Bob Sacamano
Footballguy
.300+
30+
100+
30+
100+
do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
If so, it will be close when everything is said and done (assuming A-Rod and Pujols continue at their current rates), but Pujols definitely has them beat when it comes to postseason numbers. Pujols' average in the playoffs is around .325, while Bonds' is .247 and A-Rod's is .279 (I think). Either way, Pujols is on pace to be one of the best offensive players in MLB history.do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
Pujols has a higher average, OBP, SLG and OPS than A-Rod, plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.As for Bonds, there is of course the steroid issue, but he was probably a more feared hitter than Pujols. Does that mean that he was actually better? It's very close.do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
Bonds was an outright cheater... his pre 'roid days were very very good.But not Pujols good.And yes, I include A Rod. A Rod is the best power hitter, but not the best offensive player imo.Oh Yes! said:do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Koya said:Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
Bonds ON roids? It's not very close. The ONLY person close to Bonds on Roids was Ruth - maybe some peak years of mantle. maybe.Please See Mine said:Pujols has a higher average, OBP, SLG and OPS than A-Rod, plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.As for Bonds, there is of course the steroid issue, but he was probably a more feared hitter than Pujols. Does that mean that he was actually better? It's very close.Oh Yes! said:do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Koya said:Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
Single Season OPS LeadersBonds has 4 of the Top 8 seasons.Bonds ON roids? It's not very close. The ONLY person close to Bonds on Roids was Ruth - maybe some peak years of mantle. maybe.Please See Mine said:Pujols has a higher average, OBP, SLG and OPS than A-Rod, plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.As for Bonds, there is of course the steroid issue, but he was probably a more feared hitter than Pujols. Does that mean that he was actually better? It's very close.Oh Yes! said:do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Koya said:Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
We can't.How can we assume Poo Poo isn't on Performance enhancers too?
As I stated, I am dismissing Bonds obvious roids years. Mantle led the league in OPS 6 times and OPS+ (the best indicator imo) a whopping 9 times - with two #2s thrown in.Single Season OPS LeadersBonds has 4 of the Top 8 seasons.Bonds ON roids? It's not very close. The ONLY person close to Bonds on Roids was Ruth - maybe some peak years of mantle. maybe.Please See Mine said:Pujols has a higher average, OBP, SLG and OPS than A-Rod, plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.As for Bonds, there is of course the steroid issue, but he was probably a more feared hitter than Pujols. Does that mean that he was actually better? It's very close.Oh Yes! said:do bonds or Arod count in our generation?Koya said:Best offensive baseball player of our generation.
Ruth has 7 of the Top 15 seasons.
Mantle's best year ranks 28th.
Mantle was a great player, no doubt, but his OPS numbers suffered playing in the 50s and 60s.
If we use Adjusted OPS+, Mantle's best year would be 14th on the list. Bonds holds the top 3 spots.
Why is this relevant?An out is an out, regardless of a K or a GBPlease See Mine said:plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.
Technically that is untrue. An out can move a run over or even score a run (sac fly). The only out worse than a K is hitting into a double (or triple) play.Why is this relevant?An out is an out, regardless of a K or a GBPlease See Mine said:plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.
Yes, but not only is it worse, it is *significantly* worse.The biggest thing missing from this analysis is the fact that the NL numbers are easier to attain than the AL numbers. Nobody can argue against the fact that the AL is the tougher league. I am a huge Pujols fan, but ARod is the better player over Pujol's careerTechnically that is untrue. An out can move a run over or even score a run (sac fly). The only out worse than a K is hitting into a double (or triple) play.Why is this relevant?An out is an out, regardless of a K or a GBPlease See Mine said:plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.
Hey look, wilked doesn't know what he's talking about..................... againYes, but not only is it worse, it is *significantly* worse.The biggest thing missing from this analysis is the fact that the NL numbers are easier to attain than the AL numbers. Nobody can argue against the fact that the AL is the tougher league. I am a huge Pujols fan, but ARod is the better player over Pujol's careerTechnically that is untrue. An out can move a run over or even score a run (sac fly). The only out worse than a K is hitting into a double (or triple) play.Why is this relevant?An out is an out, regardless of a K or a GBPlease See Mine said:plus A-Rod strikes out once every 5.54 PA's to Pujols's 10.59.