass) at room temperature. In another study, Ebolavirus dried onto glass, polymeric silicone rubber, or painted aluminum alloy is able to survive in the dark for several hours under ambient conditions (between 20 and 250C and 30–40% relative humidity) (amount of virus reduced to 37% after 15.4 hours), but is less stable than some other viral hemorrhagic fevers (Lassa).

The longest and highest rate of survival on a contaminated surface is under refrigerated temperatures and very low humidity levels, and appears to be on more porous surfaces.

Let's say the metal doorknob was still noticeably wet after immediately being contacted by the rather sweaty palm of a symptomatic, infected individual, and then you touched it. In that case, transmission would be more likely to take place if you had an open wound and/or then touched your mouth, eyes, nose, etc.

A virus needs a host or a suitable environment or it begins to die. Hard surfaces are not suitable environments even if you think what is stated here qualifies as "resilient".
Stop talking sense here. The world is going to end now that Ebola has gotten to the US - just lie back and accept it.

 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.

 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.
:pickle:

 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.
WHOLE lotta stupid in posts like this. There's plenty of room between "the world is coming to an end" and your "it's no big deal" shtick. Both extremes are pretty ignorant and lazy IMO.

 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.
WHOLE lotta stupid in posts like this. There's plenty of room between "the world is coming to an end" and your "it's no big deal" shtick. Both extremes are pretty ignorant and lazy IMO.
Whole Lotta Love

 
I'm very surprised that that ad shows actual corpses. Quite honestly, that's a bit disturbing.

 
Has Ham ever been right about anything?
Yes and no. No, in that I was overly concerned about Swine Flu, when early reports was that it had a higher mortality rate than it had. Yes, in that I feared that our globalized world could spread a pandemic, that viruses can mutate more easily and that we weren't prepared to handle it. Yes, my 8 year old died of a flu complication in June.2 out of 3.

And at the time of his death, my son was the 26th flu-related death amongst children in Texas this year.

Don't argue with me. Argue with math. The multiple this is spreading at has to go down. I'm not at all saying it can't happen, but it must. And the fact is, we have to be wary of future pandemics for reasons why the WHO is so alarmed. It's a matter of time until the right virus that does have a high mortality rate spreads - and better we form a strategy for what to do when that occurs.

And I never advocated going to the ER for someone not exposed who sneezes. :crazy:

 
Last edited:
It's seems as though that anyone with a fever and might have flown on an airplane recently is being treated as a suspect ebola patient. Will be super fun when flu season hits full stride.

 
Has Ham ever been right about anything?
Yes and no. No, in that I was overly concerned about Swine Flu, when early reports was that it had a higher mortality rate than it had. Yes, in that I feared that our globalized world could spread a pandemic, that viruses can mutate more easily and that we weren't prepared to handle it. Yes, my 8 year old died of a flu complication in June.2 out of 3.

And at the time of his death, my son was the 26th flu-related death amongst children in Texas this year.

Don't argue with me. Argue with math. The multiple this is spreading at has to go down. I'm not at all saying it can't happen, but it must. And the fact is, we have to be wary of future pandemics for reasons why the WHO is so alarmed. It's a matter of time until the right virus that does have a high mortality rate spreads - and better we form a strategy for what to do when that occurs.

And I never advocated going to the ER for someone not exposed who sneezes. :crazy:
They are trying to flatten the curve because if they don't soon it won't be possible. If it gets worse I'm pretty confident the military will lock down the borders of the affected countries.

 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.
Some people just want to watch the world burn, guy.
 
The problem with you Ham-nuts is that now every time someone sneezes, they think they have ebola, and they are going to overwhelm healthcare officials and keep them from treating actual ebola cases.

Congratulations - your paranoia has killed the world.
Some people just want to watch the world burn, guy.
I certainly don't want that. I recognize that our world has changed and continues to do so at an unprecedented pace - and yes, viruses and the way we live today track to favor this kind of thing, and will until we learn to mitigate them. We'll have other social and economic realities occur at an exponential pace over the coming years because of the speed by which communications and computing affect geopolitics. Things happen at a much faster pace and at scale in a world with 7 billion people and growing and pushing the boundaries. We have exposure around a lot of bulging seams and there are black swans.

Which, if you haven't read described how the human mind is predisposed NOT to see very real risks even when they are present:

books.google.com/books/about/The_Black_Swan_Second_Edition.html?id=7wMuF4A4XF8C

"A black swan is a highly improbable event with three principal characteristics: It is unpredictable; it carries a massive impact; and, after the fact, we concoct an explanation that makes it appear less random, and more predictable, than it was. The astonishing success of Google was a black swan; so was 9/11. For Nassim Nicholas Taleb, black swans underlie almost everything about our world, from the rise of religions to events in our own personal lives.

Why do we not acknowledge the phenomenon of black swans until after they occur? Part of the answer, according to Taleb, is that humans are hardwired to learn specifics when they should be focused on generalities. We concentrate on things we already know and time and time again fail to take into consideration what we dont know. We are, therefore, unable to truly estimate opportunities, too vulnerable to the impulse to simplify, narrate, and categorize, and not open enough to rewarding those who can imagine the impossible.

For years, Taleb has studied how we fool ourselves into thinking we know more than we actually do. We restrict our thinking to the irrelevant and inconsequential, while large events continue to surprise us and shape our world. In this revelatory book, Taleb explains everything we know about what we dont know, and this second edition features a new philosophical and empirical essay, On Robustness and Fragility, which offers tools to navigate and exploit a Black Swan world."

 
Last edited:
lod01 said:
Jobber said:
Mr. Ham said:
shader said:
Sinn Fein said:
Well, if all the chicken littles were correct before, the bird flu would have killed us all, so we are just happy to be living on borrowed time.

Hell I am more worried about the enterovirus

which is killing more kids than Ebola ever will in the US.
No one is saying for you to worry. I'm not worried about me or my family. I am, however, worried about this disease exploding through the 3rd world, killing millions and causing a major travel problem that could potentially devastate the economy. If you don't think it's possible, you aren't paying attention. It's being taken far more seriously than the bird flu. This isn't a bunch of conspiracy sites and a mass media dying for a story. This is the CDC, WHO, and many governments sounding the alarm of a potential catastrophe if it's not squashed soon.
I don't get the confidence that it cannot spread in the US. It's early yet.
1. I'd like to know how it started over in Africa this time around.

2.I'd like to know how it is not going to pop up again in the US now that we have officially brought it over here for the 1st time ever.

3. What says there won't be an outbreak in the Dallas area sometime down the road since this infected guy arrived there.
IIRC, it was traced to a child who consumed improperly cooked fruit bat soup.
Fruit....Bat....Soup. JFC, they deserve ebola.
whats the problem...looks devine

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top